learning differences

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有诵读困难的人,阅读的神经发育障碍,高度适应情感世界。与他们典型的发展中同行相比,患有阅读障碍的儿童表现出更大的自主神经系统反应性和面部行为,以引起情感和同理心的电影剪辑。情感症状,比如焦虑,在有阅读障碍的儿童中也比没有阅读障碍的儿童更常见。这里,我们调查了惊吓反应,情绪和反射的界面上的自动反应,在阅读障碍中升高。我们测量了面部行为,皮肤电反应性(交感神经系统测量)和对100毫秒的反应的情绪体验,在30名阅读障碍儿童和20名没有阅读障碍的比较儿童(7-13岁)中,有105dB意外的声学惊吓任务,性和非语言推理。我们的结果表明,与没有诵读困难的儿童相比,有诵读困难的儿童具有更高的整体面部行为和对听觉惊吓任务的皮肤电反应性。在整个样本中,惊吓期间皮肤电反应性越大,父母报告的焦虑症状就越大.这些发现有助于阅读障碍的情绪反应性增强,并表明交感神经系统反应性增强可能导致该人群中经常出现的焦虑升高。
    People with dyslexia, a neurodevelopmental disorder of reading, are highly attuned to the emotional world. Compared with their typically developing peers, children with dyslexia exhibit greater autonomic nervous system reactivity and facial behaviour to emotion- and empathy-inducing film clips. Affective symptoms, such as anxiety, are also more common in children with dyslexia than in those without. Here, we investigated whether the startle response, an automatic reaction that lies at the interface of emotion and reflex, is elevated in dyslexia. We measured facial behaviour, electrodermal reactivity (a sympathetic nervous system measure) and emotional experience in response to a 100 ms, 105 dB unanticipated acoustic startle task in 30 children with dyslexia and 20 comparison children without dyslexia (aged 7-13) who were matched on age, sex and nonverbal reasoning. Our results indicated that the children with dyslexia had greater total facial behaviour and electrodermal reactivity to the acoustic startle task than the children without dyslexia. Across the sample, greater electrodermal reactivity during the startle predicted greater parent-reported anxiety symptoms. These findings contribute to an emerging picture of heightened emotional reactivity in dyslexia and suggest accentuated sympathetic nervous system reactivity may contribute to the elevated anxiety that is often seen in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    报告的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童数量的增加凸显了牙科医生需要更熟悉这些特殊需求儿童的治疗方法,以确保舒适,在牙科诊所接受和有效的管理。
    本文旨在更深入地了解在牙科环境中管理ASD儿童的一些创新和最佳方法。
    在PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索,Scopus,WebofScience,Cochrane数据库,和基于PRISMA2020声明的灰色文献,使用主关键字,如:\'management\',\'牙科\',\'children\',和“自闭症谱系障碍”。纳入原始全文论文,包括随机对照试验(RCT)和所有其他非随机对照研究(NRS)设计,以英语报告相关干预研究,没有任何发表时间限制。然后使用ROB-2和ROBINS-I工具评估发现符合审查条件的证据的质量。随后,我们对管理干预措施的细节和治疗方法的影响进行了比较和讨论.
    在找到的204篇文章中,初步筛选时排除了109篇无关文章。检索了其余28篇论文的全文,只有15篇(7%)文章有资格进行审查;八个RCT具有“某些问题”和“高风险”类别,特别是关于其随机化设计,和七个具有“严重”到“严重”偏见的NSR,主要是由于混杂因素。
    我们的综述发现,最近的心理和非药物方法在牙科环境中用于治疗ASD儿童的强度方面没有确凿的证据。在某些研究中,样本量小和缺乏对照组会影响证据的强度和发现的可信度。然而,这篇综述分享了有关一些创新方法的信息,以更好地了解牙科专业人员对ASD儿童的管理。
    A rise in the reported numbers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) highlights the need for dental practitioners to be more familiar with the treatment approaches for these special needs children to ensure comfortable, well-accepted and efficient management while in dental office.
