nutritional assessment

营养评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    营养不良是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,导致全球发病率和死亡率增加。多达50%的老年患者因这种情况而住院。在这次审查中,我们重点分析了当前老年人群营养不良的诊断标准,并提出了有希望的解决方案。目前使用的诊断方法,如BMI或血清白蛋白水平不足以表明营养不良,这受到许多因素的影响,包括慢性病的数量,服用多种药物,或身体状况。此外,目前的建议是不够的,因为它们没有考虑到各种因素,如慢性疾病,多种药物,以及在诊断评估中至关重要的身体变化。这些建议与实际临床实践之间存在明显差距。然而,开发更精确,必须探索非侵入性生物标志物和个性化营养策略。我们在评论中讨论的这些策略之一是结合营养的多学科方法,身体活动,和社会心理支持。解决老年人营养不良问题应依靠标准化方案和个性化干预措施,以增强他们的营养健康和整体福祉。
    Malnutrition is a growing public health problem leading to increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. Up to 50% of elderly patients are hospitalized due to this condition. In this review, we focused on analyzing the current diagnostic criteria for malnutrition among the elderly population and proposing promising solutions. Currently used diagnostic methods such as BMI or serum albumin levels are not sufficient to indicate malnutrition, which is affected by many factors, including the number of chronic diseases, multiple medications taken, or physical condition. Moreover, current recommendations are inadequate because they fail to account for various factors such as chronic illnesses, multiple medications, and bodily changes that are crucial in diagnostic evaluations. There is a noticeable gap between these recommendations and actual clinical practice. Nevertheless, developing more precise, non-invasive biomarkers and personalized nutrition strategies has to be explored. One of these strategies we discuss in our review is multidisciplinary approaches that combine nutrition, physical activity, and psychosocial support. Addressing malnutrition among the elderly should rely on standardized protocols and personalized interventions to enhance their nutritional health and overall well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:正确描述营养不良的特征是一个挑战。甲状腺素运载蛋白(TTR)对足够的蛋白质摄入/输注迅速反应,可以用作识别营养不良的标记。营养疗法用于预防营养不良。肠胃外营养(PN)需要每日监测,以确定所提供的营养是否足够。本文旨在探讨测量TTR的做法是否合理。
    方法:在三个不同的时间收集进入病房或重症监护病房(ICU)的患者的数据:在使用PN的最初72小时(T1)内,在第7天(T2),以及初始评估后的第14天(T3)。
    结果:共纳入302例患者,平均年龄48.3岁,死亡率为22.2%,61.6%的样本为男性。这些患者的TTR值和营养支持的有效性与结局无关;然而,满足热量需求与结局相关(p=0.047).当将TTR值与营养状况进行比较时,未发现关联。因此,TTR不是住院患者营养风险或营养状况的良好指标。
    结论:毫无疑问,TTR测量值与CRP测量值成反比.在这个住院患者的随访队列中可以得出结论,TTR值对确定患者是否营养不良没有帮助。预测死亡或营养支持的有效性,然而根据我们的分析,CRP每增加1个单位,TTR降低大于0.024个单位可能是由于营养供应无效.
    OBJECTIVE: Correctly characterizing malnutrition is a challenge. Transthyretin (TTR) rapidly responds to adequate protein intake/infusion, which could be used as a marker to identify malnutrition. Nutritional therapy is used to prevent malnutrition. Parenteral nutrition (PN) requires daily monitoring to determine whether what is being offered is adequate. This article aims to investigate whether the practice of measuring TTR is justified.
    METHODS: Data from patients admitted to the ward or intensive care unit (ICU) were collected at three different times: within the first 72 h (T1) of PN use, on the 7th day (T2), and the 14th day (T3) after the initial assessment.
    RESULTS: 302 patients were included; the average age was 48.3 years old; the prevalence of death was 22.2%, and 61.6% of the sample were male. TTR values and the effectiveness of nutritional support in these patients were not associated with the outcome; however, meeting caloric needs was related to the outcome (p = 0.047). No association was found when TTR values were compared to the nutritional status. Thus, TTR was not a good indicator of nutritional risk or nutritional status in hospitalized patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Undoubtedly, the TTR measurement was inversely proportional to CRP measurements. It was possible to conclude in this follow-up cohort of hospitalized patients that TTR values were not useful for determining whether the patient was malnourished, predicting death or effectiveness of nutritional support, yet based upon our analyses, a decrease in TTR greater than 0.024 units for every 1 unit increase in CRP might be due to ineffective nutritional supply.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    营养是护理的一个基本方面,然而,老年人在医院照顾,在养老院或在自己的家中,他们的营养需求并不总是得到足够的支持,这可能会使他们面临营养不良的风险。使用整体,支持包括营养不良筛查在内的全面营养评估的生物心理社会框架可以支持护士确定老年人的营养状况和营养需求。进行此程序的护士必须确保他们具有这样做的知识和技能,并在其能力范围内工作。•老年人营养不良会导致功能能力下降,肌肉力量降低,疲劳,免疫力受损,伤口愈合欠佳,感染风险增加和跌倒风险增加。•筛查,并评估风险,营养不良是任何医疗保健环境中护理评估的重要组成部分。•全面的营养评估应纳入生理,心理,情感,精神,社会和文化因素。反思活动:“如何\”文章可以帮助更新您的实践,并确保它仍然是基于证据。将本文应用于您的实践。反思并撰写简短的说明:•当与老年人进行全面的营养评估时,本文如何改善您的实践。•您如何使用这些信息来教育护理学生或您的同事,了解与老年人进行全面营养评估的适当技术和证据基础。
    UNASSIGNED: Nutrition is a fundamental aspect of nursing care, however older people cared for in hospital, in a care home or in their own home do not always receive adequate support with their nutritional needs, which can leave them at risk of malnutrition. Using a holistic, biopsychosocial framework to support a comprehensive nutritional assessment that includes malnutrition screening can support the nurse to identify the older person\'s nutritional status and nutrition needs. Nurses undertaking this procedure must ensure they have the knowledge and skills to do so and work within the limits of their competence. • Malnutrition in older people can lead to a decline in functional ability, reduced muscle strength, fatigue, impaired immunity, suboptimal wound healing, increased risk of infection and increased risk of falls. • Screening for, and assessing the risk of, malnutrition is an important part of nursing assessments in any healthcare setting. • A holistic nutritional assessment should incorporate physiological, psychological, emotional, spiritual, social and cultural elements. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: \' How to\' articles can help to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of: • How this article might improve your practice when undertaking a holistic nutritional assessment with an older person. • How you could use this information to educate nursing students or your colleagues on the appropriate techniques and evidence base for undertaking a holistic nutritional assessment with an older person.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吞咽困难和营养不良是急性卒中患者死亡的主要原因。入院后对营养状况的早期评估对于通过减少相关的高风险并发症来提高临床结局至关重要。然而,现有文献的零散性使得优化临床实践变得困难.
    目的:本研究旨在确定护士和其他医疗保健专业人员可用于即时评估急性卒中患者营养风险的最佳临床实践。
    方法:临床实践指南的系统评价和系统评价。
    方法:根据CochraneLibrary数据库的系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,在2024年5月之前进行了全面的书目搜索,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,还有Scopus,和三个公认的指南库。
    方法:使用评估指南II(AGREEII)工具确定临床实践指南的质量,系统评价的质量通过评估系统评价的MeaSurement工具(AMSTAR2)进行评估。根据欧洲心脏病学会的分类对证据质量进行了评估。
    结果:在2534条确定的记录中,15个被纳入本审查。主要是,选定的临床实践指南和系统评价显示了较高的方法学质量.值得注意的是,Gugging吞咽屏幕和营养不良通用筛查工具被确定为初始筛查的主要工具。大多数研究建议这些评估,理想情况下在患者入院的前24小时内进行,应由受过专门培训的专业人员进行,强调护士的关键作用。筛查结果的偏差需要补充专家评估。
    结论:本系统综述整合了当前的见解,提出了一种创新的综合方法来评估高危患者的营养需求。它强调了护士在筛查过程中的重要性,强调它们在急性中风患者的营养管理中的关键作用,并倡导进一步的研究努力,以标准化干预方案,以提高患者的临床结果。
    PROSPEROCRD42023425140。
    BACKGROUND: Dysphagia and malnutrition are major contributors to mortality in patients with acute stroke. An early assessment of nutritional status upon hospital admission is crucial to enhance clinical outcomes by reducing the associated high-risk complications. However, the fragmented nature of the existing literature makes it difficult to optimize clinical practices.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the best clinical practices that nurses and other healthcare professionals can employ for the immediate assessment of nutritional risk in patients diagnosed with acute stroke.
    METHODS: Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews.
    METHODS: Comprehensive bibliographic searches were conducted up to May 2024 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across the databases Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, and three recognized guideline repositories.
    METHODS: The quality of clinical practice guidelines was ascertained using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, and the quality of systematic reviews was assessed through A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). The evidence quality was appraised based on the classifications by the European Society of Cardiology.
    RESULTS: Out of 2534 identified records, 15 were incorporated into this review. Predominantly, the selected clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews exhibited high methodological quality. Notably, the Gugging Swallowing Screen and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool were pinpointed as primary tools for initial screenings. Most studies recommended that these assessments, ideally conducted within the first 24 h of patient admission, should be carried out by specially trained professionals, highlighting the pivotal role of nurses. Deviations in screening outcomes necessitate complementary specialist evaluations.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review offers a consolidation of current insights, proposing an innovative and integrated approach to assess nutritional needs of high-risk patients. It underscores the importance of nurses in the screening process, emphasizing their pivotal role in the nutritional management of patients with acute stroke, and advocates for further research endeavors to standardize intervention protocols to elevate patient clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO CRD42023425140.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的评估以下假设:从人的流形回归预测的三维(3D)人形化身得出的人体测量尺寸与实际周长相比是准确的,volume,以及使用地面实况3D光学成像方法获得的表面积测量。使用这种方法预测的化身,如果人体测量尺寸准确,可以用于多种目的,包括临床环境中的患者代谢疾病风险分层。方法对570名完成3D光学扫描的成年人进行流形回归3D化身预测方程,双能X射线吸收法(DXA),和生物阻抗分析(BIA)评估。一个由84名成年人组成的新的前瞻性样本对6个体围进行了真实测量,7卷,和7个具有20个摄像头的3D参考扫描仪的表面区域。在这些参与者身上生成了3D人形化身,包括年龄,体重,高度,DXA%脂肪,和BIA阻抗作为潜在的预测变量。使用相同的软件对地面实况和预测的化身人体测量尺寸进行量化。结果经过探索性研究,一个歧管预测模型被向前移动以用于呈现,包括年龄,体重,高度,和%脂肪作为协变量。预测和地面真实化身具有相似的视觉外观;预测和地面真实人体测量估计之间的相关性都很高(R2s,0.75-0.99;所有p<0.001),除手臂周长(%D〜5%;p<0.05)外,平均差异无统计学意义。一致相关系数在0.80-0.99之间,在20项人体测量中的13项,Bland-Altman地块存在很小但显着的偏差(p<0.05-0.01)。通过歧管回归预测的平均腰围与臀围比与地面实况扫描仪测量值无显着差异。结论3D化身从人口统计预测,物理,和其他可访问的特征可以在没有3D扫描仪的情况下产生具有精确人体测量尺寸的身体表示。将流形回归算法结合到既定的身体成分方法中,如DXA,BIA,和其他可获得的方法提供了新的研究和临床机会。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the hypothesis that anthropometric dimensions derived from a person\'s manifold-regression predicted three-dimensional (3D) humanoid avatar are accurate when compared to their actual circumference, volume, and surface area measurements acquired with a ground-truth 3D optical imaging method. Avatars predicted using this approach, if accurate with respect to anthropometric dimensions, can serve multiple purposes including patient metabolic disease risk stratification in clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: Manifold regression 3D avatar prediction equations were developed on a sample of 570 adults who completed 3D optical scans, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) evaluations. A new prospective sample of 84 adults had ground-truth measurements of 6 body circumferences, 7 volumes, and 7 surface areas with a 20-camera 3D reference scanner. 3D humanoid avatars were generated on these participants with manifold regression including age, weight, height, DXA %fat, and BIA impedances as potential predictor variables. Ground-truth and predicted avatar anthropometric dimensions were quantified with the same software.
    UNASSIGNED: Following exploratory studies, one manifold prediction model was moved forward for presentation that included age, weight, height, and %fat as covariates. Predicted and ground-truth avatars had similar visual appearances; correlations between predicted and ground-truth anthropometric estimates were all high (R2s, 0.75-0.99; all p < 0.001) with non-significant mean differences except for arm circumferences (%D ~ 5%; p < 0.05). Concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.80-0.99 and small but significant bias (p < 0.05 - 0.01) was present with Bland-Altman plots in 13 of 20 total anthropometric measurements. The mean waist to hip circumference ratio predicted by manifold regression was non-significantly different from ground-truth scanner measurements.
