laparoscopic ovarian drilling

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在对腹腔镜卵巢打孔(LOD)后卵巢储备和卵巢激素的文献数据进行系统评价。PubMed,ScienceDirect,和ProQuest数据库使用“卵巢储备”等关键词的组合进行了全面搜索,“腹腔镜卵巢打孔”,\"黄体生成素\",“促卵泡激素”,\"抑制素\",“LH/FSH比率”,“排卵”,和“睾丸激素”。所有涉及育龄女性的研究都被正式诊断为多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS),并接受了LOD,报告的数据至少包括以下参数之一:卵巢储备,抗苗勒管激素(AMH),抑制素,卵泡刺激素(FSH),黄体生成素(LH),LH/FSH比值,和睾丸激素。所有纳入的研究均通过GRADE量表进行偏倚评估,其结果由四个独立的合著者综合。共纳入38项研究,涉及3118名女性患者。根据我们的发现,大量参与者经历了自发排卵,同时卵巢储备显着下降,AMH显著下降,LH,和睾丸激素,FSH和抑制素B无显著变化,LOD的最终目标是提高PCOS女性的生育率和妊娠率,重要的是要看看实现这一点的前几个步骤。不出所料,排卵有显著改善,而卵巢储备功能下降.随着卵巢储备的减少,AMH有显著的正常化,LH,和睾丸激素水平。LOD可能通过操纵卵巢储备发挥其主要作用。
    We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the data in the literature on ovarian reserve and ovarian hormone following laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD). The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases were comprehensively searched using a combination of keywords such as \"ovarian reserve\", \"laparoscopic ovarian drilling\", \"luteinizing hormone\", \"follicle-stimulating hormone\", \"inhibin\", \"LH/FSH ratio\", \"ovulation\", and \"testosterone\". All studies involving females of reproductive age who were officially diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and had undergone LOD with reported data concerning at least one of the following parameters were considered for inclusion: ovarian reserve, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), inhibin, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), LH/FSH ratio, and testosterone. All the included studies were evaluated by the GRADE scale for bias and their findings were synthesized by four independent coauthors. A total of 38 studies involving 3118 female patients were included. Based on our findings, a significant number of participants experienced spontaneous ovulation along with a significant decrease in ovarian reserve, and a significant decrease in AMH, LH, and testosterone, with no significant changes in FSH and inhibin B. With the end goal of LOD being to improve fertility and pregnancy rates among females with PCOS, it is important to look at the first few steps that enable this. As expected, there was a significant improvement in ovulation while the ovarian reserve decreased. Along with the decrease in ovarian reserve, there was a significant normalization in AMH, LH, and testosterone levels. LOD may exert its main effects through the manipulation of the ovarian reserves.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    女性不孕症通常与无排卵性多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)有关,以血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平高为特征。腹腔镜卵巢钻孔术(LOD)通常用于治疗PCOS,尤其是当药物干预失败时。本研究旨在通过评估AMH血清水平及其恢复正常生理月经周期和实现受孕的能力来评估PCOS女性对LOD干预的反应。研究包括75名体重指数(BMI)为19.6-35kg/m2的不孕妇女(24-41岁)。其中,57人患有原发性不孕症,和18来自继发性不孕症,平均持续时间为8.6±4.4年。卵泡刺激素(FSH)的基线水平,黄体生成素(LH),测量了AMH,并评估了LOD后LH和AMH水平。在LOD前后评估月经周期规律性。LOD前基线血清FSH水平为5.2-1.6IU/L按照LOD,血清LH和AMH水平从14.3±4.1下降到7.8±2.8IU/L,从13.7±5.9下降到7.7±3.9IU/L,分别为(p<0.05)。LOD显著(p<0.05)降低了月经周期的不规则性,如月经过少和闭经,分别从55名(73.3%)到22名(29.3%)妇女和从2名(2.7%)到0名(0%)妇女。此外,正常月经周期显着(p<0.05)从18(24%)增加到53(70.7%)。重要的是,68%的LOD治疗的妇女显示怀孕率显着增加,52.9%,35.3%,11.8%在LOD后3、6和9个月内怀孕,分别为(p<0.05)。此外,在LOD后90天内观察到7/75(9.3%)女性自发排卵,71.4%实现了怀孕。这些发现强调了腹腔镜卵巢打孔作为PCOS干预措施的成功,AMH作为评估LOD治疗反应的可靠测试。
