local recurrence

局部复发
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不同CRM模式在直肠癌患者中的临床价值尚不清楚。这项研究旨在确定不同方式的圆周切缘(CRM)参与局部晚期直肠癌患者的临床影响。
    方法:从前瞻性荷兰全国病理学数据库(PALGA)中选择2014年6月至2020年6月期间诊断为III期直肠癌的患者队列。根据CRM受累的性质(通过原发肿瘤侵袭,淋巴结转移,肿瘤沉积,多因素)并对复发和总生存期(OS)进行分析。
    结果:纳入3020例患者,其中12.4%的人有积极的CRM。这些患者中的大多数(63.2%)因原发性肿瘤侵袭而参与CRM,而在9%的患者中,多种因素导致CRM阳性。局部复发率和远处转移率与CRM受累的性质有关,淋巴结转移率最低,多因素转移率最高。在多变量分析中,CRM参与原发肿瘤侵袭,肿瘤沉积和多种因素,但不是淋巴结转移,与不良操作系统有关。
    结论:这项全国性的基于人群的研究强调了报告直肠癌患者CRM受累性质的临床重要性。涉及CRM的淋巴结转移不具有相同的局部复发风险,远处转移和OS作为原发肿瘤侵袭的CRM参与或多因素的CRM参与。
    BACKGROUND: The clinical value of different modes of CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the clinical impact of different modes of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in patients with a locally advanced rectal carcinoma.
    METHODS: A cohort of patients who were diagnosed with stage III rectal cancer between June 2014 and June 2020 was selected from the prospective Dutch nationwide pathology databank (PALGA). Histopathological and clinical data were analyzed according to the nature of CRM involvement (via primary tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor deposit, multiple factors) and analyses on recurrence and overall survival (OS) were performed.
    RESULTS: 3020 patients were included, of whom 12.4 % had a positive CRM. The majority of these patients (63.2 %) had CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion and in 9 % of patients multiple factors caused the positive CRM. The rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis were related to the nature of the CRM involvement, with lowest rate for lymph node metastasis and highest rate for multiple factors. On multivariate analysis, CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion, tumor deposits and multiple factors, but not by lymph node metastasis, were associated with poor OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide population based study highlights the clinical importance of reporting the nature of CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients. Lymph node metastasis involving the CRM does not bear the same risks for local recurrence, distant metastases and OS as CRM involvement by primary tumor invasion or CRM involvement by multiple factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估mRENAL评分对体外患者人群经皮冷冻消融术(PCA)后存在重大不良事件(AEs)和/或局部肿瘤复发(LR)风险的患者的鉴别能力。
    方法:记录患者的人口统计学数据。计算肾脏计和肾脏计评分。临床结果,如AEs,LR,癌症特异性生存率(CSS),收集总生存期(OS)。根据SIR标准对AE进行分类。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方检验对连续变量和分类变量进行分析,分别。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与主要AE或LR相关的变量。
    结果:该研究包括207名患者(男性:n=117(56.5%)),平均年龄为65.8(±11.2)岁(范围:27-90)。总的来说,肿瘤的平均直径,肾评分,平均mRENAL评分为30.1mm(±11.4),6.3(±1.7),和6.8(±1.9),分别。14例患者(6.8%)和13例患者(6.3%)在PCA后经历了严重的AE或LR,分别。CSS和OS分别为98.6%和90.3%,分别。对于PCA后出现严重不良事件的患者,平均肿瘤直径(p<0.0001),平均肾功能评分(p=0.03),平均mRENAL评分(p=0.009)均高于无严重不良事件的患者。多变量回归分析表明,只有平均肿瘤直径(p=0.005)可以预测主要的AE。在PCA后,有LR的患者和没有LR的患者在肿瘤大小方面没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.07),平均肾功能评分(p=0.32),或平均mRENAL评分(p=0.07)。多元回归分析显示,仅平均肿瘤直径(p=0.01)可预测LR。
    结论:mRENAL评分不能准确识别有严重AE或LR风险的患者。仅最大肿瘤直径可预测主要AE和LR,并且应该是患者选择期间的主要焦点。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the mRENAL score to identify patients at risk of either major adverse events (AEs) and/or local tumor recurrence (LR) after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in an external patient population.
