OBJECTIVE: To determine a conversion factor for use when switching from dexmedetomidine infusion to enteral clonidine in critically ill neonates.
METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective review of conversions from dexmedetomidine to -clonidine, performed in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between January 2020 and December 2021. Both initial conversion factors and those resulting after a 48-hour titration period were examined. Sedation and withdrawal scores were measured, and doses were titrated based on a standardized practice within the unit.
RESULTS: A total of 43 dexmedetomidine to clonidine conversions were included. The median (IQR) dexmedetomidine dose prior to conversion was 17.4 (11.3-24.0) mcg/kg/day (0.7 mcg/kg/hr) and the median (IQR) enteral clonidine dose post titration was 7.8 (4.7-9.3) mcg/kg/day (2 mcg/kg every 6 hours). This equated to a post-titration conversion factor of approximately 0.42. All neonates had also received opioid infusions while on dexmedetomidine and 60% were on concurrent opioids at the time of the clonidine conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal clinicians may find the conversion factor identified in this study a useful starting point when converting from dexmedetomidine infusion to enteral clonidine in practice and should be -reminded of the most important steps in conversions (monitoring and follow-up) owing to the variability in this patient group. More studies are needed to elucidate the impact of patient-specific factors on this -conversion process.

A primigravida in the extremist-affected region of a third-world nation gave birth to a newborn who was remotely consulted through video rounds from the capital of the state. Unfortunately, these abnormalities are often overlooked and left untreated. The baby had multiple limb defects, gastroschisis, exstrophy of the bladder and spina bifida. Tragically, the newborn did not survive due to the lack of clinical and surgical expertise in the area. It is crucial to emphasise the importance of establishing e-clinics for expectant mothers in underserved areas, providing them with access to high-quality anomaly scans.

OBJECTIVE: There is well-established data linking the adequacy of nurse staffing to patient outcomes. Evidence-based standards for staffing are therefore critical to drive improvements in clinical care. One such evidence-based approach is the use of patient acuity-based tools. The objective of this study is to determine the performance of a neonatal acuity tool in an Australian tertiary neonatal health-care setting, focusing on the classification of patient acuity and nursing:patient staffing ratios compared to current practice.
METHODS: Acuity data were collected in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and special care baby unit (SCBU) over a 10-week period in 2023. Patient data were scored in the 16 domains at two time points (prior to morning and evening nursing shift changeover) for all admitted newborns.
RESULTS: For ventilated newborns nursed with a nurse:patient staffing ratio of 1:1, 78% of scores were within the L4-high acuity (score ≥ 26) band, with the remaining scores within the L3-high acuity (18-25) band. For newborns on non-invasive respiratory support in NICU staffed 1:1, the proportion scoring within the L4 acuity band was higher in the nasal high-flow group compared to the nasal continuous positive airway pressure group (P = 0.032), an effect not seen for those nursed 1:2 in NICU or for those on nasal high-flow nursed in SCBU either 1:2 or 1:3.
CONCLUSIONS: This study of how a neonatal acuity classification system compares with current nurse:patient staffing allocations in an Australian tertiary NICU, suggests refinements in staffing ratios for specific patient groups on respiratory support are possible.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians overestimate mortality and disability rates in infants born extremely preterm. We developed a digital tool (\'NIC-PREDICT\') that predicts infant mortality and survival with and without major disability in infants born 23-27 weeks\' gestation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if clinicians could use NIC-PREDICT accurately, and if their perceptions of infant outcomes improved after its release in 2021.
METHODS: Midwives, nurses, obstetricians, neonatologists and paediatricians working in tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals in Victoria were asked to use NIC-PREDICT to estimate three mutually exclusive outcomes: (i) mortality; (ii) survival free of major disability; and (iii) survival with major disability for six different scenarios where a liveborn infant was offered survival-focused care after birth. The proportions who completed the survey (responded to all six scenarios) and the proportions able to provide 100% accurate results for all scenarios were determined. Estimates of the three outcomes were compared with true rates.
