orofacial pain

口面部疼痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)是最常见的非牙源性口腔疼痛,导致发病率和损害。由于许多病因表现出可比的症状并将疼痛指向颞下颌关节(TMJ)区域,TMD提出了诊断挑战。患者可以转诊给牙科专家,而不考虑所有疼痛来源。这项研究旨在确定使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行TMJ评估的患者中可能被误认为是TMD的放射学混杂因素(RC)。
    方法:完成了对2020年7月至2023年6月之间获得的TMJ的369例CBCT口腔颌面放射学报告的审查。相关RC被归类为牙髓病变,阻生牙列,鼻窦病理学,根断裂,软组织钙化,和其他人。卡方检验评估了RC与患者变量之间关系的显著性。
    结果:在369例中的202例(54.7%)中,共发现283个RCs。最常见的发现包括鼻窦异常(32.5%),牙髓病变(15.2%),阻生牙列(12.7%),茎舌骨突伸长/钙化(9.2%)。发现鼻窦病变与TMD征象(P=.009)和性别(P=.001)之间存在显着关联。
    结论:我们的结果表明,模拟TMD相关症状的RCs在进行TMJCBCT成像的患者中普遍存在。
    结论:临床医生在诊断与TMJ相关的投诉时应该注意这些RCs。我们建议临床医生在开始转诊之前首先获得牙齿清除,并调查患者投诉的所有其他潜在来源,以避免不必要的成本和患者护理的延误。
    OBJECTIVE: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common nonodontogenic cause of orofacial pain, leading to morbidity and impairment. TMD presents a diagnostic challenge due to many aetiologies that exhibit comparable symptoms and refer pain to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region. Patients may be referred to dental specialists without accounting for all pain sources. This study aims to identify radiographic confounders (RCs) that can be mistaken for TMD in patients undergoing TMJ assessment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    METHODS: A review of 369 CBCT oral maxillofacial radiology reports of the TMJ acquired between July 2020 and June 2023 was completed. Pertinent RCs were classified as endodontic lesions, impacted dentition, sinus pathologies, root fractures, soft tissue calcifications, and others. The chi-squared test assessed the significance of the relationship between RCs and patient variables.
    RESULTS: A total of 283 RCs were identified in 202 of the 369 cases (54.7%). The most frequent findings included sinus abnormalities (32.5%), endodontic lesions (15.2%), impacted dentition (12.7%), and elongated/calcified stylohyoid process (9.2%). Significant associations were found between sinus pathologies with TMD signs (P = .009) and gender (P = .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that RCs that mimic TMD-related symptoms are prevalent in patients referred for TMJ CBCT imaging.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of these RCs when diagnosing complaints related to the TMJ. We recommend clinicians first obtain dental clearance and investigate all other potential sources of a patient\'s complaint before initiating referrals to avoid unnecessary costs and delays in patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:除呼吸道症状外,COVID-19感染还表现出其他症状,包括口面部疼痛.我们的目标是研究发病率,2022年12月至2023年初中国与COVID-19大流行相关的口面部疼痛的特征和潜在危险因素。
    方法:在福建省进行了横断面调查,中国。收集并分析受试者的人口统计学和特征数据。
    结果:共有1526名受试者回答了调查。COVID-19感染前后口面部疼痛的发病率显着增加。(42.26%与46.52%,P<.001)共有217例(14.22%)在感染COVID-19前出现口面部疼痛的受试者报告了“COVID-19感染伴口面部疼痛”(CIOP)的现象。单因素和多因素logistic回归分析显示,男性(OR=1.761,P<.001)和其他COVID-19症状(OR=1.494,P<.001)可能是CIOP加重的危险因素,而首次感染时间(OR=0.580,P=.004)和喝茶或咖啡的偏好(OR=0.610,P=.003)可能是CIOP加重的保护因素。同时,不关注COVID-19在口服治疗中传播的受试者(OR=0.639,P=.001),女性(OR=0.749,P=0.03),教育水平(OR=1.687,P<.001)和收入水平(OR=1.796,P<.001),PSS-10评分较高(OR=1.076,P<.001),且因感染而服用的药物较多(OR=1.330,P<.001),患者更愿意求医。
    结论:由于COVID-19的流行,口面部疼痛的发病率似乎显着增加;许多因素可以影响CIOP,包括性别,感染期间,和饮料偏好的心理因素,性别,教育和收入水平也会影响寻求牙医的意图。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection shows variant symptoms apart from respiratory symptoms, including the orofacial pain. We aim to research the morbidity, characteristics and potential risk factors of orofacial pain associated with COVID-19 pandemic in China from December 2022 to early 2023.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Fujian Province, China. The demographic and characteristic data of the subjects were collected and analysed.