    METHODS: Patient demographic data were recorded. The RENAL and mRENAL nephrometry scores were calculated. Clinical outcomes such as AEs, LR, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. AEs were classified according to SIR criteria. Continuous variables and categorical variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with major AEs or LR.
    RESULTS: The study included 207 patients (Males: n = 117 (56.5%)) with a mean age of 65.8 (± 11.2) years (range:27-90). Overall, the mean tumor diameter, RENAL score, and mean mRENAL score were 30.1 mm (± 11.4), 6.3 (± 1.7), and 6.8 (± 1.9), respectively. 14 patients (6.8%) and 13 patients (6.3%) experienced a major AE or LR after PCA, respectively. CSS and OS were 98.6% and 90.3%, respectively. For patients with major AEs after PCA, the mean tumor diameter (p < 0.0001), mean RENAL score (p = 0.03), and mean mRENAL score (p = 0.009) were all higher than those for patients without a major AE. Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.005) was predictive of a major AE. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with LR and patients without LR after PCA with regards to tumor size (p = 0.07), mean RENAL score (p = 0.32), or mean mRENAL score (p = 0.07). Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.01) was predictive of LR.
    CONCLUSIONS: The mRENAL score did not accurately identify patients at risk for either major AEs or LR. Maximum tumor diameter alone was predictive of both major AEs and LR, and should be the primary focus during patient selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头颈部皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)的行为仍然知之甚少。关于局部和节点复发的风险有很多争议,以及增加风险的个人/环境因素,如肿瘤大小,神经周浸润,和免疫系统的状态。目的是分析影响头颈部cSCC患者局部和/或区域淋巴结复发的因素。
    这项回顾性单中心研究包括521例头颈部cSCC患者,11%的局部复发和5%的淋巴结复发。分析各种潜在的危险因素。
    局部和淋巴结复发的统计学意义上的危险因素包括:肿瘤复发(分别为p<0.0001,p<0.0001),组织病理学证实的组织炎症(分别为p<0.0001,p=0.0019),肿瘤大小≥10mm(分别为p=0.018,p=0.0056),侵入深度>2mm(p=0.0238,p=0.0031,分别)。仅对局部复发有意义的危险因素包括:手术切缘(p=0.0056),肿瘤分化分级(p=0.0149)。没有发现仅对淋巴结复发有意义的危险因素。
    作者认为,除了传统公认的局部和淋巴结复发的危险因素,应注意组织病理学证实的组织炎症的存在。还建议考虑10毫米的肿瘤大小作为阈值,增加复发的风险,而不是经常提出的20毫米。
    UNASSIGNED: The behavior of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck remains poorly understood. There is much controversy regarding the risk of local and nodal recurrences, as well as individual/environmental factors that increase the risk, such as tumor size, perineural invasion, and the state of the immune system. The objective was to analyze factors influencing local and/or regional lymph node recurrence in patients with cSCC in the head and neck region.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective single-centre study included 521 patients with cSCC of the head and neck region, with local recurrence observed in 11% and nodal recurrence in 5%. Various potential risk factors were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Statistically significant risk factors for both local and nodal recurrence include: tumor recurrence (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 respectively), tissue inflammation confirmed histopathologically (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0019, respectively), tumor size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.018, p = 0.0056, respectively), invasion depth > 2 mm (p = 0.0238, p = 0.0031, respectively). Risk factors significant only for local recurrence include: surgical margins (p = 0.0056), tumor differentiation grade (p = 0.0149). No risk factors were found to be significant solely for nodal recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors argue that, in addition to classically recognized risk factors for local and nodal recurrence, attention should be paid to the presence of tissue inflammation confirmed histopathologically. It is also suggested to consider a tumor size of 10 mm as a threshold, increasing the risk of recurrence, instead of the frequently proposed 20 mm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨肾部分切除术(PN)与局部复发(LR)的相关性,非转移性肾细胞癌(nmRCC)患者的以人群为基础的全国性真实世界队列研究中的远处转移性复发(DMR)和全因死亡率.