RESULTS: A total of 85 clinicians responded: 70 (82%) completed the survey, with an overall accuracy of 76%. Overall, predictions of mortality were accurate (mean difference from true value 0.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.7, 2.1) P = 0.33), as were predictions of survival without major disability (mean difference - 0.7 (95% CI -3.0, 1.7) P = 0.58). However, survival with major disability was overestimated by 4.9% ((95% CI 1.7, 8.0) P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Most perinatal clinicians who responded used NIC-PREDICT correctly to estimate expected outcomes in infants born extremely preterm who are offered intensive care. Undue pessimism about survival with major disability remains an ongoing concern.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether beta-lactam extended or continuous beta-lactam infusions (EI/CI) improve clinical outcomes in children with proven or suspected bacterial infections.
METHODS: We included observational and interventional studies that compared beta-lactam EI or CI with standard infusions in children less than 18 years old, and reported on mortality, hospital or intensive care unit LOS, microbiological cure and/or clinical cure. Data sources included PubMed, Medline, EBM Reviews, EMBASE, and CINAHL and were searched from January 1, 1980, to November 3, 2023. Thirteen studies (2,945 patients) were included: 5 randomized control trials (RCTs), and 8 observational studies. Indications for antimicrobial therapies and clinical severity varied, ranging from cystic fibrosis exacerbation to critically ill children with bacteriemia.
RESULTS: EI and CI were not associated with a reduction in mortality in RCTs (n = 1,464; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71, 1.21), but were in observational studies (n = 833; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19, 0.96). We found no difference in hospital length of stay. Results for clinical and microbiological cures were heterogeneous and reported as narrative review. The included studies were highly heterogeneous, limiting the strength of our findings. The lack of shared definitions for clinical and microbiological cure outcomes precluded analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: EI and CI were not consistently associated with reduced mortality or LOS in children. Results were conflicting regarding clinical and microbiological cures. More well-designed studies targeting high-risk populations are necessary to determine the efficacy of these alternative dosing strategies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate care practices among Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) providing Therapeutic hypothermia (TH), and more specific to investigate staff\'s experiences of parental participation, presence, and possibilities of being close with their infant during TH.
METHODS: A descriptive, qualitative, and quantitative study. All Swedish NICUs providing TH (n = 10) participated. Data were collected during January-April 2021 via a questionnaire followed by a semi-structured interview with the registered nurse and the neonatologist responsible for TH at each unit. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and a qualitative content analysis was performed.
RESULTS: All NICUs allowed parents unlimited stay with their infants and were keen to support parental presence, which was a prerequisite for promoting parent-infant closeness. Standardized routines regarding the infants\' care space and course of action were described as time-efficient and staff-saving, which freed up time to focus on the families.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardized routines regarding the care space setup and the medical and caring approach, as well as the NICU environment and practices around the families, can promote or curb the possibilities of parent-infant closeness. Well-established care practices and good environmental conditions with flexibility regarding the family\'s needs are therefore required.

BACKGROUND: Nurses accompany patients throughout the breaking bad news process.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the research was to compare neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses and well-baby nursery (WBN) nurses on their role, barriers and experiences in breaking bad news to parents/relatives during hospitalization.
METHODS: A cross-sectional comparative study.
RESULTS: Two medical centres in Israel were employed. A 39-item questionnaire was distributed with 140 nurses participating in the study. STROBE Checklist was used. A total of 140 nurses participated in this study. There was no significant overall difference (p ≤ .45) between NICU and WBN nurses in their perception of their role in breaking bad news. Differences were found in barriers to the role which included a lack of information, lack of time and communication issues. No differences were found in the nurses\' experiences in breaking bad news. NICU and WBN nurses reported that they received no support (n = 40, 58.8%; n = 45, 64.3%, respectively). No breaking bad news specialty team existed in either unit (NICU: n = 64, 91.4%; n = 60, 87.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses in the WBN and NICU are involved in breaking bad news. The role of the nurse has not been fully acknowledged making it difficult to perform. Nurses\' experiences in breaking bad news were varied. Nurses facing challenges should be provided guidance and support. This needs to be implemented.
CONCLUSIONS: The role played by nurses in breaking bad news has not been fully acknowledged making it difficult to perform. Nurses need to receive formal training and support in order to improve this practice.