    Female infertility is often associated with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), characterized by high serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is commonly used to treat PCOS, especially when drug interventions have failed. This study aimed to evaluate the response to LOD intervention in women with PCOS by assessing AMH serum levels and their ability to restore normal physiological menstrual cycle and achieve conception. Seventy-five infertile women (24-41 years old) with body mass index (BMI) ranging from 19.6-35kg/m2 were included in the study. Among them, 57 had primary infertility, and 18 from secondary infertility, with an average duration of 8.6±4.4 years. Baseline levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and AMH were measured, and post-LOD levels of LH and AMH were evaluated. Menstrual cycle regularity was evaluated before and after LOD. Baseline FSH serum level before LOD was 5.2-1.6IU/L. Following LOD, the serum levels of LH and AMH significantly decreased from 14.3±4.1 to 7.8±2.8 IU/L and from 13.7±5.9 to 7.7±3.9 IU/L, respectively (p<0.05). LOD significantly (p<0.05) decreased the menstrual cycles irregularity, such as oligomenorrhea and amenorrhea, from 55 (73.3%) to 22 (29.3%) women and from 2 (2.7%) to 0 (0%) women respectively. Moreover, regular menstrual cycles significantly (p<0.05) increased from 18 (24%) to 53 (70.7%) women. Importantly, 68% of LOD-treated women showed a significant increase in pregnancy rates, with 52.9%, 35.3%, and 11.8% achieving pregnancy within 3, 6, and 9 months after LOD, respectively (p<0.05). Moreover, spontaneous ovulation was observed in 7/75 (9.3%) women within 90 days after LOD, and 71.4% achieved pregnancy. These findings highlight the success of laparoscopic ovarian drilling as an intervention for PCOS, with AMH serving as a reliable test to assess the response to LOD treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与药物治疗相比,多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的手术治疗是一个不明确的选择,有必要深化微创手术的作用,以腹腔镜卵巢打孔术(LOD)和经阴道腹腔镜(THL)为代表,用于治疗对药物治疗耐药的不孕妇女的PCOS,并确定其在排卵和妊娠率方面的成功。
    方法:在主要电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,PubMed,和Cochrane图书馆)从1994年到2022年10月,以评估手术在对药物治疗耐药的PCOS患者中的作用。仅包括英文原始科学文章。
    结果:本综述分析了17项研究。在所有分析的研究中,超过50%的人群在手术治疗后经历了自发排卵,两种手术技术(LOD和THL)之间没有很大差异.超过40%的患者分娩,LOD后的比率更高,尽管报告了8例异位妊娠和63例流产。已经报道了THL后形成粘连的风险较低。尚未描述有关手术对月经周期正则化的影响的明确数据。已经描述了与两种手术技术的术前水平相比,LH和AMH血清水平以及LH/FSH比率降低。
    结论:尽管数据的稀缺性和异质性,对于希望怀孕的对药物治疗有抵抗的PCOS患者,手术治疗被认为是一种有效且安全的方法.
    OBJECTIVE: The surgical management of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents an unclear option compared to medical therapy, and it is necessary to deepen the role of minimally invasive surgery, represented by laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL), for the treatment of PCOS in infertile women resistant to drug therapy and to establish its success in terms of ovulation and pregnancy rates.
    METHODS: A search was performed in the main electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library) from 1994 to October 2022 in order to evaluate the role of surgery in patients with PCOS resistant to pharmacological treatment. Only original scientific articles in English were included.
