pain score

疼痛评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于马的非语言性质和在存在潜在威胁时隐藏不适迹象的倾向,对马的疼痛评估提出了重大挑战。包括人类。因此,这项研究旨在识别与疼痛相关的行为,这些行为可以在视频记录中进行基于AI的自动化检测。此外,它试图通过分析时间预算等因素来确定疼痛强度与行为和姿势参数之间的相关性,重量转移,不稳定的休息。最终目标是促进基于AI的定量工具的开发,用于马的疼痛评估。
    一所大学马科医院收治的20匹马(平均年龄15±8岁)进行了24小时录像。使用Loopy®软件对行为进行手动评分和回顾性分析。根据维也纳疼痛评分建立了三个疼痛组:无痛(P0),轻度至中度疼痛(P1),和剧烈疼痛(P2)。
    体重转移成为区分疼痛马和无痛马的可靠指标,在疼痛组之间以及镇痛前后观察到显着差异(p<0.001)。此外,与无痛马相比,严重疼痛的马(P2组)每小时进食和休息站立的频率较低,同时显示每小时不稳定休息的频率更高。
    在疼痛组之间观察到的这些参数的显着差异为马医学中基于AI的分析和自动疼痛评估提供了有希望的前景。必须进一步调查以建立精确的阈值。利用这种技术有可能更有效地检测和管理马匹的疼痛,最终提高马医学的福利并为临床决策提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Pain assessment in horses presents a significant challenge due to their nonverbal nature and their tendency to conceal signs of discomfort in the presence of potential threats, including humans. Therefore, this study aimed to identify pain-associated behaviors amenable to automated AI-based detection in video recordings. Additionally, it sought to determine correlations between pain intensity and behavioral and postural parameters by analyzing factors such as time budgets, weight shifting, and unstable resting. The ultimate goal is to facilitate the development of AI-based quantitative tools for pain assessment in horses.
    UNASSIGNED: A cohort of 20 horses (mean age 15 ± 8) admitted to a university equine hospital underwent 24-h video recording. Behaviors were manually scored and retrospectively analyzed using Loopy® software. Three pain groups were established based on the Pain Score Vetmeduni Vienna : pain-free (P0), mild to moderate pain (P1), and severe pain (P2).
    UNASSIGNED: Weight shifting emerged as a reliable indicator for discriminating between painful and pain-free horses, with significant differences observed between pain groups (p < 0.001) and before and after administration of analgesia. Additionally, severely painful horses (P2 group) exhibited lower frequencies of feeding and resting standing per hour compared to pain-free horses, while displaying a higher frequency of unstable resting per hour.
    UNASSIGNED: The significant differences observed in these parameters between pain groups offer promising prospects for AI-based analysis and automated pain assessment in equine medicine. Further investigation is imperative to establish precise thresholds. Leveraging such technology has the potential to enable more effective pain detection and management in horses, ultimately enhancing welfare and informing clinical decision-making in equine medicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估术中冷冻镇痛对扁桃体切除术后患者主观疼痛评分的影响。
    方法:对PubMED,WebofScience,EMBASE使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准进行。第一次,我们纳入并定量综合的英语随机对照试验(RCT),评估所有年龄组良性病变患者接受扁桃体切除术和术中冷冻镇痛的情况.
    结果:共确定了835种出版物,选择了7篇符合我们标准的463名参与者进行荟萃分析.总体主观疼痛评分的标准平均差异,术后Day1(POD1)的主观疼痛评分,POD7为-1.44,95%置信区间(CI)[-2.17,-0.72],P=.0001;-1.20,95%CI[-1.89,-0.50],P=.0007;-0.90,95%CI[-1.46,-0.35],分别为P=.001,都赞成冷冻镇痛。然而,按手术技术进行的亚组分析显示,热技术和“相对”热技术对总体疼痛没有明显影响:(-1.72,95%CI[-2.71,-0.73])与(-1.06,95%CI[-2.20,0.07]),p=.39;POD1:(-1.56,95%CI[-2.78,-0.33])与(-0.97,95%CI[-1.83,-0.11]),p=.39;以及POD7(-1.11,95%CI[-1.81,-0.40])与(-0.89,95%CI[-2.02,0.25]),p=.13。术后继发出血率的标准平均差异为1.29,95%CI为0.37,4.52],p=.06,两组间无差异。
    结论:有限的证据表明,扁桃体切除术期间的术中冷冻镇痛导致整体的主观疼痛评分较低,POD1和POD7对术后出血率无差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of intraoperative cryoanalgesia on subjective pain scores of patients after tonsillectomy.
