peak expiratory flow rate

呼气流速峰值
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在高度,气压下降等因素,低温,和适应可能会影响肺功能。在高海拔探险期间,通过重复肺活量测定法评估了39名受试者暴露和适应高海拔对肺功能的影响,直至6022m。根据急性高山病(AMS)的发生和登顶成功对受试者进行分类,以评估肺功能是否与成功的攀爬和发展AMS的风险有关。峰值呼气流量(PEF),用力肺活量(FVC)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)随海拔升高而增加(最大。+20.2%pred,+9.3%pred,和+6.7%pred,所有p<0.05)。只有PEF在适应环境下得到改善(BC1与BC2,+7.2%pred,p=0.044)。在海拔处,AMS组的FEV1(p=0.008)和PEF(p<0.001)较低。发生AMS的风险与较低的基线PEF(p<0.001)以及PEF(p=0.008)和FEV1(p<0.001)的纵向变化有关。肺功能与登顶成功(7126m)无关。适应后PEF的改善可能表明呼吸肌适应。
    At altitude, factors such as decreased barometric pressure, low temperatures, and acclimatization might affect lung function. The effects of exposure and acclimatization to high-altitude on lung function were assessed in 39 subjects by repetitive spirometry up to 6022 m during a high-altitude expedition. Subjects were classified depending on the occurrence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and summit success to evaluate whether lung function relates to successful climb and risk of developing AMS. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased with progressive altitude (max. +20.2 %pred, +9.3 %pred, and +6.7 %pred, all p<0.05). Only PEF improved with acclimatization (BC1 vs. BC2, +7.2 %pred, p=0.044). At altitude FEV1 (p=0.008) and PEF (p<0.001) were lower in the AMS group. The risk of developing AMS was associated with lower baseline PEF (p<0.001) and longitudinal changes in PEF (p=0.008) and FEV1 (p<0.001). Lung function was not related to summit success (7126 m). Improvement in PEF after acclimatization might indicate respiratory muscle adaptation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:日本呼吸护理和康复学会,日本肌肉减少症和虚弱协会,日本呼吸物理治疗学会,和日本康复营养协会提出了使用低呼吸肌力量和阑尾骨骼肌质量(ASM;ASM/高度2)代替呼吸肌质量来定义和诊断呼吸性肌少症;然而,这些参数尚未验证。本研究旨在确认这四个专业组织提出的呼吸性肌少症定义的有效性。
    方法:我们在2015年对468名社区居住的老年人进行队列研究的参与者进行了评估,并接受了肺活量测定。我们基于低骨骼肌质量和呼吸肌强度确定了两种呼吸性肌肉减少症模型。低骨骼肌质量定义为低ASM/高度2,低呼吸肌强度定义为峰值呼气流速(PEFR)或预测PEFR的百分比(%PEFR)。在基线评估后5年评估生存状态(2020年)。为了评估PEFR和%PEFR的截止值的有效性,我们通过依次改变每个参数的截断值来确定不同的呼吸性肌肉减少症模型,包括ASM/高度2,从高到低。我们随后使用Cox比例风险模型计算了每个呼吸性肌少症模型死亡率的风险比(HR)。此外,我们在三维图上绘制了ASM/height2和PEFR或%PEFR的每个截止值组合的HR,以观察不同截止值与HR之间的关系.
    结果:在5年的观察期内,共有31人死亡。男性的ASM/height2临界值约为7.0kg/m2,女性为5.7kg/m2,%PEFR临界值为66-75%,呼吸性肌肉减少症与死亡风险相关(HR,2.36-3.27,点估计范围)。
    结论:四个专业组织对呼吸性肌少症的定义与未来的健康结果有关,这个定义是有效的。GeriatrGerontolInt2024;••:••-•。
    OBJECTIVE: The Japanese Society for Respiratory Care and Rehabilitation, Japanese Association on Sarcopenia and Frailty, Japanese Society of Respiratory Physical Therapy, and Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Nutrition proposed the definition and diagnosis of respiratory sarcopenia using low respiratory muscle strength and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM; ASM/height2) instead of respiratory muscle mass; however, these parameters have not been validated. This study aimed to confirm the validity of the respiratory sarcopenia definition proposed by these four professional organizations.