    RESULTS: Seventeen studies were analyzed in this review. In all analyzed studies, more than 50% of the population underwent spontaneous ovulation after surgical treatment without great differences between the two surgical techniques (LOD and THL). More than 40% of patients delivered, with a higher rate after LOD, although eight ectopic pregnancies and sixty-three miscarriages were reported. A lower risk of adhesion formation after THL has been reported. No clear data regarding the effect of surgery on the regularization of the menstrual cycle has been described. A reduction in LH and AMH serum levels as well as the LH/FSH ratio compared to preoperative levels for both surgical techniques has been described.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity and heterogeneity of data, surgical therapy could be considered an effective and safe approach in the management of PCOS patients with resistance to pharmacological treatment who desire to become pregnant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种以持续无排卵为特征的常见激素紊乱。卵巢钻孔是一种公认的治疗方法,适用于对药物无反应的PCOS患者,可以通过侵入性腹腔镜入路或侵入性较小的经阴道入路进行。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估经阴道超声引导下卵巢针钻孔与常规腹腔镜卵巢钻孔(LOD)对PCOS患者的疗效。
    方法:PUBMED,Scopus,系统搜索了Cochrane数据库,从研究开始至2023年1月发表的文章中,寻找符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT).我们包括PCOS的RCT,比较经阴道卵巢钻孔和LOD,并报告排卵和妊娠率作为主要结局变量。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估研究质量。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并根据GRADE方法评估了证据的确定性。我们在PROSPERO(CRD42023397481)中前瞻性地注册了该方案。
    结果:包括899名PCOS女性在内的6项RCT符合纳入标准。与经阴道卵巢钻孔相比,发现LOD显着降低抗苗勒管激素(AMH)(SMD:-0.22;95%CI:-0.38,-0.05;I2=39.85%)和窦卵泡计数(AFC)(SMD:-1.22;95%CI:-2.26,-0.19;I2=97.55%)。我们的发现还表明,与经阴道卵巢钻孔相比,LOD显着将排卵率提高了25%(RR:1.25;95%CI:1.02,1.54;I2=64.58%)。然而,我们发现两组在卵泡刺激素方面没有显着差异(SMD:0.04;95%CI:-0.26,0.33;I2=61.53%),黄体生成素(SMD:-0.07;95%CI:-0.90,0.77;I2=94.92%),和妊娠率(RR:1.37;95%CI:0.94,1.98;I2=50.49%)。
    结论:与经阴道卵巢钻孔相比,LOD可显著降低PCOS患者的循环AMH和AFC,并显著提高排卵率。由于经阴道卵巢穿刺仍是一种侵入性较小的方法,更具成本效益,和更简单的替代方案,进一步的研究有必要在大型队列中比较这两种技术,特别关注卵巢储备和妊娠结局。
    BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent hormonal disorder distinguished by a persistent absence of ovulation. Ovarian drilling is a recognized therapeutic approach for PCOS patients who are unresponsive to medication and can be performed through invasive laparoscopic access or less-invasive transvaginal access. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound -guided ovarian needle drilling with conventional laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) in patients with PCOS.
    METHODS: PUBMED, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from articles published from inception to January 2023. We include RCTs of PCOS that compared transvaginal ovarian drilling and LOD and reported on ovulation and pregnancy rates as the main outcome variable. We evaluated study quality using the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed and the certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the GRADE approach. We registered the protocol prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42023397481).
    RESULTS: Six RCTs including 899 women with PCOS met the inclusion criteria. LOD was found to significantly reduce anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) (SMD: -0.22; 95% CI: -0.38, -0.05; I2 = 39.85%) and antral follicle count (AFC) (SMD: -1.22; 95% CI: -2.26, -0.19; I2 = 97.55%) compared to transvaginal ovarian drilling. Our findings also indicated that LOD significantly increased the ovulation rate by 25% compared to transvaginal ovarian drilling (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.54; I2 = 64.58%). However, we found no significant difference between the two groups in terms of follicle stimulating hormone (SMD: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.26, 0.33; I2 = 61.53%), luteinizing hormone (SMD: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.90, 0.77; I2 = 94.92%), and pregnancy rate (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.98; I2 = 50.49%).
