UNASSIGNED: In this study, we examined the impact and degree of lumbar stenosis on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein concentration.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, we analyzed protein concentrations in CSF samples of 61 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) obtained during pre-operative myelography. Patients were divided into two groups: those showing no block to contrast (Group A) versus those showing medium block to contrast below the lumbar puncture level (Group B).
UNASSIGNED: The CSF protein concentration in Group B (104.3 ± 59 g/dL) patients with medium block was significantly greater than that in Group A (65.1 ± 33 g/dL) patients without medium block.
UNASSIGNED: A higher average CSF protein concentration was seen in Group B patients with significant lumbar stenosis versus Group A patients without significant lumbar stenosis. Theoretically, damage to the cauda equina in patients with LSS may cause these elevated CSF protein levels.

UNASSIGNED: Determine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of fluoroscopically- or ultrasound-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) with or without catheter placement for the treatment of chronic low back (CLBP), radicular pain, and/or chronic post-surgical back pain (CPSBP).
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review.
UNASSIGNED: Adults ≥18 years with CLBP, radicular pain, or CPSBP ≥3 months.
UNASSIGNED: Fluoroscopically- or ultrasound-guided caudal ESI with or without a catheter including epidural neuroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: Sham, placebo procedure, active standard care treatment, or none.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with reduction of pain by ​≥ ​50%. Secondary outcomes included functional improvement, analgesic use, subsequent spinal surgery, healthcare utilization, and mean improvement in pain. Reported adverse events were also cataloged.
UNASSIGNED: Four reviewers independently assessed publications before January 2, 2022 in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
UNASSIGNED: Of 364 records screened, 23 publications met inclusion criteria. The success rates for the primary outcome could only be extrapolated from one study. Another study used a composite improvement scale that included pain and functional outcomes. The reported success rates in these two studies ranged from 40 to 58% at three months, 25%-67% at six months, and 58%-61% at one year. Data on secondary outcomes were limited; however, rates of functional improvement as measured by mean improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ranged from 2% to 55%.
UNASSIGNED: There is moderate-quality evidence that caudal ESIs using an in-dwelling catheter for two days is an effective treatment for pain and dysfunction associated with disc herniation with radicular pain and for CPSBP at three, six, and 12 months. There is low-quality evidence supporting the effectiveness of other caudal ESI techniques for pain and dysfunction associated with central lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication, discogenic CLBP, and CLBP without disc herniation or radiculitis.

UNASSIGNED: This prospective longitudinal study compares outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries receiving outpatient percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD) using the mild® procedure to patients undergoing outpatient laminectomy. All patients were diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication (NC).
UNASSIGNED: All medical claims for 100 % of Medicare beneficiaries were reviewed, with study subjects identified using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Research Identifiable Files. Baseline data were extracted individually to allow for longitudinal analysis through two-year follow-up. The index procedure was defined as the first mild or outpatient laminectomy during the enrollment period. The rate of subsequent surgical procedures and incidence of harms were used as study outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Cohorts included 2197 mild and 7416 laminectomy patients. mild patients were significantly older (76.7 years versus 73.4 years, respectively; p < 0.0001), and 57.4 % of mild were female, compared to 43.3 % of laminectomy (p < 0.0001). mild patients presented with significantly more baseline comorbidities compared to laminectomy patients (mean of 5.7 versus 4.8, respectively; p < 0.0001). Subsequent surgical procedure rate of 9.0 % for mild was significantly higher than 5.5 % for laminectomy (p < 0.0001). mild experienced harms at a significantly lower rate than laminectomy (1.9 % versus 5.8 %, respectively; p < 0.0001). The composite rate of subsequent surgical procedures and harms was similar between groups at 10.8 % for mild and 11.0 % for laminectomy.
UNASSIGNED: mild can be considered a viable option for treatment of LSS with NC as evidenced by real-world data in this study. At two-years, mild patients experienced fewer harms and underwent more subsequent surgical procedures than laminectomy patients. The higher rate of subsequent surgical procedures for mild may be attributable to its position earlier in the LSS treatment algorithm. The overall rate of harms and subsequent surgical procedures was similar between groups, suggesting that mild should be considered as a treatment option, particularly for older patients with multiple comorbidities.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) has yielded positive results in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Unilateral biportal ULBD (UB-ULBD) and percutaneous endoscopic ULBD (PE-ULBD) are gaining popularity because of the progress that has been made in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical results of UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD.
METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ULBD surgery for LSS. The patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of the surgical method: the UB-ULBD group and the PE-ULBD group. Data on the general demographic data, surgical details, clinical efficacy, radiography and complications were compared between the two groups were compared. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months.
RESULTS: A total of 113 LSS patients who had undergone ULBD at our institution were included, of whom 61 patients underwent UB-ULBD surgery and 52 underwent PE-ULBD surgery. The UB-ULBD group had a significantly shorter operation time (P < 0.05). The facet was significantly better preserved in the UB-ULBD group than in the PE-ULBD group, and the angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection in the UE-ULBD group was significantly smaller (P < 0.05). The ODI score, VAS score and modified Macnab criteria improved postoperatively in both groups. The UB-ULBD group had a 95.08% rate of excellent or good patient outcomes, whereas the PE-ULBD group had a 92.30% rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Both UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD can provide favourable clinical outcomes when used to treat LSS. UB-ULBD is beneficial because of its shorter operation time, smaller angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection and better facet preservation, making it a viable and safe option for treating LSS while ensuring spinal stability.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relational factors influencing the formation of cauda equina redundant nerve roots (RNRs) of the lumbar spinal stenosis.
METHODS: Clinical data of 116 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated from January 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into redundant nerve roots(RNRs) group and non-RNRs group based on the presence or absence of RNRs on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. In the non-RNRs group, there were 74 patients, including 38 males and 36 females with an average age of (62.00±10.41) years old, the body mass index (BMI) was (23.09±2.22) kg·m-2;the maximum stenosis segment was L2-L3 in 12 cases, L3-L4 in 38, L4-L5 in 20, and L5S1 in 4, respectively. In the RNRs group, there were 42 patients, including 18 males and 24 females with an average age of (63.36±8.73) years old, the BMI was (22.63±2.60) kg·m-2;the maximum stenosis segment was L2-L3 in 3 cases, L3-L4 in 9, L4-L5 in 27 and L5S1 in 3, respectively. MRI was performed in the supine position to observe the conshape and morphology of the redundant nerve in the sagittal position. The preoperative low back and leg pain visual analogue scale(VAS), and preoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) were analyzed, and the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy were compared. Simultaneously, the inter-vertebral height, intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, median sagittal diameter at the inter-vertebral space level(DIW-MSD), median sagittal diameter at the pedicel level(DV-MSD), range of motion(ROM) of the stenotic segment were measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: Among the 116 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, 42 patients developed RNRs, with an incidence of 36.2%. There were no significant differences in gender, age, BMI, preoperative VAS for lumbar and leg pain and ODI between two groups(P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences regard to the duration of symptoms and the rate of spondylolisthesis and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (P<0.05);the inter-vertebral height, intervertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, DIW-MSD, ROM of the stenotic segment were also significantly different between two groups(P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in DV-MSD between two groups(P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The inter-vertebral height, inter-vertebral foramen height, inter-vertebral height+vertebral height, DIW-MSD and ROM of the stenotic segment were the crucial factors related to RNRs in lumbar spinal stenosis.