    METHODS: Participants of our cohort study in 2015 of 468 community-dwelling older people who were evaluated for sarcopenia and underwent spirometry were included in this analysis. We determined two respiratory sarcopenia models based on low skeletal muscle mass and respiratory muscle strength. Low skeletal muscle mass was defined by low ASM/height2, and low respiratory muscle strength was defined by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or percentage of predicted PEFR (%PEFR). Survival status was assessed 5 years after baseline assessment (in 2020). To evaluate the validity of the cut-off values for PEFR and %PEFR, we determined different respiratory sarcopenia models by sequentially varying the cut-off values for each parameter, including ASM/height2, from high to low. We subsequently calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for each respiratory sarcopenia model using the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, we plotted the HR for each combination of cut-off values for ASM/height2 and PEFR or %PEFR on a three-dimensional chart to observe the relationship between the different cut-off values and HR.
    RESULTS: A total of 31 people died during the 5-year observation period. With ASM/height2 cut-off values of approximately 7.0 kg/m2 for men and 5.7 kg/m2 for women and %PEFR cut-off values of 66-75%, respiratory sarcopenia was associated with mortality risk (HR, 2.36-3.27, point estimation range).
    CONCLUSIONS: The definition of respiratory sarcopenia by the four professional organizations is related to future health outcomes, and this definition is valid. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用数字传感器技术(iPREDICT)开发了个性化预测疾病控制计划,用于使用数字技术进行哮喘管理。将设备集成到患者的日常生活中,以最小的设备负担通过测量基线健康状况的变化来建立哮喘控制的预测模型。
    为了建立研究参与者的基线疾病特征,检测与哮喘事件相关的基线变化,并评估能够从基线数据识别触发因素和预测哮喘控制变化的算法。还探索了患者的经验和对设备的依从性。
    这是一个多中心,观察,24周,在美国进行的概念验证研究。
    患者(12年)患有严重,不受控制的哮喘与肺活量计有关,生命体征监测仪,睡眠监视器,连接的吸入器装置,和两个带有嵌入式患者报告结果(PRO)问卷的移动应用程序。将预期数据与电子健康记录中的数据相关联,并传输到安全平台以开发预测算法。主要终点是哮喘事件:患者症状恶化(PRO);呼气峰值流量(PEF)<65%或1s内用力呼气量<80%;短效β2激动剂(SABA)使用增加(>8次/24小时或>4次/天/48小时)。对于每个端点,预测模型是在人群中构建的,子组,和个人水平。
    总的来说,选择了108例患者:66例(61.1%)完成,42例(38.9%)因未能响应/数据缺失而被排除。预测准确性取决于终点选择。人口水平模型在预测终点如PEF<65%方面的准确性较低。与特定过敏相关的亚组,哮喘触发因素,哮喘类型,加重治疗显示出很高的准确性,用最准确的,预测终点>4SABA抽吸/天/48小时。个体模型,为具有高终点重叠的患者构建,表现出显著的预测准确性,特别是对于PEF<65%和>4SABA粉扑/天/48小时。
    此多维数据集启用了population-,子组-,和个人层面的分析,为哮喘波动控制预测模型的发展提供概念验证证据.
    UNASSIGNED: The individualized PREdiction of DIsease Control using digital sensor Technology (iPREDICT) program was developed for asthma management using digital technology. Devices were integrated into daily lives of patients to establish a predictive model of asthma control by measuring changes from baseline health status with minimal device burden.