    CONCLUSIONS: LOD significantly lowers circulating AMH and AFC and significantly increases ovulation rate in PCOS patients compared to transvaginal ovarian drilling. As transvaginal ovarian drillingremains a less-invasive, more cost-effective, and simpler alternative, further studies are warranted to compare these two techniques in large cohorts, with a particular focus on ovarian reserve and pregnancy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是最常见的内分泌疾病,新陈代谢,和生殖期的多种病因障碍,可能有遗传起源。患有PCOS的女性以排卵过少为特征,临床或生化高雄激素血症,和多囊卵巢.患有PCOS的女性的窦卵泡数量增加。抗苗勒管激素(AMH),从窦前和窦卵泡的颗粒细胞产生的二聚体糖蛋白,在PCOS中升高。AMH与导致PCOS发展的卵泡功能障碍的两个阶段有关。PCOS患者卵巢钻孔后AMH水平下降。本研究比较了PCOS患者腹腔镜卵巢打孔术(LOD)前后AMH水平及其对生育的影响。
    方法:这项队列研究是对2020年在德黑兰Akbarabadi医院接受LOD的84名PCOS女性进行的。人口特征,AMH,和雌二醇水平在手术前测定,并与手术后一周的量进行比较。还评估了AMH水平对妊娠率的影响。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为29.01±4.01岁。患者的平均体重指数(BMI)为26.33±4.14kg/m2。结果表明,卵巢钻孔后平均AMH水平显着降低(P值<0.001)。月经周期分布在LOD前后有显著性差异(P<0.001)。所有变量对妊娠均无影响(P值>0.05)。先前月经期的月经过少可能导致AMH水平在LOD后增加3.826个单位(P值<0.001)。
    结论:治疗前测量血清AMH浓度可能是预测LOD结果的有用工具。这可以帮助选择患者进行治疗。
    背景:发现该项目符合在伊朗进行研究的道德原则和国家规范和标准,批准ID和发布日期为IR。IUMS。口蹄疫。分别为REC.1397.206和2018.08.26,已在伊朗医科大学研究与技术开发副校长的研究项目编号2766中注册,医学院,德黑兰,伊朗。URL:https://道德。
    方法:ac.ir/EthicsProposalView.php?id=34791。
    BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine, metabolic, and multi-causal disorder in the reproductive period with a possible genetic origin. Women with PCOS are characterized by oligo-ovulation, clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries. Women with PCOS have an increased number of antral follicles. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), a dimeric glycoprotein produced from the granulosa cells of the pre-antral and antral follicles, is elevated in PCOS. AMH has been implicated in two stages of follicle dysfunction that lead to the development of PCOS. The level of AMH decreases following ovarian drilling in patients with PCOS. The present study compared the level of AMH before and after Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) in patients with PCOS and its effect on fertility.
    METHODS: This cohort study was carried out on 84 women with PCOS who underwent LOD in Akbarabadi Hospital in Tehran in 2020. Demographic characteristics, AMH, and estradiol levels were determined before surgery and compared with the amount one week after surgery. The effect of AMH level on pregnancy rate was also evaluated.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 29.01 ± 4.01 years. The mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of the patients was 26.33 ± 4.14 kg/m2. The results showed that the mean AMH level decreased significantly after ovarian drilling (P-value < 0.001). Menstrual cycle distribution was significantly different before and after LOD (P < 0.001). None of the variables had an effect on the pregnancy (P-value > 0.05). Oligomenorrhea in the previous menstrual period might cause AMH levels to increase by 3.826 units after LOD (P-value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Measuring serum AMH concentration before treatment can be a useful tool to predict LOD outcomes. This can help in selecting the patient for treatment.
