neurocognition

神经认知
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管进行了抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART),人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)相关的神经认知障碍持续存在。我们调查了成熟脑源性神经营养因子(mBDNF)的血清水平,前体脑源性神经营养因子(proBDNF),以及撒哈拉以南非洲感染艾滋病毒的成年人随着时间的推移神经认知的变化,寻求阐明ART后神经营养因子与神经认知结局之间的相互作用。
    利用约翰内斯堡和哈拉雷的ACTG5199研究数据,通过酶联免疫吸附法检测血清mBDNF和proBDNF水平。使用神经心理学测试在基线和24、48和96周评估神经认知表现。弗里德曼检验和线性混合效应模型用于评估mBDNF的变化,proBDNF,随着时间的推移和神经认知表现,考虑个体差异并调整多重比较。
    在155名参与者中,有显著的认知改善(P<.001)和mBDNF水平从基线上升至96周.proBDNF水平最初保持稳定(P=0.57),但在48周时显著增加(P=0.04)。较高的mBDNF水平与48周(β=.16,P=.01)和96周(β=.32,P<.001)的神经认知能力增强呈正相关。同样,在96周时,较高的proBDNF水平与神经认知能力呈正相关(β=.25,P<.001)。
    本研究强调了HIV成人患者血清BDNF水平与ART后神经认知改善之间的显著关联。然而,需要更多的研究来复制这些发现,建立因果关系,并探讨BDNF增强活动是否可以改善HIV感染者的神经认知结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite antiretroviral therapy (ART), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive impairment persists. We investigated the association between serum levels of mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (mBDNF), precursor brain-derived neurotrophic factor (proBDNF), and neurocognitive changes over time among adults with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, seeking to elucidate the interplay between neurotrophic factors and neurocognitive outcomes post-ART.
    UNASSIGNED: Utilizing data from the ACTG 5199 study in Johannesburg and Harare, serum mBDNF and proBDNF levels were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Neurocognitive performance was assessed at baseline and 24, 48, and 96 weeks using neuropsychological tests. The Friedman test and linear mixed-effects models were used to assess changes in mBDNF, proBDNF, and neurocognitive performance over time, accounting for individual variability and adjusting for multiple comparisons.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 155 participants, there were significant cognitive improvements (P < .001) and a rise in mBDNF levels from baseline to 96 weeks. The proBDNF levels initially remained stable (P = .57) but notably increased by 48 weeks (P = .04). Higher mBDNF levels were positively associated with enhanced neurocognitive performance at 48 weeks (β = .16, P = .01) and 96 weeks (β = .32, P < .001). Similarly, higher proBDNF levels were positively associated with neurocognitive performance at 96 weeks (β = .25, P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: This study highlights the significant association between serum BDNF levels and neurocognitive improvement post-ART in adults with HIV. However, more research is needed to replicate these findings, establish causal relationships, and explore whether BDNF-enhancing activities can improve neurocognitive outcomes in people with HIV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    双相情感障碍(BD)1意味着在正常状态下执行功能受损,从而干扰社会心理功能。虚拟现实评估在效率和生态有效性方面可能会比传统评估更具优势。这项研究的目的是验证一种新颖的虚拟烹饪任务(VCT),用于评估BD患者的执行功能。这是一项横断面研究,其中使用VCT和一系列计算机化标准任务(CST)评估了一组BD患者(n=42)和健康对照(n=42)。此外,两种评估形式对心理社会功能的影响,用快速测量,进行了调查,以检查生态有效性。在BD组中,干扰显著受损,在CST和VCT中发现了工作记忆和持续注意力。然而,VCT也揭示了计划和解决问题的缺陷。关于心理社会功能,在评估时,只有VCT变量能够预测FAST评分.VCT在评估BD的执行功能和现实生活功能方面比CST具有更高的敏感性。这为在BD中设计用于诊断和治疗目的的新型认知评估提供了证据。