    UNASSIGNED: To establish baseline disease characteristics of the study participants, detect changes from baseline associated with asthma events, and evaluate algorithms capable of identifying triggers and predicting asthma control changes from baseline data. Patient experience and compliance with the devices were also explored.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a multicenter, observational, 24-week, proof-of-concept study conducted in the United States.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients (⩾12 years) with severe, uncontrolled asthma engaged with a spirometer, vital sign monitor, sleep monitor, connected inhaler devices, and two mobile applications with embedded patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires. Prospective data were linked to data from electronic health records and transmitted to a secure platform to develop predictive algorithms. The primary endpoint was an asthma event: symptom worsening logged by patients (PRO); peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 65% or forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 80%; increased short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use (>8 puffs/24 h or >4 puffs/day/48 h). For each endpoint, predictive models were constructed at population, subgroup, and individual levels.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 108 patients were selected: 66 (61.1%) completed and 42 (38.9%) were excluded for failure to respond/missing data. Predictive accuracy depended on endpoint selection. Population-level models achieved low accuracy in predicting endpoints such as PEF < 65%. Subgroups related to specific allergies, asthma triggers, asthma types, and exacerbation treatments demonstrated high accuracy, with the most accurate, predictive endpoint being >4 SABA puffs/day/48 h. Individual models, constructed for patients with high endpoint overlap, exhibited significant predictive accuracy, especially for PEF < 65% and >4 SABA puffs/day/48 h.
    UNASSIGNED: This multidimensional dataset enabled population-, subgroup-, and individual-level analyses, providing proof-of-concept evidence for development of predictive models of fluctuating asthma control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:英文PUMA问卷是一种有效的COPD病例发现工具。我们的目的是将PUMA问卷与呼气流速峰值(PEFR)结合使用,以提高中国人群的病例发现效率。
    方法:这个横截面,观察性研究包括两个阶段:英译汉PUMA(C-PUMA)问卷的语言验证和心理评估,其次是临床验证。符合条件的参与者(年龄≥40岁,呼吸道症状,吸烟史≥10包年)被纳入并接受三份问卷(C-PUMA,COPD评估测试[CAT],和通用健康调查[SF-12V2]),PEFR测量,和验证性肺活量测定。将C-PUMA评分和PEFR纳入PUMA-PEFR预测模型,应用二元逻辑回归系数来估计COPD(PCOPD)的概率。
    结果:C-PUMA是通过标准的前后翻译过程和良好的可读性确认而最终确定的,可理解性,和可靠性。在临床验证中,240名参与者完成了这项研究。78/240(32.5%)被诊断为COPD。C-PUMA表现出显着的有效性(分别与SF-12V2的CAT或物理成分得分相关,均P<0.05)。PUMA-PEFR模型诊断准确率高于C-PUMA(ROC曲线下面积,0.893vs.0.749,P<0.05)。C-PUMA和PUMA-PEFR模型(PCOPD)的最佳临界值分别为≥6和≥0.39,占筛选所需的敏感性/特异性/数字分别为77%/64%/3和79%/88%/2。C-PUMA≥5检测到更多未诊断的患者,高达11.5%(与C-PUMA≥6)。
    结论:C-PUMA得到了很好的验证。PUMA-PEFR模型比单独的C-PUMA在风险中提供了更准确和更具成本效益的病例发现功效,未确诊的COPD患者。这些工具可用于早期检测COPD。
    BACKGROUND: The English PUMA questionnaire emerges as an effective COPD case-finding tool. We aimed to use the PUMA questionnaire in combination with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) to improve case-finding efficacy in Chinese population.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study included two stages: translating English to Chinese PUMA (C-PUMA) questionnaire with linguistic validation and psychometric evaluation, followed by clinical validation. Eligible participants (with age ≥40 years, respiratory symptoms, smoking history ≥10 pack-years) were enrolled and subjected to three questionnaires (C-PUMA, COPD assessment test [CAT], and generic health survey [SF-12V2]), PEFR measurement, and confirmatory spirometry. The C-PUMA score and PEFR were incorporated into a PUMA-PEFR prediction model applying binary logistic regression coefficients to estimate the probability of COPD (PCOPD).