    BACKGROUND: The project was found to be under the ethical principles and the national norms and standards for conducting research in Iran with the approval ID and issue date of IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1397.206 and 2018.08.26 respectively, which has been registered with the research project number 2766 in the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology Development of Iran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran. URL: https://ethics.
    METHODS: ac.ir/EthicsProposalView.php?id=34791 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    简介:用LOD或二甲双胍治疗克罗米芬耐药多囊卵巢综合征(CCR-PCOS)的最佳方法仍然是一个问题。有三种不一致甚至矛盾的观点。目标:本荟萃分析旨在评估有或无CC的二甲双胍的有效性和安全性,并将其与有或无CC的LOD进行比较(Met/Met-CC与LOD/LOD-CC)在也有无排卵的CCR-PCOS女性中。数据源:ThePubMed,科克伦,我们搜索了Embase数据库,以确定1966年1月1日至2019年8月31日报告的相关研究;搜索于2022年5月17日更新.研究资格标准:我们纳入了CCR-PCOS的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验将Met/Met-CC和LOD/LOD-CC作为暴露变量,将生育率作为主要结果变量。研究评估和综合方法:我们使用Cochrane偏差风险工具评估研究质量。主要有效性结局是活产/持续妊娠率,主要安全性结局是流产率。进行固定效应荟萃分析。使用敏感性分析评估结果的稳健性。进行Meta回归和亚组分析以检查异质性的原因。使用漏斗图检查发布偏差,Egger线性回归,和Begg等级相关检验。该荟萃分析的质量根据GRADE方法进行评估。该荟萃分析已在PROSPERO(CRD42021240156)中注册。结果:在71项潜在相关研究中,我们在荟萃分析中纳入了5项RCT.我们发现Met-CC和LOD在活产/持续妊娠方面的有效性没有差异(RR=1.02,95%CI:0.87-1.21,z=0.28;p=0.780),流产率(RR=0.79,95%CI:0.46-1.36,z=0.86;p=0.390)。I2测试结果显示中度或无异质性(I2=51.4%,p=0.083;I2=0.0%;p=0.952)。灵敏度分析证实了结果的鲁棒性。漏斗图,Egger线性回归,Begg秩相关检验提示无发表偏倚(p>0.05)。LOD比Met贵(1050欧元与50.16欧元)。证据质量适中。结论:没有证据表明两种干预措施在排卵方面的结果存在差异,怀孕,和活产。由于LOD是一种侵入性程序,具有固有风险,使用Met/Met-CC应该是CCR-PCOS女性的二线治疗.系统审查注册:标识符CRD42021240156。
    Introduction: Which is optimal to treat clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (CCR-PCOS) with LOD or metformin remains a problem. There are three inconsistent or even contradictory views. Objectives: The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Metformin with or without CC and to compare them with LOD with or without CC (Met/Met-CC vs. LOD/LOD-CC) in women with CCR-PCOS who also have anovulation. Data source: The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant studies reported between 1 Jan 1966 and 31 Aug 2019; the search was updated on 17 May 2022. Study eligibility criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CCR-PCOS that had considered Met/Met-CC and LOD/LOD-CC as the exposure variables and fertility as the main outcome variable. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: We assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary effectiveness outcome was live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate and the primary safety outcome was miscarriage rate. A fixed-effect meta-analysis was performed. The robustness of the results was assessed using sensitivity analyses. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to examine the reasons for heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined using the funnel plot, Egger linear regression, and Begg rank correlation tests. The quality of this meta-analysis was estimated according to the GRADE approach. This meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021240156). Results: Among 71 potentially relevant studies, we included five RCTs in our meta-analysis. We found no difference in effectiveness between Met-CC and LOD in terms of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.21, z = 0.28; p = 0.780), and miscarriage rates (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.46-1.36, z = 0.86; p = 0.390). I2 tests results revealed moderate or no heterogeneity (I2 = 51.4%, p = 0.083; I2= 0.0%; p = 0.952). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. Funnel plot, Egger linear regression, and Begg rank correlation tests implied no publication bias (p > 0.05). LOD was more expensive than Met (€1050 vs. €50.16). The evidence quality was moderate. Conclusion: There is no evidence on the difference in the outcomes between the two interventions regarding ovulation, pregnancy, and live birth. As LOD is an invasive procedure and carries inherent risks, the use of Met/Met-CC should be the second-line treatment for women with CCR-PCOS. Systematic Review Registration: identifier CRD42021240156.