late-onset rheumatoid arthritis

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在发病年龄≥65岁的患者(晚发性RA[LORA])和发病年龄<65岁的患者(青年性RA[YORA])之间,比较骨关节炎(OA)对类风湿性关节炎(RA)初始治疗反应的影响。
    方法:对RA患者进行回顾性研究,他们在2021年1月至2022年7月期间被转诊到我们的诊所,没有接受治疗。根据Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分类,膝关节或手部的OA等级≥3的患者被分类为OA()组,其他患者被分类为OA(-)组。对74例LORA和59例YORA患者在诊断时和初始治疗后一年的临床数据进行了比较,分别。
    结果:LORA患者开始治疗一年后,与OA(-)组相比,OA(+)组的疾病活动控制较差,而日常生活活动(ADL)的残疾程度更大.在YORA患者中,两组间ADL残疾无差异.
    结论:在LORA患者的初始治疗中,OA的患病率很高,OA对LORA的影响大于对YORA的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Impact of osteoarthritis (OA) on the initial treatment response of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by treat to target (T2T) practice was compared between the patients with an onset age ≥65 years old (late-onset RA [LORA]) and those with an onset age <65 years old (young-onset RA [YORA]).
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on the patients with RA, who were referred to our clinic without treatment between January 2021 and July 2022. Patients with grade ≥3 OA according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification either in the knee or hand were classified in the OA(+) group and others were in the OA(-) group. The clinical data were compared at the diagnosis and one year after the initial treatment between the groups for 74 LORA and 59 YORA patients, respectively.
    RESULTS: One year after starting treatment in the LORA patients, the OA(+) group had poorer disease activity control and greater disability in the several activities of daily living (ADL) than the OA(-) group. In the YORA patients, there were no differences in ADL disability between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the initial treatment of the LORA patients, the prevalence of OA was high, and impact of OA on LORA was larger than on YORA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的我们调查了风湿病学家在临床实践中对迟发性类风湿关节炎(LORA)的管理的当前观点。方法本研究于2021年10月进行,包括由日本风湿病学会认证的65名风湿病学家,他们接受了关于LORA管理的问卷(包括多项选择和描述性公式)。我们汇总并分析了答复。结果65位风湿病专家均对调查做出回应;47位(72%)回答>50%的新诊断患者年龄≥65岁,42(65%)回答说,实现缓解或低疾病活动是治疗目标,和40(62%)认为患者安全是最高优先级。大多数风湿病学家都关心RA以外的疾病的管理,如合并症,财政限制,以及干扰标准或推荐治疗实施的生活环境。结论这项初步调查强调了各种风湿病学家对LORA管理的看法。
    Objectives We investigated the current perspectives regarding the management of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) among rheumatologists in clinical practice. Methods This study was performed in October 2021, and included 65 rheumatologists certified by the Japan College of Rheumatology, who were administered questionnaires (including multiple choice and descriptive formulae) regarding the management of LORA. We aggregated and analyzed the responses. Results All 65 rheumatologists responded to the survey; 47 (72%) answered that >50% of newly diagnosed patients were aged ≥65 years, 42 (65%) answered that achievement of remission or low disease activity was the treatment goal, and 40 (62%) considered patient safety to be the highest priority. Most rheumatologists are concerned about the management of conditions other than RA, such as comorbidities, financial constraints, and life circumstances that interfere with standard or recommended treatment implementation. Conclusion This preliminary survey highlighted various rheumatologists\' perspectives regarding the management of LORA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定治疗对目标(T2T)策略的有效性和安全性差异,比较晚发性MTX初治RA患者(LORA)≥75或<75岁。
    调整治疗目标为低疾病活动度,采用常规合成DMARDs,然后在LORA≥75岁(n=98,平均年龄80.0岁)和LORA<75岁(n=99)中高疾病活动度的生物DMARDs(bDMARDs)。通过无反应者归因分析在第156周实现的简化疾病活动指数(SDAI)缓解被评估为主要结果。
    LORA≥75岁的合并症比LORA<75岁的合并症多,但基线时SDAI和ACPA阳性相似.LORA≥75岁,70.4%开始MTX,34.1%和37.1%分别在第52周和第156周接受bDMARD(与LORA<75年非常相似)。糖皮质激素的使用在LORA≥75岁时比LORA<75岁时更频繁。与LORA<75的患者相比,合并症/不良事件更频繁地导致不遵守T2T的原因。在第156周,32.7%的LORA≥75和66.7%的LORA<75达到SDAI缓解(P<0.001)。在156周内严重不良事件(SAE)的累积发生率在LORA≥75时为42.8%,在LORA<75时为22.1%。多变量分析表明,LORA≥75患者在第156周SDAI未缓解的风险增加[比值比2.82(95%CI1.29。6.14)]调整基线合并症后,不遵守T2T和SAE。
    由于治疗反应差和安全性问题,LORA≥75患者比LORA<75患者更难实现缓解。
    UNASSIGNED: To identify differences in effectiveness and safety of a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy comparing late-onset MTX-naïve RA patients (LORA) ≥75 or <75 years of age.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment was adjusted to target low disease activity with conventional synthetic DMARDs followed by biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in LORA ≥75 years (n = 98, mean age 80.0 years) and LORA <75 years (n = 99) with moderate-high disease activity. Achievement of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at week 156 by non-responder imputation analysis was evaluated as a primary outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: LORA ≥75 years had more comorbidities than LORA <75 years, but SDAI and ACPA positivity were similar at baseline. Of the LORA ≥75 years, 70.4% started MTX and 34.1% and 37.1% received a bDMARD at week 52 and 156, respectively (very similar to the LORA <75 years). Glucocorticoid use was more frequent in the LORA ≥75 years than in the LORA <75 years. Comorbidities/adverse events more frequently contributed to the reasons for non-adherence to T2T in the LORA ≥75 than in the LORA <75. At week 156, 32.7% of the LORA ≥75 and 66.7% of the LORA <75 achieved SDAI remission (P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 156 weeks was 42.8% in the LORA ≥75 and 22.1% in the LORA <75. Multivariable analysis indicated an increased risk of SDAI non-remission at week 156 in the LORA ≥75 [odds ratio 2.82 (95% CI 1.29. 6.14)] after adjusting for comorbidities at baseline, non-adherence to T2T and SAEs.
