Objectives: Prevalence of irregular menstrual cycle ranges from 81.7% to 96.3%. Recent research suggested that homeopathy is one of the most popular choices for women with various gynecological disorders. This trial was aimed at differentiating individualized homeopathic medicinal products (IHMPs) from identical-looking placebos in the treatment of menstrual irregularities in early reproductive women. Design: Double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Subjects: Ninety-two females with menstrual irregularities. Interventions: Group verum (n = 46; IHMPs plus concomitant care) versus group control (n = 46; placebos plus concomitant care). Outcome Measures: Primary-The proportion of early reproductive females in whom menstrual irregularities can be corrected for consecutive three cycles; Secondary-Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) total score; all of them were measured at baseline and every month, up to 4 months. Results: Intention-to-treat sample (n = 92) was analyzed. Group differences were examined by chi-squared tests with categorical outcomes, two-way repeated measure analysis of variance accounting for the time-effect interactions, and unpaired t-tests comparing the mean estimates obtained individually every month. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 two-tailed. After 4 months of intervention, the group difference in the primary outcome was nonsignificant statistically-IHMPs: 22/46 v/s placebo: 24/46, chi-square (Yates corrected) = 0.043, p = 0.835. The improvement observed in the MDQ total score (F1,90 = 0.054, p = 0.816) and subscales scores were higher in the IHMPs group than in placebos, however statistically nonsignificant in most of the occasions, except for the behavioral change subscale (F1,90 = 0.029, p < 0.001). Pulsatilla nigricans was the most frequently prescribed medicine. Kent\'s Repertory and Zandvoort\'s Complete Repertory were the most frequently used repertories. No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either group. Conclusions: The analysis failed to demonstrate clearly that IHMPs were effective beyond placebos in all but one of the outcomes. More appropriate outcome measures may be sought for future trials. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2022/04/041659.

BACKGROUND: Hypothyroidism is known to affect a wide range of physiological systems, including menstrual function, in women of reproductive age. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the association between hypothyroidism and menstrual irregularities in women attending a tertiary care center.
METHODS: The study included 120 women aged 18-45 who presented with menstrual abnormalities. Convenience sampling was used to select participants from the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology. Thyroid function tests were conducted in the hospital\'s biochemistry laboratory, including assessments of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb). The study aimed to determine the prevalence of hypothyroidism and its association with various menstrual irregularities, such as oligomenorrhea, polymenorrhea, menorrhagia, and amenorrhea. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation for continuous variables, and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was set for the analyses.
RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 33.1 years (SD ± 7.2). The distribution of menstrual irregularities was 60 (50%) oligomenorrhea, 24 (20%) polymenorrhea, 24 (20%) menorrhagia, and 12 (10%) amenorrhea. Elevated TSH levels (>4.0 mIU/L) were observed in 42 (35%) of the participants, low FT4 levels (<0.8 ng/dL) in 18 (15%), low FT3 levels (<2.5 pg/mL) in 12 (10%), and elevated TPOAb levels (>55 IU/mL) in 24 (20%). A significant association was found between elevated TSH levels and oligomenorrhea (66 (55%), p<0.05) and between reduced FT4 levels and menorrhagia (78 (65%), p<0.05). Additionally, elevated TPOAb levels were significantly associated with amenorrhea (60 (50%), p<0.05). The correlation analysis showed a moderately positive correlation between TSH levels and the severity of menstrual irregularities (r=0.35, p<0.01). Subclinical hypothyroidism was detected in 25% of the participants, while 15% had clinical hypothyroidism.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores a notable link between hypothyroidism and menstrual irregularities in women of reproductive age. The results highlight the necessity of routine thyroid function screenings for women experiencing menstrual abnormalities, facilitating precise diagnosis and suitable treatment.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has presented numerous health challenges, including long-term COVID, which affects female reproductive health. This review consolidates the current research on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the menstrual cycle, ovarian function, fertility, and overall gynecological health. This study emphasizes the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme receptors in viral entry and the subsequent tissue-specific pathological effects. It also explores the potential influence of long COVID on hormonal balance and immune responses, contributing to menstrual irregularities and impaired ovarian function. The findings indicate a higher prevalence of long-term COVID-19 among women, highlighting the substantial implications for reproductive health and the need for sex-sensitive longitudinal studies. Enhanced surveillance and targeted research are essential to develop effective interventions that prioritize women\'s reproductive well-being following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review advocates for a sex-informed approach to ongoing COVID-19 research and healthcare strategies, aiming to provide up-to-date and pertinent data for healthcare providers and the general public, ultimately improving outcomes for females affected by long COVID.

