BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is commonly used to address various lumbar pathologies. LLIF using the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach has several potential advantages, allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the spine. The aim of this study was to report the 1-year outcomes of LLIF via PTP.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 97 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via PTP. Radiographic parameters, including lumbar-lordosis, segmental-lordosis, anterior disc height, and posterior disc height, were measured on preoperative, initial-postoperative, and 1-year postoperative imaging. Patient-reported outcomes measures, including Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS), pain EQ5D, and postoperative complications, were reviewed.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients underwent 161 levels of LLIF. Fifty-seven percent underwent 1-level LLIF, 30% 2-level LLIF, 6% 3-level LLIF, and 7% 4-level LLIF. The most common level was L4 to L5 (35%), followed by L3 to L4 (33%), L2 to L3 (21%), and L1 to L2 (11%). Significant improvements were noted at initial and 1-year postoperative periods in lumbar-lordosis (2° ± 10°, P = 0.049; 3° ± 9°, P = 0.005), segmental-lordosis (6° ± 5°, P < 0.001; 5° ± 5°, P < 0.001), anterior disc height (8 mm ± 4 mm, P < 0.001; 7 mm ± 4 mm, P < 0.001), and posterior disc height (3 mm ± 2 mm, P < 0.001; 3 mm ± 2 mm, P < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.002), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively; pain EQ5D at 6 weeks (P < 0.001), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively; and leg and back visual analog scale at 2 weeks (P < 0.001), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively. The average length of stay was 2.5 days, and the most common complications were ipsilateral hip flexor pain (46%), weakness (59%), and contralateral hip flexor pain (29%).
CONCLUSIONS: PTP is a novel way of performing LLIF. These 1-year data support that PTP is an effective, safe, and viable approach with similar patient-reported outcome measures and complications profiles as LLIF performed in the lateral decubitus position.
METHODS:

METHODS: Retrospective Cohort Study.
OBJECTIVE: Restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) is a principal objective during spinal fusion procedures, traditionally focusing on achieving an LL within 10° of the pelvic incidence (PI). Recent studies have demonstrated a relatively constant L4-S1 alignment of 35-40° at L4-S1 and at least 15° at L4-5, regardless of PI. Based on these results, this study was created to examine the success rate of achieving a minimum of 15° at L4-5 through two differing prone-based techniques: Prone Lateral (pLLIF) and Trans Foraminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
METHODS: One hundred patients with a primary single-level L4-5 interbody fusion (50 pLLIF and 50 TLIF) were retrospectively analyzed. Pre and post-operative radiographs were measured to examine the segmental change at each level in the lumbar spine and calculate the success rate for achieving a minimum L4-5 segmental lordosis of 15° at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of achieving an L4-5 segmental alignment >15° at the final follow-up was 70%. Prone LLIF was significantly more likely than TLIF to achieve this goal, achieving L4-5 > 15° 84% of the time vs TLIFs 56% (P = 0.002). Prone LLIF demonstrated an average L4-5 increase of 5.6 ± 5.9° which was larger than the mean increase for TLIF 0.4 ± 3.8° (P < 0.001). In both techniques, there was an inverse correlation between pre-operative L4-5 angle and L4-5 angle change.
CONCLUSIONS: Prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion demonstrates a high success rate for achieving a post-operative L4-5 angle >15° and achieves this at a higher rate than TLIF.

UNASSIGNED: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a late complication of lumbar fusion characterized by persistent symptoms correlating to radiographic changes in the levels immediately above or below the prior fusion. Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) through a direct lateral approach is a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment for ASD. Biomechanically, LIF for ASD provides significantly decreased motion in multiple planes. While hardware failure and injury to the lumbar plexus are potential complications, these risks may be outweighed by decreased blood loss, shorter operating room (OR) times, and possibly superior patient reported visual analog scale (VAS) scores compared to traditional posterior spinal fusion (PSF) alone. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history, uses, outcomes, and future directions of LIF for ASD.
UNASSIGNED: A review of national databases (PubMed and SCOPUS) was performed using literature from 1900 to 2022. Keywords included terms \"LATERAL\" and \"LUMBAR\" and \"INTERBODY\" and \"FUSION\" and \"ADJACENT\" and \"SEGMENT\" and \"DISEASE\". Studies that aimed to describe the biomechanical, clinical course and complications, radiological outcomes, biomechanical aspects, need for revision surgery, and/or patient reported outcomes of the XLIF/LIF technique were included.
UNASSIGNED: This review includes a brief overview of the natural history of ASD and current approaches to address it. It then summarizes the main indications and utilization of LIF to address ASD, summarizing reported outcomes in regard to biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: LIF has emerged as a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment for ASD. This mini-review suggests that LIF provides a solid foundational biomechanical construct that has been paired with good patient-reported, clinical, and radiographic outcomes. While further research is required, current literature suggests that LIF for ASD results in fewer complications, decreased morbidity, and decreased need for subsequent surgery compared to other commonly utilized techniques.