    RESULTS: C-PUMA was finalized through standard forward-backward translation processes and confirmation of good readability, comprehensibility, and reliability. In clinical validation, 240 participants completed the study. 78/240 (32.5%) were diagnosed with COPD. C-PUMA exhibited significant validity (correlated with CAT or physical component scores of SF-12V2, both P<0.05, respectively). PUMA-PEFR model had higher diagnostic accuracy than C-PUMA alone (area under ROC curve, 0.893 vs. 0.749, P<0.05). The best cutoff values of C-PUMA and PUMA-PEFR model (PCOPD) were ≥6 and ≥0.39, accounting for a sensitivity/specificity/numbers needed to screen of 77%/64%/3 and 79%/88%/2, respectively. C-PUMA ≥5 detected more underdiagnosed patients, up to 11.5% (vs. C-PUMA ≥6).
    CONCLUSIONS: C-PUMA is well-validated. The PUMA-PEFR model provides more accurate and cost-effective case-finding efficacy than C-PUMA alone in at-risk, undiagnosed COPD patients. These tools can be useful to detect COPD early.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的COVID-19是一种高度传染性的呼吸系统疾病,由严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起。症状从轻度到重度不等,大多数病人发高烧,严重的头痛,干咳,和疲惫,虽然不太常见的症状是腹泻,失去味道,喉咙痛,和气味的损失。从COVID-19中恢复后,一些患者的肺功能表现出受限的模式。因此,记录感染后COVID-19的影响至关重要,因为它可以更好地了解COVID-19的长期后果。因此,本研究的目的是评估恢复期COVID-19患者的肺功能.方法从2021年到2022年,在海湾医科大学的学生和工作人员中进行了为期一年的横断面比较研究。通过方便的采样方法,本研究共招募了100名参与者,其中使用肺活量计进行肺功能测试(PFTs),和O2水平使用脉搏血氧计测量。此外,监测呼吸率和脉搏率。结果本研究强调了恢复期COVID-19患者中PFTs的比较,并得出结论:吸烟者和恢复期COVID-19组的用力肺活量(FVC)预测没有显着降低(p>0.05)。第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)预测,FEV1/FVC%,用力呼气中流速(FEF25-75%)预测,峰值呼气流速(PEFR)预测,呼吸频率,与对照组相比,脉搏率。与康复期COVID-19组相比,恢复期COVID-19吸烟患者的FEV1/FVC%显著升高(p=0.04).此外,与康复期COVID-19组相比,观察到PEFR预测值显著增加,P值为0.045,与吸烟者组相比,P值为0.006.此外,氧饱和度(SpO2)水平显示两组间无显著变化.结论本研究得出的结论是,对于康复期COVID-19吸烟患者组的FEV1/FVC%和PEFR预测值,与恢复期COVID-19组相比,观察到显著增加。这有助于医疗保健专业人员修改策略,以防止COVID-19感染后造成的后果。
    Background and objective COVID-19 is a respiratory disease that is highly contagious and is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptoms vary from mild to severe, where most of the patients suffer from high fever, severe headaches, dry cough, and exhaustion, while the less common symptoms are diarrhea, loss of taste, sore throat, and loss of smell. Following recovery from COVID-19, some patients displayed a restricted pattern in the function of their lungs. As a result, documenting the effects of COVID-19 after infection is essential since it provides a better understanding of the long-term consequences of COVID-19. Hence, the objective of the present study was to assess pulmonary functions in post-convalescent COVID-19 patients. Methodology A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted among students and staff members of Gulf Medical University for a duration of one year from 2021 to 2022. Through a convenient sampling method, a total of 100 participants were recruited for the present study, in which pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed using a spirometer, and O2 levels were measured using a pulse oximeter. Additionally, respiratory rate and pulse rate were monitored. Results The present study highlighted the comparison of PFTs in post-convalescent COVID-19 patients and concluded that smoker