UNASSIGNED: A family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a first-degree relative is a well-established risk factor for CRC. When individuals have 2 parents with CRC, the impact on risk is uncertain, and there are no established guidelines for surveillance. We sought to define the surveillance practices and outcomes in individuals with a family history of CRC in both parents.
UNASSIGNED: We identified probands with a family history of CRC in both parents from our Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Database. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for colonoscopy surveillance patterns and incidence of adenomas and CRC.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty-two patients (64%) had genetic testing, and no pathogenic germline mutations were identified. During a mean surveillance period of 144 ± 82.2 months and a mean surveillance interval of 33.4 ± 16.6 months, a total of 3.2 ± 8.9 adenomas were found per patient. These were small (median 6.5 mm), and 96% exhibited only low-grade dysplasia. Six patients (9%) were diagnosed with CRC at a mean age of 61.5 ± 11.3 years, corresponding to an incidence rate of 14 cases/10,000 person-years. Patients with CRC were older at first colonoscopy than those without cancer (59 vs 46 years, P = .03), and half of these cases were diagnosed at this first colonoscopy.
UNASSIGNED: Among patients with a family history of CRC in both parents, cases of CRC were seen primarily in those who significantly delayed their first colonoscopy. Initiation of colonoscopy at age 40 should be recommended to individuals with CRC in both parents, consistent with recommendations for those with 1 first-degree relative with CRC.

First-tier genetic investigations for patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) may include chromosomal microarray, Fragile X testing, and screening for inherited metabolic diseases, but most remain undiagnosed upon completion of testing. Here, we report the diagnostic yields of genetic testing for 537 patients with at least one of autism spectrum disorder, global developmental delay, and/or intellectual disability. Patients were assessed in a single neurodevelopmental genetics clinic, and each underwent a standardized history and physical examination. Each patient was characterized as syndromic or nonsyndromic based on clinical features. Our results demonstrate that multigene sequencing (with an NDD gene panel or exome) had a higher diagnostic yield (8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5%, 13%) than chromosomal microarray and Fragile X testing combined (4%; 95% CI: 3%, 7%). Biochemical screening for inherited metabolic diseases had a diagnostic yield of zero. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing was significantly higher for syndromic patients than for nonsyndromic patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.09; 95% CI: 1.46, 6.83) and higher for female patients than for male (OR 3.21; 95% CI: 1.52, 6.82). These results add to the growing evidence supporting a comprehensive genetic evaluation that includes both copy number analysis and sequencing of known NDD genes for patients with NDDs.

BACKGROUND: Heterogenous clinical manifestations, overlapping phenotypes and complex genetic backgrounds are common in patients with endocrine tumors. There are no comprehensive recommendations for genetic testing and counselling of these patients compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes. The application of multigene panel testing is common in clinical genetic laboratories, but their performance for patients with endocrine tumors has not been assessed.
METHODS: As a national reference center, we prospectively tested the diagnostic utility and cost-efficiency of a multigene panel covering 113 genes representing genetic susceptibility for solid tumors. 1279 patients (including 96 cases with endocrine tumors) were evaluated between October 2021 and December 2022 who were suspected to have hereditary tumor syndromes.
RESULTS: The analytical performance of the hereditary cancer panel was suitable for diagnostic testing. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed in 24% (23/96); incidental findings in genes not associated with the patient\'s phenotype were identified in 5% (5/96). A further 7% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in genes with potential genetic susceptibility roles but currently no clear clinical consequence. Cost-benefit analysis showed that the application of a more comprehensive gene panel in a diagnostic laboratory yielded a shorter turnaround time and provided additional genetic results with the same cost and workload.
CONCLUSIONS: Using comprehensive multigene panel results in faster turnaround time and cost-efficiently identifies genetic alterations in hereditary endocrine tumor syndromes. Incidentally identified variants in patients with poor prognoses may serve as a potential therapeutic target in tumors where therapeutic possibilities are limited.