    方法:在2005-2018年期间诊断出的2751例AT或PN治疗的nmRCC肿瘤的数据,代表2701例独特患者,是从瑞典国家肾癌登记册获得的。使用Cox回归模型分析LR/DMR或有/无LR/DMR的死亡时间。
    结果:在平均4.8年的随访中,观察到111例(4.0%)肿瘤的LR,108例(3.9%)肿瘤的DMR,206例(7.5%)肿瘤无LR/DMR死亡。与PN治疗相比,AT治疗的肿瘤发生LR的风险高4.31倍(P<0.001),DMR的风险高1.91倍(P=0.018),无LR/DMR的死亡风险无显著差异。在LR/DMR后平均3.2年和2.5年的随访中,分别,24例(21.6%)LR病例和56例(51.9%)DMR病例死亡,与无LR/DMR患者的7.5%相比。在LR或DMR发生后早期死亡的风险方面,AT和PN治疗之间没有显着差异。
    结论:AT治疗nmRCC患者意味着LR和DMR的风险明显高于PN治疗。为了将LR和DMR的风险降至最低,这些结果表明,PN优先于AT作为主要治疗,支持EAU指南,主要向虚弱和/或合并症患者推荐AT。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between ablative therapy (AT) and partial nephrectomy (PN) and the occurrence of local recurrence (LR), distant metastatic recurrence (DMR) and all-cause mortality in a nation-wide real-world population-based cohort of patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (nmRCC).
    METHODS: Data on 2751 AT- or PN-treated nmRCC tumours diagnosed during 2005-2018, representing 2701 unique patients, were obtained from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register. Time to LR/DMR or death with/without LR/DMR was analysed using Cox regression models.
    RESULTS: During a mean of 4.8 years follow-up, LR was observed for 111 (4.0%) tumours, DMR for 108 (3.9%) tumours, and death without LR/DMR for 206 (7.5%) tumours. AT-treated tumours had a 4.31 times higher risk of LR (P < 0.001) and a 1.91 times higher risk of DMR (P = 0.018) than PN-treated, with no significant differences in risk of death without LR/DMR. During a mean of 3.2 and 2.5 years of follow-up after LR/DMR, respectively, 24 (21.6%) of the LR cases and 56 (51.9%) of the DMR cases died, compared to 7.5% in patients without LR/DMR. There were no significant differences between AT- and PN-treated regarding risks of early death after occurrence of LR or DMR.
    CONCLUSIONS: AT treatment of patients with nmRCC implied significantly higher risks of LR and DMR compared with PN treatment. To minimize the risks of LR and DMR, these results suggest that PN is preferred over AT as primary treatment, supporting the EAU guidelines to recommended AT mainly to frail and/or comorbid patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脑转移瘤患者术后立体定向放射外科是指南推荐的治疗方法。然而,日本临床肿瘤学组0504研究表明,术后观察可能是完全切除的脑转移患者的治疗选择。我们在此调查了在不立即放疗的情况下完全切除后局部复发的发生率和危险因素,并开发了一种评分系统来预测其复发。
    方法:我们纳入了53例脑转移瘤患者,在2016年1月至2021年12月期间接受了完全切除。我们确定了局部复发的危险因素,并开发了一个评分系统来预测它使用提取的危险因素,通过为每个风险因素分配1分并计算每位患者的总分。我们评估了预后评分与局部复发时间之间的相关性。
    结果:54例肿瘤中有37例(68.5%)出现局部复发,中位随访时间为21.0个月。局部复发的中位时间为5.1个月。单因素和多因素分析显示,非肺腺癌,幕下肿瘤,并且没有发现术后全身治疗是局部复发的危险因素(非肺腺癌,p=0.035;幕下肿瘤,p=0.044;术后无全身治疗,p=0.0069)。评分≥2分显示局部复发的中位时间为2.1个月,与评分≤1的30.8个月形成鲜明对比(p=0.0002)。
    结论:非肺腺癌,幕下肿瘤,术后无全身治疗是局部复发的危险因素。我们的评分系统可以预测局部复发,因此可能有助于治疗决策。
    OBJECTIVE: Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases is guideline-recommended therapy. However, Japanese Clinical Oncology Group 0504 study showed that postoperative observation could be a therapeutic option in patients with completed resected brain metastases. We hereby investigated the incidence and risk factors for local recurrence after complete resection without immediate radiotherapy and developed a scoring system for its prediction.