and convalescent COVID-19 groups showed non-significant decrease (p>0.05) in forced vital capacity (FVC) prediction, forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) prediction, FEV1/FVC%, forced mid-expiratory flow rate (FEF25-75%) prediction, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) prediction, respiratory rate, and pulse rate in comparison to the control group. In comparison to the convalescent COVID-19 group, convalescent COVID-19 smoking patients showed a significant increase in FEV1/FVC% (p=0.04). Additionally, in comparison to the convalescent COVID-19 group, a significant increase in PEFR prediction values was observed with a p-value of 0.045 and in comparison to the smoker group with a p-value of 0.006. Moreover, oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels demonstrated non-significant changes between the groups. Conclusion The study concluded that for FEV1/FVC% and PEFR prediction values among the convalescent COVID-19 smoking patient group, a significant increase was observed in comparison to the convalescent COVID-19 group. This aids healthcare professionals in amending strategies to prevent consequences resulting from post-COVID-19 infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们调查了峰值呼气流量(PEF)与痴呆;认知障碍,无痴呆症(CIND);从CIND过渡到痴呆症,和潜在的神经病理学机制。
    方法:对60岁以上的成年人进行了15年以上的基于人群的队列研究,以检测痴呆(精神障碍诊断和统计手册,第四版标准),CIND(通过认知电池评估),从CIND进展到痴呆症,与基线PEF观测值有关。一个子样本(n=462)对神经变性和小血管疾病的脑磁共振成像标志物进行了6年的随访数据。
    结果:在完全调整的模型中,PEF性能不佳(<10比≥80百分位数)与痴呆风险增加(风险比[HR]=1.89;95%置信区间[CI]=1.23-2.92)和CIND(HR=1.55;95%CI=1.01-2.38)和CIND进展为痴呆,尽管没有统计学意义(HR=2.44;95%CI=0.78-6.88)。PEF较差的人也经历了最快的心室扩大(β系数=0.67mL/年;95%CI=0.13-1.21),并且发生空洞的可能性最高(比值比=5.05;95%CI=1.01-25.23)。
    结论:肺功能差可能通过加速脑萎缩和微血管损伤导致认知功能恶化。
    结论:肺功能差增加了痴呆和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的风险。肺功能不良加速了从MCI到痴呆的进展。肺功能不良与脑微血管损伤和整体脑萎缩有关。
    We investigated the association of peak expiratory flow (PEF) with dementia; cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND); and transition from CIND to dementia, and possible underlying neuropathological mechanisms.
    A population-based cohort of adults aged 60+ was followed over 15 years to detect dementia (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition criteria), CIND (assessed through a cognitive battery), and progression from CIND to dementia, in relation to baseline PEF observations. A subsample (n = 462) had 6-year follow-up data on brain magnetic resonance imaging markers of neurodegeneration and small vessel disease.
    In fully adjusted models, poor PEF performance (< 10th vs. ≥ 80th percentile) was associated with increased hazards for dementia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-2.92) and CIND (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.01-2.38) and CIND progression to dementia, although not statistically significantly (HR = 2.44; 95% CI = 0.78-6.88). People with poor PEF also experienced the fastest ventricular enlargement (β coefficient = 0.67 mL/year; 95% CI = 0.13-1.21) and had the highest likelihood of developing lacunes (odds ratio = 5.05; 95% CI = 1.01-25.23).
    Poor lung function contributes to cognitive deterioration possibly through accelerated brain atrophy and microvascular damage.