    METHODS: A systematic review of PubMED, Web of Science, EMBASE was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. For the first time, we included and quantitative synthesized English-language randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating patients of all age groups with benign pathology who underwent tonsillectomy with intraoperative cryoanalgesia versus without.
    RESULTS: A total of 835 publications were identified, and 7 articles with 463 participants met our criteria were selected for meta-analysis. The standard mean difference for overall subjective pain score, subjective pain scores at postoperation Day1 (POD1), POD7 were -1.44 with 95% confidence interval (CI) [-2.17, -0.72], P = .0001; -1.20 with 95% CI [-1.89, -0.50], P = .0007; -0.90 with 95% CI [-1.46, -0.35], P = .001 respectively, both in favor of cryoanalgesia. Nevertheless, subgroup analysis by surgical technique showed no robust effect between hot technique and \"relative\" hot technique on overall pain: (-1.72, 95% CI [-2.71, -0.73]) vs. (-1.06, 95% CI [-2.20, 0.07]), p=.39; on POD1: (-1.56, 95% CI [-2.78, -0.33]) vs. (-0.97, 95% CI [-1.83, -0.11]), p=.39; and on POD7 (-1.11, 95% CI [-1.81, -0.40]) vs. (-0.89, 95% CI [-2.02, 0.25]), p=.13. The standard mean difference for postoperative secondary bleeding rate was 1.29 with 95% CI 0.37,4.52], p = .06, no difference in 2 groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that intraoperative cryoanalgesia during tonsillectomy leads to lower subjective pain score on overall, POD1 and POD7 without differences on post-operation bleeding rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:复发性口疮性口炎(RAS)是一种常见的慢性炎症性口腔疾病,对生活质量产生负面影响。目前的疗法旨在减少疼痛和愈合过程,但挑战如由于局部药物的唾液潮红而导致的快速损失和由于长期使用全身药物而导致的不良反应需要进一步注意。据报道,低水平激光治疗可立即缓解疼痛并更快愈合,从而保留了最佳治疗方式的潜力。这篇综述批判性地分析和总结了LLLT在降低RAS疼痛评分和愈合时间方面的有效性。
    方法:在ScienceDirect中进行了系统搜索,PubMed,和Scopus使用低级激光治疗的关键词,光生物调节疗法,和复发性口疮性口炎。包括1967年至2022年6月之间的RCT,呈现激光特征并报告辐照后RAS的疼痛评分和/或愈合时间。排除了动物研究和有全身性疾病史的复发性口疮。使用RoB2工具对研究进行了严格评估。使用逆方差随机效应进行荟萃分析。
    结果:纳入14项试验,共664例患者。13项研究报告疼痛减轻,而缩短的愈合时间出现在4。与安慰剂相比,CO2照射后两项研究的合并显示出更快的愈合时间(MD-3.72;95%CI-4.18,-3.25)。
    结论:用LLLT照射后,RAS的疼痛评分和愈合时间减少。RoB引起了“一些担忧”,敦促设计良好的RCT具有更大的样品,以进一步评估每种激光应用进行比较。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD420223555737。
    BACKGROUND: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common chronic inflammatory oral disease that negatively impacts the quality of life. Current therapies aim to reduce pain and healing process yet challenges such as rapid loss due to salivary flushing in topical drugs and adverse effects due to prolonged use of systemic medications require further notice. Low-level laser therapy is reported with immediate pain relief and faster healing thus preserving the potential for optimal treatment modalities. This review critically analyses and summarizes the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing pain scores and healing time of RAS.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus using keywords of low-level laser therapy, photo-biomodulation therapy, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. RCTs between 1967 to June 2022, presenting characteristics of the laser and reporting pain score and/or healing time of RAS after irradiation were included. Animal studies and recurrent aphthous ulcers with a history of systemic conditions were excluded. Studies were critically appraised using the RoB 2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance random effects.
