UNASSIGNED: To explore the views of general practitioners and physiotherapists on the current model of care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care, and if the English First Contact Practitioner model, where patients have access to multiple professional groups with musculoskeletal health expertise, could inform service development.
UNASSIGNED: We analysed interviews with five GPs and 11 physiotherapists and used Lipsky\'s theories about street-level bureaucracy and Foucault\'s theories of mechanisms of power and institutional structures to explore task shifting and cooperation between different professions.
UNASSIGNED: The empirical material reflected a multi-faceted discourse about skill-mix in primary care, where financial factors, perceptions about competence, and task preferences moderated attitudes to task shifting. Competition and cooperation coexist between the professions, and the seemingly gradual blurring between historical hegemony and new models of care creates both alliances and rivalries. Examples of deviations from the Choosing Wisely principles and evidence-based practice indicate that both general practitioners and physiotherapists balance the roles of patient advocate, gatekeeper, and homo economicus, in a context where task shifting is challenged by established practice. It appears that the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders is fragmented and to some extent reflects a supply-driven system.
The demand on primary care is placing increasing pressure on general practitioners.Multidisciplinary teamwork has potential to improve primary care, for both healthcare professionals and for patients.In this study, it appeared that both competition and cooperation exist between general practitioners and physiotherapists around the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care.There is a case for change in service delivery for patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norwegian primary care.

The growing aging population presents unique challenges in maintaining their quality of life (QoL), which encompasses physical, psychological, and social wellbeing. This study aimed to assess the impact of multidisciplinary collaboration on QoL among older patients receiving primary care. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving a purposive sampling of 200 participants aged 60 years and above from Primary Healthcare Centers in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, between March and May 2024. Data were collected using standardized tools: SF-36 for health-related QoL, Multidisciplinary Collaboration Evaluation Tool (MCET), and Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between multidisciplinary collaboration, social support, and QoL outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration exhibited a significant positive association with improvements in physical functioning (β = 2.35, p < 0.001), mental health (β = 3.01, p < 0.001), and general health perceptions (β = 2.12, p < 0.001). Key drivers of effective collaboration included effective communication (β = 0.48, p < 0.001), coordination (β = 0.42, p < 0.001), and patient involvement (β = 0.40, p < 0.001). Social support, particularly from friends (β = 0.33, p < 0.001) and family (β = 0.28, p < 0.001), was also a robust predictor of better QoL. Younger age, female gender, married status, and absence of chronic conditions were associated with greater QoL improvements from multidisciplinary care. Multidisciplinary collaboration and social support networks significantly enhance QoL among older primary care patients. Healthcare systems should prioritize developing collaborative care models, fostering interdisciplinary teamwork, and integrating strategies to promote social connectedness for the aging population.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease spectrum of torticollis in Chinese children and to improve its diagnostic flowchart.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Rehabilitation Department of Beijing Children\'s Hospital from 2017 to 2021. Patients were diagnosed and referred based on a diagnostic flowchart of torticollis. Detailed patient data were collected from the outpatient electronic medical record system.
RESULTS: A total of 2047 patients met the inclusion criteria. The top five conditions were congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) (76.6%), cerebral palsy (5.1%), ocular torticollis (4.7%), brachial plexus injury (1.9%) and atlantoaxial rotary subluxation (1.3%). CMT was most common in 0-2 year olds, cerebral palsy in 3-5 year olds, and atlantoaxial rotary subluxation in 7-12 year olds. The top five referral departments were orthopaedics, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, neurology and neurosurgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The disease spectrum of torticollis in children and the diagnostic flowchart provide important references for diagnosing torticollis, which necessitates multidisciplinary collaboration.