UNASSIGNED: The preservation of the bladder neck during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) could improve urinary continence recovery and limit the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). We refined our lateral approach to the bladder neck technique and compared its outcomes with those of the standard anterior approach.
UNASSIGNED: From a retrospective analysis of 599 consecutive RARPs, 171 patients treated with the lateral and 171 patients treated with the anterior approach were pair-matched 1:1 on the basis of age, grade, and pathological stage. We described our surgical technique and compared the two approaches in terms of basal PSMs, recovery of urinary continence, and complications.
UNASSIGNED: As compared to the anterior approach, the lateral approach had shorter operative times and comparable rates of basal PSMs and postoperative complications. The rates of urinary continence after one, three, and 12 months were comparable between the two groups and were generally higher in localized disease. At regression analysis, predictors of urinary incontinence were only age, pathological stage T3b, ISUP grade 5 and nerve-sparing surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The lateral approach leads to an anatomical dissection of the bladder neck without increasing the risk of PSMs. However, no significant benefits in terms of continence recovery were demonstrated over the standard anterior approach.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) is an increasingly popular minimally-invasive spine procedure. This study identifies notable trends in LIF literature and provides a detailed review of the bibliometric aspects of the top 100 most-cited articles.
METHODS: Articles were queried from the Web of Science database. Inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed articles, full-text availability, and LIF focus. Network analysis including co-authorship mapping and bibliographic coupling were complemented by trend analysis to determine prominent contributors and themes. Analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix (RStudio).
RESULTS: There has been a rapid increase in LIF publication and citation count since 1998. Leading journals were Spine (n = 24), Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (n = 22), and European Spine Journal (n = 12). NuVasive funded the most publications (n = 17), followed by DePuy Synthes Spine (n = 4). The United States was the most represented country (n = 81); however, trend analysis suggests a steadily growing international contribution. The most prolific author was J.S. Uribe (n = 16), followed by a tie in second place by E. Dakwar and L. Pimenta (n = 8). The most frequent keywords, \"complication\" (n = 34), \"surgery\" (n = 30), and \"outcomes\" (n = 24), demonstrated a patient-centric theme.
CONCLUSIONS: This bibliometric analysis provides in-depth insights into the evolution and trends of LIF over the last two decades. The trends and themes identified demonstrate the innovative, collaborative, and patient-focused characteristics of this subfield. Future researchers can use this as a foundation for understanding the past and present state of LIF research while designing investigations.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to analyze the data collected on lateral incisional hernias (LIH) in the National Incisional Hernia Registry (EVEREG) and assess current practices and outcomes in LIH repair.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using LIH data recorded over 10 years (2012-2022). Comorbidities, hernia characteristics, short-term complications, and recurrences were studied, along with their association with the type of approach used, either open or laparoscopic, in elective surgery.
RESULTS: 1742 LIH cases were studied. According to the EHS classification, these included L1 409 (23.5%), L2 388 (22.3%), L3 565 (32.4%), L4 150 (8.6%) and combined 230 (13.2%). An open approach was performed in 1528 (87.7%) cases and laparoscopic in 214 (12.3%). The median age was 66 ± 12.45 years, with a majority of males, 934 (53.6%). The median body mass index was 29 ± 5.18 kg/m2. The most observed comorbidity was arterial hypertension (957 patients, 55%). A specialist was present in 638 interventions (56%). The 24-month follow-up was 17.9%, and recurrence in those cases was 27.2%, with a higher incidence when there was no specialist present during the intervention, onlay mesh position, and larger defect size.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for LIH is common, although laparoscopic approach remains infrequent. Furthermore, it is associated with a high percentage of recurrences that increases when there is no specialist in abdominal wall surgery present.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of seated, supine, and recumbent postures on nasal resistance in individuals with allergic rhinitis (AR) and healthy controls, which has not been investigated in the past. Methods: A visual analog scale (VAS) assessed subjective nasal obstruction, while acoustic rhinometry and video endoscopy provided objective measures. Sixty participants, comprising 30 AR patients and 30 healthy controls, were evaluated across 4 postures without decongestion: seated, supine, left recumbent, and right recumbent. Results: In patients with AR, we noted no significant changes in subjective nasal blockage under various postures (all P > .18). However, significant reductions of minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA) were found (seated vs supine, P = .014; seated vs left recumbent, P = .001; seated vs right recumbent, P < .001) and significant increases in the inferior turbinate hypertrophy were observed on the dependent side of the nose when in recumbent posture (right nose: seated vs right recumbent, P = .013; left nose: seated vs left recumbent, P = .003). On the contrary, healthy controls experienced increased subjective nasal obstruction (VAS scores: seated vs supine, P < .001; seated vs left recumbent, P = .003; seated vs right recumbent, P < .001), reductions in mCSA (seated vs supine, P = .002; seated vs right or left recumbent, both P = .001), and increased inferior turbinate hypertrophy on the dependent side of the nose (right nose: seated vs right recumbent, P = .003; left nose: seated vs left recumbent, P = .006). Conclusions: Healthy controls reported better nasal patency when shifting from supine or recumbent to more upright or less gravity-dependent seated postures, which was further supported by objective examinations. On the contrary, despite patients with AR not subjectively perceiving increased nasal patency while adopting more upright postures, objective evaluations demonstrated an improvement in their nasal airflow in these less gravity-dependent postures.Level of Evidence: 4.

Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is the most frequent congenital variant of the lateral meniscus, which is prone to degeneration and tears, and frequently causes knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of this article has been to analyze the publications made during 2023 on DLM. The main conclusions of the analysis were as follows: MRI assessment might be helpful to diagnose DLM and detect the presence of instability: two main factors in the decision to perform surgery. Arthroscopic assessment should be utilized in conjunction with MRI findings for complete DLM diagnosis. Restoring the normal shape, retaining adequate width and thickness, and ensuring the stability of the remnant DLM is essential to sustaining the physiological function of the meniscus and preserving the knee. Partial meniscectomy with or without repair should be the first-line treatment when feasible, given that the clinical and radiological long-run results of total or subtotal meniscectomy are worse.

OBJECTIVE: The transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure is a minimally invasive lumbar spine approach that provides indirect neural decompression, improved sagittal alignment, and a high fusion rate. Typically accompanied by posterior pedicle screw insertion, there has been interest in performing LLIF in a single position to decrease cost and time under anesthesia. However, there is a paucity of direct comparisons between single-position LLIF via prone versus lateral decubitus positioning. Therefore, this study aims to compare the outcomes of a single surgeon performing prone versus lateral single-position LLIF, inclusive of the L4-L5 level.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a consecutive case series of patients who underwent either prone or lateral, single-position LLIF by a single surgeon. All cases involved the L4-L5 level. Demographic data, perioperative details, clinical outcomes, and preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis were recorded.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients underwent lateral and 16 patients underwent prone single-position LLIF. Demographics and average interbody size were similar between groups. Operative time, change in lumbar lordosis, and length of hospital stay did not differ between the 2 positions. Both groups performed similarly in terms of preoperative and postoperative visual analog score pain score and complications. Patients who underwent lateral position LLIF ambulated farther on postoperative day 1 (250 feet vs. 200 feet, P = 0.015). Average time to follow up was 53 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates promising preliminary results indicating that single-position LLIF performs well, even at the L4-L5 level, in both the prone and lateral positions.

Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy is gaining popularity among endoscopic spine surgeons for the treatment of radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis.
This study describes a technique using the lateral decubitus position for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy under monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia only.
A total of 10 patients with contraindications to general anesthesia underwent the procedure, resulting in improvement in cervical radicular pain with no perioperative complications.
The findings suggest that this approach is a viable alternative for patients at high risk of general anesthesia care, expanding the surgical options for the treatment of radiculopathy.