    RESULTS: Fourteen trials with a total of 664 patients were included. Reduced pain was reported in 13 studies, while shortened healing time was presented in 4. The pooling of two studies after CO2 irradiation demonstrated faster healing time compared to placebo (MD - 3.72; 95% CI - 4.18, - 3.25).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pain score and healing time of RAS were reduced after irradiation with LLLT. RoB resulted in \"some concerns\" urging well-designed RCTs with larger samples to further assess each laser application for comparison.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022355737.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:色氨酸(TRP),必需氨基酸,通过各种途径进行分解代谢。值得注意的是,犬尿氨酸途径(KP),构成这些途径之一,对免疫反应和能量代谢表现出单向影响。尽管如此,其对痛觉的影响以双相动力学为特征。这项研究旨在仔细检查KP途径对疼痛感觉的影响,特别是在胰腺炎症的背景下。
    方法:我们的前瞻性病例对照研究包括诊断为急性胰腺炎的个体和性别和年龄相匹配的对照组。随后将患者队列细分为重度和非重度亚组。为了评估KP内的代谢物,从患者队列中收集了两份血液样本,一个在诊断时,另一个在恢复阶段。此外,对于疼痛量化,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)从患者病历中提取每日疼痛评分.
    结果:该研究纳入了30名患者以及同等数量的对照。患者组和对照组之间有明显的区别,以犬尿氨酸水平增加和色氨酸/犬尿氨酸比例降低为特征。在整个疾病康复过程中,在所有KP代谢物中观察到均匀下降,不包括3-羟基犬尿氨酸。犬尿氨酸(KYNA)水平升高与疼痛评分升高相关。严重的,在以神经受累为特征的合并症患者中,在疼痛严重程度方面未发现KP代谢物的明显差异.
    结论:根据我们的结果,犬尿氨酸途径(KP)在急性胰腺炎中被激活.发现KYNA水平升高与疼痛评分升高有关。在以神经病引起的疼痛感觉为特征的情况下,负责疼痛调节的KP内的手术阶段受损。
    OBJECTIVE: Tryptophan (TRP), an essential amino acid, undergoes catabolism through various pathways. Notably, the kynurenine pathway (KP), constituting one of these pathways, exhibits a unidirectional impact on immune response and energy metabolism. Nonetheless, its influence on pain sensation is characterized by biphasic dynamics. This study aims to scrutinize the influence of the KP pathway on pain sensation, particularly within the context of pancreatic inflammation.
    METHODS: Our prospective case-control study involved individuals diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and a control group matched for gender and age. The patient cohort was subsequently subdivided into severe and non-severe subgroups. To assess metabolites within KP, two blood samples were collected from the patient cohort, one at the time of diagnosis and another during the recovery phase. Furthermore, for pain quantification, daily pain scores utilizing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were extracted from the patients\' medical records.
    RESULTS: The study incorporated 30 patients along with an equivalent number of controls. A noticeable distinction was evident between the patient and control groups, characterized by an increase in kynurenine levels and a decrease in the tryptophan/kynurenine ratio. Throughout the process of disease recovery, a uniform decrease was observed in all KP metabolites, excluding 3-Hydroxykynurenine. Elevated levels of Kynurenic acid (KYNA) were correlated with increased pain scores. Critically, no apparent distinctions in KP metabolites were discerned concerning pain severity in patients with comorbidities characterized by neural involvement.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, the kynurenine pathway (KP) is activated in instances of acute pancreatitis. Elevated levels of KYNA were found to be associated with heightened pain scores. The operative stages within the KP responsible for pain modulation are impaired in cases characterized by neuropathy-induced pain sensation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较在接受选择性卵巢切除术的猫中肌内注射(IM)的三种不同麻醉方案,在评估镇静质量时,抗伤害性,异氟烷保留作用,在术中和术后阶段镇痛。共有71只母猫用阿法沙松(3mg/kg)联合布托啡诺(0.3mg/kg)镇静IM,美沙酮(0.3mg/kg),或哌替啶(5毫克/千克)。手术期间,不断监测生命参数;在程序结束时,通过特定表格评估恢复质量,并使用UNESP-Botucatu量表对每只猫进行5天的感知疼痛评分,并在需要时给予丁丙诺啡IM进行抢救镇痛。此外,两种不同的术后休息方案之间的差异(医院狗窝与家)也进行了评估。静脉导管插入术达到足够镇静水平所需的IM右美托咪定的量存在显著差异,强调哌替啶组的需求更大(p=0.021)。阿片类药物组之间对术中抢救镇痛的需求没有显着差异。无论术前用药中使用何种阿片类药物,临床参数均保持在生理范围内.最后,从术后第3天到第5天检测到UNESP-Botucatu评分之间的差异,与住院动物相比,采用家庭休息方案的猫得分较低,可能是由于存在不熟悉的条件和缺乏对猫友好的环境。
