{Reference Type}: Journal Article {Title}: Nursing Home Star Ratings and End-Of-Life Care Quality: Lessons Learned From the Veterans Health Administration. {Author}: Carpenter J;Kinder D;Smith D;Ersek M;Wachterman M;Thorpe J;Sullivan DR;Bailey J;Shreve S;Kutney-Lee A; {Journal}: J Am Med Dir Assoc {Volume}: 0 {Issue}: 0 {Year}: 2024 Jun 28 {Factor}: 7.802 {DOI}: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105121 {Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: More than 25% of deaths among older adults occur in nursing homes. Thus, assessments of nursing home quality, including the widely used 5-star rating systems, should reflect quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. Our objective was to examine the associations between Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home star ratings and quality of EOL care as measured by the VA's Bereaved Family Survey (BFS).
METHODS: National, retrospective observational study.
METHODS: VA nursing homes, known as Community Living Centers (CLCs). All veterans who died in a CLC from October 2018 to September 2019 whose next of kin completed a BFS.
METHODS: Using linked VA data sources, we examined the BFS-Performance Measure (BFS-PM) (ie, the % of BFS respondents who provided an "excellent" overall rating) by the Overall Star Rating and domain star ratings (unannounced survey, staffing, and quality) for the 133 CLCs in our sample. Logistic and linear regression was used to examine the associations between CLC Overall Star Rating and individual-level BFS outcomes. Outcomes included the BFS-PM (primary), the 3 BFS factor scores of Respectful Care and Communication, Emotional and Spiritual Support, and Death Benefits, and 2 symptom management items.
RESULTS: Differences in the BFS-PM by CLC star rating were small to none and not statistically significant across all star rating domains. The relationship between a higher CLC Overall Star Rating and odds of an "excellent" BFS global rating was not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant associations were observed between a higher CLC Overall Star Rating and scores on the BFS factor scores and symptom management items.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the current CLC star rating system is not sufficient to assess the quality of EOL care. BFS scores, or a comparative EOL quality of care measure, should be integrated into CLC quality rating systems.