    UNASSIGNED: 3D avatars predicted from demographic, physical, and other accessible characteristics can produce body representations with accurate anthropometric dimensions without a 3D scanner. Combining manifold regression algorithms into established body composition methods such as DXA, BIA, and other accessible methods provides new research and clinical opportunities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头颈部癌症放疗期间患者会经历许多副作用,这可能会对患者通过口服饮食满足个人日常能量需求的能力产生相当大的影响。
    方法:本研究纳入了104名符合根治性放疗资格的头颈部癌症患者。根治性治疗需要6周,每周评估患者的饮食摄入量。受试者接受了营养师的持续护理,收到FSMP(特殊医疗用途食品),and,如有必要,肠内营养。
    结果:在治疗的第一周,病人,仅从厨房饮食中,满足91.5%的能源需求,在治疗的最后一周,只有40.9%。在引入FSMP或肠内营养后,患者在治疗的第一周满足了120%的需求,在最后一周满足了95%的需求,分别。遵循饮食建议的患者的特征是体重减轻(3.07kg)明显低于非粘附患者(5.56kg)。
    结论:所使用的治疗显著有助于减少随后几周的营养摄入。另一方面,将FSMP纳入饮食和肠内营养与工业饮食显着增加了患者的能量需求。
    BACKGROUND: Patients during radiotherapy due to head and neck cancers experience a lot of side effects which may have a considerable impact on the patients\' ability to meet individual daily energy demands by means of oral diet.
    METHODS: The study included 104 head and neck cancer patients who qualified for radical radiotherapy. Radical treatment takes 6 weeks and every week the patients were assessed for dietary intake. The subjects were covered with the constant care of a dietician, received FSMP (food for special medical purposes), and, if necessary, enteral nutrition.
    RESULTS: In the first week of treatment, the patients, from the kitchen diet alone, met 91.5% of the energy demand, while in the last week of treatment, only 40.9%. After introducing the FSMP or enteral nutrition, the patients met 120% of the demand in the first week of therapy and 95% in the last week, respectively. The patients who followed the dietary recommendations were characterized by significantly lower weight loss (3.07 kg) compared to non-adherent patients (5.56 kg).
    CONCLUSIONS: The used therapy significantly contributed to decreasing nutritional intake in the subsequent weeks of treatment. On the other hand, incorporating FSMP in the diet and enteral nutrition with industrial diets significantly increased the fulfilled energy demand of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受血液透析的人营养不良的风险增加;然而,使用主观整体评估(SGA)定期诊断营养不良是耗时的。这项研究旨在确定加拿大营养筛查工具(CNST)或老年营养风险指数(GNRI)筛查工具是否可以准确识别有营养不良风险的血液透析患者。对中心日班血液透析患者(n=95)进行了回顾性医学图表审查,以获得SGA评估和CNST筛选器的结果,并计算GNRI评分。敏感性和特异性分析显示,SGA和CNST之间仅有相当的一致性(敏感性=20%;特异性96%;κ=.210(95%CI,-0.015至.435),p<.05)以及SGA和GNRI之间(灵敏度=35%;特异性=88%;κ=.248(95%CI,.017至.479),p<.05)。两种工具在识别有营养不良风险的患者的准确性之间没有显着统计学差异(p=.50)。CNST和GNRI无法准确筛查血液透析人群中营养不良的风险;因此,需要进一步的研究来确定该人群中有效的营养不良筛查工具.
    Individuals receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk of malnutrition; however, regular diagnosis of malnutrition using subjective global assessment (SGA) is time-consuming. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) or the Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) screening tools could accurately identify hemodialysis patients at risk for malnutrition. A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for in-centre day shift hemodialysis patients (n = 95) to obtain the results of the SGA assessment and the CNST screener and to calculate the GNRI score. Sensitivity and specificity analyses showed only a fair agreement between the SGA and CNST (sensitivity = 20%; specificity 96%; κ = .210 (95% CI, -0.015 to .435), p < .05) and between the SGA and GNRI (sensitivity = 35%; specificity = 88%; κ = .248 (95% CI, .017 to .479), p < .05). There was no significant statistical difference between the accuracy of either tool in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition (p = .50). The CNST and GNRI do not accurately screen for risk of malnutrition in the hemodialysis population; therefore, further studies are needed to determine an effective malnutrition screening tool in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界人口中的营养不良是儿童和成人中常见但未被诊断的问题。开发营养不良筛查和早期发现营养不良的诊断工具对于预防患者健康和福祉的长期并发症是必要的。这些工具大多数基于预定义的问卷和共识准则。人工智能(AI)的使用允许自动化工具在早期阶段检测营养不良,以防止长期后果。在这项研究中,进行了系统的文献综述,目的是提供关于哪些患者组的详细信息,筛选工具,机器学习算法,数据类型,和变量正在使用,以及这些基于AI的工具的当前限制和实施阶段。结果显示,超过90%的AI模型在日常临床实践中没有使用。此外,监督学习模型似乎是最受欢迎的学习类型。除此之外,疾病相关营养不良是所有主要研究分析中发现的最常见的营养不良类别.当前的研究为研究人员提供了资源,以确定他们在营养不良中使用AI的研究方向。