    The aim of this study was to compare three different anesthetic protocols administered intramuscularly (IM) in cats undergoing elective ovariectomy, while evaluating the quality of sedation, antinociceptive, isoflurane-sparing effect, and analgesia in the intra-operative and post-operative phases. A total of 71 female cats were sedated IM with alfaxalone (3 mg/kg) combined with either butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg), methadone (0.3 mg/kg), or pethidine (5 mg/kg). During surgery, vital parameters were constantly monitored; at the end of the procedure, the quality of recovery was assessed through a specific form and each cat was scored for perceived pain using the UNESP-Botucatu scale for 5 days, and rescue analgesia was provided with buprenorphine IM when indicated. Moreover, differences between two different post-operative resting regimens (hospital kennels vs. home) were also assessed. A significant difference emerged for the amount of IM dexmedetomidine required to achieve an adequate level of sedation for intravenous catheterization, highlighting a greater need in the pethidine group (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference between opioid groups for the requirement of intra-operative rescue analgesia, and the clinical parameters were kept within physiological ranges regardless of the opioid used in premedication. Lastly, differences between the UNESP-Botucatu scores were detected from day 3 to day 5 post-operatively, with lower scores in cats with home resting regimens compared to the hospitalized animals, likely due to the presence of an unfamiliar condition and the absence of a cat-friendly environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨剖宫产术后疼痛的特点及预测因素。材料和方法:该定量研究在斐济的Labasa医院进行了6个月。共有312名接受脊柱治疗的母亲,包括硬膜外麻醉和全身麻醉。术后24h使用视觉模拟量表评估其疼痛评分。结果:70.8%的女性在视觉模拟评分上有中度或重度疼痛。约41.3%的妇女对疼痛管理表示不满,70.5%的妇女由于疼痛而难以进行活动。在接受CS的女性中,较低的胎次被认为是疼痛的积极预测因子。结论:Labasa医院对CS后患者缺乏足够的疼痛管理。
    Labasa手术分娩后的疼痛和疼痛控制方法,这项研究是关于什么的?这项研究调查了通过手术分娩后女性疼痛的影响因素,也称为手术分娩或剖宫产(CS),在斐济的Labasa医院.超过6个月,312名使用不同类型的止痛药进行手术分娩的母亲参加了这项研究。手术后24小时使用疼痛量表检查他们的疼痛。结果是什么?结果显示,70.8%的妇女在手术分娩后感到中度至重度疼痛。此外,41.3%的女性对自己的疼痛控制不满意,70.5%的人由于疼痛而在日常活动中遇到困难。该研究还发现,初产妇在手术分娩后更有可能感到更多的疼痛。结果意味着什么?这项研究的重点是,Labasa医院的许多妇女在手术分娩后没有得到足够的疼痛缓解,尤其是第一次做母亲.这表明需要改进这些患者的疼痛控制方法。更好的疼痛控制可以帮助这些母亲变得更好,更舒适,并对他们的护理感到更满意。
    Aim: To identify the characteristics and predictors of post cesarean section (CS) pain among women. Materials & methods: This quantitative study was conducted at Labasa hospital in Fiji over a 6-month period. A total of 312 mothers who received spinal, epidural and general anesthesia were included. Their pain score was assessed using the visual analogue scale 24 h postoperatively. Results: 70.8% women had either moderate or severe pain on the visual analogue scale. About 41.3% women expressed dissatisfaction with their pain management and 70.5% women had difficulties in performing activities due to pain. Lower parity was noted to be a positive predictor of pain among women undergoing CS. Conclusion: Adequate pain management for post-CS patient at Labasa hospital is lacking.