    METHODS: We included 53 patients with 54 brain metastases, who underwent complete resection between January 2016 and December 2021. We identified risk factors for local recurrence and developed a scoring system to predict it using the extracted risk factors, by assigning one point to each risk factor and calculating the total scores for each patient. We evaluated the correlation between the prognostic score and time to local recurrence.
    RESULTS: Local recurrence occurred in 37 of 54 tumors (68.5%), with a median follow-up duration of 21.0 months. The median time to local recurrence was 5.1 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were identified as risk factors for local recurrence (non-lung adenocarcinoma, p = 0.035; infratentorial tumors, p = 0.044; and no postoperative systemic therapy, p = 0.0069). A score ≥ 2 showed a median time to local recurrence of 2.1 months, starkly contrasting with 30.8 months for a score ≤ 1 (p = 0.0002).
    CONCLUSIONS: Non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were risk factors for local recurrence. Our scoring system can predict local recurrence, thus potentially aiding treatment decisions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    深部血管粘液瘤(DAM)是一种生长缓慢的良性肿瘤,手术切除后局部复发的风险很高。虽然下肢的DAM极为罕见,临床医生必须意识到它的可能发生。可以根据临床检查和放射影像学进行怀疑,但最终诊断在组织病理学检查和免疫组织化学上得到证实。我们打算介绍一个极其罕见的膝盖DAM病例,边缘切除成功管理。
    一个4岁的男孩被无痛的抱怨,逐步增加,软,非招标,右膝肿胀波动.X线平片显示无钙化的软组织肿胀,MRI显示多部位囊性病变伴多发隔膜。术前诊断为良性囊性病变。通过边缘切除肿瘤进行管理,并进行了DAM的组织学诊断。免疫组化染色显示SMA阳性,CD34和波形蛋白呈局灶性阳性,而desmin和calponin呈阴性。在12个月的随访中,患者的步态正常,无痛,膝盖ROM饱满,没有任何局部复发。
    DAM是一种罕见的肿瘤,常被误诊。在这份报告中,我们介绍了一例罕见的良性囊性病变,结果是切除标本的HPE上的DAM。该病变的边缘切除显示良好的结果,直到最后随访12个月才复发。有了这个,我们得出的结论是,在DAM病例中,手术切除应该是金标准。
    UNASSIGNED: Deep angiomyxoma (DAM) is a slow-growing benign tumor with high risk of local recurrence after surgical resection. Although DAM in a lower extremity is extremely rare, clinicians must be aware of its possible occurrence. Suspicion can be made based on clinical examination and radiological imaging but final diagnosis is confirmed on histopathological examination and immunohistochemistry. We intend to present an extremely rare case of DAM in the knee, managed successfully with marginal excision.
