non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的严重并发症,以脂代谢异常为特征。然而,与发病和进展相关的特定脂质分子仍不清楚.我们使用广泛靶向的脂质组学方法来评估增殖性视网膜病变阶段之前发生的脂质变化,并鉴定新型脂质生物标志物以区分无DR(NDR)和无增殖性DR(NPDR)的患者。对I型糖尿病患者的血清样本进行靶向脂质组学分析,包括20个NDR和20个NPDR。结果表明,与NDR组相比,NPDR组中的102个脂质显示出特异性表达。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)和支持向量机递归特征消除(SVM-RFE)方法获得了包括TAG58:2-FA18:1的四种脂质代谢物。四脂组合诊断模型在发现集和验证集上均表现出良好的预测能力,并且能够区分NDR患者和NPDR患者。所鉴定的脂质标志物显著提高了NPDR组中的诊断准确性。我们的发现有助于更好地理解DR脂质代谢的复杂性和个体差异。
    Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a serious complication of diabetes featuring abnormal lipid metabolism. However, the specific lipid molecules associated with onset and progression remain unclear. We used a broad-targeted lipidomics approach to assess the lipid changes that occur before the proliferative retinopathy stage and to identify novel lipid biomarkers to distinguish between patients without DR (NDR) and with non-proliferative DR (NPDR). Targeted lipomics analysis was carried out on serum samples from patients with type I diabetes, including 20 NDRs and 20 NPDRs. The results showed that compared with the NDR group, 102 lipids in the NPDR group showed specific expressions. Four lipid metabolites including TAG58:2-FA18:1 were obtained using the Least Absolute Shrink And Selection Operator (LASSO) and Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) methods. The four-lipid combination diagnostic models showed good predictive ability in both the discovery and validation sets, and were able to distinguish between NDR patients and NPDR patients. The identified lipid markers significantly improved diagnostic accuracy within the NPDR group. Our findings help to better understand the complexity and individual differences of DR lipid metabolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是一种导致糖尿病患者失明和视力丧失的眼病。DR的危险因素包括高血糖水平和一些环境因素。发病机制是基于由干扰素和其他核蛋白引起的炎症。本文对DR进行了综述,并讨论了核蛋白在该疾病发病机制中的作用。一些核心蛋白如MAPK,转录辅因子,转录共激活剂,和其他人是这次审查的一部分。此外,将分析当前由核蛋白的作用导致的一些先进治疗,包括表观遗传修饰,甲基化的使用,乙酰化,和组蛋白修饰。干细胞技术和纳米生物技术的使用被认为是更有效治疗DR的有希望的方法。
    Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an eye disease that causes blindness and vision loss in diabetic. Risk factors for DR include high blood glucose levels and some environmental factors. The pathogenesis is based on inflammation caused by interferon and other nuclear proteins. This review article provides an overview of DR and discusses the role of nuclear proteins in the pathogenesis of the disease. Some core proteins such as MAPK, transcription co-factors, transcription co-activators, and others are part of this review. In addition, some current advanced treatment resulting from the role of nuclear proteins will be analyzes, including epigenetic modifications, the use of methylation, acetylation, and histone modifications. Stem cell technology and the use of nanobiotechnology are proposed as promising approaches for a more effective treatment of DR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是长期2型糖尿病(T2DM)的重要微血管并发症,如果不正确诊断和治疗,将导致失明。它可以在糖尿病诊断前7年发展。指甲折叠毛细管镜检查(NFC)是一种观察毛细血管微血管的非侵入性技术,很少有研究探索NFC在糖尿病患者中的应用。目的研究2型糖尿病合并糖尿病视网膜病变患者的指甲皱褶改变,并与健康对照进行比较。次要目标是将NFC结果与糖尿病的持续时间相关联,血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平和DR的严重程度。材料和方法这项横断面观察性研究纳入了200名患者-100名患有糖尿病性视网膜病变的T2DM患者(根据美国糖尿病协会标准和糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度量表)和100名健康年龄和性别匹配的对照。所有患者均接受NFC和眼科评估。结果NFC显示DR患者表现出明显较高的曲折频率,扩张,浓密,蜿蜒,成角度的毛细血管,与健康对照组相比,无血管区域和微出血(p<0.05)。在增殖性DR(PDR)中,曲折的频率,浓密的毛细血管,与非增生性DR相比,无血管区域在统计学上较高,毛细血管密度降低。病程较长(>20年)的DR患者出现毛细血管曲折的频率明显较高,无血管区域,蜿蜒,成角度和扩张的毛细血管。弯曲的频率,无血管区域,血糖控制不良(HbA1c>11)的患者中,浓密区域明显更高。局限性对于不同人口统计学人群的更大样本量研究可能提供了具有DRDM的T2DM患者的NFC变化的更广泛图片。讨论NFC可以作为DM患者视网膜受累的替代标记,应定期进行。结论NFC是一种快速,简单,安全,和非侵入性方法来评估糖尿病患者的毛细血管镜改变,这反过来可以帮助评估DR的严重程度。
    Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important microvascular complication of long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) leading to blindness if not properly diagnosed and managed. It can develop as early as 7 years before the diagnosis of diabetes. Nail fold capillaroscopy (NFC) is a non-invasive technique for observing capillary microvasculature and there are few studies which have explored the use of NFC in diabetes mellitus patients. Objective To study the nail fold capillaroscopic alterations in patients with T2DM having diabetic retinopathy and compare them to healthy controls. The secondary objective was to correlate the NFC findings with the duration of diabetes, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and the severity of DR. Materials and methods This cross-sectional observational study enrolled 200 patients - 100 cases with T2DM having diabetic retinopathy (as per the American Diabetes Association criteria and Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale) and 100 healthy age and sex-matched controls. All patients were subjected to NFC and ophthalmological assessment. Results NFC revealed that patients with DR showed significantly higher frequencies of tortuous, dilated, bushy, meandering, angulated capillaries, avascular areas and micro-haemorrhages as compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). In proliferative DR (PDR), the frequency of tortuous, bushy capillaries, and avascular areas was statistically high and the capillary density was reduced as compared to non-proliferative DR. The DR patients with longer disease duration (>20) years had a significantly higher frequency of tortuous capillaries, avascular areas, meandering, angulated and dilated capillaries. The frequency of tortuosity, avascular areas, and bushy areas was significantly higher in patients with poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >11). Limitations A larger sample size study with different demographic populations could have provided a broader picture of NFC changes in T2DM patients with DR. Discussion NFC may act as a surrogate marker of retinal involvement in patients with DM and should be performed at regular intervals. Conclusion NFC is a quick, simple, safe, and non-invasive method to assess the capillaroscopic alterations in diabetic patients which inturn can help in assessing the severity of DR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究评估了在美国现实世界临床实践中,抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗对非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者的增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)发展的影响。
    方法:这是一项对具有基线NPDR的眼睛的电子病历(VestrumHealth;2013年1月至2019年6月)的回顾性分析,没有DME,并在DR指数诊断时首次接受抗VEGF治疗。在PDR发展之前在研究过程中接受抗VEGF和/或激光治疗的眼睛构成治疗组群,而剩余的包括用激光治疗的那些构成抗VEGF初始组群。通过Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,通过基线NPDR严重程度评估DME和PDR发展时间,以抗VEGF治疗为审查变量。使用Cox多元回归分析影响PDR发展的基线因素,审查抗VEGF治疗。
    结果:在抗VEGF幼稚的眼睛中,轻度眼DME的累积发病率(n=70,050),中等(n=39,116),基线时重度NPDR(n=10,692)为27.1%,51.2%,和60.6%。多变量回归分析确定基线NPDR严重程度是48个月内PDR发展的最重要预测因素(中度与轻度NPDR的风险比[HR][95%置信区间{CI}]为2.69(2.65-2.72),重度与轻度NPDR的风险比为6.51(6.47-6.55))。PDR的累积发生率(95%CI)为7.9%(7.4%-8.3%),20.9%,(20.0%-21.7%)和46.8%(44.4%-49.2%)超过48个月的轻度眼睛,中度,基线时严重的NPDR,分别。在基线严重NPDR的治疗眼睛中,在接受激光治疗的眼中,48个月时PDR的累积发生率为50.1%(n=546;HR[95%CI]vs未治疗:0.8[0.7-1.0]),用抗VEGF治疗的眼睛中27.4%(n=923;HR[95%CI]:0.4[0.4-0.5]),用抗VEGF加激光治疗的眼为25.6%(n=293;HR[95%CI]:0.5[0.4-0.7]),而未治疗的眼为49.9%(n=8930)。
    结论:DME和PDR发展率随着基线NPDR严重程度的增加而增加。在美国临床实践中,大约一半的患有严重NPDR的抗VEGF幼稚眼睛在4年内发展为PDR。抗VEGF治疗与不治疗相比,从严重NPDR到PDR的进展率大约减半。