Cancer is a major global public health challenge, affecting both quality of life and mortality. Recent advances in genetic research have uncovered hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) that predispose individuals to malignant neoplasms. While traditional single-gene testing has focused on high-penetrance genes, the past decade has seen a shift toward multigene panels, which facilitate the analysis of multiple genes associated with specific HCS. This approach reveals variants in less-studied gene regions and improves our understanding of cancer predisposition. In a study composed of Russian patients with clinical signs of HCS, we used a multigene hereditary cancer panel and revealed 21.6% individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variants. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations predominated, followed by the CHEK2 and ATM variants. Of note, 16 previously undescribed variants were identified in the MUTYH, GALNT12, MSH2, MLH1, MLH3, EPCAM, and POLE genes. The implications of the study extend to personalized cancer prevention and treatment strategies, especially in populations lacking extensive epidemiological data, such as Russia. Overall, our research provides valuable genetic insights that give the way for further investigation and advances in the understanding and management of hereditary cancer syndromes.

Introduction  Cancer is a multifactorial disease dependent on the influence of genetic and environmental factors. About 10% of cancers are associated with germline mutations, which predispose to a higher risk of developing cancer. Currently, the use of panels that identify susceptibility and/or association genes cancer has been increasingly used, both in clinical practice and in scientific research. Objective  To investigate genetic mutations in patients with a profile for hereditary cancer in individuals from a region of northeast Brazil, where there is a high frequency of endogenous and consanguineous marriages. Methods  A set of 17 genes ( BRCA1 , BRCA2 , APC , TP53 , PTEN , RET , VHL , RB1 , CDKN2 , CDH1 , CHEK2 , MLH1 , MSH2 , MSH6 , MUTYH , XPA , and XPC ) associated with cancer and hereditary syndromes were analyzed. Fifteen patients with a hereditary cancer profile were evaluated. Results  The pathogenic variant found was c.1187G > A (p.Gly396Asp), rs36053993 in the MUTYH gene in a male patient diagnosed with melanoma at the age of 43 years and a family history for this tumor. This gene encodes an important enzyme related to DNA repair and has been associated with other types of cancer, this is the first report of an association with melanoma, the biological plausibility of this association is given once the MUTYH protein is expressed in the skin tissue and is responsible for repairing damage caused, for example, by sun exposure. Conclusion  The results of this study suggest that this mutation may be important for the hereditary predisposition to melanoma, but a broader investigation of this mutation is needed.

UNASSIGNED: The increase in incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients of African ancestry coupled with increased aggressiveness has warranted investigation of the heritable nature of these cancers. Only a limited number of published reports of hereditary colorectal cancer in indigenous African populations have been reported and no systematic screening of these groups has been performed previously. We aimed to investigate causative germline variants and to establish the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in the known colorectal cancer genes in indigenous African colorectal cancer patients using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were selected from two hospitals in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients with unresolved molecular diagnosis with an age of onset below or at 60 years were selected. Germline DNA samples were analyzed using a 14-gene NGS panel on the Ion Torrent platform. Variant calling and annotation were performed, and variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Observed variants were verified by Sanger sequencing and/or long-range PCR.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 107 patients, 25 (23.4%) presented with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant (PGV). Fourteen PGVs in at least one mismatch repair (MMR) gene were identified and verified in 12 patients (11.2%). Of these MMR gene variants, five were novel. The remaining 10 PGVs were in the APC, BMPR1A, MUTYH, POLD1, and TP53 genes.
UNASSIGNED: The high incidence of PGVs associated with early-onset colorectal cancer in indigenous African patients has important implications for hereditary colorectal cancer risk management. These findings pave the way for personalized genetic screening programs and cascade testing in South Africa. The next step would involve further screening of the unresolved cases using tools to detect copy number variation, methylation, and whole exome sequencing.