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是导致无排卵性不孕的主要原因,促排卵是一线治疗。如果失败了,腹腔镜卵巢打孔(LOD)用于诱导单排卵。有影响,LOD可导致卵巢组织破坏,从而导致卵巢早衰。此外,PCOS女性在LOD后可发生对促性腺激素的意外卵巢反应不良(POR).已经有关于在PCOS女性中发现的FSH受体多态性的报道,这与较高的血清FSH水平和对促性腺激素的POR有关。材料和方法:在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了144名在IVF前进行LOD的PCOS不孕妇女的资料.结果:纳入患者中有30例(20.8%)对促性腺激素的卵巢刺激有POR(≤3个卵母细胞)。患有POR的妇女的基础血清FSH中位数水平明显较高(7.2(四分位距(IQR),6.0-9.2)与卵巢反应正常的女性(6.0(IQR,5.0-7.4);p=0.006)。此外,患有POR的女性使用了显着更高的促性腺激素累积剂量(1875IU(IQR,1312.5-2400)与卵巢反应正常的女性相比(1600IU(IQR,1200-1800);p=0.018)。结论:与LOD后卵巢反应正常的女性相比,LOD后经历POR的不孕PCOS女性的血清FSH水平明显更高。由于这些水平仍在正常范围内,我们推测LOD不是导致POR的原因。我们推测在LOD后患有PCOS和POR的女性可能具有与POR相关的FSH-R基因型和更高的血清FSH水平。
    Background and Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a major cause of anovulatory infertility, and ovulation induction is the first-line treatment. If this fails, laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is used to induce mono-ovulations. There have been implications, that LOD can cause destruction of ovarian tissue and therefore premature ovarian failure. Furthermore, unexpected poor ovarian response (POR) to gonadotrophins can occur in PCOS women after LOD. There have been reports about FSH receptor polymorphisms found in women with PCOS that are related to higher serum FSH levels and POR to gonadotrophins. Materials and Methods: In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed data of 144 infertile PCOS women that had LOD performed before IVF. Results: Thirty of included patients (20.8%) had POR (≤3 oocytes) to ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins. Women with POR had significantly higher median levels of basal serum FSH (7.2 (interquartile range (IQR), 6.0-9.2) compared to women with normal ovarian response (6.0 (IQR, 5.0-7.4); p = 0.006). Furthermore, women with POR used a significantly higher median cumulative dose of gonadotrophins (1875 IU (IQR, 1312.5-2400) for ovarian stimulation compared to women with normal ovarian response (1600 IU (IQR, 1200-1800); p = 0.018). Conclusion: Infertile PCOS women who experience POR after LOD have significantly higher serum FSH levels compared to women with normal ovarian response after LOD. As these levels are still within the normal range, we speculate that LOD is not the cause of POR. We presume that women with PCOS and POR after LOD could have FSH-R genotypes associated with POR and higher serum FSH levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrinopathy, characterized by chronic anovulation, hyperandrogenism, and multiple small subcapsular cystic follicles in the ovary during ultrasonography, and affects 5-10% of women of reproductive age. PCOS is frequently associated with insulin resistance (IR) accompanied by compensatory hyperinsulinemia and, therefore, presents an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The pathophysiology of PCOS is unclear, and many hypotheses have been proposed. Among these hypotheses, IR and hyperandrogenism may be the two key factors. The first line of treatment in PCOS includes lifestyle changes and body weight reduction. Achieving a 5-15% body weight reduction may improve IR and PCOS-associated hormonal abnormalities. For women who desire pregnancy, clomiphene citrate (CC) is the front-line treatment for ovulation induction. Twenty five percent of women may fail to ovulate spontaneously after three cycles of CC treatment, which is called CC-resistant PCOS. For CC-resistant PCOS women, there are many strategies to improve ovulation rate, including medical treatment and surgical approaches. Among the various surgical approaches, one particular surgical method, called laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD), has been proposed as an alternative treatment. LOD results in an overall spontaneous ovulation rate of 30-90% and final pregnancy rates of 13-88%. These benefits are more significant for women with CC-resistant PCOS. Although the intra- and post-operative complications and sequelae are always important, we believe