BACKGROUND: Residents in NH are more likely to be diagnosed with epilepsy or seizures, which are associated with higher mortality and complicate care. This setting provides unique challenges in the treatment of seizures however, little is known about current management practices in NH. Most studies in the literature concentrate on the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) but little is known about the management of the acute seizure and clinical guidance is needed to ensure the safety of this vulnerable population. The objective of this study was to survey current practices, identifying knowledge deficits and inform future educational endeavors, including acute seizure action plans (ASAPs).
METHODS: A survey was developed pertaining to a broad spectrum of clinical aspects in the management of acute seizures in NH, distinguishing first time seizures from those in the setting of a known seizure disorder. It was sent to NH medical directors throughout the US and data was gathered from those who had at least one new case of new onset/epilepsy in the last 3 years.
RESULTS: Ninety-one NH directors responded with 52 % having a seizure protocol. Nurses are responsible in the majority of cases for protocol activation. Regardless of the patient\'s seizure history, rescue medications are given in the majority of cases, oral benzodiazepines, followed by intravenous and then rectal benzodiazepines. Newer intranasal and intramuscular formulations of benzodiazepines were less frequently prescribed. The most commonly prescribed ASM is levetiracetam, followed by lamotrigine, valproic acid and phenytoin. Staff training and in-service education occur infrequently. Respondents thought no-cost seizure education would be highly beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS: Only approximately half of NH have protocols for the acute management of seizures. Rescue medications are given regardless of seizure history and often older ASMs are used for long-term management. Our study highlights areas of knowledge deficits and treatment areas for improvement, identifying the need and potential for ASAPs in NHs.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the relationship among resilience, stress, and demographic factors in certified nursing assistants (CNAs) who worked in long-term care institutions during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional correlation-based research design was used. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and Occupational Stress Scale. CNAs from 21 long-term care institutions in Taiwan were recruited.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 118 female and 26 male CNAs (response rate = 80%). Mean age was 46.8 years. A moderately negative correlation was found between workplace resilience and stress. Overall, being a woman and parent were found to be significantly correlated with CNAs\' resilience. Furthermore, resilience and shift work were important predictors of stress.
UNASSIGNED: We suggest that leadership and management pay more attention to CNAs\' basic demographic background information. Furthermore, timely, relevant strategies can be provided to enhance resilience and reduce workplace stress. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(7), 19-26.].

UNASSIGNED: Increasing racial and ethnic diversity in U.S. nursing facilities has necessitated the provision of more culturally competent care. This study explored the cultural challenges in providing palliative care from the perspective of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and nurses in nursing facilities.
UNASSIGNED: A thematic analysis approach was used to examine data from semi-structured interviews with 12 CNAs and 11 nurses from six nursing facilities in a U.S. Midwestern state.
UNASSIGNED: Four themes emerged from the data: Cultural Needs Expressed by Residents, Cultural Needs Expressed by Family Members, Accommodating Residents\' Cultural Needs, and Organizational Responses to Cultural Competency Challenges.
UNASSIGNED: Results highlighted the training variations on diversity and cultural competency issues and the varying cultural competency levels possessed by staff. To support residents\' culture-related needs, staff need education and support. Organizations can provide foundational resources for this diversity of cultural expression, including providing more culturally diverse programming facilities. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(7), 35-41.].

UNASSIGNED: To examine behavior changes among formal caregivers in Taiwanese long-term care facilities (LTCFs) after receiving training in function-focused care for cognitive impairment (FFC-CI).
UNASSIGNED: The current study was a clustered randomized controlled trial. Formal caregivers (i.e., RNs and nursing assistants) (N = 98) from four LTCFs were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. Training was based on four components of FFC-CI. Data were collected four times within 9 months using five observational outcome measurements: Self-Efficacy for Restorative Care (SERCS), Outcome Expectations for Restorative Care Scale (OERCS), Restorative Care Knowledge Scale (RCKS), Restorative Care Behavior Checklist (RCBC), and Job Attitude Scale (JAS).
UNASSIGNED: Statistically significant changes were noted in each activity of restorative care behavior among the four observational measurements. Results also indicated that job satisfaction was a statistically significant main effect for the experimental group; however, SERCS, OERCS, and RCKS scores were not statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: To eliminate gaps between translating research outcomes to clinical practice, this study applied a theory-based caring model for caregivers to improve knowledge and skills in caring for older adults with dementia. Caregivers who received training in FFC-CI not only had higher job satisfaction but could also provide specific FFC activities for residents during their daily care. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(7), 42-50.].