    BACKGROUND: This study evaluated impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment on proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) development among patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in US real-world clinical practice.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (Vestrum Health; January 2013 to June 2019) of eyes with baseline NPDR, without DME, and naïve to anti-VEGF treatment at index DR diagnosis. Eyes that received anti-VEGF and/or laser treatment over the course of study before development of PDR constituted the treated cohort while the remaining including those treated with laser constituted the anti-VEGF naïve cohort. Survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier method evaluated time to DME and PDR development by baseline NPDR severity, with anti-VEGF treatment as censoring variable. Baseline factors affecting PDR development were analyzed using Cox multivariable regression, censoring for anti-VEGF treatment.
    RESULTS: Among anti-VEGF-naive eyes, cumulative incidence of DME in eyes with mild (n = 70,050), moderate (n = 39,116), and severe NPDR (n = 10,692) at baseline was 27.1%, 51.2%, and 60.6%. Multivariable regression analysis identified baseline NPDR severity as the most significant predictor of PDR development over 48 months (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] of 2.69 (2.65-2.72) for moderate vs mild NPDR and 6.51 (6.47-6.55) for severe vs mild NPDR). Cumulative incidence (95% CI) of PDR was 7.9% (7.4%-8.3%), 20.9%, (20.0%-21.7%) and 46.8% (44.4%-49.2%) over 48 months in eyes with mild, moderate, and severe NPDR at baseline, respectively. Among treated eyes with baseline severe NPDR, cumulative incidence of PDR at 48 months was 50.1% in eyes treated with laser (n = 546; HR [95% CI] vs no treatment: 0.8 [0.7-1.0]), 27.4% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF (n = 923; HR [95% CI]: 0.4 [0.4-0.5]), and 25.6% in eyes treated with anti-VEGF plus laser (n = 293; HR [95% CI]: 0.5 [0.4-0.7]) compared with 49.9% in eyes with no treatment (n = 8930).
    CONCLUSIONS: DME and PDR development rates increased with increasing baseline NPDR severity. Approximately half of anti-VEGF‒naive eyes with severe NPDR progressed to PDR within 4 years in US clinical practice. The progression rate from severe NPDR to PDR was approximately halved with anti-VEGF versus no treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病最常见的微血管并发症,如果不及时治疗会导致视力障碍。本文讨论了使用光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)作为早期发现和管理DR的诊断工具。OCTA是一个快速的,非侵入性,非接触测试,使黄斑微血管在不同的丛详细可视化。OCTA比荧光素眼底血管造影术(FFA)有几个优点,特别是提供定量数据。OCTA并非没有限制,包括仔细解释文物的要求以及目前可以捕获的有限感兴趣区域。我们探讨了OCTA如何在检测DR临床体征之前的早期微血管变化中发挥作用。我们还讨论了OCTA在DR各个阶段的诊断和管理中的应用。包括非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR),增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR),糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO),糖尿病性黄斑缺血和糖尿病前期。最后,我们讨论了OCTA的未来作用以及它如何用于提高DR的临床结局。
    Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, leading to visual impairment if left untreated. This review discusses the use of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) as a diagnostic tool for the early detection and management of DR. OCTA is a fast, non-invasive, non-contact test that enables the detailed visualisation of the macular microvasculature in different plexuses. OCTA offers several advantages over fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), notably offering quantitative data. OCTA is not without limitations, including the requirement for careful interpretation of artefacts and the limited region of interest that can be captured currently. We explore how OCTA has been instrumental in detecting early microvascular changes that precede clinical signs of DR. We also discuss the application of OCTA in the diagnosis and management of various stages of DR, including non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), diabetic macular ischaemia (DMI), and pre-diabetes. Finally, we discuss the future role of OCTA and how it may be used to enhance the clinical outcomes of DR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文介绍了一个多模式数据库,由76人的222张图像组成,其中111是OCTA图像,111是在浦那马哈拉施特拉邦的娜塔莎眼科护理和研究所拍摄的彩色眼底图像,印度。使用共聚焦SLO宽视场眼底成像Eidon机获取非散瞳眼底图像。非散瞳OCTA图像最初使用OptovueAvantiEdition机器获取,本文描述的临床方法用于获得视网膜图像。在此之后,数据集由两位经验丰富的眼科专家分类.确定非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)的不同阶段的实例,医学专家和学者可以使用这些数据。研究学者和眼科医生可以利用创建的数据来开发糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的自动识别技术的初始阶段。
