This case report discusses the functional outcomes and multidisciplinary coordination of care for a patient with hemiplegia due to stroke complicated by a migrated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter embedded in the right side of the heart. The patient suffered an acute right-sided stroke with hemorrhagic transformation requiring hemicraniectomy with left hemiplegia. The patient developed a subsequent pulmonary embolism requiring IVC filter placement as anticoagulation was contraindicated due to risk of further intracranial hemorrhage. The IVC filter was later identified bridging the tricuspid valve, and surgical intervention was contraindicated requiring a coordinated plan to delay surgical removal of the filter in order to allow for optimization of the patient\'s functional and medical status. The patient underwent extensive telemetry monitoring in the intensive care unit to verify no significant cardiac arrhythmia developed with physical activity and was ultimately cleared for admission to acute inpatient rehabilitation. There was a well-coordinated effort between the cardiac, surgical, intensive care, and rehabilitation teams to transition to the inpatient rehabilitation facility to minimize risk and enhance recovery. The patient demonstrated functional improvement throughout rehabilitation and was discharged home with family with eventual surgical removal of the IVC filter. This case highlights the importance of collaboration across multiple disciplines to maximize patient rehabilitation and function, particularly in the context of atypical complications.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the views of general practitioners and physiotherapists on the current model of care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care, and if the English First Contact Practitioner model, where patients have access to multiple professional groups with musculoskeletal health expertise, could inform service development.
UNASSIGNED: We analysed interviews with five GPs and 11 physiotherapists and used Lipsky\'s theories about street-level bureaucracy and Foucault\'s theories of mechanisms of power and institutional structures to explore task shifting and cooperation between different professions.
UNASSIGNED: The empirical material reflected a multi-faceted discourse about skill-mix in primary care, where financial factors, perceptions about competence, and task preferences moderated attitudes to task shifting. Competition and cooperation coexist between the professions, and the seemingly gradual blurring between historical hegemony and new models of care creates both alliances and rivalries. Examples of deviations from the Choosing Wisely principles and evidence-based practice indicate that both general practitioners and physiotherapists balance the roles of patient advocate, gatekeeper, and homo economicus, in a context where task shifting is challenged by established practice. It appears that the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders is fragmented and to some extent reflects a supply-driven system.
The demand on primary care is placing increasing pressure on general practitioners.Multidisciplinary teamwork has potential to improve primary care, for both healthcare professionals and for patients.In this study, it appeared that both competition and cooperation exist between general practitioners and physiotherapists around the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care.There is a case for change in service delivery for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care.

Functional neurological symptom disorder (FNSD) is a complex condition with multifactorial etiology in which psychological factors may play a significant role in some patients, and they are not universally present or necessary for the diagnosis. FNSD can occur in the absence of psychological distress and each patient\'s presentation should be evaluated individually, considering a wide range of potential contributing factors. This is the first report related to prevalence data from Rwanda. This report presents a case study of a 15-year-old female patient who presented hemibody weakness without a structural neurological explanation on the background of the direct exposure to parental conflict. she was ultimately diagnosed with an FNSD and responded effectively to five sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy. Additionally, follow-up appointments were conducted every 4 months over the course of 1 year. During this period, the patient successfully resumed her studies and demonstrated normal functioning in all essential areas of daily life. This is the first reported case in Rwanda among similar cases. Addressing these specific stressors played a crucial role in the patient\'s overall outcome, leading to improved quality of care and prevention of unnecessary medical costs and interventions.

The growing aging population presents unique challenges in maintaining their quality of life (QoL), which encompasses physical, psychological, and social wellbeing. This study aimed to assess the impact of multidisciplinary collaboration on QoL among older patients receiving primary care. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a purposive sampling of 200 participants aged 60 years and above from Primary Healthcare Centers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, between March and May 2024. Data were collected using standardized tools: SF-36 for health-related QoL, Multidisciplinary Collaboration Evaluation Tool (MCET), and Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between multidisciplinary collaboration, social support, and QoL outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration exhibited a significant positive association with improvements in physical functioning (β = 2.35, p < 0.001), mental health (β = 3.01, p < 0.001), and general health perceptions (β = 2.12, p < 0.001). Key drivers of effective collaboration included effective communication (β = 0.48, p < 0.001), coordination (β = 0.42, p < 0.001), and patient involvement (β = 0.40, p < 0.001). Social support, particularly from friends (β = 0.33, p < 0.001) and family (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), was also a robust predictor of better QoL. Younger age, female gender, married status, and absence of chronic conditions were associated with greater QoL improvements from multidisciplinary care. Multidisciplinary collaboration and social support networks significantly enhance QoL among older primary care patients. Healthcare systems should prioritize developing collaborative care models, fostering interdisciplinary teamwork, and integrating strategies to promote social connectedness for the aging population.