    Poor lung function increased the risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Poor lung function accelerated the progression from MCI to dementia. Poor lung function was linked to brain microvascular damage and global brain atrophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长时间通气仍然是气管狭窄的最常见原因。在这些情况下,气管重建是金标准治疗。手术的成功取决于肺功能测试(PFT)的结果,这取决于患者的表现及其合作。该研究的目的是研究气管狭窄情况下气管重建对血气指标和气流指标的影响,以及动脉血气(ABG)是否可以更好地替代气管重建的充分性。这是一项对61例年龄在21至65岁之间的气管狭窄患者进行气管重建的回顾性观察研究。各种血气指标的术前和术后值,如氧分压(pO2),二氧化碳分压(pCO2),评估了氢气电位(pH)和气流指数,例如1s的用力呼气量(FEV1)和峰值呼气流量(PEF),发现所有参数在气管重建后均显示出显着改善,P<0.0001。气管重建导致氧合和气流参数的改善,从而缓解症状。因此,ABG可以用作表示手术成功的替代标记。
    Prolonged ventilation remains the most common cause of tracheal stenosis. Tracheal reconstruction is the gold standard treatment in these cases. The success of surgery is based on results of the pulmonary function test (PFT) which relies on patients\' performance and their cooperation. The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of tracheal reconstruction in cases of tracheal stenosis on blood gas indices as well as airflow indices and whether arterial blood gas (ABG) can be a better surrogate of adequacy of tracheal reconstruction. This was a retrospective observational study of 61 patients with tracheal stenosis between the ages of 21 and 65 years who underwent tracheal reconstruction. The preoperative and postoperative values of various blood gas indices like partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2), and potential of hydrogen (pH) and airflow indices like forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were evaluated and found that all the parameters showed significant improvement after tracheal reconstruction with P < 0.0001. Tracheal reconstruction resulted in improvement of oxygenation and airflow parameters which led to relief of symptoms. Hence, ABG can be used as a surrogate marker for denoting the success of the surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能新工具的开发在识别多维模式方面表现突出,这就是为什么它们已被证明对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断有用。
    这是一项观察性分析单中心研究,在门诊医疗护理中进行肺活量测定。从呼气流量峰值到强制肺活量的部分用二次多项式建模,获得的系数用于训练和测试COPD患者分类任务中的神经网络.
    共695例患者记录纳入分析。COPD组比无COPD组年龄大。使用二次多项式对支气管扩张剂前(BD前)和支气管扩张剂后(BD后)的肺活量曲线进行建模,并将获得的系数用于馈送三个神经网络(PreBD,后BD和所有系数)。最好的神经网络是使用支气管扩张剂后系数的神经网络,其具有3个神经元的输入层和具有sigmoid激活函数的3个隐藏层以及具有softmax激活函数的输出层中的两个神经元。该系统的精度为92.9%,使用专家判断作为参考测试进行评估时,敏感性为88.2%,特异性为94.3%。它还显示出比当前的黄金标准更好的性能,特别是在特异性和阴性预测值方面。
    使用二次和三次多项式获得的系数的人工神经网络具有模拟临床诊断过程的有趣潜力,并且可以成为初级保健中帮助早期诊断COPD的重要辅助手段。
    UNASSIGNED: Development of new tools in artificial intelligence has an outstanding performance in the recognition of multidimensional patterns, which is why they have proven to be useful in the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).
    UNASSIGNED: This was an observational analytical single-centre study in patients with spirometry performed in outpatient medical care. The segment that goes from the peak expiratory flow to the forced vital capacity was modelled with quadratic polynomials, the coefficients obtained were used to train and test neural networks in the task of classifying patients with COPD.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 695 patient records were included in the analysis. The COPD group was significantly older than the No COPD group. The pre-bronchodilator (Pre BD) and post-bronchodilator (Post BD) spirometric curves were modelled with a quadratic polynomial, and the coefficients obtained were used to feed three neural networks (Pre BD, Post BD and all coefficients). The best neural network was the one that used the post-bronchodilator coefficients, which has an input layer of 3 neurons and three hidden layers with sigmoid activation function and two neurons in the output layer with softmax activation function. This system had an accuracy of 92.9% accuracy, a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 94.3% when assessed using expert judgment as the reference test. It also showed better performance than the current gold standard, especially in specificity and negative predictive value.
