organ transplant

器官移植
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏关于小儿实体器官移植受者SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种率和替沙格维单抗-西加维单抗(TC)摄取的数据。我们研究的目的是评估这些比率。
    方法:我们回顾了儿科心脏受者的疫苗接种记录,肾,在梅奥诊所进行肝移植,罗切斯特,MN,他在2011年1月至2021年12月期间接受了移植。2022年9月1日或之前收到的所有SARS-CoV-2疫苗和TC剂量,即二价SARS-CoV2疫苗的批准日期,包括在内。我们还评估了患者在过去6个月中是否被传染病医生(ID)看过。
    结果:我们的研究包括110例患者:47例肾脏,36心,和27名肝移植受者。记录的所有疫苗剂量均为单价SARS-CoV-2疫苗。68例(61.8%)患者至少接种了一种疫苗。这因年龄组而异,f≥12岁,40.9%的5-11岁儿童和14.3%的5岁以下儿童(p=0.001)。7名患者(6.4%)的年龄是最新的(UTD)。不同器官类型的UTD状态没有差异(p=0.335)。看到ID的患者更有可能是UTD(13.2%对2.8%;p=0.047)。在那些符合条件的人中,14(18.2%)收到TC,根据移植器官类型(p=0.158)或是否看到ID(p=0.273),比率没有差异。
    结论:尽管有疫苗,在二价疫苗发布时,近40%的小儿实体器官移植受者仍未接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗.不到五分之一的合格患者接受了TC。应进一步探索在该弱势群体中增加SARS-CoV-2疫苗和辅助药物吸收的策略。
    BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rates and tixagevimab-cilgavimab (TC) uptake among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of our study was to assess these rates.
    METHODS: We reviewed vaccination records of pediatric recipients of heart, kidney, and liver transplants at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, who received a transplant between January 2011 and December 2021. All SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and doses of TC received on or before September 1, 2022, the date of approval of the bivalent SARS-CoV2 vaccine, were included. We also assessed whether patients had been seen by an infectious diseases physician (ID) in the preceding 6 months.
    RESULTS: Our study included 110 patients: 47 kidney, 36 heart, and 27 liver transplant recipients. All vaccine doses recorded were monovalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Sixty-eight (61.8%) patients received at least one vaccine. This varied by age group, with f of ≥12 years olds, 40.9% of 5-11 year olds and 14.3% of under 5 year olds (p = 0.001). Seven patients (6.4%) were up-to-date (UTD) for age. There was no difference in UTD status by organ type (p = 0.335). Patients who saw ID were significantly more likely to be UTD (13.2% versus 2.8%; p = 0.047). Among those eligible, 14 (18.2%) received TC, with rates not different based on transplanted organ type (p = 0.158) or whether they saw ID (p = 0.273).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of vaccines, nearly 40% of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients remained unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 at time of the bivalent vaccine release. Less than a fifth of eligible patients received TC. Strategies to increase uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as well as adjunctive agents among this vulnerable group should be further explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球每年收集超过1.18亿次献血。血液制品的接受者包括那些经历重大创伤或手术的人,有急性失血和贫血,或者骨髓功能受损。实体器官移植受者通常需要输血血液制品,这使他们面临输血相关不良事件的风险,包括输血传播的感染。国家血液警戒网络记录了一般人群中输血传播感染率低。输血传播的感染继续发生在实体器官移植患者中,并且主要是由于献血者生物警戒过程中存在的差距。新出现的传染病突出了供体-受体途径在施用安全血液制品方面的现有差距。本文回顾了献血者生物警戒的当前过程和监管,包括供体筛查和微生物检测,突出文献中记录的输血传播感染病例,并解决了可以改善生物警戒的方法,重点关注实体器官移植的影响。
    Over 118 million blood donations are collected globally each year. Recipients of blood products include those who experience major trauma or surgery, have acute blood loss and anemia, or impaired bone marrow function. Solid organ transplant recipients often require transfusion of blood products which places them at risk of transfusion-associated adverse events including transfusion-transmitted infection. National hemovigilance networks have documented low rates of transfusion-transmitted infection in the general population. Incidence transfusion-transmitted infection continues to occur in solid organ transplant patients and arises mainly from existing gaps in blood donor biovigilance processes. Emerging infectious diseases have highlighted existing gaps in the donor-recipient pathway to administering safe blood products. This article reviews the current process and regulatory oversight of blood donor biovigilance, including donor screening and microbiological testing, highlights cases of transfusion-transmitted infection documented in the literature, and addresses ways in which biovigilance may be improved, with a focus on the impact of solid organ transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非理想的供体提供可接受的同种异体移植物,并可能扩大供体库。