nucleic acid test

核酸检测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)于2022年2月在上海迅速传播。无症状和轻度症状的患者被送往方仓庇护所医院进行集中隔离。
    方法:纳入隆耀方仓和石龙方仓医院住院的非重症患者5217例。人口统计学和临床特征,合并症,曝光历史,治疗和病程分析。进行单变量分析和二项逻辑回归分析以确定影响14天内核酸从阳性到阴性变化的因素。
    结果:连续核酸检测结果(天数)与高龄显着相关(OR=1.343,95%CI1.143至1.578,p<0.001),吸烟(OR=0.510,95%CI0.327至0.796,p=0.003)和疫苗接种(OR=0.728,95%CI0.641至0.827,p<0.001)。然而,无症状和轻度症状患者之间无显著差异(p=0.187).在单变量分析中,包括糖尿病在内的合并症,高血压,心血管系统,恶性肿瘤,自身免疫性疾病和脑卒中与核酸检测结果连续阳性有关,但二项物流回归分析无显著差异。
    结论:老化和合并症导致阳性核酸检测结果延长数天。提高疫苗接种覆盖率有利于预防和控制疫情。上海方仓庇护所医院的管理和处理方法具有重要的借鉴意义,可为今后COVID-19疫情的防控提供有价值的指导。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly in Shanghai in February 2022. Patients with asymptomatic and mild symptoms were admitted to Fangcang shelter hospitals for centralized quarantine.
    METHODS: A total of 5,217 non-severe patients hospitalized in the Longyao Fangcang and Shilong Fangcang hospitals were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidity, exposure history, treatment and disease duration were analyzed. Univariate analysis and binomial logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the factors influencing nucleic acid change from positive to negative over 14 days.
    RESULTS: Consecutive positive nucleic acid test results (days) were significantly associated with advanced age (OR = 1.343, 95% CI 1.143 to 1.578, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 0.510, 95% CI 0.327 to 0.796, p = 0.003) and vaccination (OR = 0.728, 95% CI 0.641 to 0.827, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between asymptomatic and mild symptomatic patients (p = 0.187). In univariate analysis, comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular system, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases and cerebral apoplexy were associated with consecutive positive nucleic acid test results, but there was no significant difference in binomial logistics regression analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Aging and comorbid conditions lead to the prolongation of positive nucleic acid test results for several days. Improving vaccination coverage is beneficial for prevention and control of the epidemic. The management and treatment methods of Shanghai Fangcang shelter hospitals had important referential significance, which can provide valuable guidance for the prevention and control of the COVID-19 epidemic in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    病原体的快速和精确检测对于公共卫生和社会稳定至关重要。在军事和反恐背景下,检测生物战剂(BWA)尤其重要,防御生物威胁至关重要。传统方法,如聚合酶链反应(PCR),受限于他们对特定设置的需求,影响他们的适应性和多功能性。这项研究通过将目标病原体的16SrRNA转化为可检测的功能蛋白质分子,引入了用于BWA检测的无细胞生物传感器。这种方法的模块化性质允许病原体检测的灵活配置,能够通过每个靶向序列的定制报告蛋白同时鉴定多种致病性16SrRNA。此外,我们演示了该方法如何与利用逆向反射Janus颗粒(RJP)的技术集成,以轻松且高度敏感的病原体检测。无细胞生物传感器,使用RJP测量非彩色白光的反射,可以在毫微微摩尔水平检测来自BWAs的16SrRNA,对应于每毫升致病菌数十个菌落形成单位。这些发现代表了病原体检测的重大进展,为传统方法提供更有效和更容易获得的替代方案。