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) offers a unique option to restore form and function after limb loss or facial trauma that cannot be satisfactorily accomplished through traditional prosthetics or reconstructions. Establishing a successful Upper Extremity Transplantation (UET) program requires strong leadership and a structured surgical team, and extensive interdisciplinary collaboration. We conducted a qualitative study among 12 health care professionals and patients. Informed consent was obtained per protocol, and semi-structured interviews were conducted online and recorded. Participants reported their perceptions of factors that either favored or hindered a successful outcome, including functional status before and after surgery, preparation for transplant, shared decision-making, rehabilitation, and psychosocial support. Thematic analysis revealed that it is essential to establish a team comprising various disciplines well before performing VCA procedures. Defining a common goal and choosing a defined leader is a key factor in procedural success and requires open collaboration beyond what is typical. Primary described categories are interdisciplinary collaboration and skills of the VCA team, building and leading a VCA team, pre-transplant procedures, post-transplant course, and factors to consider when establishing a program. The basic roles of team science play an outsized role in establishing a VCA program. Transplantation medicine involves various overlapping scientific and medical categories requiring health professionals to consciously work together to establish complex vertical and horizontal communication webs between teams to obtain positive outcomes. In addition to medical considerations, patient-specific factors such as transparent communication, therapy plan establishment, plan adherence, and continual follow-up are significant factors to overall success.