    Bipolar disorder (BD)1 implies impairments in executive functions during euthymia that interfere in psychosocial functioning. Virtual reality assessments may confer advantages respect to traditional assessments in terms of efficiency and ecological validity. The aim of this study was to validate a novel Virtual Cooking Task (VCT) for executive functions assessment in euthymic patients with BD. This is a cross-sectional study in which a group of BD patients (n = 42) and healthy controls (n = 42) were assessed with the VCT and a battery of computerized standard tasks (CST). Additionally, the influence on psychosocial functioning of both forms of assessment, measured with the FAST, was investigated to check ecological validity. In BD group significant impairments in interference, working memory and sustained attention were found in CST and VCT respect to controls. However, deficits in planning and problem-solving were also revealed with the VCT. With respect to psychosocial functioning, only VCT variables were able to predict FAST scores at the assessment time. The VCT showed a greater sensitivity than CST to assess executive functions and real-life functioning in BD. This provides evidence about the opportunity to design novel cognitive assessments for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in BD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)患者神经认知依赖对跳跃距离和下肢运动学的影响。这是通过比较标准和神经认知条件下的跳跃表现来实现的。
    方法:32名ACLR后患者和32名健康对照(CTRL)参加。两组都进行了单腿跳跃距离(SLHD)和两个神经认知跳跃测试,每个设计用于评估神经认知的不同方面。神经认知测试包括反应SLHD(R-SLHD),测量对中央刺激的反应和工作记忆SLHD(WM-SLHD),评估在分心刺激中对记忆刺激的反应。评估三跳测试的距离。此外,收集关节运动学计算下肢协调功能。SLHD表现定义为每个参与者每条腿的每种条件的平均跳跃距离,并使用混合ANOVA进行分析,其中条件和腿作为受试者内因素,组(ACLR或CTRL)作为受试者间因素。联合协调变异性的差异采用双样本t检验统计参数作图(SPM)和线性回归分析。
    结果:与ACLR和CTRL的标准跳跃测试相比,WM-SLHD导致跳跃距离显着降低。此外,在较高的认知负荷下,ACLR组内的腿部差异增加,如WM-SLHD测试,指示下肢协调的腿部特异性适应。
    结论:神经认知单腿跳跃测试导致CTRL和ACLR的跳跃距离减少。神经认知跳测验揭示了CTRL和ACLR个体未受伤腿的协调变异性的变化,而受伤的腿的协调变异性保持不变,提示ACLR后运动的持续认知控制。
    方法:三级。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurocognitive reliance on jump distance and lower extremity kinematics in individuals who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This was achieved by comparing hop performance under standard and neurocognitive conditions.
    METHODS: Thirty-two patients after ACLR and 32 healthy controls (CTRL) participated. Both groups performed a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and two neurocognitive hop tests, each designed to evaluate distinct aspects of neurocognition. The neurocognitive tests included the reaction SLHD (R-SLHD), measuring reaction to a central stimulus and working memory SLHD (WM-SLHD) assessing response to a memorized stimulus amidst distractor stimuli. Distances were assessed for the three-hop tests. In addition, joint kinematics were collected to calculate lower extremity coordination of the lower extremity. SLHD performance was defined as the mean hop distance per condition per leg for each participant and was analyzed using a mixed ANOVA with condition and leg as the within-subjects factors and the group (ACLR or CTRL) as the between-subjects factor. Differences in joint coordination variability were analyzed using two-sample t-test statistical parametric mapping (SPM) with linear regression.
    RESULTS: The WM-SLHD resulted in a significantly decreased jump distance compared with the standard hop test both for ACLR and CTRL. Furthermore, the leg difference within the ACLR group increased under higher cognitive load as tested with the WM-SLHD, indicating leg-specific adaptations in lower extremity coordination.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive single-leg hop tests resulted in reduced jump distance in CTRL and ACLR. The neurocognitive hop test revealed changes in coordination variability for the CTRL and the uninjured leg of ACLR individuals, whereas the injured leg\'s coordination variability remained unaltered, suggesting persistent cognitive control of movements post-ACLR.