    UNASSIGNED: Artificial Neural Networks fed with coefficients obtained from quadratic and cubic polynomials have interesting potential of emulating the clinical diagnostic process and can become an important aid in primary care to help diagnose COPD in an early stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估咳嗽的有效性,使用咳嗽峰值流量,对神经肌肉疾病患者至关重要,如肌萎缩侧索硬化症。咳嗽功能受损可导致呼吸下降和衰竭。这项研究的目的是确定膈肌偏移和咳嗽呼气相之间的相关性,可能利用超声指标来估计这些患者的咳嗽峰值流量。22名患者参加了这项研究。在自愿咳嗽呼气期间用超声测量隔膜的向上位移,并同时测量咳嗽峰值流量。建立多元线性回归模型来量化咳嗽峰值流量与隔膜呼气偏移之间的关系。在患者组中,咳嗽峰值流量与隔膜偏移之间存在显着关系,皮尔逊r系数为0.86。咳嗽峰值流量的多元线性回归分析(调整后的R2=0.86)显示咳嗽峰值流量与呼气偏移之间存在显着关联(调整后的β系数:64.78,95%,CI:51.50至78.07,p<0.001)和性别(调整后的β系数:-69.06;95%CI:-109.98至-28.15,p=0.001)。我们的结果通过使用M型膈肌超声检查来预测咳嗽的有效性,这可能对治疗选择产生重大影响。
    Assessing cough effectiveness, using Cough Peak Flow, is crucial for patients with Neuromuscular Diseases, such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Impaired cough function can contribute to respiratory decline and failure. The goal of the study is to determine the correlation between diaphragmatic excursion and cough expiratory phase, potentially utilizing ultrasonographic indices to estimate Cough Peak Flow in these patients. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study. The upward displacement of the diaphragm was measured with ultrasonography during voluntary cough expiration and Cough Peak Flow was simultaneously measured. A multivariable linear regression model was built to quantify the association between Cough Peak Flow and diaphragm expiratory excursion. There is significative relationship between Cough Peak Flow and diaphragm excursion with a Pearson\'s r coefficient of 0.86 observed in the patients group. Multiple linear regression analysis for Cough Peak Flow (Adjusted R2 = 0.86) revealed significant associations between Cough Peak Flow and expiratory excursion (adjusted β-coefficient: 64.78, 95 %, CI: 51.50-78.07, p<0.001) and sex (adjusted β-coefficient: -69.06; 95 % CI: -109.98 to -28.15, p=0.001). Our results predict the cough effectiveness by using M-mode diaphragmatic sonography with a potentially significant impact on therapeutic choices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重症肌无力(MG)咳嗽强度降低导致误吸并增加MG危机的风险。这项研究的目的是阐明MG中咳嗽峰流量(CPF)测量的可靠性和有效性。总共包括26例MG患者,他们自己使用峰值流量计进行了CPF测量。在免疫治疗前后,通过肺功能检查和临床MG评估量表评估MG症状。评估CPF与肺功能检查和MG综合的关系。确定抽吸风险的CPF截断值并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。治疗前后的组内相关系数均大于0.95。CPF与几乎所有肺活量测定值之间以及CPF治疗前后的差异与定量重症肌无力评分之间均呈正相关。使用用于识别误吸风险的CPF来计算205L/min的CPF截断值,灵敏度为0.77,特异性为0.90,AUC为0.85。CPF,患者自己采取的方便措施,在MG患者中具有较高的可靠性,并且是反映MG症状的有用生物标志物。
    Decreased cough strength in myasthenia gravis (MG) leads to aspiration and increases the risk of MG crisis. The aim of this study was to clarify the reliability and validity of cough peak flow (CPF) measurements in MG. A total of 26 patients with MG who underwent CPF measurements using the peak flow meter by themselves were included. MG symptoms were evaluated by pulmonary function tests and clinical MG assessment scales before and after immune-treatments. The relationship between CPF and pulmonary function tests and MG comprehensive were assessed. The cut-off value of CPF for aspiration risk was determined and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient was more than 0.95 for pre-and post-treatment. Positive correlations were found between CPF and almost all spirometric values as well as between the differences of pre-and post-treatment in CPF and quantitative myasthenia gravis score. The CPF for identifying the aspiration risk was used to calculate the CPF cut-off value of 205 L/min with a sensitivity of 0.77, specificity of 0.90, and AUC of 0.85. The CPF, a convenient measure by patients themselves, has a high reliability in patients with MG, and is a useful biomarker reflecting MG symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号