BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NP) due to nerve injury, disrupts neural plasticity by triggering the release of inflammatory mediators. Alongside the hypothesis that neuro-inflammation contributes to this disruption, Andrographolide (Andro), a traditional bioactive compound derived from Andrographis paniculata, has garnered attention for its potent anti-inflammatory properties. However, whether Andro could ameliorate NP by regulating neuroinflammation remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether and how Andro regulates neuroinflammation and alleviates NP.
METHODS: The analgesic effects of Andro on NP were evaluated using both the spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and formalin rat models. A combination of network pharmacology, RNA sequencing, and experimental validation was employed to elucidate the underlying mechanism behind Andro\'s analgesic effects. Additionally, various techniques such as functional ultrasound, immunohistochemistry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), patch clamp, and electron microscopy were employed to investigate the specific neural cell types, neural functions, and changes in neural plasticity influenced by Andro.
RESULTS: Network pharmacology analysis unveiled the crucial roles played by shared targets of Andro and pain in regulating pain-related inflammation, including microglia activation, neuroinflammation, immune modulation, and synaptic transmission. Furthermore, we confirmed Andro\'s superior efficacy in pain relief compared to the traditional analgesic drug, Gabapentin. In these models, Andro was observed to modulate the haemodynamic response triggered by SNL. Transcriptome analysis and molecular docking studies indicated the involvement of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) genes (Db1, Da, and Bb). Electron microscopy revealed improvements in synaptic ultrastructure, and electrophysiological investigations showed a selective reduction in glutamatergic transmission in neuropathic rats after following Andro treatment. The integration of systems pharmacology analysis and biological validation collectively demonstrated that the mechanism of pain relief involves immune modulation, enhancement of synaptic plasticity, and precise regulation of excitatory neurotransmission.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that Andro, by targeting MHCII genes, may serve as a promising therapeutic candidate for neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of neuropathic pain remains incomplete, highlighting the need for research on biomarkers for improved diagnosis and treatment. This review focuses on identifying potential biomarkers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid for neuropathic pain in different neuropathies.
METHODS: Searches were performed in six databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Included were observational studies, namely cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control, that evaluated quantitative biomarkers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Data were qualitatively synthesized, and meta-analyses were conducted using R. The study is registered with PROSPERO under the ID CRD42022323769.
RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 16 studies for qualitative and 12 for quantitative analysis, covering patients over 18 years of age with painful neuropathies. A total of 1403 subjects were analyzed, identifying no significant differences in levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) between patients with and without pain. Despite the high inter-rater reliability and adequate bias assessment, the results suggest negligible differences in inflammatory biomarkers, with noted publication bias and heterogeneity among studies, indicating the need for further research.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review underscores the complex nature of neuropathic pain and the challenges in identifying biomarkers, with no significant differences found in CRP, IL-6, and TNF-alpha levels between patients with and without pain. Despite methodological robustness, the results are limited by publication bias and heterogeneity. This emphasizes the need for further research to discover definitive biomarkers for improved diagnosis and personalized treatment of neuropathic pain.

Conventionally, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for treatment of chronic pain has involved a two-stage process: a short-term (e.g., 7 days) trial and, if significant pain relief is achieved, a permanent PNS system is implanted. A percutaneous PNS treatment is now available where a coiled lead may be implanted for up to 60 days with the goal of producing sustained relief. In the present review, published prospective trials using percutaneous PNS treatment were identified and synthesized. The collected evidence indicates that percutaneous PNS treatment for up to 60 days provides durable clinically significant improvements in pain and pain interference. Similar efficacy across diverse targets and etiologies supports the broad applicability for use within the chronic pain population using this nonopioid technology.
What is this review about? This review looks at a drug-free way to treat chronic pain called percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). Percutaneous means it is placed through the skin. PNS applies small amounts of electricity to the nerves to reduce chronic pain. Most PNS systems involve a two-step process. A short trial is first performed to see if a patient has pain relief. A permanent system is then placed if the person had pain relief. Percutaneous PNS treatments are different. They use a thin wire called a lead placed in the body for up to 60 days. The lead is taken out at the end of the treatment period. Studies have shown that this type of PNS treatment can reduce chronic pain even after the treatment is over. No previous article has collected all these studies of percutaneous PNS in one place.What evidence was gathered? This review found evidence from studies on treatment of chronic pain. Pain types included shoulder pain, neuropathic pain and low back pain. It found that percutaneous PNS treatment for up to 60 days can reduce pain and how pain interferes with daily life.How can these data lead to better care for patients? These findings mean that percutaneous PNS treatments could be a useful, non-drug option for many types of chronic pain.