这项研究评估了美国超过15年的实体器官对供体的利用。方法:我们分析了OPTNSTAR数据库,以识别三个供体时代的潜在供体:2005-2009年,2010-2014年和2015-2019年。通过综合捐赠者利用率评分(DUS)分析捐赠者,包括供体年龄和合并症。感兴趣的结果是总体和器官特异性供体利用。进行描述性分析和多变量逻辑回归建模。P值<0.01被认为是显著的。结果:132,465名捐献者,32,710(24.7%)被确定为非理想捐赠者(NID),基于DUS≥3。与理想捐赠者(ID)相比,NID年龄较大(中位数为56岁,IQR51-64年vs.35年,22-48岁,p<0.001),女性更常见(44.3%vs.39.1%,p<0.001),黑色(22.1%与14.6%,p<0.001)和肥胖(60.7%vs.19.6%,p<0.001)。从第1时代到第2时代(OR1.227,95%CI1.123-1.341,p<0.001)和第3时代(OR1.504,1.376-1.643,p<0.001),而DCD供体在NID中的利用率在Eras之间没有统计学差异。与时代1相比,在时代2(OR0.882,0.822-0.946)和时代3(OR0.938,0.876-1.004,p=0.002)中,从NID利用DBD进行肾移植的可能性较低。与第1时代相比,第3时代的肝脏使用NID的可能性增加(OR1.511,1.411-1.618,p<0.001),心脏(OR1.523,1.415-1.862,p<0.001),和肺(OR2.251,2.011-2.520,p<0.001)。结论:使用跨器官的NID的通用定义,NID捐助者的利用正在增加;然而,使用DUS可能会提高资源利用率,从而在多器官捐献的可能性最高时确定捐献者.
    Background: Non-ideal donors provide acceptable allografts and may expand the donor pool. This study evaluates donor utilization across solid organs over 15-years in the United States. Methods: We analyzed the OPTN STAR database to identify potential donors across three donor eras: 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. Donors were analyzed by a composite Donor Utilization Score (DUS), comprised of donor age and comorbidities. Outcomes of interest were overall and organ-specific donor utilization. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed. p-values < 0.01 considered significant. Results: Of 132,465 donors, 32,710 (24.7%) were identified as non-ideal donors (NID), based on a DUS ≥ 3. Compared to ideal donors (ID), NID were older (median 56 years, IQR 51-64 years vs. 35 years, 22-48 years, p < 0.001) and more frequently female (44.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001), Black (22.1% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001) and obese (60.7% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). The likelihood of overall DBD utilization from NID increased from Era 1 to Era 2 (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.123-1.341, p < 0.001) and Era 3 (OR 1.504, 1.376-1.643, p < 0.001), while DCD donor utilization in NID was not statistically different across Eras. Compared to Era 1, the likelihood of DBD utilization from NID for kidney transplantation was lower in Era 2 (OR 0.882, 0.822-0.946) and Era 3 (OR 0.938, 0.876-1.004, p = 0.002). The likelihood of NID utilization increased in Era 3 compared to Era 1 for livers (OR 1.511, 1.411-1.618, p < 0.001), hearts (OR 1.623, 1.415-1.862, p < 0.001), and lungs (OR 2.251, 2.011-2.520, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using a universal definition of NID across organs, NID donor utilization is increasing; however, use of DUS may improve resource utilization in identifying donors at highest likelihood for multi-organ donation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    毛霉菌病是一种主要影响免疫受损宿主的新兴疾病,但是对于实体器官移植受者(SOTRs)的证据很少.我们系统地回顾了发生在SOTRs中的183例,探索流行病学,临床特征,致病性病原体,治疗方法,和结果。肾移植占病例的一半,其次是心脏(18.6%),肝脏(16.9%),和肺(10.4%)。诊断显示二分分布,63.7%的病例在移植后100天内报告,20.6%发生在移植后至少1年。90天和1年死亡率分别为36.3%和63.4%,分别。播散性疾病在两个时间点的死亡率最高(75%和93%)。>3种免疫抑制药物治疗对90天死亡率有显著影响(比值比[OR],2.33;95%CI,1.02-5.66;P=.0493),播散性疾病表现(或,8.23;95%CI,2.20-36.71;P=.0027)和糖尿病的存在(OR,2.35;95%CI,1.01-5.65;P=.0497)。值得注意的是,我们对12例使用两性霉素B进行了预防,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并评估在高风险SOTR中实施预防方案的可能性.