    Pain & pain control methods after surgical birth in Labasa, FijiWhat is the study about? This study looked at what affects pain in women after delivering a baby through surgery, also known as surgical birth or cesarean section (CS), at Labasa Hospital in Fiji. Over 6 months, 312 mothers who had surgical births with different types of pain-reducing medicines took part in this study. Their pain was checked 24 h after surgery using a pain scale.What were the results? The results showed that 70.8% of women felt moderate to severe pain after their surgical birth. In addition, 41.3% of the women were not happy with their pain control, and 70.5% had difficulties doing their daily activities because of the pain. The study also found that first-time mothers were more likely to feel more pain after their surgical birth.What do the results mean? The key point of the study is that many women at Labasa Hospital are not getting enough pain relief after their surgical birth, especially first-time mothers. This shows there is a need to improve pain control methods for these patients. A better pain control could help these mothers get better more comfortably and feel more satisfied with their care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项系统评价和荟萃分析评估了自动刺血装置与手动刺血针或皮下注射针相比在新生儿中的益处。材料与方法:我们遵循了Cochrane手册方法论,使用RoB-2工具进行偏差风险评估,用于不确定性评估的荟萃分析和等级框架的RevMan4.1。我们于2023年11月15日检索了数据库和灰色文献。结果:纳入了六项符合条件的研究,共539名新生儿。自动穿刺装置减少了脚跟刺痛期间和之后的疼痛评分,采样时间和重复穿刺的需要。证据的确定性非常低至中等。结论:新生儿足跟刺优选采用自动穿刺装置,给予更少的痛苦和更高的效率。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023483189。
    这篇文章是关于什么的?脚跟刺痛是新生儿常见的疼痛过程。它可以用皮下注射针或刺血针(手动或自动穿刺装置)进行。很少有研究表明,自动切缝装置,随着深度调节,减少疼痛。我们回顾了现有文献,以评估不同采样方法的益处和危害。结果是什么?我们发现了六项研究,比较了这些干预措施对新生儿脚跟刺痛的影响。疼痛评分明显下降,采样时间和使用自动穿刺装置时需要重复穿刺。研究结果的含义是什么?自动穿刺装置减少了疼痛(更安全),并减少了采样和重复穿刺所需的时间(更有效),当用于新生儿的脚跟穿刺时。
    Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the benefits of an automatic lancing device compared with a manual lancet or a hypodermic needle in neonates. Materials & methods: We followed the Cochrane Handbook methodology, used the RoB-2 tool for risk of bias assessment, RevMan 4.1 for meta-analysis and GRADE framework for certainty assessment. We searched the databases and gray literature on 15 November 2023. Results: Six eligible studies enrolling 539 neonates were included. An automatic lancing device reduced pain scores during and after heel prick, sampling time and the need for repeat puncture. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate. Conclusion: An automatic lancing device is preferred for heel pricks in neonates, given less pain and higher efficiency.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023483189.
    What is this article about? The heel prick is a common painful procedure in neonates. It is performed either with a hypodermic needle or a lancet (manual or automatic lancing device). Few studies have shown that an automatic lancing device, with depth regulation, causes less pain. We reviewed the available literature to assess the benefits and harms of different sampling methods.What were the results? We found six studies comparing these interventions for heel prick in neonates. There was a significant reduction in pain score, sampling time and need for repeated pricks when using an automatic lancing device.What do the results of the study mean? The automatic lancing device causes less pain (safer) and reduces the time required for sampling and repeated pricks (more effective) when used for heel pricks in neonates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:常规使用多模式镇痛方式可降低疼痛评分,副作用和阿片类药物利用率最小。
    方法:前瞻性,横截面,我们在印度各地的骨科医师中进行了观察性研究,以评估使用镇痛药有效治疗骨科疼痛的专业意见.