    This article presents a Multimodal database consisting of 222 images of 76 people wherein 111 are OCTA images and 111 are color fundus images taken at the Natasha Eye Care and Research Institute of Pune Maharashtra, India. Nonmydriatic fundus images were acquired using a confocal SLO widefield fundus imaging Eidon machine. Nonmydriatic OCTA images were acquired using the Optovue Avanti Edition machine Initially, the clinical approach described in this article was used to obtain the retinal images. Following that, the dataset was categorized by two experienced eye specialists. To identify instances of Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) with their various stages, medical professionals and scholars can use this data. Research scholars and ophthalmologists can utilize the data created to develop the initial stages of automated identification techniques for diabetic retinopathy (DR).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)合并糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者全身炎症介质水平,探讨全身炎症介质与DME的相关性。
    在这项前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了25例非糖尿病患者(对照组)和75例2型糖尿病患者(糖尿病组).根据眼底检查,将糖尿病组患者分为:无糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的糖尿病患者(Non-DR组),无DME的NPDR患者(非DME组),和NPDR患者的DME(DME组)。通过基于流式细胞术检测系统的多重蛋白质定量检测技术分析了多种炎症介质的血清水平。
    DME组和非DME组的干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)水平显著高于对照组(p=0.023和p=0.033)和非DR组(p=0.009和p=0.015)。与对照组相比,在DME组和非DME组中获得显著更高的白介素-8(IL-8)值(p=0.003和p=0.003)。DME组和非DR组的IL-23水平明显高于非DME组(p=0.013和p=0.004)。糖尿病组血清IL-8和IL-33水平显著升高(p=0.001和p=0.011),与对照组相比,血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平较低(p=0.027)。
    血清炎症介质水平的变化提示全身炎症介质参与了NPDR伴DME患者的发病机制。这种影响可以指导临床监测,早期DME患者的诊断和治疗方法。
    To study the systemic inflammatory mediator levels in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and explore the correlation between systemic inflammatory mediators and DME.
    In this prospective study, we included 25 patients without diabetes (control group) and 75 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetic group). According to fundus examination, the diabetic group patients were divided into: diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR) (Non-DR group), NPDR patients without DME (Non-DME group), and NPDR patients with DME (DME group). Serum levels of a broad panel of inflammatory mediators were analysed by multiplex protein quantitative detection technology based on a flow cytometry detection system.
    The interferon-γ (IFN-γ) levels were significantly higher in DME group and Non-DME group as compared to control group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.033) and Non-DR group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.015). Significantly higher values were obtained in DME group and Non-DME group as compared to control group for the interleukin-8 (IL-8) (p = 0.003 and p = 0.003). The IL-23 levels were significantly elevated in DME group and Non-DR group than in Non-DME group (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004). The diabetic group had significantly higher serum levels of IL-8 and IL-33 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011), and lower serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (p = 0.027) in comparison with control group.