    Mucormycosis is an emerging disease primarily affecting the immunocompromised host, but scarce evidence is available for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). We systematically reviewed 183 cases occurring in SOTRs, exploring epidemiology, clinical characteristics, causative pathogens, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes. Kidney transplants accounted for half of the cases, followed by heart (18.6%), liver (16.9%), and lung (10.4%). Diagnosis showed a dichotomous distribution, with 63.7% of cases reported within 100 days of transplantation and 20.6% occurring at least 1 year after transplant. The 90-day and 1-year mortality rates were 36.3% and 63.4%, respectively. Disseminated disease had the highest mortality at both time points (75% and 93%). Treatment with >3 immunosuppressive drugs showed a significant impact on 90-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.02-5.66; P = .0493), as did a disseminated disease manifestation (OR, 8.23; 95% CI, 2.20-36.71; P = .0027) and the presence of diabetes (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.01-5.65; P = .0497). Notably, prophylaxis was administered to 12 cases with amphotericin B. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings and to evaluate the potential implementation of prophylactic regimens in SOTRs at high risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    意向治疗分析跟随患者从上市到死亡,不管他们的移植状态如何,并旨在提供一个更全面的成人实体器官移植进展的范围。
    许多研究表明,成人肾脏在等待名单和移植后存活率方面取得了进展,肝脏,心,和肺移植,但有必要为患者及其家人提供更全面的移植结果。
    单变量和多变量Cox回归分析用于分析肾脏列出的813,862名成年人的意向治疗生存率的因素,肝脏,心,和肺移植。Kaplan-Meier方法用于检查候补名单的变化,移植后,和治疗生存的意图。移植率比较采用χ2检验。
    肝脏的治疗意向生存率稳步增加,心,和肺移植。在1年内移植的患者的心脏(52.9%的57.4%)和肺(33.2%的73.5%)的百分比显着增加。然而,1年内接受肾移植的患者比例从35.8%显著下降至21.2%.值得注意的是,尽管等待名单和移植后存活率增加,但肾脏的意向治疗存活率下降,可能是因为移植率下降。
    肝脏的生存率稳步提高,心,和30年研究期间的肺移植。分配政策的不断进步,免疫抑制,对等待名单上的患者进行更好的护理可能有助于进一步改善所有器官的预后,但是供体肾脏的供需差异越来越大,这令人担忧,并阻碍了肾脏意向治疗生存率的提高。
    UNASSIGNED: Intent-to-treat analysis follows patients from listing to death, regardless of their transplant status, and aims to provide a more holistic scope of the progress made in adult solid-organ transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: Many studies have shown progress in waitlist and post-transplant survival for adult kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants, but there is a need to provide a more comprehensive perspective of transplant outcomes for patients and their families.
    UNASSIGNED: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to analyze factors contributing to intent-to-treat survival in 813,862 adults listed for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine changes in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Transplantation rates were compared using χ2 tests.
    UNASSIGNED: Intent-to-treat survival has steadily increased for liver, heart, and lung transplants. The percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased for heart (57.4% from 52.9%) and lung (73.5% from 33.2%). However, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly decreased from 35.8% to 21.2% for kidney transplant. Notably, intent-to-treat survival has decreased for kidneys despite increases in waitlist and post-transplant survival, likely because of the decreased transplant rate.
    UNASSIGNED: Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved for liver, heart, and lung transplant over the 30-year study period. Continued advancements in allocation policy, immunosuppression, and improved care of patients on the waitlist may contribute to further progress in outcomes of all organs, but the increasing discrepancy in supply and demand of donor kidneys is alarming and has impeded the progress of kidney intent-to-treat survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:二价mRNA疫苗,旨在对抗新兴的SARS-CoV-2变种,纳入祖先菌株和一个新的变体。我们的研究评估了二价mRNA疫苗接种后瑞士HIV队列研究(SHCS)和瑞士移植队列研究(STCS)先前接种过疫苗的个体的免疫反应。
    方法:符合条件的SHCS和STCS参与者在临床常规范围内接受了批准的二价mRNASARS-CoV-2疫苗(mRNA-1273.214或BA.1适应的BNT162b2)。在基线时收集血样,4周,8周,接种疫苗后6个月。我们分析了抗刺突蛋白抗体反应≥1642单位/ml(表明对SARS-CoV-2感染具有保护作用)的参与者比例,并且在子样本T细胞反应(包括平均浓度)中,按队列和人群特征对结果进行分层。
    结果:在SHCS参与者中,在87%(96/112)中观察到基线抗刺药抗体浓度≥1642,在随访中达到近100%。在STCS参与者中,58%(35/60)的基线抗体≥1642,在6个月时增加到80%。除了肺移植受者,所有参与者的几何平均抗体浓度在第4周时增加5倍,在第6个月时减少一半.在基线,96%(26/27)的SHCS参与者和36%(16/45)的STCS参与者的T细胞反应呈阳性(6个月时适度增加至53%)。很少有参与者报告SARS-CoV-2感染,副作用,或严重不良事件。
    结论:二价mRNA疫苗在HIV或实体器官移植患者中引起了强烈的体液应答,肺移植受者的反应延迟。尽管效果减弱,6个月时抗体水平仍然很高,不良事件罕见.
    BACKGROUND: Bivalent mRNA vaccines, designed to combat emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, incorporate ancestral strains and a new variant. Our study assessed the immune response in previously vaccinated individuals of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) following bivalent mRNA vaccination.
    METHODS: Eligible SHCS and STCS participants received approved bivalent mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (mRNA-1273.214 or BA.1-adapted BNT162b2) within clinical routine. Blood samples were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post vaccination. We analyzed the proportion of participants with anti-spike protein antibody response ≥1642 units/ml (indicating protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection), and in a subsample T-cell response (including mean concentrations), stratifying results by cohorts and population characteristics.