Recent methodological recommendations suggest the use of the \"3-step method,\" consisting of calendar-based counting, urinary ovulation testing, and serum blood sampling, for the identification of subtle menstrual disturbances (SMDs). However, the use of the 3-step method is not always feasible, so a less demanding combination of calendar-based counting and urinary ovulation testing, that is, the 2-step method, may be a viable alternative.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement between the 2- and 3-step methods for the detection of SMDs.
METHODS: Menstrual cycles (MCs, 98) of 59 athletes were assessed using the 2- and 3-step methods. Regular-length MCs (ie, ≥21 and ≤35 d) were classified as either having no SMD (luteal phase length ≥10 d, midluteal progesterone concentration ≥16 nmol·L-1, and being ovulatory) or having an SMD (eg, short luteal phase [<10 d], inadequate luteal phase [midluteal progesterone concentration <16 nmol·L-1], or being anovulatory). Method agreement was assessed using the McNemar test and Cohen kappa (κ).
RESULTS: Substantial agreement was observed between methods (κ = .72; 95% CI, .53-.91), but the 2-step method did not detect all MCs with an SMD, resulting in evidence of systematic bias (χ2 = 5.14; P = .023). The 2-step method detected 61.1% of MCs that had an SMD ([51.4, 70.8]), as verified using the 3-step method, and correctly identified 100% of MCs without an SMD.
CONCLUSIONS: MCs classified as being disturbed using the 2-step method could be considered valid evidence of SMDs. However, MCs classified without SMDs do not definitively confirm their absence, due to the proven underdetection via the 2-step method.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) presents complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to its multifactorial nature. This case study focuses on a 31-year-old woman exhibiting symptoms of weight gain, irregular menstruation cycles, and hirsutism, leading to a diagnosis of PCOS. Conventional diagnostic criteria and ultrasound confirmation of multiple ovarian cysts supported the diagnosis. By integrating Ayurvedic principles alongside Western medical techniques, this study sought to address imbalances in the Kapha and Pitta doshas, fundamental energies according to Ayurveda, believed to contribute to PCOS symptoms. Clinical findings emphasized the role of Pitta dosha imbalance in inflammation, hormonal irregularities, and excessive body heat, while Kapha dosha imbalance manifested in fluid retention, weight gain, and increased mucus production. A holistic treatment approach was devised, aiming to restore doshic balance while addressing hormonal and metabolic dysregulation. The treatment protocol comprised lifestyle modifications, advocating for a regular exercise regimen focusing on activities enhancing insulin sensitivity and promoting weight loss. Swimming, yoga, and brisk walking were recommended to achieve these goals. Dietary interventions tailored to balance Kapha and Pitta doshas were prescribed, emphasizing nourishing, warming foods low in carbohydrates to prevent weight gain and boost metabolism. Anti-inflammatory foods, such as turmeric and ginger, were incorporated to mitigate inflammation. The integration of Ayurvedic principles alongside Western medicine offered a comprehensive approach to PCOS management, addressing both the root causes and symptoms of the condition. This personalized treatment strategy aimed not only to alleviate immediate symptoms but also to promote long-term health and well-being by restoring doshic equilibrium and optimizing hormonal and metabolic functions. In conclusion, this case study highlights the potential efficacy of combining Ayurvedic and Western medical approaches in the management of PCOS, offering a tailored and holistic treatment paradigm for patients seeking comprehensive care.

