暂无摘要。

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, profoundly incapacitating disease predominantly affecting the apocrine gland-rich areas of the human body. Although it affects 0.05% to 4% of the general population, there exists a significant racial disparity, with people of color, particularly Black individuals, experiencing a notably higher prevalence. Despite this disparity, the current literature lacks comprehensive analyses of HS concerning race and ethnicity, revealing a systemic blind spot in understanding and addressing the disease\'s racially disproportionate impacts. In this commentary, we aim to shed light on these racial disparities, focusing specifically on the stark inequities related to the timely diagnosis and subsequent dermatological care of HS in the United States. This commentary explores the racial bias in HS prevalence, severity, diagnostic delay, access to specialized care, and underrepresentation in clinical trials. By emphasizing the urgent need to address these disparities, we seek to foster an inclusive dialogue and drive proactive efforts toward achieving equitable care and research representation for all populations affected by this debilitating condition. Through this discussion, we aim to pave the way for a healthcare landscape that acknowledges and addresses the racial disparities inherent in HS, ensuring that advancements in the management of the disease cater to the needs of all populations, irrespective of their racial or ethnic background.

Numerous studies provide critical analyses of TV minority representations but only few examine successful portrayals. Moreover, there is no consensus on what makes a given depiction successful and how to measure it. Bringing insights from representation studies and media psychology, we propose that successful representations showcase minorities in a way which may foster audience engagement with characters and improve their diversity attitudes. In the current project, we developed a quantitative content analysis codebook with the following representation strategies: portrayal of minority experiences, recognizable representation, attractive representation, psychological depth, stereotypical representation, and friendly interactions. We demonstrate our approach by analyzing the portrayal of non-heterosexual and Black characters in Sex Education. We coded all the scenes with Eric, Adam, and Jackson from the first season of the TV show. Results indicate that these characters are predominantly shown as recognizable to viewers and in friendly interactions with other people. Moreover, they are depicted with attractive personality traits, and indicators of psychological depth. They also undergo various minority experiences. Some stereotypes about gay men are shown but anti-Black stereotypes are rare. In the results\' discussion, we suggest different ways of using our codebook in future studies.

The field of otolaryngology has one of the lowest rates of racial and ethnic diversity. An anonymous survey was distributed to members of the Student National Medical Association at different medical schools to identify factors that may contribute to this disparity. Responses were received from 104 students at 36 allopathic medical schools. Most respondents identified as black (86.5%). One-third of students (34.6%) noted that they were discouraged from pursuing otolaryngology due to lack of mentorship, and among these students, most noted that they lack mentors of the same race (75%). One-fourth of respondents (25%) indicated that they lack a home otolaryngology program. The most common reasons for participants\' disinterest in otolaryngology included competitiveness, inadequate exposure, research, and the high board scores needed to match. This hypothesis-generating, proof-of-concept study highlights potential barriers that may discourage underrepresented medical students from pursuing a career in otolaryngology.

BACKGROUND: Diversity within the medical profession with respect to sex and racial minorities has been shown to have a positive effect on health and healthcare. Characterization of a field is key to evaluating trends and the advancement of diversity in an otolaryngology subspecialty.
METHODS: Observational study.
METHODS: A comprehensive list of all the academic laryngologists was compiled from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited otolaryngology residency programs in 2020. The last 20 past presidents of the American Laryngological Association (ALA) and American Broncho-Esophogological Association (ABEA) were analyzed. Academic rank and years in practice were determined from departmental websites, with online search tools used as secondary resources. The h-index was utilized as a measure of research productivity. Regression analysis was performed to analyze these variables.
RESULTS: There are 184 academic laryngologists in the 124 programs. The majority of the population is Caucasian 76.6% (141/184), followed by Asian 16.3% (30/184), African American 4.34% (8/184), and then Hispanic 1% (2/184). There are 47 full professors with 83% Caucasian, 14.1% Asian, and 2.1% African American and 91.5% male and only 8.5% female. Past ALA presidents were 90% male and for the ABEA 75% male. H-index revealed a statistically significant difference between Caucasian and African American colleagues [P value (<.0005)].
CONCLUSIONS: Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in laryngology. Women are less likely to be in leadership roles in laryngology and become full professors. Laryngology lags behind other surgical specialties in the representation of minorities and women. Continued efforts should be made to increase diversity in the field of laryngology, especially in regard to underrepresented minorities.
METHODS: N/A Laryngoscope, 2021.

The present work experimentally examines how identity cues that signal minority inclusion contribute to sexual minorities\' (SM) healthcare visit expectations. We find that minority representation cues reduced SM\'s (N = 188) expectations of a healthcare provider\'s bias and increased perceived provider cultural competency which was, in turn, associated with lower anticipated identity-based devaluation and greater sexual orientation disclosure comfort. Providers\' diversity-valuing statements had mixed effects highlighting the importance of more concrete indicators of inclusion in this context. This work suggests that a lack of identity safety cues in healthcare settings may contribute to disparate health outcomes for sexual minority populations.

Gender and diversity in the workforce are hot topics in both the public and professional spheres. Medicine has not been immune to these discussions, with many recent publications highlighting the lack of equal representation of women and minorities within medicine and surgery. This paper will review the history and current state of gender and minority representation in the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (CAPS) as presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of CAPS in September 2018 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evolution of racial, ethnic, and gender diversity in US otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency programs and compare these figures with other residency programs.
METHODS: Retrospective database review.
METHODS: US residency programs.
METHODS: Information concerning minority and female representation in US residency programs was obtained from annually published graduate medical education reports by the Journal of the American Medical Association from 1975 to 2010. Minority representation among US population and university students was obtained from the US Census Bureau. The racial, ethnic, and gender diversity of otolaryngology residents was then compared with other medical fields (general surgery, family medicine, and internal medicine).
RESULTS: Underrepresentation in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery is particularly disconcerting for African Americans (-2.3%/y, P = .09) and Native Americans (1.5%/y, P = .11) given their nonsignificant annual growth rates. Hispanic representation (17.3%/y, P < .0001) is growing in otolaryngology but is half the rate of growth of the Hispanic American population (32.8%/y, P < .0001). There is nonetheless promise for women (70.6%/y, P < .0001) and Asian Americans (63.0%/y, P < .0001), who demonstrated statistically significant growth trends.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the evolution of female and minority representation among US otolaryngology residents. Despite increasing gender, ethnic, and racial diversity among medical residents in general, female and certain minority group representation in US otolaryngology residency programs is lagging. These findings are in contrast to rising trends of diversity within other residency programs including general surgery.