We present a case of an 82-year-old female with a significant medical history of hypertension and Alzheimer\'s disease who developed heparin-induced hemorrhagic bullous dermatosis during treatment for a subsegmental pulmonary embolism. The patient was admitted with lower extremity edema and cyanosis, diagnosed with a subsegmental pulmonary embolism, and started on therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin. On the sixth day of heparin therapy, she developed abdominal bloating and a diffuse exanthematous rash, which progressed to hemorrhagic bullae on the plantar and dorsal aspects of her feet, alongside extensive purpura on her legs. Laboratory findings revealed thrombocytopenia. Multidisciplinary consultations confirmed the diagnosis of heparin-induced hemorrhagic bullous dermatosis. Management included continuing unfractionated heparin with close monitoring, supportive topical treatments, and a subsequent transition to rivaroxaban. The patient\'s condition improved significantly, and she was discharged in stable condition. This case highlights the importance of recognizing rare adverse reactions to heparin and raises the question of preventive measures or risk factors related to this manifestation.

Being a dialysis patient is one of the risks for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. In addition, there have been many reports of coagulation abnormalities in severe COVID-19 cases; these also make dialysis management more difficult. In this study, we report a case of severe COVID-19 in a hemodialysis patient who had coagulation in the dialysis circuit with unfractionated heparin (UFH), which could be managed without intracircuit obstruction when nafamostat mesylate (NM) was used in combination with unfractionated heparin.

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis is a relatively common form of acute pancreatitis that may represent up to 10% of all etiologies of this condition. Due to its specific pathogenic mechanisms related to high serum triglyceride levels, different treatment options have been proposed, including insulin perfusion, heparin perfusion, and plasmapheresis. Although the superiority of plasmapheresis in this clinical setting has not been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, many centers have reported its effectiveness and considered this as a possible alternative according to the current guidelines. We report a case of a young patient diagnosed with hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis that was successfully treated with plasmapheresis. Since complications associated with plasmapheresis are rare and other therapeutic options may not be so effective or safe, we believe that this should be a valid alternative treatment that may be offered to these patients. More studies are still needed to further evaluate its effectiveness and to elucidate if there is a subset of patients in whom treatment with plasmapheresis may be more beneficial.