    METHODS: Level III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:种族认同可能与运动相关脑震荡(SRC)后的临床结果相关。这项研究比较了黑人或白人大学运动员从SRC恢复前后的临床结果得分。
    方法:前瞻性队列。
    方法:参与者是自我报告的白人(n=61,18.5[1.1]岁)和黑人(n=24,18.3[1.1]岁)NCAA1级大学运动员。修订后的头部伤害量表(HIS-r),即时脑震荡后和认知测试(Impact)电池,和基线(T1)的感官组织测试(SOT),根据诊断出的SRC后的症状缓解(T2),并建立新的基线评估(T3)。种族是从纸质和电子病历中收集的。修订后的头部损伤总症状严重程度量表,Impact\的言语记忆,视觉记忆,视觉电机转速(VMS),反应时间,和SOT均衡分数,在每个时间点进行组间比较。多变量方差分析(2[组]×3[时间])用于比较修订的头部损伤量表,影响,和SOT结果分数。事后分析包括独立和配对样本t检验。
    结果:对于SOT,观察到显著的时间主效应(λ=0.66,F2,82=21.55,P<.001,ηp2=.34)。白人运动员在所有时间点之间的平衡得分显着提高(所有P<.006)。同样,黑人运动员在T1-T2和T1-T3之间的平衡得分显着提高(所有P<.001)。时间对ImPACT的言语记忆有显著的主要影响,视觉记忆,和VMS结果评分(所有P<.001)。白人运动员的VMS在T1-T2(P=.02)和T3(P=.006)之间有所改善。黑人运动员在T1-T3(P=0.015)和T2-T3(P=0.005)之间的VMS得分有所改善。在T2观察到VMS的组间差异(P=.004)。
    结论:在T2时,两组之间的VMS评分有1个小的且无临床显著性差异。总的来说,组的基线平衡表现一致或有所改善,认知,和SRC后临床相关时间点的症状结果评分。
    BACKGROUND: Racial identity may associate with clinical outcomes following sport-related concussion (SRC). This study compared clinical outcome scores before and after recovery from a SRC between Black or White college athletes.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort.
    METHODS: Participants were self-reported White (n = 61, 18.5 [1.1] y of age) and Black (n = 24, 18.3 [1.1] y of age) NCAA Division 1 college athletes. The revised Head Injury Scale (HIS-r), the Immediate Postconcussion and Cognitive Test (ImPACT) battery, and the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) at baseline (T1), upon symptom resolution (T2) following a diagnosed SRC, and upon establishing a new baseline assessment (T3). Race was collected from paper and electronic medical records. The revised Head Injury Scale total symptom severity, ImPACT\'s Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual Motor Speed (VMS), and Reaction Time, and the SOT Equilibrium Score, were compared between groups at each time point. Multivariate analyses of variance (2 [group] × 3 [time]) were used to compare revised Head Injury Scale, ImPACT, and SOT outcome scores. Post hoc analyses consisted of independent and paired sample t tests.