暂无摘要。

Objective:To explore the methods of resection, dura and skull base repair and reconstruction of cranionasal communication tumor. Methods:Data of 31 patients with cranionasal communication tumor who underwent dura and skull base reconstruction after tumor resection from 2018 to 2022 were collected. Follow-up lasted for 3 to 41 months. Results:A total of 31 patients were enrolled, including 20 males and 11 females. The ages ranged from 19 to 74 years, with a median age of 57 years old. There were 17 benign lesions（one case of hemangioma, one case of Rathke cyst, one case of squamous papilloma, one case of craniopharyngioma, two cases of meningocele, two cases of varus papilloma, two cases of meningioma of grade Ⅰ, three cases of schwannoma, four cases of pituitary tumor） and 14 malignant lesions（one case of osteosarcoma, one case of poorly differentiated carcinoma, two cases of varus papilloma malignancy, two cases of olfactory neuroblastoma, two cases of adenocarcinoma, two cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma, four cases of squamous cell carcinoma） . Sixteen cases underwent nasal endoscopy combined with craniofacial incision and 15 cases underwent nasal endoscopy surgery alone. Complete resection of the mass and dura and skull base reconstruction were performed in all 31 patients, and free graft repair was performed in 8 cases（fascia lata in 5 cases and nasal mucosa in 3 cases）. Twenty-three cases were repaired with pedicled flaps（septal mucosal flap alone in 11 cases, septal mucosal flap combined with free graft in 6 cases, and cap aponeurosis combined with free graft in 6 cases）. Eight out of 31 patients underwent skull base bone repair. Postoperative cerebral hemorrhage occurred in 1 case, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 1 case, intracranial infection in 2 cases. All patients were successfully treated without severe sequelae. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection occurred in one patient after radiotherapy, who recovered after conservative treatment. All 17 patients with benign lesions survived. Thirteen out of 14 patients with malignant lesions received radiotherapy after surgery, nine survived without recurrence, five cases recurred, of which 2 survived with tumor, one underwent reoperation and 2 died. Conclusion:Cranionasal communication tumors are high-risk diseases of anterior and middle skull base, and various surgical repair methods could be selected after complete resection of the tumor. Successful reconstruction and multidisciplinary cooperation are crucial for treatment outcome.
目的：探讨颅鼻沟通瘤切除与硬脑膜颅底修复重建方法。 方法：收集2018-2022年接受颅鼻沟通瘤切除术后行硬脑膜颅底重建的31例患者的临床资料，并随访3～41个月。 结果：总计31例患者，其中男20例，女11例；年龄19～74岁，中位年龄57岁。良性病变17例（血管瘤、Rathke囊肿、鳞状上皮乳头状瘤、颅咽管瘤各1例，脑膜脑膨出、内翻性乳头状瘤、脑膜瘤Ⅰ级各2例，神经鞘瘤3例，垂体瘤4例），恶性病变14例（骨肉瘤、低分化癌各1例，内翻性乳头状瘤恶变、嗅神经母细胞瘤、腺癌、腺样囊性癌各2例，鳞癌4例）。鼻内镜联合颅面切口16例，单纯鼻内镜手术15例。31例患者均行肿物手术全切及硬脑膜颅底重建，游离组织修复8例（阔筋膜5例，鼻腔黏膜3例）；带蒂皮瓣修复23例（单纯鼻中隔黏膜瓣11例，鼻中隔黏膜瓣联合游离移植物6例，帽状腱膜联合游离移植物6例）；31例患者中有8例行颅底骨性修复。术后脑出血1例，脑脊液漏1例，颅内感染2例，治疗后均顺利出院。放疗后脑脊液漏伴颅内感染1例，保守治疗康复。17例良性病变患者均生存；14例恶性患者术后13例行放疗，9例无复发生存；5例复发，其中2例带瘤生存，1例再次手术，2例死亡。 结论：颅鼻沟通瘤是前中颅底的高危疾病，肿物完整切除后修复方式多种多样，良好的修复重建及多学科协作对患者的预后至关重要。.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the barriers perceived by Advance Care Planning (ACP) facilitators in nursing and welfare professions when implementing ACP in practice.
METHODS: An online survey using Google Forms was conducted between December 2021 and January 2022. The survey targeted 220 individuals, including 82 who completed the Hiroshima Prefecture ACP Promotion Training in 2020 and 138 ACP Promotion Collaborators in Fukuyama City, Hiroshima Prefecture. In addition to the respondents\' attributes, the survey asked about the importance of 37 items related to barriers to ACP implementation, using a 7-point scale. We compared two groups: nurses and physicians (\"nurses/physicians\") and other medical and nursing care professionals (\"nursing care professionals, etc.\").
RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 67 participants (response rate: 34.4%). The barriers to ACP perceived by nursing care professionals were as follows: 1) lack of knowledge about ACP, 2) belief that other professions are more suitable for implementing ACP than themselves, and 3) difficulty in realizing intentions due to institutional and environmental factors. Nurses and physicians perceived lack of time as an important barrier. Measures such as 1) clarifying how different professions should be involved in ACP, 2) expanding educational opportunities tailored to each profession, 3) utilizing tools to support the decision-making process in ACP, and 4) establishing an information-sharing system infrastructure are considered to be effective in promoting the implementation of ACP by facilitators in the nursing and welfare professions.
CONCLUSIONS: By implementing measures to address the barriers identified in this study, it is expected that the practice of ACP by facilitators in nursing and welfare professions will be promoted, and ACP will become more widespread in the community.

Healthcare systems face significant challenges in meeting the unique needs of older adults, particularly in the acute setting. Age-friendly healthcare is a comprehensive approach using the 4Ms framework-what matters, medications, mentation, and mobility-to ensure that healthcare settings are responsive to the needs of older patients. The Age-Friendly Emergency Department (AFED) is a crucial component of a holistic age-friendly health system. Our objective is to provide an overview of the AFED model, its core principles, and the benefits to older adults and healthcare clinicians. The AFED optimizes the delivery of emergency care by integrating age-specific considerations into various aspects of (1) ED physical infrastructure, (2) clinical care policies, and (3) care transitions. Physical infrastructure incorporates environmental modifications to enhance patient safety, including adequate lighting, nonslip flooring, and devices for sensory and ambulatory impairment. Clinical care policies address the physiological, cognitive, and psychosocial needs of older adults while preserving focus on emergency issues. Care transitions include communication and involving community partners and case management services. The AFED prioritizes collaboration between interdisciplinary team members (ED clinicians, geriatric specialists, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, and social workers). By adopting an age-friendly approach, EDs have the potential to improve patient-centered outcomes, reduce adverse events and hospitalizations, and enhance functional recovery. Moreover, healthcare clinicians benefit from the AFED model through increased satisfaction, multidisciplinary support, and enhanced training in geriatric care. Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and clinicians must collaborate to standardize guidelines, address barriers to AFEDs, and promote the adoption of age-friendly practices in the ED.