UNASSIGNED: Neuropathic pain is one of the most common symptoms in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Notwithstanding, its underlying mechanism remains obscure.
UNASSIGNED: The amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) metric was employed to investigate spontaneous neural activity alterations via resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-MRI) data from a 3.0 T MRI scanner, in a sample of 26 patients diagnosed with NMOSD with neuropathic pain (NMOSD-WNP), 20 patients with NMOSD but without neuropathic pain (NMOSD-WoNP), and 38 healthy control (HC) subjects matched for age and sex without the comorbidity of depressive or anxious symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: It was observed that patients with NMOSD-WNP displayed a significant ALFF decrease in the left amygdala and right anterior insula, relative to both patients with NMOSD-WoNP and HC subjects. Furthermore, ALFF values in the left amygdala were negatively correlated with the scores of the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions and McGill Pain Questionnaire (both sensory and affective descriptors) in patients with NMOSD-WNP. Additionally, there were negative correlations between the ALFF values in the right anterior insula and the duration of pain and the number of relapses in patients with NMOSD-WNP.
UNASSIGNED: The present study characterizes spontaneous neural activity changes in brain regions associated with sensory and affective processing of pain and its modulation, which underscore the central aspects in patients with NMOSD-WNP. These findings might contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiologic basis of neuropathic pain in NMOSD.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of insomnia and the effectiveness of its treatment in patients with a painful form of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN).
METHODS: Fifty patients with the painful form of DPN were randomly divided into 2 groups: the standard therapy group (ST) and the extended therapy group (ET). In the ST group, a single lesson on sleep hygiene was conducted, in the ET group there were 3-4 face-to-face individual sessions for the treatment of insomnia for two weeks. Both groups were interviewed at the time of hospitalization, after 3 and 6 months. The severity of polyneuropathy and the nature of neuropathic pain were assessed using the Neuropathic Neuropathy Impairment Score in the Lower Limbs (NIS-LL) and the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score - 9 (NTSS-9); the intensity of pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Sleep disorders were analyzed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI).
RESULTS: Sleep disorders of varying severity were observed in 82% of patients in the initial survey. In both groups, improvement in sleep quality was noted during treatment, but significantly better results were in the ET group, the ISI score after 6 months was 7.15±2.08 for the ST group and 3.07±2.49 for the ET group (p<0.0001). In the ST group, there was no significant decrease in the intensity of pain and the severity of polyneuropathy in dynamics. In the ET group, a significant decrease in NTSS-9 and VAS scores was found during the initial survey and after 6 months (p<0.0001). The intensity of pain also significantly decreased in the ET group compared with the ST group (p<0.0001) at the end of follow-up, which indicates the importance of sleep normalization in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with the painful form of DPN have insomnia. Treatment of insomnia has shown its effectiveness as part of a multimodal approach to the managing of neuropathic pain in DPN and improving the quality of life of patients.
UNASSIGNED: Определение распространенности инсомнии и эффективности ее коррекции у пациентов с болевой формой диабетической полинейропатии (ДПН).
UNASSIGNED: Пятьдесят пациентов с болевой формой ДПН случайным образом разделены на 2 группы: группу стандартной (СТ) и группу расширенной (РТ) терапии. В группе СТ проводилось однократное занятие по гигиене сна, в группе РТ — 3—4 очных индивидуальных сессии по коррекции инсомнии в течение 2 нед. Обеим группам проведено анкетирование на момент госпитализации, через 3 и 6 мес. Оценка выраженности полинейропатии и характера нейропатических болей проводилась с помощью шкалы нейропатических нарушений в ногах (NIS-LL) и шкалы общей оценки симптомов нейропатии (NTSS-9); интенсивность болевого синдрома оценивалась с помощью Визуальной аналоговой шкалы (ВАШ). Анализ нарушений сна проводился с использованием Питтсбургского индекса качества сна (PSQI) и Индекса тяжести инсомнии (ISI).