    RESULTS: A significant main effect for time (λ = 0.66, F2,82 = 21.55, P < .001, ηp2=.34) was observed for the SOT. White athletes significantly improved on the Equilibrium Score between all time points (all P < .006). Similarly, Black athletes significantly improved on the Equilibrium Score between T1-T2 and T1-T3 (all P < .001). A significant main effect of time was observed for ImPACT\'s Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and VMS outcome scores (all P < .001). VMS improved for White athletes between T1-T2 (P = .02) and T3 (P = .006). Black athletes had improved VMS scores between T1-T3 (P = .015) and T2-T3 (P = .005). A between-group difference was observed for VMS at T2 (P = .004).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was 1 small and not clinically significant difference between groups for the VMS score at T2. Overall, groups performed consistently or improved upon their baseline balance, cognition, and symptom outcome scores at clinically relevant time points following a SRC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与设计创意任务相关的大脑动力学在很大程度上是未经探索的。尽管取得了重大进展,在设计创作任务期间,对大脑行为的理解有限。本文的目的是回顾创意和设计创意的概念及其差异,并使用脑电图(EEG)作为神经成像工具来探索与设计创造力任务相关的大脑动力学。本文旨在为设计创造力神经认知领域的未来研究人员提供必要的见解。它试图检查基础研究,提出关键发现,并开始讨论相关的大脑动力学。该综述采用主题分析和正向和反向滚雪球搜索方法,并具有特定的纳入和排除标准来选择相关研究。此搜索策略确保了对基于EEG的创造力和设计创造力实验的全面审查。这些实验的不同组成部分,如参与者,心理计量学,实验设计,和创造性任务,进行审查,然后讨论。该评论指出,虽然一些研究已经集中在创造力实验中关于脑电图α带活动的具体发现上,文献中仍然存在不一致之处。本文强调需要进一步研究以揭示这些认知过程之间的相互作用。这篇全面的评论为读者寻求对当前文学的理解提供了宝贵的资源,主要发现,以及知识仍然不完整的领域。它突出了积极和基础方面,识别差距,并提出了挥之不去的问题来指导未来的研究工作。
    Brain dynamics associated with design creativity tasks are largely unexplored. Despite significant strides, there is a limited understanding of the brain-behavior during design creation tasks. The objective of this paper is to review the concepts of creativity and design creativity as well as their differences, and to explore the brain dynamics associated with design creativity tasks using electroencephalography (EEG) as a neuroimaging tool. The paper aims to provide essential insights for future researchers in the field of design creativity neurocognition. It seeks to examine fundamental studies, present key findings, and initiate a discussion on associated brain dynamics. The review employs thematic analysis and a forward and backward snowball search methodology with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to select relevant studies. This search strategy ensured a comprehensive review focused on EEG-based creativity and design creativity experiments. Different components of those experiments such as participants, psychometrics, experiment design, and creativity tasks, are reviewed and then discussed. The review identifies that while some studies have converged on specific findings regarding EEG alpha band activity in creativity experiments, there remain inconsistencies in the literature. The paper underscores the need for further research to unravel the interplays between these cognitive processes. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for readers seeking an understanding of current literature, principal discoveries, and areas where knowledge remains incomplete. It highlights both positive and foundational aspects, identifies gaps, and poses lingering questions to guide future research endeavors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    22q11.2缺失综合征(22q11DS)是精神分裂症(SCZ)最重要的遗传危险因素之一,是研究SCZ内表型特征的可靠生物学模型。该研究的目的是调查22q11.2DS受试者与相当数量的精神分裂症患者相比的社会认知障碍。
    纳入44名22q11.2DS(DEL)患者和18名22q11.2DS和精神病(DEL_SCZ)患者;将这些组与887名精神分裂症患者(SCZ)和780名健康对照(HCs)进行比较;后一组由我们中心参加的意大利精神病研究网络(NIRP)招募。通过社会推理意识测验(TASIT)评估社会认知。采用重采样程序来平衡样本量的差异。
    所有临床组(DEL;DEL_SCZ;和SCZ)在TASIT上的表现均比HC差,除了真诚的尺度。没有发现临床组间的差异,除了简单的讽刺,矛盾的讽刺和丰富的讽刺尺度。
    在22q11.2DS的个体中,无论精神病症状如何,SC均受损,与SCZ的人相似。因此,SC缺陷可能代表SCZ的潜在内表型,从而导致精神病易感性。
    UNASSIGNED: 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) represents one of the most important genetic risk factors for schizophrenia (SCZ) and a reliable biological model to study endophenotypic characters of SCZ. The aim of the study was to investigate Social Cognition impairments in subjects with 22q11.2DS compared to a considerable sample of schizophrenic patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-four individuals with 22q11.2DS (DEL) and 18 patients with 22q11.2DS and psychosis (DEL_SCZ) were enrolled; these groups were compared to 887 patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and 780 healthy controls (HCs); the latter groups were recruited by the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses (NIRP) to which our Centre took part. Social cognition was evaluated through The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT). A resampling procedure was employed to balance differences in samples size.