    The rapid and precise detection of pathogenic agents is critical for public health and societal stability. The detection of biological warfare agents (BWAs) is especially vital within military and counter-terrorism contexts, essential in defending against biological threats. Traditional methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are limited by their need for specific settings, impacting their adaptability and versatility. This study introduces a cell-free biosensor for BWA detection by converting the 16S rRNA of targeted pathogens into detectable functional protein molecules. The modular nature of this approach allows for the flexible configuration of pathogen detection, enabling the simultaneous identification of multiple pathogenic 16S rRNAs through customized reporter proteins for each targeted sequence. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this method integrates with techniques utilizing retroreflective Janus particles (RJPs) for facile and highly sensitive pathogen detection. The cell-free biosensor, employing RJPs to measure the reflection of non-chromatic white light, can detect 16S rRNA from BWAs at femtomolar levels, corresponding to tens of colony-forming units per milliliter of pathogenic bacteria. These findings represent a significant advancement in pathogen detection, offering a more efficient and accessible alternative to conventional methodologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在加拿大,对送去分级分离的血浆进行细小病毒B19(B19V)和甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)的检测。这项研究比较了加拿大血浆样本中COVID-19限制时代(2015年至2020年2月底[Q1]2020年)和COVID-19限制时代后的B19和HAV核酸检测(NAT)阳性率。
    方法:使用ProcleixPanther系统(Grifols诊断解决方案公司,圣地亚哥,CA,美国)用于B19V和HAV检测。通过单独的样品测试解决了反应池。
    结果:在2015年1月1日至2022年3月31日之间,对来自加拿大血浆供体的3,928,619份标本进行了B19V测试。在同一时期,对3,922,954个样本进行了HAV测试。考虑到样本测试的滞后长达24个月,数据分为:(1)大流行前时期(2015年1月1日至2020年3月31日;B19V测试n=2,412,701,B19VNAT阳性n=240[0.01%],HAV测试n=2,407,036,HAVNAT阳性n=26[0.001%]);(2)两年混合影响期(2020年4月1日至2022年3月31日;B19V测试n=968,250,B19VNAT阳性n=14[0.001%],HAV测试n=968,250,HAVNAT阳性n=2[0.0002%]);和(3)大流行影响期(2022年4月1日至3月31日,2023年;B19V测试n=597,668,B19VNAT阳性n=3[0.0005%],HAV测试n=597,668,HAVNAT阳性n=1[0.0002%])。
    结论:从大流行前到大流行影响期,B19V和HAV阳性捐赠的百分比显着降低。
    OBJECTIVE: In Canada, plasma sent for fractionation is tested for both parvovirus B19 (B19V) and hepatitis A virus (HAV). This study compared positivity rates of B19 and HAV nucleic acid tests (NATs) in Canadian plasma samples for the pre-COVID-19 restriction era (2015 to end of February 2020 [Q1] 2020) and the post-COVID-19 restriction era.
    METHODS: Pooled EDTA plasma specimens were tested within 24 months of blood draw using the Procleix Panther System (Grifols Diagnostic Solutions Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) for B19V and HAV detection. Reactive pools were resolved by individual specimen testing.
    RESULTS: Between 1 January 2015, and 31 March 2022, 3,928,619 specimens from Canadian plasma donors were tested for B19V. For the same period, 3,922,954 specimens were tested for HAV. To account for a lag in specimen testing for up to 24 months, the data were divided into: (1) a pre-pandemic period (1 January 2015-31 March 2020; B19V tested n = 2,412,701, B19V NAT-positive n = 240 [0.01%], HAV tested n = 2,407,036, HAV NAT-positive n = 26 [0.001%]); (2) a two-year mixed-impact period (1 April 2020-31 March 2022; B19V tested n = 968,250, B19V NAT-positive n = 14 [0.001%], HAV tested n = 968,250, HAV NAT-positive n = 2 [0.0002%]); and (3) a pandemic-impact period (1 April 2022-31 March, 2023; B19V tested n = 597,668, B19V NAT-positive n = 3 [0.0005%], HAV tested n = 597,668, HAV NAT-positive n = 1 [0.0002%]).
    CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of B19V- and HAV-positive donations was significantly reduced from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic-impact period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的诊断中,引进了几种SARS-CoV-2核酸检测仪器和试剂,以满足临床需要。我们评估了IDNOW™COVID-192.0(IDNOW™2.0)的临床表现,它能够在12分钟内检测SARS-CoV-2,作为即时检测(POCT)的一部分。出现COVID-19相关症状的患者,为了筛查目的进行了测试,被招募到这项研究中。收集两个鼻咽拭子并使用IDNOW™2.0测试进行测试。使用cobas8800或6800(试剂:cobasSARS-CoV-2和流感A/B)进行参考测试。共有38份样本及46份样本呈阳性及阴性,分别,通过参考测试。IDNORTM2.0显示94.7%的灵敏度(95%CI:82.3-99.4)和100%的特异性(95%CI:92.3-100)。通过参考测试为阳性的样品具有范围从11.90至35.41的循环阈值(Ct)值。在这些参考阳性样本中,两个样品的IDNOW™2.0为阴性,Ct值为35.25和35.41。对于Ct值<35的样品,IDNORTM2.0的灵敏度为100%。在日本,与COVID-19相关的限制已经放宽,然而,COVID-19疫情仍在继续。IDNOW™2.0有望用作基于实验室的RT-PCR方法的快速和可靠的替代方法。
    In the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several types of instruments and reagents for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing have been introduced to meet clinical needs. We evaluated the clinical performances of ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 (ID NOW™ 2.0), which is capable of detecting SARS-CoV-2 within 12 min as part of point-of-care testing (POCT). Patients who displayed COVID-19 related symptoms, and who were tested for screening purposes, were recruited to this study. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested using the ID NOW™ 2.0 test. Reference testing was performed using the cobas 8800 or 6800 (reagents: cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B). A total of 38 samples and 46 samples were tested positive and negative, respectively, by the reference test. The ID NOW™ 2.0 showed a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI: 82.3-99.4) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 92.3-100). Samples that were positive by reference testing had cycle threshold (Ct) values ranging from 11.90 to 35.41. Among these reference positive samples, two samples were negative by ID NOW™ 2.0 with Ct values of 35.25 and 35.41. For samples with Ct values < 35, the sensitivity of ID NOW™ 2.0 was 100%. In Japan, the restrictions related to COVID-19 have been relaxed, however the COVID-19 epidemic still continues. ID NOW™ 2.0 is expected to be used as a rapid and reliable alternative to laboratory-based RT-PCR methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与成年人相比,儿童仅占感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的一小部分。然而,大量儿童患有慢性HCV感染,并有可能出现包括肝硬化在内的并发症,门静脉高压症,肝失代偿伴肝性脑病,和成年期的肝细胞癌。全世界儿童HCV的总体患病率估计为0.87%。HCV通过血液传播。由于已知的感染风险,应对患有慢性丙型肝炎的妇女所生的儿童进行HCV评估和测试。丙型肝炎的治疗过程取决于HCV的类型。目前,儿童有两种泛基因型HCV治疗(Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir和Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir).我们的目的是回顾关于儿童HCV感染管理的最新临床指南。包括筛查,诊断,和长期监测,以及目前已发表的临床试验和正在进行的关于儿童直接抗病毒丙型肝炎治疗的研究。
    Children represent only a small proportion of those infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) compared to adults. Nevertheless, a substantial number of children have chronic HCV infection and are at risk of complications including cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatic decompensation with hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in adulthood. The overall prevalence of the HCV in children was estimated to be 0.87% worldwide. The HCV spreads through the blood. Children born to women with chronic hepatitis C should be evaluated and tested for HCV due to the known risk of infection. The course of treatment for hepatitis C depends on the type of HCV. Currently, there are two pan-genotype HCV treatments (Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) for children. We aim to review the updated clinical guidelines on the management of HCV infection in children, including screening, diagnosis, and long-term monitoring, as well as currently published clinical trials and ongoing research on direct acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)引起,立即成为流行病。因此,医院感染控制对于筛查可能患有COVID-19的患者是必要的。
    本研究旨在调查常用的临床变量来预测COVID-19。
    这项横断面研究在大学医院的隔离病房招募了1087名患者。组织会议以区分COVID-19和非COVID-19病例,当不能排除COVID-19时,多项核酸检测是强制性的。采用多因素logistic回归模型确定住院时与COVID-19相关的临床因素。
    总的来说,352例(32.4%)患者被诊断为COVID-19。大多数非COVID-19病例主要由细菌感染引起。多因素分析显示COVID-19与年龄显著相关,性别,身体质量指数,乳酸脱氢酶,C反应蛋白,和恶性肿瘤。
    一些临床因素可用于预测与COVID-19症状相似的COVID-19患者。这项研究表明,推荐SARS-CoV-2的至少两个实时逆转录聚合酶链反应排除COVID-19。
    UNASSIGNED: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), immediately became a pandemic. Therefore, nosocomial infection control is necessary to screen for patients with possible COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate commonly measured clinical variables to predict COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study enrolled 1087 patients in the isolation ward of a university hospital. Conferences were organized to differentiate COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 cases, and multiple nucleic acid tests were mandatory when COVID-19 could not be excluded. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to determine the clinical factors associated with COVID-19 at the time of hospitalization.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 352 (32.4%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. The majority of the non-COVID-19 cases were predominantly caused by bacterial infections. Multivariate analysis indicated that COVID-19 was significantly associated with age, sex, body mass index, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and malignancy.
    UNASSIGNED: Some clinical factors are useful to predict patients with COVID-19 among those with symptoms similar to COVID-19. This study suggests that at least two real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions of SARS-CoV-2 are recommended to exclude COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    沙门氏菌属。,作为食源性病原体之一,是对全球公共卫生的严重威胁。沙门氏菌的快速筛查。低感染剂量的污染食品是防止食物中毒的关键。在这项研究中,一种检测鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的快速可视化方法(S.鼠伤寒)是基于光子PCR和AuNP侧流免疫层析试纸条(LFIS)开发的。此外,利用AuNPs的光热效应可以实现目标细菌的定量检测,并且可以通过放大光热信号来提高灵敏度。在优化的条件下,开发的光子PCR-LFIS检测方法灵敏度高,激光照射后,纯培养物中细菌的检测限低至19cfumL-1,而且非常具体,与肠炎沙门氏菌没有交叉反应,单核细胞增生李斯特菌,大肠杆菌,和金黄色葡萄球菌。值得注意的是,在猪肉中可以检测到鼠伤寒沙门氏菌,蛋清,和牛奶没有预处理,三个样品的回收率在81%-109%之间。总之,光子PCR-LFIS测定实现了灵敏,简单,和快速检测鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。
    Salmonella spp., as one of the foodborne pathogens, is a severe threat to global public health. Rapid screening of salmonella spp. in contaminated food with low infective doses is the key to preventing food poisoning. In this study, a fast visualization method for detecting Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) was developed based on photonic PCR and AuNPs lateral-flow immunochromatography strip (LFIS). In addition, quantitative detection of target bacteria could be achieved by utilizing the photothermal effect of AuNPs, and the sensitivity could be improved by amplifying the photothermal signal. On the optimized conditions, the developed photonic PCR-LFIS assay was highly sensitive, with a detection limit as low as 19 cfu mL-1 of bacteria in pure culture after laser irradiation, and highly specific, exhibiting no cross-reaction with Salmonella enteritidis, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Notably, S. typhimurium could be detected in pork, egg white, and milk without pre-treatment, with the recovery rates of the three samples between 81 % and 109 %. In conclusion, the photonic PCR-LFIS assay realizes sensitive, simple, and rapid detection of S. typhimurium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    更快的周转时间可以导致快速的患者治疗。实施POC分子COVID-19测试需要仔细计划。在POC设置中,有许多运营商和定期监测他们的活动是成功实施POC分子测试的关键。样本可能会产生测试错误,运营商,试剂、测试系统,甚至来自环境。在实施新测试时,应考虑这些错误来源。
    我们概述了为员工制定明确的政策的重要性,SARS-CoV-2测试的分析和分析后阶段。由于这些因素对测试结果的准确性和可靠性至关重要。主要讨论点来自CLSIEP23-Ed2文档,关于制定个性化质量控制计划和EMBASE等医学文献搜索引擎,MEDLINE和MedlinePlus。
    在实施核酸POC测试时应用的风险管理原则可以识别特定的控制过程,以帮助减轻在POC进行分子测试时常见的错误来源。
    UNASSIGNED: Faster turnaround times can lead to rapid patient treatment. Implementing a point-of-care (POC) molecular COVID-19 test requires careful planning. In the POC setting, there are numerous operators and regular monitoring of their activities is key to the successful implementation of a POC molecular test. Test errors can arise from samples, operators, reagents, the testing system, and even from the environment. These sources of error should be considered when implementing a new test.