    结果:共有530名骨科医师参加了本次调查。超过50%的参与者回答曲马多联合或不联合扑热息痛是治疗急性疼痛的选择。近50%的参与者提到多模式干预有时可以帮助控制疼痛。共有55.6%的参与者提到使用非甾体抗炎药是他们临床实践中最常见的,而25.7%的参与者提到他们在临床实践中更常用曲马多。根据临床疗效排名,曲马多加对乙酰氨基酚的组合(44.3%)在镇痛组合中排名第一,其次是醋氯芬酸加对乙酰氨基酚(40.0%)。疼痛的严重程度(62.6%),其次是年龄(60.6%)和治疗持续时间(52.6%)是处方曲马多和扑热息痛联合用药时应考虑的最常见因素。据报道,胃肠和肾脏是镇痛药最常见的安全性问题。
    结论:曲马多和对乙酰氨基酚的组合被认为是用于长期骨科疼痛管理的最优选的镇痛药选择。
    BACKGROUND: The routine use of multimodal analgesic modality results in lower pain scores with minimum side effects and opioid utilization.
    METHODS:  A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted among orthopedicians practicing across India to assess the professional opinions on using analgesics to manage orthopedic pain effectively.
    RESULTS:  A total of 530 orthopedicians participated in this survey. Over 50% of the participants responded that tramadol with or without paracetamol was the choice of therapy for acute pain. Nearly 50% of the participants mentioned that multimodal interventions can sometimes help to manage pain. A total of 55.6% of participants mentioned that using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was the most common in their clinical practice, while 25.7% of participants mentioned that they used tramadol more commonly in their clinical practice. As per clinical efficacy ranking, the combination of tramadol plus paracetamol (44.3%) was ranked first among analgesic combinations, followed by aceclofenac plus paracetamol (40.0%). The severity of pain (62.6%) followed by age (60.6%) and duration of therapy (52.6%) were the most common factors that should be considered while prescribing tramadol plus paracetamol combination. Gastrointestinal and renal are reported as the most common safety concerns encountered with analgesics.
    CONCLUSIONS:  The combination of tramadol and paracetamol was identified as the most preferred choice of analgesics for prolonged orthopedic pain management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究主要集中在肛瘘治疗的手术结果,比如治愈率,而不是患者报告的结果,如术后疼痛,这可能会影响手术选择。
    目的:比较激光闭合和括约肌间结扎术治疗肛瘘术后6和24h的疼痛评分。
    方法:前瞻性,双盲随机对照试验。
    方法:马来西亚一家四级医院。
    方法:年龄在18-75岁的经括约肌高位瘘患者。
    方法:瘘管激光闭合与瘘管道结扎(LIFT)治疗。
    方法:疼痛评分,尿失禁,生活质量(QOL),手术时间,使用卡方比较治疗失败,费希尔的精确检验,学生t检验,或Mann-Whitney,p<0.05表示有统计学意义。
    结果:招募了56名患者(激光,n=28,LIFT,n=28)。术后6小时激光与LIFT的疼痛评分中位数分别为1.0和2.0(休息,p=0.213)和3.0对4.0(运动,p=0.448),分别。在24小时,这减少到2.5在两个手臂在休息(p=0.842),但增加到4.8与3.5在运动(p=0.383)。激光的中位手术时间(32.5分钟)明显短于LIFT(p<0.001)。激光治疗的患者倾向于更快地恢复工作(10.5vs.14.0,p=0.181),但治疗失败相似(54%与50%,p=0.71)。没有患者出现术后尿失禁。平均SF-36评分较基线增加(67.1±17.0;95%CI63.6-82.4vs.71.3±11.4;95%CI64.0-75.0)至术后6个月(77.7±21.0;95%CI57.0-80.3vs.74.0±14.3;95%CI67.6-81.4),与手术类型无关(P>0.05)。
    结论:既往瘘管手术的患者(约20%)导致异质性。递送的总激光能量根据瘘管解剖结构而变化。
    结论:激光瘘管闭合是LIFT的替代方法,具有相似的术后疼痛和更短的手术时间,尽管在激光臂中更复杂的瘘管解剖,生活质量有了更大的提高。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT06212739。
    BACKGROUND: Prior studies focus primarily on surgical outcomes of anal fistula treatment, such as healing rates, rather than patient-reported outcomes, such as postoperative pain, which could influence surgical choice.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare pain scores at 6 and 24 h postoperatively between laser closure and ligation of the intersphincteric tract for anal fistula.
    METHODS: Prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: A quaternary hospital in Malaysia.
    METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years with high transsphincteric fistulas.