UNASSIGNED: Over the last two decades, reablement programs have been studied and implemented internationally. Goal-setting and multidisciplinary collaboration are central elements of reablement. Unfortunately, limited intervention descriptions leave questions on how they are applied in practice and how goals set by the user are achieved. As a consequence, healthcare providers and organizations often lack knowledge to implement and align reablement to their national and local context. This study aimed to collect data on goal-setting and achievement, and multidisciplinary collaboration within reablement services to provide insight into how these processes inform reablement practice as well as to explore the experiences of healthcare professionals in Norway, New Zealand, and the Netherlands.
UNASSIGNED: A qualitative exploratory design was used comprising three focus group interviews with 20 healthcare professionals (nursing and allied health) involved in reablement programs from the three countries. Purposive sampling was employed considering a mix of gender, age and educational level.
UNASSIGNED: Findings reflected healthcare professionals\' experiences and reablement processes in three main themes: (1) Goal-setting processes; clearly demonstrating goal-setting as an essential part of reablement and contributing to better understanding of users\' motives; (2) Impact of goal-setting on multidisciplinary collaboration; promoting a sense of community, learning climate, job satisfaction and task-shifting; and (3) Behavior change techniques used to reach users\' goals, promoting self-reflection and changing users\' perspectives.
UNASSIGNED: This study offers valuable insights from three countries. Goal-setting serves a crucial role enabling effective reablement implementation across diverse contexts. More specifically, to facilitate tailoring of reablement programs to the user\'s needs as well as establish more effective multidisciplinary collaboration by promoting trust, shared vision, and utilizing each other\'s expertise. However, despite the acknowledgement of the significance of reablement, it was reported by all that a cultural shift is necessary for users, informal caregivers as well as healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia has a high recurrence rate, and oral care by dentists has been found effective in preventing its onset; however, this has not been evaluated using prospective studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of professional oral care by dentists in reducing aspiration pneumonia recurrence in older adult patients.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated a dental oral care intervention, using a historical control group (control group). It was conducted at a single-centre regional core hospital in Japan that serves a large number of patients aged older than 80 years. Patients who were hospitalised for aspiration pneumonia were included in this study. During the study period (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022), the clinical group received weekly professional cleaning by a dentist and the control group received standard oral care by a nurse as usual from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021. The dentist oral care group received weekly professional oral care from a dentist and was followed prospectively for 1 year. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the timing of recurrent aspiration pneumonia or death. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to obtain a hazard ratio and determine the 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: There were 91 participants in the clinical group and 94 in the control group. The mean age of participants was 85 years, and 75 (40.5%) were female. The recurrence rate was 27.5% in the clinical group and 44.7% in the control group (P = .005). Professional cleaning by a dentist reduced the risk of recurrence of aspiration pneumonia by approximately 50% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% confidence interval, 0.278-0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Professional cleaning by a dentist was associated with a lower rate of aspiration pneumonia recurrence than nurse-provided conventional oral care.

Collaboration with diverse stakeholders in eHealth research is fundamental yet complex. Stakeholders from various disciplines do not \"speak the same language\" and have different levels of power and interest, resulting in contrasting objectives, priorities, and expectations. An approach to constructive communication and collaboration is necessary to overcome this complex dynamic. Cocreation, known in the field of eHealth most often to involve end users, may also be suitable for facilitating stakeholder engagement and alignment.
This paper provides insights into the application of cocreation, specifically in the early phases of research that focus on involving and aligning relevant stakeholders from different academic and professional backgrounds.
The case for this study was a group discussion with members of a multidisciplinary consortium that works on developing a personalized eHealth intervention for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Using stakeholder mapping, health and medicine experts, big data scientists, software developers, and an innovation manager (N=8) were invited to participate. The discussion was based on a user scenario and structured according to the Six Thinking Hats of de Bono, representing 6 different types of thinking. The discussion was recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically with the use of ATLAS.ti software.
First, informative and intuitive thinking served the preparatory purpose of familiarization with the project details and other participants. Second, positive and critical thinking constituted the body of the discussion and resulted in an in-depth conversation. Third, creative and organizational thinking were action oriented and focused on solutions and planning to safeguard future progress. The participants repeatedly reflected on various intervention-related themes, ranging from intervention content to technical functionalities and from legal requirements to implementation in practice. Moreover, project-related matters were discussed, including stakeholder management and time and budget constraints.
This paper demonstrates how cocreation can be of value for multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement and alignment. Based on stakeholder mapping (with whom to discuss), a dream user scenario (what to discuss), and the Six Thinking Hats of de Bono (how to discuss), the participants shared information, discussed differences, searched for solutions, and moved toward a collective approach regarding intervention development. The lessons learned may further improve the understanding of how cocreation can contribute to multidisciplinary collaboration.

Malnutrition has important health impacts, especially in the elderly. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are effective strategies to help balance the nutritional needs of malnourished persons. Multiple ONS are available at community pharmacies, enabling pharmacists to have the possibility to implement strategies for prevention and monitoring of malnourished patients. The aim of this study was to characterize the experience of community pharmacists with the counseling and follow-up of users of ONS. A sample of 19 pharmacists from 19 different community pharmacies were interviewed. Apart from dispensing ONS to support patients that are preparing for diagnostic tests, the most frequently mentioned clinical condition for ONS counseling was malnutrition and dysphagia. When pharmacists consider dispensing ONS, three themes emerge: patient care, related to counselling tailored ONS to each patient\'s needs; interprofessional collaboration, with a special focus in the collaboration with registered dietitians; and training and education on ONS, looking to improve their knowledge and skills in ONS counselling and follow-up. Future studies exploring new forms of interaction between pharmacists and dietitians in this context should be developed, aiming to determine the workflow of an interdisciplinary service addressing the needs of community dwelling malnourished patients.