    UNASSIGNED: All clinical groups (DEL; DEL_SCZ; and SCZ) showed worse performance on TASIT than HCs, except in Sincere scale. No differences between-clinical groups were found, except for Simple Sarcasm, Paradoxical Sarcasm and Enriched Sarcasm scales.
    UNASSIGNED: SC was impaired in individuals with 22q11.2DS regardless of psychotic symptomatology, similarly to people with SCZ. Therefore, SC deficits may represent potential endophenotypes of SCZ contributing to the vulnerability to psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认知控制和奖励相关异常与成瘾密切相关。然而,关于成瘾行为的神经认知预测因素的纵向研究的结果喜忧参半。Further,很少有工作进行预测非物质相关的成瘾行为。我们的研究旨在评估社区样本中物质和非物质成瘾行为的预测因素,系统评估每种神经认知功能对成瘾行为的独立影响。
    澳大利亚人(N=294;51.7%为女性;M[SD]年龄=24.8[4.7]岁)在基线和3个月随访时完成了在线神经认知任务和调查。自我报告量表评估了有问题的酒精使用,成瘾性进食(AE),有问题的色情使用(PPU),和有问题的互联网使用(PUI)在3个月和6个月的随访。带有引导的线性回归评估了6个月内每种成瘾行为的神经认知预测因子。
    基线时的神经认知不能预测6个月随访时的AE或PUI严重程度。基线时延迟折扣较少,预测6个月随访时PPU较高(β=-0.16,p=0.005)。基线时表现较差的监测预测3个月随访时AE较高(β=-0.16,p=0.004),3个月时与奖励相关的注意力捕获更多,在6个月随访时,AE更高(β=0.14,p=0.033)。较少奖励相关的注意力捕获(β=-0.14,p=0.003)和较少的风险承担在模糊(β=-0.11,p=0.029)的基线预测较高的PUI在3个月的随访。所有的发现都是小的影响大小。没有一个神经认知变量预测有问题的酒精使用。
    我们无法确定一组能够可靠地预测多种成瘾行为类型的特定神经认知功能的核心集合。然而,我们的发现表明认知控制和奖励相关功能都以不同的方式预测非物质成瘾行为。研究结果表明,取决于特定的成瘾行为,可能存在部分不同的神经认知机制导致成瘾。
    UNASSIGNED: Cognitive control and reward-related abnormalities are centrally implicated in addiction. However, findings from longitudinal studies addressing neurocognitive predictors of addictive behaviors are mixed. Further, little work has been conducted predicting non-substance-related addictive behaviors. Our study aimed to assess predictors of substance and non-substance addictive behaviors in a community sample, systematically evaluating each neurocognitive function\'s independent influence on addictive behavior.
    UNASSIGNED: Australians (N = 294; 51.7% female; M[SD] age = 24.8[4.7] years) completed online neurocognitive tasks and surveys at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Self-report scales assessed problematic alcohol use, addictive eating (AE), problematic pornography use (PPU), and problematic internet use (PUI) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Linear regressions with bootstrapping assessed neurocognitive predictors for each addictive behavior across a 6-month period.
    UNASSIGNED: Neurocognition at baseline did not predict AE or PUI severity at 6-month follow-up. Less delay discounting at baseline predicted higher PPU at 6-month follow-up (β = -0.16, p = 0.005). Poorer performance monitoring at baseline predicted higher AE at 3-month follow-up (β = -0.16, p = 0.004), and more reward-related attentional capture at 3-months predicted higher AE at 6-month follow-up (β = 0.14, p = 0.033). Less reward-related attentional capture (β = -0.14, p = 0.003) and less risk-taking under ambiguity (β = -0.11, p = 0.029) at baseline predicted higher PUI at 3-month follow-up. All findings were of small effect size. None of the neurocognitive variables predicted problematic alcohol use.