    UNASSIGNED: It was more difficult to achieve remission in the LORA ≥75 patients than in the LORA <75 patients due to both poor treatment response and safety issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用日本国家风湿病数据库(NinJa)的数据,调查晚发性类风湿关节炎(LORA)患者的治疗趋势。
    方法:在NinJa注册的患者根据疾病发作进行分类:<65岁(青年型类风湿关节炎[YORA]);65-74岁(早期LORA);≥75岁(晚期LORA)。比较了治疗和疾病活动的时间变化。
    结果:在2010年、2013年、2016年和2019年分别评估了7,178、13,171、15,295和15,943名患者。在所有组中,甲氨蝶呤的使用逐渐减少,而生物/靶向合成抗风湿药(DMARDs)的增加;肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)的使用减少,而非TNFi的增加。LORA的特点是使用更多的单一DMARD,和较少的甲氨蝶呤和生物/靶向合成DMARD使用。TNFi和白介素-6抑制剂的使用频率较低,而abatacept在晚期与早期LORA中使用频率更高。晚期与早期LORA相比,常规合成DMARD(不包括甲氨蝶呤)和糖皮质激素的使用更高。
    结论:该分析揭示了日本LORA治疗的时间变化。早期和晚期LORA之间的差异表明患者不是同质人群。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the treatment of patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) using data from the National Database of Rheumatic Diseases in Japan (NinJa).
    METHODS: Patients registered in the NinJa were classified according to disease onset: at <65 years (young-onset rheumatoid arthritis [YORA]); at 65-74 years (early LORA); and at ≥75 years (late LORA). Chronological changes in the treatment and disease activity were compared.
    RESULTS: A total of 7,178, 13,171, 15,295, and 15,943 patients were evaluated in 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019, respectively. In all groups, the use of methotrexate gradually decreased, whereas that of biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) increased; the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) decreased, whereas that of non-TNFi increased. LORA was characterized by more single DMARD use, and less methotrexate and biological/targeted synthetic DMARD use. TNFi and interleukin-6 inhibitors were used less frequently, whereas abatacept was utilized more frequently in late versus early LORA. Conventional synthetic DMARD (excluding methotrexate) and glucocorticoid use was higher in late versus early LORA.