Multiple primary tumors (MPTs) are a harbinger of hereditary cancer syndromes. Affected individuals often fit genetic testing criteria for a number of hereditary cancer genes and undergo multigene panel testing. Other genomic testing options, such as whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) are available, but the utility of these genomic approaches as a second-tier test for those with uninformative multigene panel testing has not been explored. Here, we report our germline sequencing results from WGS in 9 patients with MPTs who had non-informative multigene panel testing. Following germline WGS, sequence (agnostic or 735 selected genes) and copy number variant (CNV) analysis was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants and reporting CNVs. In this cohort, WGS, as a second-tier test, did not identify additional pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. Although we identified a CHEK2 likely pathogenic variant and a MUTYH pathogenic variant, both were previously identified in the multigene panels and were not explanatory for the presented type of tumors. CNV analysis also failed to identify any pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes. In summary, after multigene panel testing, WGS did not reveal any additional pathogenic variants in patients with MPTs. Our study, based on a small cohort of patients with MPT, suggests that germline gene panel testing may be sufficient to investigate these cases. Future studies with larger sample sizes may further elucidate the additional utility of WGS in MPTs.

The use of multigene panel testing for patients with a predisposition to Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) is increasing as the identification of mutations is useful for diagnosis and disease management. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA gene sequencing in 4630 French HBOC suspected patients. Patients were investigated using a germline cancer panel including the 13 genes defined by The French Genetic and Cancer Group (GGC)-Unicancer. In the patients analyzed, 528 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (P/LP) were identified, including BRCA1 (n = 203, 38%), BRCA2 (n = 198, 37%), PALB2 (n = 46, 9%), RAD51C (n = 36, 7%), TP53 (n = 16, 3%), and RAD51D (n = 13, 2%). In addition, 35 novel (P/LP) variants, according to our knowledge, were identified, and double mutations in two distinct genes were found in five patients. Interestingly, retesting a subset of BRCA1/2-negative individuals with an expanded panel produced clinically relevant results in 5% of cases. Additionally, combining in silico (splicing impact prediction tools) and in vitro analyses (RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing) highlighted the deleterious impact of four candidate variants on splicing and translation. Our results present an overview of pathogenic variations of HBOC genes in the southeast of France, emphasizing the clinical relevance of cDNA analysis and the importance of retesting BRCA-negative individuals with an expanded panel.

Triple negative breast cancer is considered as the worst aggressive subtype with poor prognosis. Recent studies suggest a hereditary component is involved in TNBC development, especially in young patients. However, genetic spectrum remains unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of multigene panel testing in triple negative patients compared to overall breast cancer cases as well as contributing to elucidate which genes are most implicated in triple negative subtype development. Two breast cancer cohorts, comprising 100 triple negative breast cancer patients and 100 patients with other breast cancer subtypes, were analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing using an On-Demand panel which included 35 predisposition cancer genes associated with inherited cancer susceptibility. The percentage of germline pathogenic variant carriers was higher in the triple negative cohort. ATM, PALB2, BRIP1 and TP53 were the most non-BRCA mutated genes. Moreover, triple negative breast cancer patients without family history related who were identified as carriers were diagnosed at significantly earlier age. As conclusion, our study reinforces the usefulness of multigene panel testing in breast cancer cases but specifically in those with triple negative subtype regardless family history.

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) refers to a group of heterogeneous neurological disorders mainly characterized by corticospinal degeneration (pure forms), but sometimes associated with additional neurological and extrapyramidal features (complex HSP). The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has led to huge improvements in knowledge of HSP genetics and made it possible to clarify the genetic etiology of hundreds of \"cold cases,\" accelerating the process of reaching a molecular diagnosis. The different NGS-based strategies currently employed as first-tier approaches most commonly involve the use of targeted resequencing panels and exome sequencing, whereas genome sequencing remains a second-tier approach because of its high costs. The question of which approach is the best is still widely debated, and many factors affect the choice. Here, we aim to analyze the diagnostic power of different NGS techniques applied in HSP, by reviewing 38 selected studies in which different strategies were applied in different-sized cohorts of patients with genetically uncharacterized HSP.