    UNASSIGNED: We were unable to identify a core set of specific neurocognitive functions that reliably predict multiple addictive behavior types. However, our findings indicate both cognitive control and reward-related functions predict non-substance addictive behaviors in different ways. Findings suggest that there may be partially distinct neurocognitive mechanisms contributing to addiction depending on the specific addictive behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尚未研究青春期前神经认知结构与青春期物质使用发生之间的前瞻性关联。这项研究调查了9-10岁青少年的认知结构与13-14岁进行烟草和酒精实验的可能性之间的关联。
    方法:使用九项神经认知评估的主成分(PC)分析来识别无关的青少年大脑认知发展研究参与者(n=9,655)的认知结构。我们使用广义线性混合模型对神经认知PC与13-14岁的烟草或酒精使用几率之间的关联进行建模,该模型具有logit链接和招募地点的随机截获。人口统计,家庭冲突,邻里安全,外部化和内化行为被认为是协变量。
    结果:确定了四种神经认知PC,并标记了一般能力,执行功能,学习和记忆,和精神旋转。心理旋转[优势比[OR]=0.88,p值=0.013]与青少年吸烟的几率较低相关;女性青年之间的关联更强。男性和女性的一般能力[OR=1.20,p值<0.0001],以及女性的学习和记忆[OR=1.11,p值=0.024],与年轻人饮酒的几率增加有关。
    结论:在年轻人中,较高的神经认知表现对吸烟有保护作用,但增加了饮酒的可能性.确定了潜在的性别差异。在美国,认知在处理围绕烟草和酒精使用的社会环境中的作用可能有助于形成不同的青少年对烟草和酒精使用的期望。
    OBJECTIVE: Prospective associations between preadolescent neurocognitive structure and onset of substance use in adolescence have not been examined. This study investigated associations between cognitive structure among youth aged 9 - 10 years and the likelihood of experimentation with tobacco and alcohol by ages 13-14 years.
    METHODS: A principal component (PC) analysis of nine neurocognitive assessments was used to identify the cognitive structure of unrelated adolescent brain cognitive development study participants (n = 9,655). We modeled associations between neurocognitive PCs and odds of tobacco or alcohol use by ages 13-14 years using generalized linear mixed models with a logit link and random intercept for recruitment sites. Demographics, family conflict, neighborhood safety, and externalizing and internalizing behavior were considered covariates.
    RESULTS: Four neurocognitive PCs were identified and labeled general ability, executive function, learning and memory, and mental rotation. Mental rotation [odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, p-value = .013] was associated with lower odds of youth tobacco use; the association was stronger among female youth. General ability [OR = 1.20, p-value < .0001] among both males and females, and learning and memory [OR = 1.11, p-value = .024] among females, were associated with increased odds of youth alcohol use.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among youth, higher neurocognitive performance was protective for tobacco use but increased the likelihood of alcohol use. Potential sex differences were identified. The role of cognition in processing the social contexts surrounding tobacco and alcohol use in the United States may contribute to the formation of disparate youth expectancies for tobacco and alcohol use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究提出并评估了一个理论模型,用于探索神经认知之间的关系,自欺欺人的信念,经验阴性症状,以及慢性精神分裂症患者的社会功能。
    方法:这项研究招募了229名被诊断为精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍的人,他们来自精神健康医院的门诊和日间病房。在获得知情同意后,参与者使用向后数字跨度进行评估,数字符号,以及自欺欺人的信念的衡量标准,经验阴性症状,和社会功能。应用结构方程模型来评估假设模型的适合度,利用拟合优度指数等指数,比较拟合指数,逼近的均方根误差,标准化均方根残差用于模型评估。
    结果:假设模型具有足够的拟合度。研究结果表明,神经认知可能通过对经验阴性症状的影响间接影响自欺欺人的信念。与预期相反,这项研究没有观察到神经认知的直接影响,自欺欺人的信念,或社会功能的负面症状。修订后的模型揭示了经验阴性症状在介导神经认知与社会功能之间的关系中的作用。然而,自欺欺人的信念并没有显着影响社会功能。
    结论:在改变消极思想之前,增强自我意识能力有助于改善阴性症状,从而提高社会功能的表现。未来的研究应该制定一个阴性症状的分层程序,从认知康复到自我意识的增强,并以修改适应不良的信念结束。
    OBJECTIVE: This study proposed and evaluated a theoretical model for exploring the relationships between neurocognition, self-defeatist beliefs, experiential negative symptoms, and social functioning in individuals with chronic schizophrenia.