    RESULTS: A total of 1526 subjects responded to the survey. The morbidity of orofacial pain increased significantly before and after COVID-19 infection. (42.26% vs. 46.52%, P < .001) A total of 217 (14.22%) subjects with orofacial pain before COVID-19 infection reported the phenomenon of \"COVID-19 infection with orofacial pain\" (CIOP). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression showed that male (OR = 1.761, P < .001) and other symptoms of COVID-19 (OR = 1.494, P < .001) may be the risk factors for the aggravation of CIOP, while the time of first infection (OR = 0.580, P = .004) and preference for drinking tea or coffee (OR = 0.610, P = .003) may be the protective factors for the aggravation of CIOP. While, the subjects who did not concern about the spread of COVID-19 in oral treatment (OR = 0.639, P = .001), female (OR = 0.749, P = .03), education level (OR = 1.687, P < .001) and income level (OR = 1.796, P < .001), higher PSS-10 score (OR = 1.076, P < .001), and more drugs taken for infection (OR = 1.330, P < .001) were more willing to seek medical treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity of orofacial pain appears to have increased significantly due to the COVID-19 epidemic; a number of factors can influence the CIOP including gender, infection period, and beverage preference\' psychological factors, gender, education and income level can also influence the intent to seek a dentist.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虚拟现实(VR)已成为治疗急性和慢性疼痛症状的非药物佐剂。这项调查研究的目的是确定来自马里兰州痛苦和繁荣社区的慢性疼痛参与者对VR的可接受性。我们假设疼痛的严重程度和干扰在经历健康差异的群体中有所不同,可能影响VR的可接受性。从2020年3月11日至3月15日,我们调查了一组患有慢性口面部疼痛的临床表型参与者。参与者被要求表达他们参与纵向VR研究的意愿,以及他们对使用VR缓解疼痛的期望。350名患有慢性疼痛的参与者中有70名完成了调查(应答率:20%)。根据他们的邻居困扰,对调查做出回应的可能性没有差异。在调查受访者和非受访者中,相似比例的参与者来自陷入困境的社区。在受访者中,63(90%)和59(84.3%)愿意参与并期望从VR干预中获得疼痛缓解。分别。年龄,性别,种族,邻里困扰,疼痛的严重程度,和以前的VR经验不影响参与VR试验的意愿或VR诱导的改善的预期。这些发现表明,VR作为辅助干预可能被慢性疼痛参与者接受。与邻里层面的健康社会决定因素无关。
    Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a nonpharmacological adjuvant to manage acute and chronic pain symptoms. The goal of this survey study was to determine the acceptability of VR among chronic pain participants hailing from distressed and prosperous neighborhoods in the state of Maryland. We hypothesized that pain severity and interference vary in groups experiencing health disparities, potentially influencing VR\'s acceptability. From March 11 to March 15, 2020, we surveyed a cohort of clinically phenotyped participants suffering from chronic orofacial pain. Participants were asked to express their willingness to participate in a longitudinal VR study and their expectation of pain relief from using VR. Seventy out of 350 participants with chronic pain completed the survey (response rate: 20%). There was no difference in the likelihood of responding to the survey based on their neighborhood distress. Among survey respondents and nonrespondents, similar proportions of participants were from distressed neighborhoods. Among the respondents, 63 (90%) and 59 (84.3%) were willing to participate and expected to experience pain relief from the VR intervention, respectively. Age, sex, race, neighborhood distress, severity of pain, and prior VR experience did not influence willingness to participate in the VR trial or the expectations of VR-induced improvement. These findings suggest that VR as an adjuvant intervention is potentially accepted by chronic pain participants, irrespective of neighborhood-level social determinants of health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1374929。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1374929.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述总结了随机对照试验(RCT)报告的结果,旨在评估与颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)相关的耳鸣患者的不同治疗方法,以及影响治疗结果的可能预测因素。
    方法:电子数据库Medline,WebofScience,截至2023年3月,系统搜索了拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献(LILAC)。本研究仅包括具有全文的RCT。所选RCT的资格是基于PICO模型(参与者,干预,比较器,结果),和任何年龄的受试者,性别或种族,当显示耳鸣和TMD时,通过DC/TMD标准诊断。
    结果:在总共635篇文章中,仅纳入5项RCT,共纳入329名参与者的数据.两项RCT重点研究了多学科方法在患有TMD的耳鸣患者中的疗效;两项RCT检查了预测多学科口面治疗后阳性结果的预后指标;一项RCT分析了Nd:YAG激光低水平激光治疗的有效性。
    结论:多学科非侵入性方法是治疗TMD患者耳鸣的最有效方法。基线耳鸣严重程度,性别,生活质量,年龄,和耳鸣持续时间被认为是诊断为DMT和转诊耳鸣的患者临床结局的预测因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review summarised the results reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at evaluating the different treatment approaches in patients with tinnitus associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) evaluated with the diagnostic criteria of temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), and the possible predictive factors influencing treatment outcomes.