    UNASSIGNED: A 4-year-old male child presented with the complains of a painless, progressively increasing, soft, non-tender, and fluctuant swelling in his right knee. The plain radiograph showed a non-calcified soft-tissue swelling and MRI revealed a multi-loculated cystic lesion with multiple septations. A pre-operative diagnosis of a benign cystic lesion was made. It was managed by marginal excision of the tumor and a histological diagnosis of DAM was made. IHC staining showed positivity for SMA, CD34 and vimentin were focally positive, while desmin and calponin were negative. At 12 months of follow-up, the patient had a normal painless gait and full knee ROM, without any local recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: DAM is a rare tumor which is often misdiagnosed. In this report, we present a rare case of benign cystic lesion which turned out to be DAM on HPE of resected specimen. Marginal excision of this lesion revealed good outcomes with no recurrence until 12 months of final follow-up. With this, we conclude that surgical excision should be the gold standard in cases of DAM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:乳腺叶状肿瘤(PT)患者的最佳手术切缘宽度仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是评估边缘宽度对长期局部复发风险的影响。
    方法:这是对2008-2015年确诊PT患者的单机构回顾性研究。边缘被定义为阳性(肿瘤上的墨水),狭窄(墨缘无肿瘤,但<10mm),或广泛自由(>/=10mm)。LR率通过Kaplan-Meier方法估计。
    结果:在117名女性患者中,组织学包括55(47%)良性,29(25%)边界线,和33(28%)恶性PT。16位(14%)的最终利润率为正,32岁(27%),在64(55%)中广泛免费,5(4%)患者未知。与>10mm的边距相比,边缘窄阳性患者的LR风险较高[HR10.57(95%CI2.48-45.02)和HR5.66(95%CI1.19-26.99),分别]。在良性PT中,十年无LR利率是100%,94%,66%为广泛负面,狭窄,和正利润率,分别(p=0.056)。对于临界/恶性PT,10年期无LR利率分别为93%和57%,利润率普遍为负和窄小,分别为(p=0.02),窄边缘组和阳性边缘组的LR无差异(p=1.00)。
    结论:对于良性PT,肿瘤上无墨水的边缘似乎足以优化局部控制。在患有交界性或恶性PT的患者中,获得较宽的手术切缘可能仍然很重要,因为与切缘阳性的患者相比,较窄的切缘与LR率相关.
    BACKGROUND: Optimal surgical margin width for patients with phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of margin width on long-term local recurrence risk.
    METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with confirmed PT treated from 2008-2015. Margins were defined as positive (ink on tumor), narrow (no tumor at inked margin but < 10mm), or widely free (>/= 10mm). LR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
    RESULTS: Among 117 female patients, histology included 55 (47%) benign, 29 (25%) borderline, and 33 (28%) malignant PT. Final margins were positive in 16 (14%), narrow in 32 (27%), widely free in 64 (55%), and unknown in 5 (4%) patients. Compared with margins > 10 mm, patients with positive and narrow margins had a higher LR risk [HR 10.57 (95% CI 2.48-45.02) and HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.19-26.99), respectively]. Among benign PTs, the 10-year LR-free rates were 100%, 94%, and 66% for widely negative, narrow, and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.056). For borderline/malignant PT, the 10-year LR-free rates were 93% and 57% for widely negative and narrow margins, respectively (p = 0.02), with no difference in LR between narrow and positive margin groups (p = 1.00).
    CONCLUSIONS: For benign PTs, a margin of no ink on tumor appears sufficient to optimize local control. In patients with borderline or malignant PTs, achieving a wide surgical margin may remain important as narrower margins were associated with LR rates comparable to those with positive margins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估部分乳腺再照射(re-PBI)与调强放疗(IMRT)的结果,使用大分割方案治疗乳腺癌(BC)局部复发(LR),并进行重复保乳手术(re-BCS)。
    方法:使用螺旋或分步方式进行基于IMRT的re-PBI,在2.5周内以13个部分递送37.05Gy。2ndLR的累积发病率(CumI),毒性,无病(DFS),BC特异性(BCSS),评估总生存率(OS)。
    结果:在2012年5月5日至2021年5月5日之间,70例患者发生了PBI复发。中位随访时间(FU)为6.3年(Q1-Q3,4.0-8.1。).1stLR的中位年龄为62。原发性BC-1stLR间期中位数为12.4年(范围:1.6-26.7)。管腔A样1stLR占病例的41%,中位大小为0.8cm。FU期间,18例(26%)患者出现后续事件:3个2snLR(对应4%的8-y累积率),3个区域节点复发,7个远处转移,和其他5个原发性肿瘤。8年,DFS,BCSS和OS为76%,90%,90%,分别。在多变量分析中,3级和广泛的导管内成分是DFS的独立预测因子。对于51和46名患者,慢性毒性和美容进行了评估,分别为:4%的患者有3级纤维化,在超过60%的病例中,美容被认为是良好/优异的。
    结论:就局部控制而言,re-BCS后的re-PBI是替代乳房切除术的可行方法。显示可接受的毒性特征。长期FU对于更好地了解复发模式和巩固re-PBI在临床实践中的地位至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the outcome of partial breast re-irradiation (re-PBI) with intensity modulated RT (IMRT), using a hypofractionated scheme for breast cancer (BC) local recurrence (LR) operated on with repeat breast-conserving surgery (re-BCS).