UNASSIGNED: У 82% пациентов при первичном опросе имелись нарушения сна различной степени выраженности. В обеих группах на фоне лечения отмечалось улучшение качества сна в динамике, однако достоверно лучшие результаты отмечены в группе РТ: для группы СТ балл по шкале ISI через 6 мес составил 7,15±2,08, для группы РТ — 3,07±2,49 (p<0,0001). В группе СТ значимого снижения интенсивности болевого синдрома и выраженности полинейропатии в динамике обнаружено не было. В группе РТ обнаружено статистически значимое снижение баллов по шкалам NTSS-9 и ВАШ при первичном опросе и через 6 мес (p<0,0001). Интенсивность болевого синдрома также достоверно снизилась в группе РТ в сравнении с группой СТ (p<0,0001) по окончании наблюдения, что свидетельствует о значимости нормализации сна в лечении нейропатической боли.
UNASSIGNED: У большинства пациентов с болевой формой ДПН имеется инсомния. Коррекция инсомнии показала свою эффективность в рамках мультимодального подхода к лечению нейропатической боли при ДПН и повышению качества жизни пациентов.

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a shared burden for 68.1% of oncological patients undergoing chemotherapy with Paclitaxel (PTX). The symptoms are intense and troublesome, patients reporting paresthesia, loss of sensation, and dysesthetic pain. While current medications focus on decreasing the symptom intensity, often ineffective, no medication is yet recommended by the guidelines for the prevention of CIPN. Cannabinoids are an attractive option, as their neuroprotective features have already been demonstrated in neuropathies with other etiologies, by offering the peripheral neurons protection against toxic effects, which promotes analgesia. Methods: We aim to screen several new cannabinoids for their potential use as neuroprotective agents for CIPN by investigating the cellular toxicity profile and by assessing the potential neuroprotective features against PTX using a primary dorsal root ganglion neuronal culture. Results: Our study showed that synthetic cannabinoids JWH-007, AM-694 and MAB-CHMINACA and phytocannabinoids Cannabixir® Medium dried flowers (NC1) and Cannabixir® THC full extract (NC2) preserve the viability of fibroblasts and primary cultured neurons, in most of the tested dosages and time-points. The combination between the cannabinoids and PTX conducted to a cell viability of 70%-89% compared to 40% when PTX was administered alone for 48 h. When assessing the efficacy for neuroprotection, the combination between cannabinoids and PTX led to better preservation of neurite length at all tested time-points compared to controls, highly drug and exposure-time dependent. By comparison, the combination of the cannabinoids and PTX administered for 24 h conducted to axonal shortening between 23% and 44%, as opposed to PTX only, which shortened the axons by 63% compared to their baseline values. Discussion and Conclusion: Cannabinoids could be potential new candidates for the treatment of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy; however, our findings need to be followed by additional tests to understand the exact mechanism of action, which would support the translation of the cannabinoids in the oncological clinical practice.

First-line pharmacotherapy for peripheral neuropathic pain (NP) of diverse pathophysiology consists of antidepressants and gabapentinoids, but only a minority achieve sufficient analgesia with these drugs. Opioids are considered third-line analgesics in NP due to potential severe and unpredictable adverse effects in long-term use. Also, opioid tolerance and NP may have shared mechanisms, raising further concerns about opioid use in NP. We set out to further elucidate possible shared and separate mechanisms after chronic morphine treatment and oxaliplatin-induced and diabetic polyneuropathies, and to identify potential diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. We analysed thermal nociceptive behaviour, the transcriptome of dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and the metabolome of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in these three conditions, in rats. Several genes were differentially expressed, most following oxaliplatin and least after chronic morphine treatment, compared with saline-treated rats. A few genes were differentially expressed in the DRGs in all three models (e.g. Csf3r and Fkbp5). Some, e.g. Alox15 and Slc12a5, were differentially expressed in both diabetic and oxaliplatin models. Other differentially expressed genes were associated with nociception, inflammation, and glial cells. The CSF metabolome was most significantly affected in the diabetic rats. Interestingly, we saw changes in nicotinamide metabolism, which has been associated with opioid addiction and withdrawal, in the CSF of morphine-tolerant rats. Our results offer new hypotheses for the pathophysiology and treatment of NP and opioid tolerance. In particular, the role of nicotinamide metabolism in opioid addiction deserves further study.