BACKGROUND: While there are several parenting programs for NICU caregivers, no studies, to our knowledge, have developed parenting programs aimed at preventing child maltreatment that specifically address these parental factors: parental stress, parental self-efficacy, and positive parent-infant interaction.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to: 1) Identify adaptations and/or augmentations needed to optimize SafeCare® for NICU caregivers, and 2) Examine the acceptability and preliminary effects of the adapted SafeCare NICU (SCNC) program with NICU caregivers.
METHODS: This study consisted of two phases: formative (phase one) and pilot (phase two). For phase one, 5 NICU former caregivers and 5 NICU staff were interviewed to make relevant, NICU-specific adaptations for SCNC. Phase two consisted of a pilot study, where 13 current NICU caregivers were enrolled in the adapted SCNC program. Outcomes included acceptability and preliminary effects of parental stress, parental self-efficacy, and parent-infant interaction.
RESULTS: Adaptations to SafeCare consisted of adding a pre-session to discuss individualized experiences, incorporation of adjusted developmental milestones, a NICU-specific resource sheet, and individualized adaptations to activities based on relevant medical concerns. Out of the 13 participants, 8 completed SCNC (61.5 % retention rate). Participants indicated significant reductions in stress after SCNC (Parental stress index score = 61.7) compared to baseline (79.2, p = 0.02). Among participants who completed SCNC (n = 8), all stated they supported this program for implementation among NICU caregivers.
CONCLUSIONS: The adapted SCNC demonstrated acceptability among NICU caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate level of agreement of specialist trained retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) nurses compared with an experienced paediatric ophthalmologist in detection of referral-warranted ROP (RWROP) using wide-field digital retinal imaging.
METHODS: This is a prospective, observational, blinded study of neonates in a level III neonatal intensive care unit, from July 2020 to November 2022. Image capture using wide-field digital retinal imaging followed by ROP grading and staging was completed by trained ROP nurses. This was then compared with findings by an experienced paediatric ophthalmologist. The primary outcome was presence of RWROP in either eye.
RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five neonates (55% male) with a total of 768 screening visits were included. At the initial screen, nurse and ophthalmologist agreed about presence of RWROP for 191 of 195 neonates (98%, kappa = 0.79, P < 0.0001), with 100% sensitivity for RWROP detection. Including all 768 screening episodes, agreement was 98% for RWROP. There was disagreement in 16 screenings (2%) for 11 (6%) neonates. Of the five screenings (0.7%) that the ophthalmologist thought were RWROP and the nurse did not, three were disagreements about whether the zone was posterior zone 2 or zone 1.
CONCLUSIONS: We found excellent levels of agreement and add evidence that interpretations by specialist trained nurses could be safely integrated into a \'hybrid ROP screening system\'.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the prevalence of ankyloglossia in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population and to determine characteristics of this cohort compared to infants in the birth center (BC).
METHODS: Prospective data were collected using a standardized flow sheet. Breastfeeding infants undergoing evaluation for tongue-tie in the BC and NICU were included. Coryllos type, tip to frenulum length, tongue function, frequency of frenotomy, and breastfeeding outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Of 20,879 infants birthed at or admitted to the institution during the study period, there were fewer patients diagnosed with ankyloglossia in the BC compared to the NICU (3.3% BC vs. 5.4% NICU, p < 0.01). Of these, 163 underwent frenotomy: 86 in the BC and 77 in the NICU. For those undergoing frenotomy, gestational age (39.1 ± 1.3 BC, 34.4 ± 4.4 NICU, p < 0.01) and age at time of procedure (3.2 days BC, 29.2 NICU, p < 0.01) were the only demographic factors significantly different between the groups. There was no difference in Coryllos type or function score. In a subset of NICU infants with multiple assessments over time, function scores after frenotomy were significantly improved compared to pre-frenotomy (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Standard assessment tools appear to be appropriate for use in infants in the NICU, despite the higher rates of prematurity, low birth weights, and increased comorbidities. Assessment and intervention for tongue-tie can be one critical intervention to move these patients closer to oral feeding and discharge to home.
METHODS: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.