    Malnutrition among the population of the world is a frequent yet underdiagnosed problem in both children and adults. Development of malnutrition screening and diagnostic tools for early detection of malnutrition is necessary to prevent long-term complications to patients\' health and well-being. Most of these tools are based on predefined questionnaires and consensus guidelines. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) allows for automated tools to detect malnutrition in an earlier stage to prevent long-term consequences. In this study, a systematic literature review was carried out with the goal of providing detailed information on what patient groups, screening tools, machine learning algorithms, data types, and variables are being used, as well as the current limitations and implementation stage of these AI-based tools. The results showed that a staggering majority exceeding 90% of all AI models go unused in day-to-day clinical practice. Furthermore, supervised learning models seemed to be the most popular type of learning. Alongside this, disease-related malnutrition was the most common category of malnutrition found in the analysis of all primary studies. This research provides a resource for researchers to identify directions for their research on the use of AI in malnutrition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:估计患有人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的人的无脂质量(FFM)的方程式显示验证过程中的差异。目前的研究旨在验证从生物电阻抗(BIA)得出的FFM估计方程在40岁及以上艾滋病毒感染者中的有效性。
    方法:对68名参与者进行了横断面研究,这些参与者使用双能X射线吸收法(DXA)和两种BIA设备(分析仪和生物动力学)进行了评估。该研究旨在从Lukaski和Bolonchuk(1987)的四个不同研究中确定六个不同的FFM方程的有效性,Kotler等人。(1996),Beraldoetal.(2015)和Hegelund等人。(2017)。使用t检验或Wilcoxon检验进行比较。要验证DXA和两个BIA设备之间的有效性,进行了以下统计分析:Lin的一致性相关系数,组内相关系数,决定系数,估计的标准误差,通过Bland和Altman分析得出协议界限的差异,通过皮尔逊或斯皮尔曼相关方法的平均值和差异之间的相关性。
    结果:只有Kotler等人的等式2。(1996)通过生物动力学BIA对男性显示FFM没有差异。林氏一致性相关系数为优(0.96),不论性别,对于Kotler等人的方程2。(1996)BIAAnalyzer。所有方程都是可重现的(>0.85)。决定系数从68%到92%不等,估计值的标准误差范围为1.8kg至5.0kg。协议限值之间的差异范围从7.2公斤到14.9公斤,方法的平均值和差异之间的相关性显示三个方程的FFM差异(p<0.01)。
    结论:方程式的选择必须考虑所使用的设备和所研究样品的性别。只有Kotler等人的方程式2。(1996)被认为是有效的,不论性别,通过BIA分析仪估算FFM。
    OBJECTIVE: Equations estimating fat-free mass (FFM) in people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) show differences in the validation process. The current study aimed to verify the validity of FFM estimation equations derived from bioelectrical impedance (BIA) in people living with HIV aged 40 years and older.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 68 participants evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and by two BIA devices (Analyzer and Biodynamics). The study aimed to determine the validity of six different FFM equations from four different studies by Lukaski and Bolonchuk (1987), Kotler et al. (1996), Beraldo et al. (2015) and Hegelund et al. (2017). Comparisons were made using the t-test or Wilcoxon test. To verify the validity between DXA and two BIA devices, the following statistical analyses were performed: Lin\'s concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, standard error of the estimate, differences in the limits of agreement by Bland and Altman analysis, correlation between the average and the differences of the methods by Pearson or Spearman correlation.
    RESULTS: Only equation 2 of Kotler et al. (1996) for males by Biodynamics BIA showed no difference in FFM. The Lin\'s concordance correlation coefficient was excellent (0.96), irrespective of sex, for Equation 2 of Kotler et al. (1996) by BIA Analyzer. All equations were reproducible (>0.85). The coefficient of determination ranged from 68% to 92%, and the standard error of the estimates ranged from 1.8 kg to 5.0 kg. The differences between the limits of agreement ranged from 7.2 kg to 14.9 kg, and the correlations between the average and the differences of the methods showed differences in FFM for three equations (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The choice of equations must consider the equipment used and the sex of the sample investigated. Only Equation 2 of Kotler et al. (1996) was considered valid, irrespective of sex, to estimate the FFM by BIA Analyzer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号