UNASSIGNED: Functional loss, the inability to perform necessary or desired tasks, is a common consequence of life-limiting illnesses and associated symptoms (pain, fatigue, breathlessness, etc.) and causes suffering for patients and families. Rehabilitation, a set of interventions designed to address functional loss, is recognised as essential within palliative care, as it can improve quality of life and reduce care costs. However, not everyone has equal access to rehabilitation. Despite limited life expectancy or uncertain ability to benefit from interventions, palliative rehabilitation services are often absent. This is partly due to a lack of high-quality research around optimal models of rehabilitation. Research in this area is methodologically challenging and requires multidisciplinary and cross-speciality collaboration.
UNASSIGNED: We aimed to establish and grow a United Kingdom research partnership across diverse areas, commencing with partners from Edinburgh, East Anglia, Lancashire, Leeds, London and Nottingham, around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The objectives were to (1) develop a multidisciplinary, cross-speciality research partnership, (2) generate high-priority unanswered research questions with stakeholders, (3) co-design and submit high-quality competitive research proposals, including (4) sharing topic and methodological expertise, and (5) to build capacity and capability to deliver nationally generalisable studies.
UNASSIGNED: The partnership was established with professionals from across England and Scotland with complementary areas of expertise including complex palliative and geriatric research, physiotherapy, nursing, palliative medicine and psychology. Research questions were generated through a modified version of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, which allowed for the collation and refinement of research questions relating to functional loss and rehabilitation towards the end of life. Partnership members were supported through a series of workshops to transform research ideas into proposals for submission to stage one calls by the National Institute for Health and Care Research. The partnership not only supported students, clinicians and public members with training opportunities but also supported clinicians in securing protected time from clinical duties to allow them to focus on developing local research initiatives.
UNASSIGNED: Through our partnership we established a network that offered researchers, clinicians, students and public members the chance to develop novel skills and explore opportunities for personal and professional development around the topic area of functional loss and rehabilitation in palliative and end-of-life care. The partnership was crucial to foster collaboration and facilitate exchange of ideas, knowledge and experiences to build joint research study proposals.
UNASSIGNED: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) programme as award number NIHR135171. A plain language summary of this article is available on the NIHR Journals Library website https://doi.org/10.3310/PTHC7598.
‘Functional loss’ describes a person becoming unable to do the everyday activities they would like or need to do. Life-limiting illnesses and their symptoms can often lead to functional loss: a common source of suffering for patients and their families. Rehabilitation aims to support a person to carry out everyday activities that have been affected by illness. This should be an important part of providing good palliative care. However, in practice, not everyone has equal access to rehabilitation and there is a lack of high-quality research in this area. The Palliative Care Rehabilitation Partnership was created to begin to address these challenges. This partnership completed activities in five key areas: Establishing the partnership – Brought together experts from different fields, like palliative care, care for older people and research, to improve rehabilitation for people with life-limiting illnesses. Generating research questions – Collected and ranked research questions about functional loss and rehabilitation from various stakeholders, including patients, to identify key research areas. Developing research proposals – Helped, through workshops, turn these research questions into detailed proposals for funding. This involved refining ideas, discussing how best to conduct the studies and getting feedback. Building capacity and capability – Provided training opportunities for its members, including clinicians, researchers and patients, to improve their research and rehabilitation skills. It also offered mentorship to people with dual roles as clinicians and researchers. Service mapping – Improved our understanding of services for functional loss and rehabilitation across different healthcare settings. The Palliative Care Rehabilitation Partnership has made gains in addressing the complex issues of functional loss and rehabilitation in people with life-limiting illnesses. The partnership has supported the development of at least three new research proposals that will be used to apply for future funding.