BACKGROUND: Older adults have a progressive deficiency in the ability to detoxify chemical elements and are susceptible to dyslipidemia and changes in glycemic control. The objective was to evaluate the association of the mixture of essential and toxic elements in the plasma of institutionalized older adults and test the associations with lipid profile variables and glycemic control.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 149 Brazilian older adults aged ≥60 living in nursing homes (NH) in Natal, Brazil. The concentrations of sixteen chemical elements in plasma and lipid profile parameters and glycemic control of 149 institutionalized older adults were measured. Bayesian kernel machine regression was used to estimate the associations of the mixture of chemical elements with total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), triglycerides (TG), fasting glucose, and glycated hemoglobin.
RESULTS: Non-linear responses to exposure were observed for iron (Fe) about TC, LDL-c, and TG, and for barium (Ba) and copper (Cu) about TG. The concentration of the mixture of chemical elements below the 35th percentile was associated with a decrease in TC. Fe was the main element in the effect of the mixture associated with TC.
CONCLUSIONS: The lower concentrations of the mixture of chemical elements in plasma had a protective effect on the increase in TC, with Fe being the main element. Considering the results, the levels of essential and toxic elements in the plasma of older adults require extensive screening, mainly to prevent dyslipidemia and monitor clinical interventions.

OBJECTIVE: More than 25% of deaths among older adults occur in nursing homes. Thus, assessments of nursing home quality, including the widely used 5-star rating systems, should reflect quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. Our objective was to examine the associations between Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home star ratings and quality of EOL care as measured by the VA\'s Bereaved Family Survey (BFS).
METHODS: National, retrospective observational study.
METHODS: VA nursing homes, known as Community Living Centers (CLCs). All veterans who died in a CLC from October 2018 to September 2019 whose next of kin completed a BFS.
METHODS: Using linked VA data sources, we examined the BFS-Performance Measure (BFS-PM) (ie, the % of BFS respondents who provided an \"excellent\" overall rating) by the Overall Star Rating and domain star ratings (unannounced survey, staffing, and quality) for the 133 CLCs in our sample. Logistic and linear regression was used to examine the associations between CLC Overall Star Rating and individual-level BFS outcomes. Outcomes included the BFS-PM (primary), the 3 BFS factor scores of Respectful Care and Communication, Emotional and Spiritual Support, and Death Benefits, and 2 symptom management items.
RESULTS: Differences in the BFS-PM by CLC star rating were small to none and not statistically significant across all star rating domains. The relationship between a higher CLC Overall Star Rating and odds of an \"excellent\" BFS global rating was not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant associations were observed between a higher CLC Overall Star Rating and scores on the BFS factor scores and symptom management items.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the current CLC star rating system is not sufficient to assess the quality of EOL care. BFS scores, or a comparative EOL quality of care measure, should be integrated into CLC quality rating systems.

OBJECTIVE: To produce a consensus list of the top 10 signs and symptoms suggestive of adverse drug events (ADEs) for monitoring in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) who use antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants.
METHODS: A 3-round Delphi study.
METHODS: Geriatricians, psychiatrists, pharmacologists, general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, and caregivers from 13 Asia Pacific, European, and North American countries.
METHODS: Three survey rounds were completed between April and June 2023. In Round 1, participants indicated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale on whether 41 signs or symptoms identified in a systematic review should be routinely monitored. Participants considered signs and symptoms that reduce quality of life or cause significant harm, are observable or measurable by nurses or care workers, and can be assessed at a single time point. Round 1 statements were included in a list for prioritization in Round 3 if ≥ 70% of participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. Statements were excluded if ≤ 30% of participants responded ≥7. In Round 2, participants indicated their level of agreement with statements that did not reach initial consensus, plus amended statements based on Round 1 participant feedback. Round 2 statements were included in Round 3 if ≥ 50% of the participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. In Round 3, participants prioritized the signs and symptoms.
RESULTS: Forty-four participants (93.6%) completed all 3 rounds. Four of 41 signs and symptoms reached consensus for inclusion after Round 1, and 9 after Round 2. The top 10 signs and symptoms prioritized in Round 3 were recent falls, daytime drowsiness or sleepiness, abnormal movements (eg, shaking or stiffness), confusion or disorientation, balance problems, dizziness, postural hypotension, reduced self-care, restlessness, and dry mouth.
CONCLUSIONS: The top 10 signs and symptoms provide a basis for proactive monitoring for psychotropic ADEs.