    METHODS: Fistula laser closure versus ligation of the fistula tract (LIFT) treatment.
    METHODS: Pain scores, continence, quality of life (QOL), operative time, and treatment failure were compared using chi-square, Fisher\'s exact test, student t-test, or Mann-Whitney with p < 0.05 denoting statistical significance.
    RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were recruited (laser, n = 28, LIFT, n = 28). Median pain scores for laser versus LIFT at 6 h postoperatively were 1.0 versus 2.0 (Rest, p = 0.213) and 3.0 versus 4.0 (Movement, p = 0.448), respectively. At 24 h, this reduced to 2.5 in both arms at rest (p = 0.842) but increased to 4.8 versus 3.5 on movement (p = 0.383). Median operative time for laser was significantly shorter (32.5 min) than LIFT (p < 0.001). Laser treated patients trended toward quicker return to work (10.5 vs. 14.0, p = 0.181) but treatment failure was similar (54% vs. 50%, p = 0.71). No patients developed postoperative incontinence. Mean SF-36 scores increased from baseline (67.1 ± 17.0; 95% CI 63.6-82.4 vs. 71.3 ± 11.4; 95% CI 64.0-75.0) to 6 months postoperatively (77.7 ± 21.0; 95% CI 57.0-80.3 vs. 74.0 ± 14.3; 95% CI 67.6-81.4) regardless of the type of surgery (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior fistula surgery (approximately 20%) led to heterogeneity. The total laser energy delivered varied depending on fistula anatomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laser fistula closure is an alternative to LIFT, with similar postoperative pain and shorter operative time despite more complex fistula anatomy in the laser arm, with a greater improvement in QOL.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06212739.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部麻醉技术对于为痛苦的外科手术提供多模式镇痛是非常宝贵的。这个未来,随机研究描述了在接受骨科手术的兔子中神经刺激器引导的臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)与全身性利多卡因相比。术前用药采用肌内(IM)美托咪定,芬太尼,还有咪达唑仑.诱导麻醉(丙泊酚IV)并用异氟烷维持。九只兔子接受了利多卡因BPB(2%;0.3mLkg-1),八人接受了利多卡因恒速输注(CRI)(2mgkg-1IV,其次是100µgkg-1min-1)。用芬太尼IV提供抢救镇痛。在手术结束时给予卡洛芬。术后疼痛采用兔格里姆斯量表(RGS)和复合疼痛量表进行测定。拔管后2小时根据疼痛评分给予丁丙诺啡。在前两个小时内拍摄兔子以测量行进距离和行为。比较食物摄入量和粪便输出。CRI中的每只兔子都需要术中抢救镇痛,而BPB中没有。然而,两组兔子的疼痛评分相似,术后镇痛给药无差异。在18小时内,食物摄入量或粪便产量没有显着差异,在前两个小时内,旅行距离或检查行为没有显着差异。BPB在术中镇痛方面似乎更优越。术后,两组具有可比性.
    Locoregional anaesthetic techniques are invaluable for providing multimodal analgesia for painful surgical procedures. This prospective, randomised study describes a nerve stimulator-guided brachial plexus blockade (BPB) in rabbits undergoing orthopaedic surgery in comparison to systemic lidocaine. Premedication was provided with intramuscular (IM) medetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam. Anaesthesia was induced (propofol IV) and maintained with isoflurane. Nine rabbits received a lidocaine BPB (2%; 0.3 mL kg-1), and eight received a lidocaine constant rate infusion (CRI) (2 mg kg-1 IV, followed by 100 µg kg-1 min-1). Rescue analgesia was provided with fentanyl IV. Carprofen was administered at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain was determined using the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RGS) and a composite pain scale. Buprenorphine was administered according to the pain score for two hours after extubation. Rabbits were filmed during the first two hours to measure distance travelled and behaviours. Food intake and faeces output were compared. Every rabbit in CRI required intraoperative rescue analgesia compared to none in BPB. However, rabbits in both groups had similar pain scores, and there was no difference in the administration of postoperative analgesia. There were no significant differences in food intake or faeces production over 18 h, and no significant differences in distance travelled or behaviours examined during the first two hours. BPB seems superior for intraoperative analgesia. Postoperatively, both groups were comparable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号