    UNASSIGNED: We outline the importance of establishing well-defined policies for staff to follow at the preanalytic, analytic and postanalytic phases of SARS-CoV-2 testing. As these factors are crucial for the accuracy and reliability of the test results. The key discussion points are from the CLSI EP23-Ed2 document on developing individualized quality control plans and medical literature search engines such as EMBASE, MEDLINE and MedlinePlus.
    UNASSIGNED: The risk management principles applied when implementing nucleic acid POC tests can identify specific control processes to help mitigate common sources of error when conducting molecular testing at the POC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管有越来越多的报告称SARS-CoV-2在康复和出院后再次阳性,关于再阳性的影响因素及其在Omicron变体的传播和流行病学中的作用,我们的知识仍然非常有限。
    在这项回顾性研究中,再阳性定义为住院期间两个连续阴性结果后的阳性核酸结果(Ct<35)。纳入上海住房客舱医院的751例患者,按1:2的比例分为再阳性组和非再阳性组。患者每天需要三个连续的阴性结果作为分离标准。出院患者随访时间为5周。单变量回归分析用于比较再阳性和非再阳性组之间的变量,以及单个阳性和多个阳性组,以P<0.05定义为差异有统计学意义。随后,对P<0.2的变量进行多因素logistic回归分析,以研究Omicron变异体的再阳性比值比(OR)和再阳性的影响因素.
    再阳性组的男性比例更高(68.1%vs58.1%,p=0.000),高等教育水平(31.9%对12.7%,p=0.007),住院时间更长(13天比8天,p=0.000),和更高的Convidea疫苗接种率(6.0%对2.4%,p=0.011)。进一步的多变量分析显示男性(OR=2.168,p=0.000),唇膏疫苗接种(OR=2.634,p=0.014),住院时间(OR=2.146,p=0.000)和教育程度(OR=1.595,p=0.007)与再阳性相关.住院期间的平均再阳性率为25%,出院患者中降至0.4%。在住院患者人数较多的时期,以及在患者人数较多的较大病房中,再阳性更为常见。
    大量住院患者,大型病房,和性别是影响再积极的重要因素。将庇护所医院划分为小型独立病房,并要求每天连续三个结果作为隔离标准,可能更有利于控制和预防Omicron变体的传播。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the increasing reports of re-positive SARS-CoV-2 cases after recovery and discharge from hospitals, our knowledge remains very limited regarding the contributing factors of re-positivity and its roles in the transmission and epidemiology of the Omicron variant.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, re-positivity is defined as the positive nucleic acid result (Ct < 35) following two consecutive negative results during hospitalization. A total of 751 patients from Shanghai Shelter Cabin Hospital were enrolled and divided with a ratio of about 1:2 into the re-positivity group and the non-re-positivity group. Patients required three consecutive negative results daily as the de-isolation criterion. The follow-up time of discharged patients lasted five weeks. Univariate regression analysis was used to compare variables between the re-positivity and non-re-positivity groups, and the single re-positivity and multiple re-positivity groups, with P < 0.05 defined as the statistical significance of differences. Subsequently, variables with P < 0.2 were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the odds ratio (OR) of re-positivity and the influencing factors of re-positivity of the Omicron variant.
    UNASSIGNED: The re-positivity group had a higher proportion of males (68.1% vs 58.1%, p = 0.000), a higher education level (31.9% vs 12.7%, p = 0.007), a longer hospitalization duration (13 days vs 8 days, p = 0.000), and a higher Convidecia vaccination rate (6.0% vs 2.4%, p = 0.011). Further multivariable analysis showed male (OR = 2.168, p = 0.000), Convidecia vaccination (OR = 2.634, p = 0.014), hospitalization duration (OR = 2.146, p = 0.000) and education level (OR = 1.595, p = 0.007) were associated with re-positivity. The average rate of re-positivity was 25% during hospitalization and decreased to 0.4% among discharged patients. Re-positivity was more common in the period with a larger number of hospitalized patients and in larger wards with a larger number of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A large number of hospitalized patients, large-sized wards, and gender are significant contributing factors to re-positivity. Division of the shelter cabin hospital into small independent wards and requirement of three consecutive results daily as the de-isolation criterion might be more beneficial to the control and prevention of the spread of the Omicron variant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号