There is evidence suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with small, transitory effects on uterine bleeding, possibly including menstrual timing, flow, and duration, in some individuals. However, changes in health care seeking, diagnosis, and workup for abnormal uterine bleeding in the COVID-19 vaccine era are less clear.
This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosis and diagnostic evaluation in a large integrated health system.
Using segmented regression, we assessed whether the availability of COVID-19 vaccines was associated with changes in monthly, population-based rates of incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses relative to the prepandemic period in health system members aged 16 to 44 years who were not menopausal. We also compared clinical and demographic characteristics of patients diagnosed with incident abnormal uterine bleeding between December 2020 and October 13, 2021 by vaccination status (never vaccinated, vaccinated in the 60 days before diagnosis, vaccinated >60 days before diagnosis). Furthermore, we conducted detailed chart review of patients diagnosed with abnormal uterine bleeding within 1 to 60 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the same time period.
In monthly populations ranging from 79,000 to 85,000 female health system members, incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosis per 100,000 person-days ranged from 8.97 to 19.19. There was no significant change in the level or trend in the incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses between the prepandemic (January 2019-January 2020) and post-COVID-19 vaccine (December 2020-December 2021) periods. A comparison of clinical characteristics of 2717 abnormal uterine bleeding cases by vaccination status suggested that abnormal bleeding among recently vaccinated patients was similar or less severe than abnormal bleeding among patients who had never been vaccinated or those vaccinated >60 days before. There were also significant differences in age and race of patients with incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses by vaccination status (Ps<.02). Never-vaccinated patients were the youngest and those vaccinated >60 days before were the oldest. The proportion of patients who were Black/African American was highest among never-vaccinated patients, and the proportion of Asian patients was higher among vaccinated patients. Chart review of 114 confirmed postvaccination abnormal uterine bleeding cases diagnosed from December 2020 through October 13, 2021 found that the most common symptoms reported were changes in timing, duration, and volume of bleeding. Approximately one-third of cases received no diagnostic workup; 57% had no etiology for the bleeding documented in the electronic health record. In 12% of cases, the patient mentioned or asked about a possible link between their bleeding and their recent COVID-19 vaccine.
The availability of COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with a change in incidence of medically attended abnormal uterine bleeding in our population of over 79,000 female patients of reproductive age. In addition, among 2717 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses in the period following COVID-19 vaccine availability, receipt of the vaccine was not associated with greater bleeding severity.

Background After COVID-19 vaccination, females reported irregularities and changes in their menstrual cycle. We aimed to explore the menstrual irregularities following COVID-19 vaccination in Saudi women of childbearing age. Methodology The study was a cross-sectional study conducted among women in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who had no history of menstrual irregularities before receiving the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The participants filled out an online self-administered questionnaire via Google Form about any menstrual irregularities they experienced after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Results A total of 535 participants completed the survey. The study found that 41.7% (223) of women experienced menstrual changes after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, increasing to 44.1% (236) after the second dose. The incidence of these changes varied between the first and second doses. For example, the incidence of changes in period duration decreased from 51.6% to 48.3% after the first and second doses, respectively. Similarly, the incidence of delayed periods decreased from 48.4% to 47.9%, while dysmenorrhea increased slightly from 30.9% to 32.2% after the two doses. The incidence of heavier menstrual flow increased from 26.9% to 30.5%, while the incidence of lighter menstrual flow decreased from 26.9% to 24.6% after the first and second doses, respectively. Conclusions There is an increased incidence of changes in menstrual cycle after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in menstrual cycle length, menstrual pain, and the flow of menstruation. Future studies are needed to investigate the potential underlying biological mechanisms.