    METHODS: The electronic databases Medline, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACs) were searched systematically up to March 2023. Only RCTs with full texts were included in this study. The eligibility of the RCTs selected was based on the PICO model (participants, intervention, comparators, outcomes), and subjects of any age, sex or ethnicity, were included when showing both tinnitus and TMD, diagnosed through DC/TMD criteria.
    RESULTS: From a total of 635 articles, only five RCTs were included and the data from a total of 329 participants were examined. Two RCTs focused on the efficacy of the multidisciplinary approach among people with tinnitus who have TMD; two RCTs examined prognostic indicators predicting a positive outcome after multidisciplinary orofacial treatment; one RCT analysed low-level laser therapy\'s effectiveness with Nd:YAG laser.
    CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary non-invasive approach is the most efficacious treatment for tinnitus in patients diagnosed with TMD. Baseline tinnitus severity, gender, quality of life, age, and tinnitus duration were considered predictive factors of clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with DMTs and referring tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:很少有研究调查COVID-19大流行期间口腔功能异常习惯的影响。由于一些研究表明颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的体征和症状,以及心理上的改变,在COVID-19大流行封锁期间有所增加,这项研究的目的是调查社会隔离是否会增加口腔功能异常习惯的患病率。
    方法:这是一项观察性病例对照研究。在两个不同的时间(2020年和2021年)对巴西居民进行了一项关于TMD症状(诊断标准症状问卷)和口腔功能异常习惯(口腔行为清单[OBC])的在线调查。根据社会隔离实践将参与者分为研究组(GI:2020,n=507;GIII:2021,n=282)和对照组(GII:2020,n=98;GIV:2021,n=202)。
    结果:在每组中,我们评估了口腔功能异常习惯的频率与TMD症状的相关性,我们观察到,疼痛性TMD较多的个体表现出更多的口腔功能异常习惯。尽管有文献表明,实行社会隔离的人养成了更多的口头超功能习惯,在分析GI×GII和GIII×GIV组中OBC问题的关联时,只有“持续通话”(p=.0022)和“手和肩膀之间的电话”(p=.0124)在GI×GII上有显着差异。肯德尔的一致性系数表明,在所有组中所分析的口腔副功能习惯的等级之间存在非常强的一致性(GI×GII0.9515(p=.0087)和GIII×GIV0.9655(p=.0074))。
    结论:我们可以说,实行社会隔离的个体并没有表现出更多的口腔功能异常习惯。
    OBJECTIVE: Few studies investigated the influence of oral parafunctional habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since some studies have demonstrated that signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), as well as psychological alterations, increased during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, the aim of this study was to investigate whether social isolation is a situation that increases the prevalence of oral parafunctional habits.
    METHODS: This was an observational case-control study. An online survey with questions about TMD symptoms (Diagnostic Criteria Symptom Questionnaire) and oral parafunctional habits (Oral Behaviours Checklist [OBC]) was administered to Brazilian residents at two different times (2020 and 2021). The participants were divided according to social isolation practices into study groups (GI: 2020, n = 507; GIII: 2021, n = 282) and control groups (GII: 2020, n = 98; GIV: 2021, n = 202).