    CONCLUSIONS: This analysis revealed chronological changes in the treatment of LORA in Japan. Differences between early and late LORA suggest that patients are not a homogeneous population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:为了描述晚发型类风湿关节炎(LORA)与青年型(YORA)之间的患者特征,并分析其与累积炎症负担的关系。
    UASSIGNED:我们在一项前瞻性队列中进行了嵌套队列研究,该队列包括110例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和110例年龄和性别匹配的对照。主要变量是根据28关节疾病活动评分和红细胞沉降率(DAS28-ESR)的累积炎症活动。高活性定义为DAS28≥3.2,低活性定义为DAS28<3.2。记录的其他变量是炎症细胞因子,物理功能,和合并症条件。运行两个多变量模型以鉴定与累积炎症活动相关的因素。
    UNASSIGNED:共有22/110例患者(20%)符合LORA标准(≥60岁)。与患有YORA和对照组的患者相比,患有LORA的患者更频繁地患有合并症。与YORA患者相比,更多的LORA患者从发病开始累积高炎症活动[13(59%)与28(31%);p=0.018]和CRP(p=0.039)和IL-6(p=0.045)的高值。RA患者的累积高炎症活动与LORA相关[OR(95%CI)4.69(1.49-10.71);p=0.008],吸烟[OR(95%CI)2.07(1.13-3.78);p=0.017],抗瓜氨酸肽抗体[OR(95%CI)3.24(1.15-9.13);p=0.025],平均健康评估问卷(HAQ)得分[OR(95%CI)2.09(1.03-14.23);p=0.034],和身体活动[OR(95%CI)0.99(0.99-0.99);p=0.010]。第二个模型显示与LORA患者的炎症活动相似。
    UNASSIGNED:与YORA患者和健康对照组相比,LORA患者诊断后炎症控制较差,合并症更频繁。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the characteristics of patients between late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) with young-onset (YORA), and analyze their association with cumulative inflammatory burden.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a nested cohort study in a prospective cohort comprising 110 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 110 age- and sex-matched controls. The main variable was cumulative inflammatory activity according to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). High activity was defined as DAS28 ≥ 3.2 and low activity as DAS28 < 3.2. The other variables recorded were inflammatory cytokines, physical function, and comorbid conditions. Two multivariate models were run to identify factors associated with cumulative inflammatory activity.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 22/110 patients (20%) met the criteria for LORA (≥ 60 years). Patients with LORA more frequently had comorbid conditions than patients with YORA and controls. Compared with YORA patients, more LORA patients had cumulative high inflammatory activity from onset [13 (59%) vs. 28 (31%); p = 0.018] and high values for CRP (p = 0.039) and IL-6 (p = 0.045). Cumulative high inflammatory activity in patients with RA was associated with LORA [OR (95% CI) 4.69 (1.49-10.71); p = 0.008], smoking [OR (95% CI) 2.07 (1.13-3.78); p = 0.017], anti-citrullinated peptide antibody [OR (95% CI) 3.24 (1.15-9.13); p = 0.025], average Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score [OR (95% CI) 2.09 (1.03-14.23); p = 0.034], and physical activity [OR (95% CI) 0.99 (0.99-0.99); p = 0.010]. The second model revealed similar associations with inflammatory activity in patients with LORA.
    UNASSIGNED: Control of inflammation after diagnosis is poorer and comorbidity more frequent in patients with LORA than in YORA patients and healthy controls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatism in adults. The objective of our study was to analyze the clinical, biological and therapeutic characteristics in subjects over 60 years old.
    We performed a retrospective, monocentric, descriptive study on medical records consultations. The data collection concerned subjects over 60 years of age who had been diagnosed with \"rheumatoid arthritis\" in the rheumatology and internal medicine departments of CHU Reims over a period stretching from 2010 to 2015.
    Thirty-two patients were included in our study for this period. The mean age of diagnosis was 66.6 years, for a median age of 67.5 years (min: 60 years, max: 88 years). There were 22 female (69%) and 10 male (31%) patients, with a sex ratio H/F of 2.2. The mean duration of symptom progression before diagnosis was 33.2 months. What dominates our series is the inaugural involvement of the interphalangeal proximal, wrists, shoulders and metacarpophalangeal for the vast majority of cases. Oral corticosteroids were used in 27 patients and were the only treatment in 3 patients. Methotrexate (MTX) was introduced in 27 patients. Nine patients received biotherapy: it was tocilizumab (Roactemra®) for 5 patients, adalimumab (Humira®) for 2 patients, abatacept (Orencia®) for 2 patients, etanercept (Enbrel®) for 2 patients, golimumab (Simponi®) for 1 patient and infliximab (Remicade®) for one patient. In our series, 7 patients are over 75 years old at the time of diagnosis of RA.
    The rheumatoid arthritis of the elderly remains a common condition and constitutes a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Because of the co-morbidities, the clinician\'s perception of the patient\'s overall condition and the inaccuracies in the use of certain molecules in these patients, under-treatment may, on the contrary, weaken a patient whose remission will be postponed. This was not the case in our series, with a methodical use of methotrexate as well as effective dose biotherapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of depression and its risk factors in patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated in German primary care practices.
    Longitudinal data from general practices (n=1072) throughout Germany were analyzed. Individuals initially diagnosed with RA (2009-2013) were identified, and 7301 patients were included and matched (1:1) to 7301 controls. The primary outcome measure was the initial diagnosis of depression within 5 years after the index date in patients with and without RA. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for confounders.
    The mean age was 72.2 years (SD: 7.6 years). A total of 34.9 % of patients were men. Depression diagnoses were present in 22.0 % of the RA group and 14.3 % of the control group after a 5-year follow-up period (p < 0.001). In the multivariate regression model, RA was a strong risk factor for the development of depression (HR: 1.55, p < 0.001). There was significant interaction of RA and diagnosed inflammatory polyarthropathies (IP) (RA*IP interaction: p < 0.001). Furthermore, dementia, cancer, osteoporosis, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with a higher risk of developing depression (p values <0.001).
    The risk of depression is significantly higher in patients with late-onset RA than in patients without RA for subjects treated in primary care practices in Germany. RA patients should be screened routinely for depression in order to ensure improved treatment and management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号