UNASSIGNED: The telemedicine/telehealth is well established and rapidly evolving innovation in modern practice of medicine. It is used in nearly every aspect of obstetrics and gynecology. Telehealth intervention may reduce the need for in-person visits amongst high-risk obstetric patients. It is an effective innovation for chronic gynecological conditions.
UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective, observational study where the online platform \'e-Sanjeevani\' was used. It was a health care worker to doctor (specialist) consultation regarding the patient. After an interaction, provisional diagnosis and management plan was made, and an electronic prescription for the same was generated and printed at the patient\'s end.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 3219 patients were attended in 10 months. The majority of the cases had a gynecological problem (71.5%), with menstrual irregularity being the commonest. Among pregnant patients, consultations for early pregnancy complications were made in 29% of the cases. 5.8% were referred because of some surgical intervention.
UNASSIGNED: Non-emergency patients who can be managed medically can be prevented from unnecessary visits to the hospital and managed through teleconsultation, which decreases the burden of patient load at the tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the association between kidney stones and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) were used to investigate the risk of kidney stones in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Four distinct phenotypes of PCOS, as defined by the Rotterdam criteria, were examined in a sample of 520 women and compared to a control group of 1638 eumenorrheic non-hirsute healthy women. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were employed for analysis. The four PCOS phenotypes were classified as follows: Phenotype A, characterized by the presence of all three PCOS features (anovulation (OA), hyperandrogenism (HA), and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound (PCOM)); Phenotype B, characterized by the presence of anovulation and hyperandrogenism; Phenotype C, characterized by the presence of hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound; and Phenotype D, characterized by the presence of anovulation and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound.
RESULTS: The prevalence of a history of kidney stones was found to be significantly higher in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) compared to healthy controls (12.5% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.001). This increased prevalence was observed across all PCOS phenotypes (p < 0.001). After adjusting for potential risk factors, including age, family history of kidney stones, waist-to-height ratio, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein, the odds ratio for kidney stones in women with PCOS was found to be 1.59 [95% CI: 1.12-2.25, p = 0.01], indicating a 59% increase in risk compared to healthy women. Women with PCOS Phenotype A [OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.09-3.55, p = 0.02] and Phenotype D [OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.24-7.41, p = 0.01] were found to be at a higher risk for kidney stones.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), particularly those exhibiting menstrual irregularities and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound (PCOM), have been found to be two to three times more likely to develop kidney stones. This increased prevalence should be taken into consideration when providing preventive care and counseling to these individuals.

The purpose of this study was to examine the menstrual cycle (MC) characteristics, explore the impact on performance, and identify barriers to and facilitators of MC-related communication among high-performance female adolescent athletes in Singapore. Ninety athletes (15.4 ± 1.8 years) from multiple sports completed an online questionnaire. Eighty-four athletes were postmenarcheal (menarcheal age 11.9 ± 1.3 years), including two who were using an oral contraceptive pill (OCP). Secondary amenorrhea, current or history of, was self-reported in 16% of athletes. Sixty-two percent and 67% of non-OCP athletes perceived that the MC affected their ability to train and compete, respectively. Athletes preferred speaking to a parent (85%) and a female figure (67%) about MC-related concerns. Through thematic analysis, three barriers to communication were constructed: (1) pervasive menstrual stigma, (2) constraints of the training environment, and (3) the low value placed on MC-related conversations. Two facilitators of communication were constructed: (1) respect athletes\' individual experiences as menstruating girls and (2) foster a safe space for MC-related conversations. Findings demonstrated that menstrual irregularities are common in adolescent athletes and screening for MC disorders, particularly primary amenorrhea should be undertaken in this population, with clear support pathways for management including symptom mitigation. To support athletes in raising MC-related concerns when needed, structured communication pathways that consider individual preferences and involve a (female) point of contact should be established within the training environment. Improving menstrual health literacy among adolescent athletes before any misinformation or negative perceptions are firmly established may contribute to longevity in their athletic careers.