    This paper aimed to acquire a deeper understanding of some of the innovative and best approaches to managing children with ASD in dental settings.
    A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, and grey literature based on the PRISMA 2020 statement, using main keywords such as: \'management\', \'dental\', \'children\', and \'Autism Spectrum Disorder\'. Original full-text papers including randomised controlled trials (RCT) and all other designs of non-randomised controlled studies (NRS) reporting relevant intervention studies in English were included without any publication time limit. The quality of the evidence found eligible for the review were then assessed using the ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Subsequently, the details of management interventions and impact of treatment approaches were compared and discussed.
    Out of the 204 articles found, 109 unrelated articles were excluded during the initial screening. The full papers of remaining 28 were retrieved and only 15 (7%) articles were eligible to be reviewed; eight RCTs with \'some concerns\' and \'high risk\' categories particularly concerning their randomisation design, and seven NSRs with \'serious\' to \'critical\' bias largely due to confounding factors.
    Our review found inconclusive evidence on the strength of recent psychological and non-pharmacological approaches used to manage children with ASD in dental settings. Small sample size and lack of a control group in certain studies affected the strength of evidence and credibility of the findings. Nevertheless, this review shared informative details on some innovative approaches for better understanding of the management of children with ASD for dental professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中枢致敏性疼痛是一部分非特异性慢性下腰痛患者的主要机制,并与不良预后相关。建议病前的经历和背景可能与中央敏感性的发展有关。
    目的:本研究的目的是探索非特异性慢性下腰痛患者中枢致敏性疼痛患者的病前经历和个人特征。
    方法:这是定性的,探索性研究,在混合方法协议中使用并发嵌套设计。n=9名参与者是根据感觉概况和特质焦虑相关的人格类型有目的地招募的。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的,使用QSRNVivo10软件进行管理,并使用理论专题分析进行分析。
    结果:出现了四个主题:发展学习经历,个人特征,敏感和创伤。据报道缺乏信心,低自尊和需要取悦他人,身体超敏感(气味,光,声音)和情绪敏感性(焦虑)以及身体低敏感性。参与者还遭受了情感和/或身体创伤。学习困难,感觉敏感性和创伤与自主神经应激反应有关,这反过来又与中枢致敏性疼痛中看到的生理变化有关。
    结论:中枢致敏性疼痛是在与学习困难有关的感觉处理差异的背景下发展起来的,敏感性和创伤,以及低自信和控制力的个人特征,在一组非特异性慢性腰背痛的参与者中。预先存在的感官加工差异的作用,作为中枢神经系统功能改变的组成部分,关于中枢致敏性疼痛需要进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: Central sensitisation pain is a predominant mechanism in a proportion of individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain and is associated with poor outcomes. It is proposed that the pre-morbid experiences and contexts may be related to the development of central sensitisation.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the pre-morbid experiences and personal characteristics of participants with central sensitisation pain from a non-specific chronic low back pain population.
    METHODS: This was a qualitative, exploratory study, using a concurrent nested design within a mixed methods protocol. n=9 participants were recruited purposively based on sensory profiles and trait anxiety-related personality types. Data were collected through semi structured interviews, managed using QSR NVivo 10 software and analysed using theoretical thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Four themes emerged: developmental learning experiences, personal characteristics, sensitivity and trauma. Reported was lack of confidence, low esteem and a need to please others, physical hyper-sensitivities (smell, light, sound) and emotional sensitivity (anxiety) as well as physical hypo-sensitivity. Participants had also suffered emotional and/or physical trauma. Learning difficulties, sensory sensitivities and trauma are associated with autonomic stress responses, which in turn have been linked to physiological changes seen in central sensitisation pain.
    CONCLUSIONS: Central sensitisation pain developed in the context of sensory processing differences related to learning difficulties, sensitivities and trauma, and personal characteristics of low confidence and control, in a group of participants with non-specific chronic low back pain. The role of pre-existing sensory processing differences, as a component of altered central nervous system function, in relation to central sensitisation pain warrants further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号