    RESULTS: In each group, we evaluated the association of the frequency of oral parafunctional habits with the symptoms of TMD, and we observed that individuals with a greater presence of painful TMD present a greater number of oral parafunctional habits. Despite the literature showing that individuals who practiced social isolation developed more oral parafunctional habits, when analysing the association of the OBC questions in Groups GI × GII and GIII × GIV, only \'sustained talking\' (p = .0022) and \'hold telephone between your hand and shoulders\' (p = .0124) showed a significant difference in GI × GII. Kendall\'s coefficient of concordance revealed that there was a very strong concordance (GI × GII 0.9515 (p = .0087) and GIII × GIV 0.9655 (p = .0074)) between the ranks of the analysed oral parafunctional habits in all groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: We can state that Individuals who practiced social isolation did not present more oral parafunctional habits than individuals who did not.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于与泰国COVID-19爆发相关的口面部疼痛的数据不足。
    目的:调查发病率,在过去的6年中,新患者的口面部疼痛的诊断和管理,在COVID-19爆发之前和期间。
    方法:对2017年至2022年首次到朱拉隆功牙科医院就诊的新患者的病历进行回顾性调查。确定了样本量,并采用比例分层随机抽样在每年按比例分配样本数。使用在线软件作为抽样策略随机分配每位患者的医院数量。开发了数据收集表格,并用于从数字数据系统收集信息。
    结果:第一次就诊时,1359名患者中的770名(56.7/100人,95%CI:54.0-59.3)报告口面部疼痛定义为急性,慢性和未分类疼痛。根据AAOP分类,最常见的主诉是牙源性疼痛(90.00%)和颞下颌关节紊乱病(6.10%)。在这些患者中,前三名临时改良ICD-10-TM诊断为牙髓疾病(21.95%),阻生牙齿(20.65%)和龋齿(9.09%)。81.87%的牙科学生的临时诊断与牙科专家的最终诊断相符。在COVID-19大流行期间,只有63.38%的口面部疼痛患者得到了完全治疗,常见的手术是手术切除,拔除和根管治疗。
    结论:一半在大学牙科医院寻求三级护理的泰国牙科患者报告口面疼痛,这不受COVID-19大流行的影响。相比之下,在大流行期间,口面区域的功能障碍相关问题显着增加。
    BACKGROUND: There is insufficient data on orofacial pain related to the COVID-19 outbreak in Thailand.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence, diagnosis and management of orofacial pain among new patients over the last 6 years, before and during the COVID-19 outbreak.
    METHODS: Medical records from new patients who first visited Chulalongkorn Dental Hospital between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively investigated. The sample size was determined, and proportional stratified random sampling was employed to distribute the sample number proportionally across each year. The hospital number of each patient was randomised using online software as a sampling strategy. A data collection form was developed and used to gather information from the digital data system.
    RESULTS: At the first visit, 770 out of 1359 patients (56.7/100 people, 95% CI: 54.0-59.3) reported orofacial pain defined as acute, chronic and unclassified pain. The most common chief complaints based on the AAOP classification were odontogenic pain (90.00%) and temporomandibular disorders (6.10%). The top three provisional modified ICD-10-TM diagnoses among these patients were pulp diseases (21.95%), impacted teeth (20.65%) and dental caries (9.09%). 81.87% of dental students\' provisional diagnoses matched the final diagnoses given by dental specialists. Only 63.38% of orofacial pain patients were completely managed during the COVID-19 pandemic with common procedures being surgical removal, extraction and root canal therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Half of Thai dental patients seeking tertiary care at a university dental hospital reported orofacial pain, which was not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, dysfunction-related problems in the orofacial area significantly increased during the pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颞下颌关节紊乱症是口面部疼痛的一个来源。了解评估程序的临床特性对于评估损伤和确定对干预措施的反应是必要的。
    可靠性,最小可检测变化(MDC95),并调查了TMJ检查程序的95%一致性限制。
    闭塞(中切牙对齐,喷射机,过咬合),下颌动力学(最大切牙开口,laterotrusion,突起活动范围(AROM)),听诊,压痛,并对50名无症状成年人(30名女性)进行了关节运动测量,平均年龄24.8岁。评估者间可靠性评估使用了会话内设计。参与者在24-48小时后返回进行评估者内部评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和Kappa值来确定再现性。
    闭塞和AROM的评分者内可靠性为ICC3,1≥0.75,而评分者间可靠性为ICC2,1≥0.68。评估者间关节活动度一致的Kappa值为K=.18,而听诊和触诊为K≥0.48。评分者Kappa值≥0.24,翼状体外侧区触诊的一致性较差。闭塞的MDC95为1毫米,而AROM的范围从3到6毫米。最大切牙开口的平均AROM差异为-1.16、-0.42、-0.18和-0.8mm,左和右侧移,和突出,分别。
    AROM和遮挡测量可以放心地使用;但是,必须认识到关节活动度测量和翼状体外侧触诊的一致性差。重新评估测量时,AROM和遮挡的3-6和1-mm变化,分别,要求95%确定的变化不是由于错误。需要未来的症状人群研究(250/250)。
    UNASSIGNED: Temporomandibular disorders are a source of orofacial pain. Understanding clinimetric properties of evaluation procedures is necessary for assessing impairments and determining response to interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC95), and 95% limits of agreement of TMJ examination procedures were investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: Occlusion (central incisor alignment, overjet, overbite), mandibular dynamics (maximal incisor opening, laterotrusion, protrusion active range of motion (AROM)), auscultation, tenderness, and joint play were measured on 50 asymptomatic adults (30 females), mean age 24.8. The inter-rater reliability assessment used an intra-session design. Participants returned 24-48 h later for intra-rater assessments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Kappa values were used to determine reproducibility.