    METHODS: The study recruited 229 individuals given a diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders from outpatient clinics and the day ward of a mental health hospital. After informed consent was obtained, the participants underwent assessments using the backward digit span, the digit symbol, and measures of self-defeatist beliefs, experiential negative symptoms, and social functioning. A structural equation model was applied to assess the fitness of the hypothesized model, with indices such as the goodness-of-fit index, comparative fit index, root mean square error of approximation, and standardized root mean square residual being used for model evaluation.
    RESULTS: The hypothesized model had an adequate fit. The study findings indicated that neurocognition might indirectly influence self-defeatist beliefs through its effect on experiential negative symptoms. Contrary to expectations, the study did not observe a direct influence of neurocognition, self-defeatist beliefs, or negative symptoms on social functioning. The revised model revealed the role of experiential negative symptoms in mediating the association between neurocognition and social functioning. However, self-defeatist beliefs did not significantly affect social functioning.
    CONCLUSIONS: Before modifying negative thoughts, enhancement of self-awareness ability can help improve negative symptoms and thereby improve the performance of social functions. Future research should develop a hierarchical program of negative symptoms, from cognition rehabilitation to enhancement of self-awareness, and end with modifying maladaptive beliefs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    言语流畅性(VF)已被认为是精神分裂症(SZ)和双相情感障碍(BD)的假定神经认知内表型。然而,该假设尚未使用纵向家庭方法进行检查。我们进行了五个小组,比较研究。样本包括323名成年参与者,包括81名BD患者,47个未受影响的BDBD-Rel亲属),76SZ患者,40个未受影响的SZ(SZ-Rel)亲属,和79名遗传无关的健康对照(HC)。在2年的随访期内,通过语义VF(sem-VF)和语音VF(ph-VF)测试对所有受试者进行了两次评估。控制年龄和受教育年限的ANCOVA用于比较各组的表现。SZ和BD患者及其未受影响的亲属在基线时显示sem-VF和ph-VF缺陷,随着时间的推移而持续(所有,p<0.05)。此外,BD-Rel表现出SZ和HC之间的中等性能。重复测量方差分析显示,组间轨迹比较无显著差异(p>0.05)。我们的发现支持VF可能代表SZ和BD的神经认知内表型。进一步纵向,有必要进行家庭研究以证实这一初步证据.
    Verbal fluency (VF) has been proposed as a putative neurocognitive endophenotype in schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD). However, this hypothesis has not been examined using a longitudinal family approach. We conducted a five-group, comparative study. The sample comprised 323 adult participants, including 81 BD patients, 47 unaffected relatives of BD BD-Rel), 76 SZ patients, 40 unaffected relatives of SZ (SZ-Rel), and 79 genetically unrelated healthy controls (HC). All subjects were assessed twice with semantic VF (sem-VF) and phonological VF (ph-VF) tests over a 2-year follow-up period. ANCOVAs controlling for age and years of education were used to compare performance across groups. Patients with SZ and BD and their unaffected relatives showed sem-VF and ph-VF deficits at baseline, which persisted over time (all, p < 0.05). Moreover, BD-Rel showed an intermediate performance between SZ and HC. A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences in the between-group trajectories comparison (p > 0.05). Our findings support that VF may represent a neurocognitive endophenotype for SZ and BD. Further longitudinal, family studies are warranted to confirm this preliminary evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号