    The changed levels of serum inflammatory mediators suggest that the systemic inflammatory mediators are involved in the pathogenesis of NPDR patients with DME. Such effects can guide clinical monitoring, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for DME patients at an early stage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们试图阐明全身炎症标志物如高敏C反应蛋白(Hs-CRP)之间的潜在关联,pentraxin-3(PTX3),2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)和心外膜脂肪厚度(EFT)。以前的研究将糖尿病性视网膜病变作为一个整体,而不是糖尿病性视网膜病变的早期阶段。在临床实践中优先考虑早期检测NPDR的各种决定因素。
    在曼苏拉大学医院进行了一项病例对照研究,包括207名埃及受试者,分为3组;69名没有视网膜病变的糖尿病患者,69例NPDR糖尿病患者,和69名健康对照受试者。参与者接受了临床病史记录,体检,以及Hs-CRP和血浆PTX3的实验室评估。经胸超声心动图用于估计EFT。
    Hs-CRP,无视网膜病变的T2D患者的PTX3和EFT明显高于对照组(p=0.033,p<0.00和p<0.00)。此外,NPDR患者Hs-CRP值显著升高,PTX3和EFT比无视网膜病变的糖尿病对照者(分别为p=0.002,p=0.012和p<0.001)。虽然,NPDR与Hs-CRP呈正相关,PTX3和EFT(p<0.001),Hs-CRP不是NPDR的独立决定因素,EFT(OR=1.094,95CI:1.036-1.154,P=0.001)和PTX3(OR=16.145,95CI:1.676-155.551,P=0.016)。
    在2型糖尿病患者中,血浆pentraxin-3和心外膜脂肪厚度与NPDR的相关性高于高敏C反应蛋白。
    UNASSIGNED: We tried to clarify the potential association between systemic inflammatory markers like high-sensitive C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and epicardial fat thickness (EFT) with the non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Previous studies dealt with diabetic retinopathy as a whole entity rather than early stages of diabetic retinopathy. Early detection of various determinants of NPDR is prioritized in clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: A case-control study was conducted at Mansoura University Hospital, included 207 Egyptian subjects divided into 3 groups; 69 diabetic patients without retinopathy, 69 diabetic patients with NPDR, and 69 healthy control subjects. Participants were subjected to clinical history taking, physical examination, and laboratory assessment of Hs-CRP and plasma PTX3. Transthoracic echocardiography was applied to estimate EFT.
    UNASSIGNED: Hs-CRP, PTX3, and EFT were significantly higher in patients with T2D without retinopathy than control cohort (p = 0.033, p < 0.00 and p < 0.00, respectively). Moreover, patients with NPDR showed significantly higher values of Hs-CRP, PTX3, and EFT than diabetic comparators without retinopathy (p = 0.002, p = 0.012, and p < 0.001, respectively). Although, NPDR was positively correlated with Hs-CRP, PTX3, and EFT (p < 0.001), Hs-CRP was not an independent determinant of NPDR meanwhile, EFT (OR = 1.094, 95%CI: 1.036-1.154, P = 0.001) and PTX3 (OR = 16.145, 95%CI: 1.676-155.551, P = 0.016) were.
    UNASSIGNED: Plasma pentraxin-3 and epicardial fat thickness showed more significant association with NPDR than high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR),一种常见的糖尿病并发症,发病率高,以视功能受损和眼底病变为特征。据报道,口服中成药(OCPM)可能会改善视力和资金体征。然而,NPDR的最佳OCPM仍然值得怀疑,值得进一步研究。
    从成立到2022年10月20日,在七个数据库中搜索了符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果为临床有效率,视敏度,视野灰度值,微动脉瘤体积,出血面积,黄斑厚度,和不良事件发生率。使用修订的Cochrane偏倚风险工具(ROB2)评估纳入研究的质量。使用R4.1.3和STATA15.0软件进行网络荟萃分析。
    我们纳入了42个RCTs,有4,858名患者(5,978只眼)。复方丹参滴丸(CDDP)联合羟苯磺酸钙(CD)在临床疗效上提高最大(SUCRA,88.58%)。复方血栓通胶囊(CXC)联合CD可能是最佳干预措施(SUCRA,98.51%)用于改善视力。单用CDDP可能是最有效的治疗选择(SUCRA,91.83%)用于提高视野灰度值。和血明目片(HXMMT)和双丹明目胶囊(SDMMC)联合CD可能是减少微动脉瘤体积和出血面积的最有效治疗方法(SUCRA,94.48%,和86.24%),分别。关于减少黄斑厚度,CXC结合CD排名第一(SUCRA,86.23%)。此外,所有OCPM均未引起严重不良反应.