    UNASSIGNED: Intra-rater reliability for occlusion and AROM was ICC 3,1 ≥ 0.75, whereas interrater reliability was ICC 2,1 ≥ 0.68. Kappa values for inter-rater agreement of joint mobility was K = .18, whereas auscultation and palpation were K ≥ 0.48. Intra-rater Kappa values were ≥ 0.24, with lateral pterygoid region palpation having poor agreement. The MDC95 for occlusion was 1 mm, whereas AROM ranged from 3 to 6 mm. Mean AROM differences between raters were -1.16, -0.42, -0.18, and -0.8 mm for maximal incisor opening, left and right laterotrusion, and protrusion, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: AROM and occlusion measurements may be used with confidence; however, poor agreement for joint mobility measurements and lateral pterygoid region palpation must be recognized. When re-assessing measurements, a 3-6 and 1-mm change in AROM and occlusion, respectively, is required to be 95% certain change is not due to error. Future symptomatic population research is needed (250/250).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类带状疱疹是水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV)感染的结果。向大鼠注射水痘带状疱疹病毒会产生类似于人类带状疱疹“带状疱疹”疼痛的疼痛。.在之前的研究中,通过向雄性大鼠的晶须垫注射VZV引起口面疼痛,并且在减弱杏仁核中央的Neurexin3(Nrxn3)表达后,疼痛反应增加。神经元从中央杏仁核下降到外侧臂旁核,口面疼痛信号上升到外侧臂旁核。中央杏仁核内的GABA能神经元通过抑制臂旁核内的活性来调节疼痛。减轻杏仁核中央Nrxn3的表达会增加臂旁核外侧的GABA释放,这表明Nrxn3通过调节GABA释放来控制疼痛。Nrxn3还可以控制神经元之间的突触连接,我们假设杏仁核中央的Nrxn3敲低会减少臂旁核外侧的GABA能突触连接的数量,并增加VZV相关的疼痛。
    为了测试这个想法,在输注表达突触素的病毒后,对杏仁核中央的GABA能细胞与臂旁核外侧的兴奋性或强啡肽阳性神经元之间的突触连接数量进行了定量.突触素是一种标记神经元突触连接的突触小泡蛋白。在杏仁核中央内注射和不注射晶须垫VZV和敲低Nrxn3的大鼠中测量了这些连接。使用避免位置逃避范式来测量面部疼痛。
    Nrxn3敲除后,臂旁核外侧的GABA能突触连接减少。连接数量减少的大鼠与VZV相关的口面部疼痛增加。疼痛标记前强啡肽的免疫染色表明,GABA能连接的减少主要与前强啡肽阳性神经元有关。
    结果表明Nrxn3减少了VZV相关的口面部疼痛,在某种程度上,通过增强中央杏仁核的GABA细胞和外侧臂旁核内的疼痛神经元之间的突触连接。
    UNASSIGNED: Herpes Zoster in humans is the result of varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection. Injecting rats with varicella zoster virus produces pain similar to herpes zoster \"shingles\" pain in humans. . In a previous study, orofacial pain was induced by injecting the whisker pad of male rats with VZV and the pain response increased after attenuating neurexin 3 (Nrxn3) expression in the central amygdala. Neurons descend from the central amygdala to the lateral parabrachial nucleus and orofacial pain signals ascend to the lateral parabrachial nucleus. GABAergic neurons within the central amygdala regulate pain by inhibiting activity within the lateral parabrachial nucleus. Attenuating Nrxn3 expression in the central amygdala increased GABA release in the lateral parabrachial nucleus suggesting Nrxn3 controls pain by regulating GABA release. Nrxn3 can also control synaptic connections between neurons, and we hypothesized that Nrxn3 knockdown in the central amygdala would reduce the number of GABAergic synaptic connections in the lateral parabrachial nucleus and increase VZV associated pain.