Neuropathic pain is a challenging chronic pain condition. Limited knowledge exists regarding the relative effectiveness of pharmacological treatments, and differences in trial design and impact of the placebo response preclude indirect comparisons of efficacy between drug classes. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of drugs recommended for neuropathic pain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct-comparison double-blind randomized trials. Primary outcomes were mean change in pain intensity and number of responders with a 50% reduction in pain intensity. Secondary outcomes encompassed quality of life, sleep, emotional functioning, and number of dropouts because of adverse events. We included 30 trials (4087 patients), comprising 16 crossover and 14 parallel-group design studies. All studies were conducted in adults, and the majority were investigator-initiated trials. We found moderate-quality evidence for equivalence (no clinically relevant difference) between tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) and gabapentin/pregabalin with a combined mean difference in pain score of 0.10 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.32). We could not document differences between TCA and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), between SNRI and gabapentin/pregabalin, or between opioids and TCA (low quality of evidence). We found more dropouts because of adverse events with SNRI and opioids compared with TCA (low quality of evidence). We did not identify any studies that included topical treatments. This systematic review of direct-comparison studies found evidence for equivalence between TCA and gabapentin/pregabalin and fewer dropouts with TCA than SNRI and opioids.

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a common type of chronic pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. This condition imposes a considerable economic burden on society and patients. Daphnetin (DAP) is a natural product isolated from a Chinese medicinal herb with various pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. However, the underlying mechanisms of these effects are not fully understood. In the present study, we aimed to investigate DAP\'s anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects and explore the underlying mechanisms of action. The NP model was established as chronic constrictive injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve, and pain sensitivity was evaluated by measuring the mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) and thermal withdrawal threshold (TWT). The activation of microglia in the spinal dorsal horn was measured via immunofluorescence staining. Protein levels were measured using a western blot assay. Using a mass-spectrometry proteomics platform and an LC-MS/MS-based metabolomics platform, proteins and metabolites in spinal cord tissues were extracted and analyzed. DAP treatment ameliorated the MWT and TWT in CCI rats. The expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α was inhibited by DAP treatment in the spinal cords of CCI rats. Moreover, the activation of microglia was suppressed after DAP treatment. The elevation in the levels of P2X4, IRF8, IRF5, BDNF, and p-P38/P38 in the spinal cord caused by CCI was inhibited by DAP. Proteomics and metabolomics results indicated that DAP ameliorated the imbalance of glycerophospholipid metabolism in the spinal cords of CCI rats. DAP can potentially ameliorate NP by regulating microglial responses and glycerophospholipid metabolism in the CCI model. This study provides a pharmacological justification for using DAP in the management of NP.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between neuropathic pain and CREB-binding protein (CBP) and methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) expression levels in a rat model with spared nerve injury (SNI). Materials and Methods: Rat (male Sprague-Dawley white rats) models with surgical SNI (n = 6) were prepared, and naive rats (n = 5) were used as controls. The expression levels of CBP and MeCP2 in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) were compared through immunohistochemistry at 7 and 14 days after surgery. The relationship between neuropathic pain and CBP/MeCP2 was also analyzed through intrathecal siRNA administration. Results: SNI induced a significant increase in the number of CBPs in L4 compared with contralateral DRG as well as with naive rats. The number of MeCP2 cells in the dorsal horn on the ipsilateral side decreased significantly compared with the contralateral dorsal horn and the control group. SNI induced a significant decrease in the number of MeCP2 neurons in the L4 ipsilateral DRG compared with the contralateral DRG and naive rats. The intrathecal injection of CBP siRNA significantly inhibited mechanical allodynia induced by SNI compared with non-targeting siRNA treatment. MeCP2 siRNA injection showed no significant effect on mechanical allodynia. Conclusions: The results suggest that CBP and MeCP2 may play an important role in the generation of neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury.