Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant risk of recurrence following surgical treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that perioperative factors, particularly anesthetic techniques, may influence cancer recurrence rates. This comprehensive review aims to critically analyze the impact of various anesthetic techniques on colorectal cancer recurrence. We explore the distinct immunomodulatory and inflammatory effects of general, regional, and combined anesthetic approaches and their potential influence on tumor biology. The review synthesizes findings from clinical studies, experimental research, and theoretical models, highlighting the differential impact of anesthetic choices on long-term oncological outcomes. By examining recurrence rates, immune responses, and inflammatory markers associated with different anesthetic techniques, this review provides a holistic understanding of the role of anesthetic management in colorectal cancer surgery. Our findings suggest that anesthetic techniques can modulate the immune and inflammatory responses in ways that may affect tumor recurrence, underscoring the need for further research to optimize anesthetic protocols. The review offers clinical recommendations based on current evidence and identifies gaps in knowledge, proposing directions for future investigations. This comprehensive analysis aims to inform clinical practice and guide future research, ultimately improving long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether initial tumor burden at biopsy could predict adverse features after radical prostatectomy (RP) in International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 1 prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in six referral centers. The cohort included patients with ISUP 1 PCa at systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy. We defined a high tumor burden at biopsy if ≥ 20% of cores were positive. The endpoint of the study was adverse features at RP, defined as ≥ pT3a stage and/or N1 and/or ISUP ≥ 3. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess associations between different thresholds on biopsy (percentage of positive cores [PPC] ≥ 25%, ≥ 33%, ≥ 50%, bilateral positivity and positive cores > 3) and adverse features. As the number of targeted biopsies sampled may influence the number of positive cores, we used a virtual biopsy model in which all targeted biopsy results were interpreted as a single targeted biopsy.
RESULTS: A total of 312 contemporary patients were included. At final pathology, 99 patients (32%) had adverse features. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no statistical association between PPC > 20% and adverse features (OR = 1.22; 95%CI:0.69-2.22, p = 0.5). In sensitivity analysis, tumor burden at biopsy was not associated with the risk of adverse features, regardless of the definition used (all p > 0.05). When we considered a unique virtual targeted biopsy, tumor burden remained not associated with adverse features (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: ISUP 1 PCa tumor burden at biopsy did not predict adverse features in this study, suggesting that it should not be used alone as an exclusion criterion when assessing eligibility for active surveillance.

BACKGROUND:   Prostate cancer has a variable natural history and, despite the existence of biochemical recurrence (BCR) predictors, they are still limited in predicting outcomes.  The role of testosterone in advanced prostate cancer is well known, however its role in localized prostate cancer is still uncertain.  In the present study, we evaluated the relationship of testosterone levels and androgen receptor (AR) expression with oncological and functional outcomes, in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
METHODS:   Through a retrospective study, patients who underwent RRP, who had at least two preoperative total testosterone dosages, were analyzed and compared according to testosterone levels, oncological and functional outcomes.  After analyzing data, tissue samples were selected in a biorepository to carry out the AR and the AR-V7 expression.
RESULTS:   After applying exclusion criteria, 212 patients were included in the analysis.  Thirty-two patients (15.1%) had low testosterone levels and, in this group, a lower rates of erectile function recovery were observed at 24 months (53.1% vs. 71.7%; p = 0.037), a higher rate of BCR (21.9% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.041) and higher International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade in biopsy products.  The AR expression was higher in patients with low testosterone, but there was no difference in relapse rates.
CONCLUSIONS:   Lower levels of testosterone were related to lower rates of erectile function recovery at the end of 24 months after RRP, in addition to conferring higher rates of BCR and higher ISUP grades in biopsy.  Furthermore, patients with total testosterone < 300 ng/dL had higher expression of AR, but no difference in BCR rates.

Aim The effects of conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer on perioperative clinical and long-term oncological outcomes are still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of conversion to laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer on perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. Material and methods Between January 2019 and December 2023, 84 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer at a single academic center were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were classified and compared as the laparoscopic (LAP-G) and converted (CONV-G) groups. Perioperative, pathological, and long-term oncological outcomes were compared. Results Of the 84 consecutive patients included, 18 were converted to open surgery, leading to a 21.4% conversion rate. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in CONV-G (180 ml vs. 80 ml, p<0.001), but early clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. The median follow-up period was 23.5 (range 3-65) and 30.5 (range 6-61) months in the LAP-G and CONV-G, respectively, and recurrence occurred in 11 (16.7%) and 3 (16.6%) patients, respectively. Three-year overall survival was 96.9% and 89.4% (p=0.609) and 3-year disease-free survival was 92.4% and 83.3% (p=0.881) in LAP-G and CONV-G, respectively, and the results were similar. Conclusion Conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery does not have a significant negative impact on morbidity and long-term oncological outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and midterm oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) extended thymectomy for patients with large resectable thymomas compared to small thymomas.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 204 thymoma patients who underwent RATS extended thymectomy between January 2003 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the thymoma size (5cm threshold).
RESULTS: The study comprised 114 patients (55.9%) in the small thymoma (ST) group and 90 patients (44.1%) in the large thymoma (LT) group. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding gender, age, proportion of elderly patients, or pathologic high-risk classifications. Apart from a longer operative time (p=0.009) in the LT group, no differences were observed between the two groups regarding surgical parameters and postoperative outcomes. No deaths occurred within 30 days in either group. During a median follow-up of 61.0 months (95% CI: 48.96-73.04), four patients experienced recurrence (1.96%). No significant differences in the five-year overall survival (OS) rate (p=0.25) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (p=0.43) were observed between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: RATS extended thymectomy is technically feasible, safe, and effective for treating large resectable thymomas. Moreover, midterm outcomes for patients with completely resected large thymomas were comparable to those with small thymomas during a median follow-up period of up to five years.

UNASSIGNED: Despite advances in lung cancer treatment and the subsequent improvement in oncological outcomes, the optimal frequency of radiological follow-up remains unclear. Current recommendations lack consensus and do not consider individual patient characteristics and tumor factors. This study aimed to examine the impact of radiological follow-up frequency on oncological outcomes following lung cancer resection.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective multicenter study, involving patients who underwent anatomical lung resection in the GEVATS database between December 2016 and March 2018. The relationship between surveillance frequency and oncological outcomes was evaluated. Two groups were established based on follow-up frequency: low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor stage, histology, lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the groups.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,916 patients were included in the study, LF 444 (23.17%), HF 1,472 (76.83%). Factors associated with HF surveillance included higher stage, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Subanalyses were performed after PSM for various factors, revealing significant differences between LF and HF groups in cancer-specific survival among who received adjuvant therapy {LF 53.021 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 48.622-57.421] vs. HF 58.836 months (95% CI: 55.343-62.330); HR 0.453, 95% CI: 0.242-0.849; P=0.013}, as well as overall survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma [LF 54.394 months (95% CI: 51.424-57.364) vs. HF 61.578 months (95% CI: 59.091-64.065); HR 0.491, 95% CI: 0.299-0.806; P=0.005] and those who received adjuvant therapy LF 50.176 months [95% CI: 45.609-54.742) vs. HF 57.189 months (95% CI: 53.599-60.778); HR 0.503, 95% CI: 0.293-0.865; P=0.013].
UNASSIGNED: Findings suggest that high-frequency surveillance only improves survival outcomes in lung cancer patients who received adjuvant treatment or had squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, future guidelines for lung cancer follow-up should consider individualizing the frequency of radiological surveillance based on patients\' risk profiles.

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, locally advanced scalp malignancies have been managed through composite, full-thickness calvarial resection. The aim of this study is to explore the oncologic outcomes of partial calvarial resection for locally invasive scalp malignancies without medullary space invasion, employing a burr-down approach.
METHODS: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Tertiary referral center.
METHODS: This study analyzed records of 26 adult patients diagnosed with scalp cancer that spread to the calvarial region. Data collected included demographics, medical history, adjuvant therapy details, imaging, surgical outcomes, and postoperative oncological results.
RESULTS: 26 patients with cancerous scalp lesions necessitating calvarial resection for deep margin control were identified in 22 men and 4 women. Mean age at diagnosis was 72.7 years. The most common histopathological diagnosis was Squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16). Partial removal of the calvarial lesions was achieved in all patients without any intraoperative complications. Twelve patients received adjuvant therapy consisting of the following modalities: radiation (6), chemotherapy (1), immunotherapy (1), a combination of immunotherapy and radiation (2), and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (2). There was a total of 7 recurrences: local (n = 3,11.5 %), regional (n = 3,11.5 %), distal (n = 1,3.8 %). Long term local control was achieved in (n = 23,88.4 %) of patients. The mean time of follow-up was 19.1 months, and the mean time to recurrence was 15.1 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial calvarial resection represents a viable, safe, and effective surgical technique for cancerous tissue removal, reducing risks associated with full thickness calvarial resection, and enhancing soft tissue healing when compared to the established gold standard.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative radiotherapy (PRT) and pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) prior to mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer have the potential to reduce radiation late-effects and expedite oncologic treatment. Recent feasibility work indicates that PCRT is safe and technically possible. Here, we present a systematic review of currently available data on clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes.
METHODS: A prospectively registered search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), EMCARE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) databases was performed in August 2023. Clinical, oncological, reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes were appraised with risk of bias (ROBINS-I) and methodological quality determined (STROBE checklist) for each study.
RESULTS: Twenty-two published articles (19 journal articles and 3 abstracts) were identified reporting the outcomes of 1258 patients with median follow-up between 19.0-212.4 months. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 20 studies. Rates of locoregional recurrence and overall survival ranged between 0-21.7% and 82.0%-98.3% respectively. Rates of flap loss or necrosis ranged from 0-7.6%. Rates of revisional procedures ranged between 1.9-35.3%. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 7 studies and were mostly \'good\' or \'excellent\'.
CONCLUSIONS: PRT and PCRT preceding mastectomy and breast reconstruction produce acceptable oncological outcomes with rates of surgical complication and reconstructive outcomes within normal limits, however, the majority of available studies are of low methodological quality and at high risk of bias. A pragmatic randomised trial comparing PRT versus PMRT in the setting of breast reconstruction is now urgently required to guide surgical practice.

BACKGROUND: Previously, in a randomised trial we demonstrated bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) could achieve a higher detrusor sampling rate than monopolar TURBT. We hereby report the long-term oncological outcomes following study intervention.
METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial comparing monopolar and bipolar TURBT. Only patients with pathology of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) were included in the analysis. Per-patient analysis was performed. Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: From the initial trial, 160 cases were randomised to receive monopolar or bipolar TURBT. 24 cases of non-urothelial carcinoma, 22 cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and 9 cases of recurrences were excluded. A total of 97 patients were included in the analysis, with 46 in the monopolar and 51 in the bipolar group. The median follow-up was 97.1 months. Loss-to-follow-up rate was 7.2%. Regarding the primary outcome of RFS, there was no significant difference (HR = 0.731; 95%CI = 0.433-1.236; P = 0.242) between the two groups. PFS (HR = 1.014; 95%CI = 0.511-2.012; P = 0.969), CSS (HR = 0.718; 95%CI = 0.219-2.352; P = 0.584) and OS (HR = 1.135; 95%CI = 0.564-2.283; P = 0.722) were also similar between the two groups. Multifocal tumours were the only factor that was associated with worse RFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the superiority in detrusor sampling rate, bipolar TURBT was unable to confer long-term oncological benefits over monopolar TURBT.

Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of developing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to high recurrence rate of UTUC in contralateral kidney and ureter, and high risk of complications related to surgery and anesthesia, whether it\'s necessary to remove both kineys and ureters at one time remains in debate. We utilized Taiwanese UTUC Registry Database to valuate the difference of oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with ESRD with unilateral and bilateral UTUC receiving surgical resection. Patients with ESRD and UTUC were divided into three groups, unilateral UTUC, previous history of unilateral UTUC with metachronous contralateral UTUC, and concurrent bilatetral UTUC. Oncological outcomes, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stays were investiaged. We found that there is no diffence of oncological outcomes including overall survival, cancer specific survival, disease free survival and bladder recurrence free survival between these three groups. Complication rate and length of hospital stay are similar. Adverse oncological features such as advanced tumor stage, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margin would negatively affect oncological outcomes.