    OCPM对NPDR有效且安全。仅CDDP,并结合CD,可能是最有效的提高视野灰度值和临床有效率,分别;CXC联合CD可能是增强BCVA和减少黄斑厚度的最佳方法;HXMMT和SDMMC联合CD,可能是最有效的微动脉瘤体积和出血面积,分别。然而,初步研究中的方法论报告很差,在综合证据和解释结果时,可能存在潜在的偏见。目前的发现需要更多的大样本来证实,双盲,未来严格设计和稳健方法的多中心RCT。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/,标识符CRD42022367867。
    Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), a common diabetic complication with high morbidity, is featured by impaired visual function and fundus lesions. It has been reported that oral Chinese patent medicines (OCPMs) may improve visual acuity and fund signs. However, the best possible OCPMs for NPDR remain questionable and merit further investigation.
    From inception to October 20, 2022, seven databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes were clinical effective rate, visual acuity, visual field gray value, microaneurysm volume, hemorrhage area, macular thickness, and adverse events rate. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was performed using R 4.1.3 and STATA 15.0 software.
    We included 42 RCTs with 4,858 patients (5,978 eyes). The Compound Danshen Dripping Pill (CDDP) combined with calcium dobesilate (CD) had the most improvement in clinical efficacy rate (SUCRA, 88.58%). The Compound Xueshuantong Capsule (CXC) combined with CD may be the best intervention (SUCRA, 98.51%) for the improvement of visual acuity. CDDP alone may be the most effective treatment option (SUCRA, 91.83%) for improving visual field gray value. The Hexuemingmu Tablet (HXMMT) and Shuangdan Mingmu Capsule (SDMMC) combined with CD may be the most effective treatment for reducing microaneurysm volume and hemorrhage area (SUCRA, 94.48%, and 86.24%), respectively. Referring to reducing macular thickness, CXC combined with CD ranked first (SUCRA, 86.23%). Moreover, all OCPMs did not cause serious adverse reactions.
    OCPMs are effective and safe for NPDR. CDDP alone, and combined with CD, may be the most effective in improving visual field gray value and clinical efficacy rate, respectively; CXC combined with CD may be the best in enhancing BCVA and reducing macular thickness; HXMMT and SDMMC combined with CD, maybe the most effective regarding microaneurysm volume and hemorrhage area, respectively. However, the reporting of methodology in the primary study is poor, potential biases may exist when synthesizing evidence and interpreting the results. The current findings need to be confirmed by more large-sample, double-blind, multi-center RCTs of rigorous design and robust methods in the future.
    https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022367867.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable visual impairment in the working age population. Despite the increasing prevalence of DR, there remain gaps in our understanding of its pathophysiology. This is a prospective case-control study comparing the genetic profiles of patients with no DR vs. non-proliferative DR (NPDR) focusing on intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA) and venous beading (VB) in Caucasians. A total of 596 participants were recruited to the study; 199 with moderate/severe NPDR and 397 with diabetes for at least 5 years without DR. Sixty-four patients were excluded due to technical issues. In total, 532 were analysed; 181 and 351 were in the NPDR group and no DR group, respectively. Those with severe IRMA and VB had distinctly different genetic profiles from each other and from the no DR group, which further supports the theory that these two features of DR might have different etiologies. This also suggests that IRMA and VB are independent risk factors for the development of PDR and may have different pathophysiologies. If these findings are confirmed in larger studies, this could pave the way for personalised treatment options for those more at risk of developing different features of NPDR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号