BACKGROUND: Penile augmentation with foreign material injection is used to increase penile length, girth, or both. Most of these individuals develop complications due to an abnormal mass formation known as penile paraffinoma. Multiple surgical techniques for restoring penile function and correcting near-normal penile shape have been developed, but prior techniques have some post-operative complications.
METHODS: We explained the smile incision-modified technique for penile paraffinoma reconstruction using illustrations to describe step-by-step procedures. This study aimed to describe our modified surgical technique for reconstruction to correct complications due to disastrous consequences of failed penile augmentation.
RESULTS: A total of 16 patients aged 28-66 years (mean: 44.25 ± 2.63) were operated with a smile incision-modified technique from January 2017 until December 2020 in Semarang Dr. Kariadi tertiary hospital. There were no intraoperative complications observed. We found hematoma in 3 patients in a 1-week follow-up. After 2 weeks of post-operative surgery, all patients had no skin dehiscence or necrosis. Cosmetic appearance and functional improvement after reconstruction were acceptable by all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile paraffinoma reconstruction using the smile incision-modified technique was a feasible and effective technique to manage penile paraffinoma patients with good esthetic results and minor complications.

To report outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with penile foreign body granuloma and compare surgical outcomes between single- and two-stage scrotal flap reconstructions.
Medical records of patients with penile foreign body granuloma who underwent surgical treatment were reviewed. Patients with single- and two-stage scrotal flap reconstructions were compared.
Forty-two patients underwent surgical treatment from January 1, 2018 to October 31, 2022. Twenty-three patients underwent single-stage reconstruction with bilateral scrotal flap while 12 patients underwent two-stage repair with 19 operations. Five patients underwent circumcision; one had excision with primary closure. Another patient underwent reconstruction by penile skin preservation technique. There was no statistically significant differences between single- and two-stage groups in wound infection (8.69% vs. 0%, RR 2.71, 95%CI; 0.14-52.29), wound dehiscence (21.74% vs. 8.33%, RR 2.61, 95%CI 0.34-19.87), reoperation rate (26.08% vs. 8.33%, RR 3.13, 95%CI; 0.42-23.10). Postoperative fever was significantly higher in single-stage group (56.52 vs. 8.33%, RR 6.78, 95%CI; 1.01-43.83). Total length of hospital stay was shorter in single-stage group (7.43 ± 3.19 days vs. 10.86 ± 1.57 days, MD -3.42, 95%CI; -5.28 to -1.57). Incidence of patients without Clavien-Dindo surgical complications was significantly lower in single-stage group (43.48% vs. 83.33%, RR 0.53, 95%CI; 0.31-0.89).
Both single- and two-stage techniques may be considered for penile foreign body granuloma reconstruction. Although the hospital stay was longer in two-stage group, the complication rates were lower.

BACKGROUND: Penile injection of foreign materials is an obsolete practice often performed by non-medical personnel in order to enlarge penile size.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from 1956 to 2022 was conducted in accordance with the general guidelines recommended by the Primary Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included full papers published from 1956 to 2022. We also described a case report of a 23 year old Bulgarian male affected by penile paraffinoma who underwent a 2-stages surgical technique.
RESULTS: A total of 152 cases have been reported, with a median age of 37.9 ranging from 18 to 64 years. Six different techniques have been described in the whole literature: bilateral scrotal flap, simple excision of the paraffinoma with primary closure, two-stage scrotum skin flap, medial prepuce-soprapubic advancement flap technique and penile reconstruction using split thickness skin graft (STSG) or full thickness skin graft (FTSG). An analysis of the distribution among early and late complications was then carried out.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, among the variety of surgical techniques described, a two-stage penile reconstruction using scrotal skin results in excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes, with a low rate of complications.

Penile paraffinoma is a rare condition after penile injection of liquid paraffin or other mineral oils, with well-documented debilitating complications. Nevertheless, such injections are still performed by people of Eastern European and Asian descent for cosmetic penile augmentation. We report a case of penile paraffinoma in an otherwise healthy, 30-year-old male, with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as the sole complaint at presentation in the emergency department and a conservative approach. This case report describes an unusual presentation of penile paraffinoma in a young man and aims to raise public and physician awareness regarding disease manifestation to prevent high morbidity from delayed diagnosis and treatment.

A fifty-year-old healthy, Portuguese male, with prior history of paraffin injections into the penis 30 years ago, was referred for urological consultation because of a large, hardened ulcerated mass on the base of the penis causing deformity and pain. The patient underwent a biopsy that showed a benign granulomatous lesion, and then excision of the mass and penile plasty with a scrotum flap in the same surgical time. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of paraffinoma. Three months after surgery, the patient is satisfied with the functional (urinary function and erectile function) and aesthetic results. Penile paraffinoma is a rare disease (most common in Asia and Eastern Europe) and results from an inflammatory response to the subcutaneous injection of paraffin, Vaseline or other mineral oils. Treatment is usually surgery.