    RESULTS: In SHCS participants, baseline anti-spike antibody concentrations ≥1642 were observed in 87% (96/112), reaching nearly 100% at follow-ups. Among STCS participants, 58% (35/60) had baseline antibodies ≥1642, increasing to 80% at 6 months. Except for lung transplant recipients, all participants showed a five-fold increase in geometric mean antibody concentrations at 4 weeks and a reduction by half at 6 months. At baseline, T-cell responses were positive in 96% (26/27) of SHCS participants and 36% (16/45) of STCS participants (moderate increase to 53% at 6 months). Few participants reported SARS-CoV-2 infections, side-effects, or serious adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bivalent mRNA vaccination elicited a robust humoral response in individuals with HIV or solid organ transplants, with delayed responses in lung transplant recipients. Despite a waning effect, antibody levels remained high at 6 months and adverse events were rare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年里,细胞疗法彻底改变了一些疾病的治疗,获得了成为治疗学“第三支柱”的定义。特别是,研究了输注调节性T细胞(Tregs)用于预防和控制自身免疫反应和急性/慢性同种异体移植排斥反应。这种方法代表了一种有希望的治疗自身免疫性疾病的新疗法,以恢复对自身抗原的免疫耐受。并防止对同种抗原的免疫反应。体外扩增的多克隆和抗原特异性Treg输注在治疗大量自身免疫性疾病中的功效已在小鼠模型中得到广泛证明。同样,实验工作记录了Treg输注预防急性和慢性同种异体移植物排斥的功效。Treg疗法在控制1型糖尿病(T1D)和克罗恩病方面显示出令人鼓舞的结果,系统性红斑狼疮,自身免疫性肝炎和延迟移植排斥的临床试验。然而,在如何将这些治疗性治疗应用于临床方面,尚未完全了解Treg扩展的最佳方法以及不同类型Treg的优缺点。这篇综述提供了基于Treg输注的治疗在自身免疫性疾病和同种异体移植中的最新概述。当前的技术挑战,以及这种治疗方法的优点和缺点。\"
    In the last decade, cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of some diseases, earning the definition of being the \"third pillar\" of therapeutics. In particular, the infusion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) is explored for the prevention and control of autoimmune reactions and acute/chronic allograft rejection. Such an approach represents a promising new treatment for autoimmune diseases to recover an immunotolerance against autoantigens, and to prevent an immune response to alloantigens. The efficacy of the in vitro expanded polyclonal and antigen-specific Treg infusion in the treatment of a large number of autoimmune diseases has been extensively demonstrated in mouse models. Similarly, experimental work documented the efficacy of Treg infusions to prevent acute and chronic allograft rejections. The Treg therapy has shown encouraging results in the control of type 1 diabetes (T1D) as well as Crohn\'s disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune hepatitis and delaying graft rejection in clinical trials. However, the best method for Treg expansion and the advantages and pitfalls with the different types of Tregs are not fully understood in terms of how these therapeutic treatments can be applied in the clinical setting. This review provides an up-to-date overview of Treg infusion-based treatments in autoimmune diseases and allograft transplantation, the current technical challenges, and the highlights and disadvantages of this therapeutic approaches.\"
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伏立康唑暴露与皮肤癌有关,但尚不清楚其代谢表型的全谱如何影响这种关联。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定通过CYP2C19代谢状态测量的伏立康唑代谢变化如何与患者发展的皮肤癌总数和治疗后首次皮肤癌的发展速度相关。有1,739例器官移植受者具有CYP2C19表型数据。其中,134人暴露于伏立康唑。根据伏立康唑的暴露,移植后皮肤癌的数量有显著差异,代谢表型,以及这两者的相互作用(三者均p<0.01)。这种增加主要是由于伏立康唑暴露的快速代谢中鳞状细胞癌的数量(两者均p<0.01)。与未接触伏立康唑的患者相比,暴露于伏立康唑的患者发生皮肤癌的速度更快(Fine-Grey危险比1.78,95%置信区间1.19-2.66)。这种关联类似地由SCC的发展驱动(精细-灰色危险比1.83,95%置信区间1.14-2.94)。伏立康唑代谢的差异与移植后发生的皮肤癌数量增加有关,特别是SCC。
    Voriconazole exposure is associated with skin cancer, but it is unknown how the full spectrum of its metabolizer phenotypes impacts this association. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine how variation in metabolism of voriconazole as measured by metabolizer status of CYP2C19 is associated with the total number of skin cancers a patient develops and the rate of development of the first skin cancer after treatment. There were 1,739 organ transplant recipients with data on CYP2C19 phenotype. Of these, 134 were exposed to voriconazole. There was a significant difference in the number of skin cancers after transplant based on exposure to voriconazole, metabolizer phenotype, and the interaction of these two (p < 0.01 for all three). This increase was driven primarily by number of squamous cell carcinomas among rapid metabolizes with voriconazole exposure (p < 0.01 for both). Patients exposed to voriconazole developed skin cancers more rapidly than those without exposure (Fine-Grey hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.66). This association was similarly driven by development of SCC (Fine-Grey hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.94). Differences in voriconazoles metabolism are associated with an increase in the number of skin cancers developed after transplant, particularly SCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号