    METHODS: IMRT-based re-PBI was performed using either helical or step-and-shoot modality to deliver 37.05 Gy in 13 fractions in 2.5 weeks. Cumulative incidence (CumI) of 2ndLR, toxicity, disease-free (DFS), BC specific (BCSS), and overall (OS) survival were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Between 5/2012 and 5/2021, 70 patients had re-PBI. Median follow-up (FU) was 6.3 years (Q1-Q3, 4.0-8.1.). Median age at 1stLR was 62. The median primary BC-1stLR interval was 12.4 years (range: 1.6-26.7). Luminal A-like 1stLR accounted for 41% of the cases and median size was 0.8 cm. During FU, 18 (26%) patients showed a subsequent event: three 2snLRs (corresponding to 8-y Cumulative rate of 4%), 3 regional nodal recurrences, 7 distant metastases, and 5 other primary tumors. At 8 years, DFS, BCSS and OS were 76%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, Grade 3 and extensive intraductal component were independent predictors for DFS. For 51 and 46 patients, chronic toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated, respectively: 4% had grade 3 fibrosis and cosmesis was deemed good/excellent in just over 60% of the cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Re-PBI after re-BCS represents a feasible alternative to mastectomy with regard to local control, showing an acceptable toxicity profile. A long-term FU is crucial to better understand the pattern of relapse and consolidate the position of re-PBI in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症患者经常发生脑转移(BMs),立体定向放射治疗(SRT)是首选治疗选择。在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了接受SRT治疗的患者在第一次SRT治疗期间进行了一次BM治疗,并比较了两个亚组:\"队列1\"患者未接受脑再照射,\"队列2\"患者接受了至少一次脑复发的随后SRT治疗.
    方法:我们纳入了2010年1月至2020年6月接受SRT治疗的患者。队列1包括152名患者,队列2有46名患者。
    结果:队列2显示年轻患者具有较高的Karnofsky表现状态(KPS)。与队列1(6.1个月)相比,队列2(21.8个月)的中位总生存期更长。第2组的局部和脑复发率明显较高(p<0.001),归因于患者选择和更长的生存期。年龄和KPS的综合评分被证明是生存的预测因素,65岁以下且KPS>80的患者在总体人群中表现出最佳生存率。
    结论:这项回顾性研究强调,年龄和KPS的综合评分可以预测更好的生存率,尤其是65岁以下KPS评分高于80的患者。涉及更大和更多样化人群的进一步研究对于验证和扩展这些发现至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in cancer patients, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a preferred treatment option. In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients treated by SRT for a single BM during their first SRT session and we compared two subgroups: \"Cohort 1\" with patients did not undergo cerebral re-irradiation and \"Cohort 2\" with patients received at least one subsequent SRT session for cerebral recurrence.
    METHODS: We included patients who received SRT for a single BM between January 2010 and June 2020. Cohort 1 comprised 152 patients, and Cohort 2 had 46 patients.
    RESULTS: Cohort 2 exhibited younger patients with higher Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Median overall survival was considerably longer in Cohort 2 (21.8 months) compared to Cohort 1 (6.1 months). Local and cerebral recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cohort 2 (p < 0.001), attributed to patient selection and longer survival. The combined score of age and KPS proved to be a predictive factor for survival, with patients under 65 years of age and KPS > 80 showing the best survival rates in the overall population.
    CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study highlights that the combined score of age and KPS can predict better survival, especially for patients under 65 years with a KPS score above 80. Further research involving larger and more diverse populations is essential to validate and expand upon these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号