that a better understanding of the pathophysiological changes and/or molecular mechanisms after LOD may provide a rationale for this procedure. LOD, mediated mainly by thermal effects, produces a series of morphological and biochemical changes. These changes include the formation of artificial holes in the very thick cortical wall, loosening of the dense and hard cortical wall, destruction of ovarian follicles with a subsequently decreased amount of theca and/or granulosa cells, destruction of ovarian stromal tissue with the subsequent development of transient but purulent and acute inflammatory reactions to initiate the immune response, and the continuing leakage or drainage of \"toxic\" follicular fluid in these immature and growth-ceased pre-antral follicles. All these factors contribute to decreasing local and systemic androgen levels, the following apoptosis process with these pre-antral follicles to atresia; the re-starting of normal follicular recruitment, development, and maturation, and finally, the normalization of the \"hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary\" axis and subsequent spontaneous ovulation. The detailed local and systematic changes in PCOS women after LOD are comprehensively reviewed in the current article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is one of the common modes of treatment for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are resistant to clomiphene citrate. The data related to the effect of LOD on sex hormones are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of LOD on hormonal parameters and clinical outcomes in women with PCOS.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty PCOS patients who were admitted for LOD were enrolled in the study. Serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were estimated in all the patients before and after LOD.
    UNASSIGNED: Paired t-test was used to assess the differences in hormonal parameters before and after LOD.
    UNASSIGNED: LOD reduces testosterone (P < 0.001), LH (P < 0.001), and LH/FSH ratio (P < 0.001), increases FSH (P < 0.001) levels, and improves the rate of ovulation (38/50) and clinical pregnancy (21/50) in PCOS. When subgroup analysis was done, LOD significantly reduced testosterone and LH/FSH ratio in ovulatory and conceived groups. Furthermore, the menstrual cycle became regular, and hirsutism and acne were reduced after LOD in women with PCOS.
    UNASSIGNED: LOD reduces testosterone and LH/FSH ratio and improves clinical outcome in PCOS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    To compare pregnancy outcomes in PCOS women undergoing transvaginal ovarian injury (TVOI) and laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) DESIGN: 126 infertile patients with PCOS were included in this prospective cohort study CANADIAN TASK FORCE CLASSIFICATION OF LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIA.
    University-affiliated fertility center.
    Sixty-seven infertile patients with the history of failed in vitro maturation underwent follow-up as the TVOI group. Fifty-nine infertile women who underwent LOD acted as controls. All subjects had PCOS with menstrual irregularity and were anovulatory by repetitive serum progesterone levels.
    The LOD group underwent six cauterizations of a single ovary with 30W for 4-6 s. Failed IVM subjects with 20-30 needle punctures per ovary acted as the TVOI group. Subjects were followed for six months.
    There was not a significant difference between the groups when the cases were evaluated in terms of spontaneous pregnancy or miscarriage rates. BMI levels decreased in both the TVOI and the LOD groups in a similar fashion. However, serum AMH and AFC decreased greater after LOD than they did with TVOI over the six-month duration of the study (p < 0.001 in both cases).
    Preliminary data suggest that TVOI likely represents a safer, less costly and equally effective manner of surgical ovulation induction in anovulatory PCOS women when compared to LOD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号