Dental care for hospitalized patients can improve nutritional status and feeding function while reducing complications. However, such care in Japan is not uniformly provided. This investigation examined the presence and characteristics of hospitals where dentists work and the collaboration between medical and dental teams. This cross-sectional study involves 7205 hospitals using the administrative reports on the Hospital Bed Function of 2018. Indicators described were the proportion of hospitals employing dentists, those providing perioperative oral care, and those with a nutrition support team (NST) that included dentists. A two-level logistic regression model was performed using hospital-based and secondary medical area-based factors to identify factors associated with hospitals employing dentists and dental care services. Some hospitals had poor medical and dental collaboration, even those with dentists, and no-dentist hospitals had rare medical and dental collaboration. Factors positively associated with hospitals that employed dentists were diagnosis-procedure-combination-hospital types, the Japanese government-established hospitals compared with hospitals established by public organizations, among others. In conclusion, the present study found poor medical and dental collaboration was observed in some hospitals and that hospital type, region, and hospital founders were associated with the performance of collaborative medical and dental care.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to review colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) patients at multiple centers to analyze the factors affecting the success of conversion therapy in patients whose CRLM was initially evaluated as potentially resectable, to explore the effect of different treatment approaches on patient survival, and to provide a scientific reference for clinical treatment of CRLM.
METHODS: Fifty patients whose CRLM was initially evaluated as potentially resectable at 3 large Chinese general hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. Statistical analyses were carried out on the general data and pathological characteristic data to examine the clinical efficacy of the treatment approaches. The factors affecting the success of conversion therapy were analyzed by logistic regression. Additionally, follow-up appointments were conducted to examine survival, and survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The effect of different clinical and pathological characteristics on CRLM patients was analyzed.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients achieved no evidence of disease (NED) status through surgical resection/ablation after undergoing conversion therapy. The multifactor analysis demonstrated that the number of liver metastases was the primary risk factor affecting the efficacy of conversion therapy (P<0.05). Survival analysis results showed statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the NED group and the inconspicuous/progressive group (P<0.0001). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) between the NED group and the inconspicuous/progressive group (P<0.0001). Patients in the surgical resection group had better OS and PFS than those in the ablation group (P<0.0001 and P<0.01, respectively). The monofactor analysis demonstrated that the number and maximum diameter of liver metastases, serum Carcino-Embryonic Antigen (CEA) level, and BRAF V600E mutation status were factors affecting the OS of CRLM patients (P<0.05), of which BRAF V600E mutation was the primary determinant (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients whose CRLM was initially evaluated as unresectable, those who underwent surgical resection of the primary lesions and liver metastases after receiving conversion therapy had the best prognosis. Thus, a thorough evaluation should be conducted to determine the effect of and survival factors affecting conversion therapy in the treatment of liver metastases.

In general during pregnancy, women are aware of the importance of good diet quality, interested in nutrition, and receptive to changing dietary intake. However, adherence to dietary guidelines is sub-optimal. A pregnant woman\'s first information source regarding nutrition information is her midwife. Healthy nutrition promotion by midwives may therefore be very promising, but midwives face multiple barriers in providing nutritional support. Empowering pregnant women to improve their diet quality is expected to improve their health. Therefore an empowerment intervention has been developed to improve diet quality among pregnant women. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of Power 4 a Healthy Pregnancy (P4HP). P4HP aims to empower pregnant women to have a healthier diet quality.
This study applies a mixed methodology consisting of a non-blinded cluster randomized trial with an intervention (P4HP) group and a control group and a process evaluation. Midwifery practices, the clusters, will be randomly allocated to the intervention arm (n = 7) and control arm (n = 7). Participating women are placed in intervention or control conditions based on their midwifery practice. Each midwifery practice includes 25 pregnant women, making 350 participants in total. Health related outcomes, diet quality, empowerment, Sense of Coherence, Quality of Life, and Self-Rated Health of participants will be assessed before (T0) and after (T1) the intervention. The process evaluation focuses on multidisciplinary collaboration, facilitators, and barriers, and consists of in-depth interviews with midwives, dieticians and pregnant women.
This study is the first to evaluate an empowerment intervention to improve diet quality in this target population. This mixed method evaluation will contribute to knowledge about the effectiveness and feasibility regarding diet quality, empowerment, health-related outcomes, multidisciplinary collaboration, facilitators and barriers of the empowerment intervention P4HP. Results will help inform how to empower pregnant women to achieve improved diet quality by midwives and dieticians. If proven effective, P4HP has the potential to be implemented nationally and scaled up to a long-term trajectory from preconception to the postnatal phase.
The trial is prospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register ( NL9551 ). Date registered: 19/05/2021.