OBJECTIVE: Nursing home residents constituted a vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic, and half of all cause-attributed COVID-19 deaths occurred within nursing homes. Yet, given the low life expectancy of nursing home residents, it is unclear to what extent COVID-19 mortality increased overall mortality within this population. Moreover, there might have been differences between nursing homes in their ability to protect residents against excess mortality. This article estimates the number of excess deaths among Dutch nursing home residents during the pandemic, the variation in excess deaths across nursing homes, and its relationship with nursing home characteristics.
METHODS: Retrospective, use of administrative register data.
METHODS: All residents (N = 194,432) of Dutch nursing homes (n = 1463) in 2016-2021.
METHODS: We estimated the difference between actual and predicted mortality, pooled at the nursing home level, which provided an estimate of nursing home-specific excess mortality corrected for resident case-mix differences. We show the variation in excess mortality across nursing homes and relate this to nursing home characteristics.
RESULTS: In 2020 and 2021, the mortality probability among nursing home residents was 4.0 and 1.6 per 100 residents higher than expected. There was considerable variation in excess deaths across nursing homes, even after correcting for differences in resident case mix and regional factors. This variation was substantially larger than prepandemic mortality and was in 2020 related to prepandemic spending on external personnel and satisfaction with the building, and in 2021 to prepandemic staff absenteeism.
CONCLUSIONS: The variation in excess mortality across nursing homes was considerable during the COVID-19 pandemic, and larger compared with prepandemic years. The association of excess mortality with the quality of the building and spending on external personnel indicates the importance of considering differences across nursing home providers when designing policies and guidelines related to pandemic preparedness.

Nursing home residents and staff were disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing attention to long-standing challenges of poor infection control, understaffing, and substandard quality of care in many facilities. Evolving practices and policies during the pandemic often focused on these challenges, with little effect. Despite the emergence of best practices to mitigate transmission of the virus, even the highest-quality facilities experienced outbreaks, indicating a larger systemic problem, rather than a quality problem at the facility level. Here we present a narrative review and discussion of the evolution of policies and practices and their effectiveness, drawing on evidence from the United States that was published during 2020-23. The lessons learned from this experience point to the need for more fundamental and nuanced changes to avoid similar outcomes from a future pandemic: greater integration of long-term care into public health planning, and ultimately a shift in the physical structure of nursing homes. More incremental measures such as vaccination mandates, higher staffing, and balancing infection control with resident quality of life will avoid some adverse outcomes, but without more systemic change, nursing home residents and staff will remain at substantial risk for repetition of the poor outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic.

UNASSIGNED: A well-functioning multidisciplinary team optimizes resource utilization and reduces care redundancy, fragmentation, and wastage. Collaborative efforts yield a clearer understanding of older people\'s needs and desires, significantly reducing hospitalization days. Despite limited studies, particularly in Indonesia, investigating professionals\' experiences in implementing multidisciplinary collaboration in government nursing homes, nursing care quality remains a concern.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the implementation of multidisciplinary collaboration in nursing homes from the perspectives of various disciplines.
UNASSIGNED: A descriptive phenomenological study was used with semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with multidisciplinary care providers, including nurses, doctors, social workers, physiotherapists, psychologists, occupational and recreational activity instructors, and clergy in nursing homes owned by the Jakarta provincial government. A total of 64 participants were involved, and data were collected from September 2022 to July 2023. Data were analyzed using content-based analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Three main themes emerged: 1) context of multiple collaborations, 2) barriers to implementing multiple collaborations, and 3) impacts of non-optimal multidisciplinary collaborations. Nursing home management\'s multidisciplinary teams predominantly implement professional-centered care with limited support systems. While providers generally perceive collaboration positively, shared responsibility and joint work among professionals are lacking.
UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the need to improve multidisciplinary collaboration in nursing homes to enhance care quality for older individuals. While providers view collaboration positively, barriers like a lack of shared responsibility and joint work persist. Enhancing teamwork cohesion through improved communication and integrated case reporting systems is crucial. Addressing human resource and systemic barriers is also vital. By overcoming these challenges, nursing homes can optimize resource use, reduce care redundancy, and better meet the diverse needs of older residents.