    UNASSIGNED: To test this idea, the number of synaptic connections between GABAergic cells of the central amygdala and excitatory or dynorphin positive neurons within the lateral parabrachial nucleus were quantitated after infusion of a virus expressing synaptophysin. Synaptophysin is a synaptic vesicle protein that labels neuronal synaptic connections. These connections were measured in rats with and without whisker pad injection of VZV and knockdown of Nrxn3 within the central amygdala. Orofacial pain was measured using a place escape avoidance paradigm.
    UNASSIGNED: GABAergic synaptic connections were reduced in the lateral parabrachial nucleus after Nrxn3 knockdown. Rats with a reduction in the number of connections had an increase in VZV associated orofacial pain. Immunostaining with the pain marker prodynorphin indicated that the reduction in GABAergic connections was primarily associated with prodynorphin positive neurons.
    UNASSIGNED: The results suggest Nrxn3 reduces VZV associated orofacial pain, in part, by enhancing synaptic connections between GABA cells of the central amygdala and pain neurons within the lateral parabrachial nucleus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经提出注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT-A)作为患有慢性颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)相关肌筋膜疼痛(MFP)的患者的额外治疗方式。BoNT-A损害肌肉功能,随着它的镇痛作用,应使用最小有效剂量。这项随机安慰剂对照交叉研究的目的是评估中等剂量(50U)BoNT-A的临床益处。
    方法:66名受试者随机分为两组,一个首先接受BoNT-A,第二个首先接受盐水溶液(SS)。在注射后2、11和16周进行随访。使用颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准(DC/TMD)诊断算法根据慢性疼痛分级量表(GCPS)评估特征性疼痛强度(CPI)和疼痛相关残疾。还评估了肌电图和咬合力。
    结果:组内分析显示,在BoNT-A(p<0.001,p=0.005,p=0.011)和SS(p=0.003,p=0.005,p=0.046)注射后,直到第16周,疼痛强度和疼痛相关残疾都有显著改善。疼痛相关变量的组间分析显示,组间在任何时候都没有差异。尽管如此,BoNT-A,但不是SS,导致肌肉性能显著下降。在第2、11和16周的随访中,关于临床上显着疼痛减轻(≥30%)所需的治疗数量(NNT)为6.3、57.0和19.0,有利于BoNT-A。
    结论:注射50UBoNT-A可能会改善MFP症状,但与安慰剂相比,该药物对疼痛的具体作用并不明显。
    BACKGROUND: Injections of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) have been proposed as an additional treatment modality for patients suffering chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-related myofascial pain (MFP). BoNT-A impairs muscle function, along with its analgesic effect, and a minimal effective dose should be used. The objective of this randomized placebo-controlled crossover study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of a moderate dose (50 U) of BoNT-A.
    METHODS: Sixty-six subjects were randomized into two groups, one which received BoNT-A first and a second which received a saline solution (SS) first. Follow-ups were performed 2, 11, and 16 weeks after the injections. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) diagnostic algorithms were used to evaluate characteristic pain intensity (CPI) and pain-related disability based on the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS). Electromyographic and bite force were also evaluated.
    RESULTS: The within-group analysis showed a significant improvement in pain intensity and pain-related disability after BoNT-A (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.011) and SS (p = 0.003, p = 0.005, p = 0.046) injections up to week 16. The between-group analysis of pain-related variables revealed no differences between groups at any time. Nonetheless, BoNT-A, but not SS, caused a significant decline in muscle performance. The number needed to treat (NNT) regarding a clinically significant pain reduction (≥30%) was 6.3, 57.0, and 19.0 at 2, 11, and 16-week follow-ups favoring BoNT-A.
    CONCLUSIONS: Injections of 50 U of BoNT-A might improve MFP symptoms, but the specific effect of the drug on pain compared to the placebo is not obvious.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号