Desmoid tumors are rare, benign, but locally aggressive fibromatoses that pose significant therapeutic challenges, particularly when located in the head and neck region. This report details the case of an extensive cervical desmoid tumor dependent on the levator scapulae muscle and involving the vertebral artery managed through surgical resection and intraoperative navigation. A 45-year-old male presented with a slowly growing cervical mass. Imaging revealed an 83x68x40 mm mass in the right lateral paravertebral space, dependent on the levator scapulae muscle and involving the vertebral artery. Biopsy confirmed a low-grade fusocellular myofibroblastic neoplasm consistent with a desmoid tumor. Given the poor prognosis associated with the symptomatic mass, surgical resection was performed using Brainlab intraoperative navigation (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). The procedure was successful, with preservation of vital structures and no evidence of recurrence postoperatively. Desmoid tumors in the head and neck region, though rare, require precise diagnostic and therapeutic approaches due to their aggressive nature and proximity to critical anatomical structures. The use of intraoperative navigation, in this case, facilitated accurate tumor resection, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. Pathological analysis revealed a CTNNB1 gene mutation, specifically the S45P variant, which is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating advanced surgical techniques and genetic analysis, in the management of complex desmoid tumors. Intraoperative navigation proved invaluable in achieving successful surgical outcomes, underscoring its potential utility in similar cases. Continued follow-up is essential, given the potential for recurrence associated with desmoid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) is a highly sophisticated surgical technique that aims to repair a variety of skeletal and dental abnormalities, including misaligned jaws and teeth. It requires precise preoperative preparation and advanced surgical skills, which are typically learned through years of practical experience in operating rooms or laboratory-based surgical training facilities utilizing cadavers or models. The traditional physical hands-on method of surgical training is still used at OGS. However, this method requires a longer time of preparation. Currently, mixed reality (MR)-a combination of virtual reality and augmented reality technology-is an innovation of OGS. The present study aimed to present a comprehensive review of studies that assessed the advantages of utilizing mixed reality technology in OGS.
METHODS: A modified Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome strategy was performed using a combination of electronic (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase) and manual searches between 2013 and 2023 exploring mixed reality (MR) technology in OGS in the last 10 years. The inclusion criteria were limited to the patient and study model focusing on the clinical application of MR and the associated field of OGS.
RESULTS: The initial search indicated 1731 studies, of which 17 studies were included for analysis. The main results indicated that the use of MR technology in OGS led to high accuracy and time reduction as primary outcomes and cost-effectiveness and skill improvement as secondary outcomes. The review firmly concluded that MR technology exhibited a positive impact on students, trainees, and oromaxillofacial surgeons. However, due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, meta-analyses could not be performed. Collectively, these findings provide strong evidence for the advantages of MR technology in orthognathic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: MR technology significantly improves OGS planning efficiency by providing pre-surgical information and serving as an intraoperative navigation tool, reducing surgical time without compromising outcomes. Virtual training using MR technology exerts a positive impact on knowledge and skill improvement for OGS. This innovative technology will revolutionize the healthcare system and enhance patient care.

Computer technology-based treatment approaches like intraoperative navigation and intensity-modulated radiation therapy have become important components of state of the art head and neck cancer treatment. Multidirectional exchange of virtual three-dimensional patient data via an interdisciplinary platform allows all medical specialists involved in the patients treatment to take full advantage of these technologies. This review article gives an overview of current technologies and future directions regarding treatment approaches that are based on a virtual, three-dimensional patient specific dataset: storage and exchange of spatial information acquired via intraoperative navigation allow for a highly precise frozen section procedure. In the postoperative setting, virtual reconstruction of the tumor resection surface provides the basis for improved radiation therapy planning and virtual reconstruction of the tumor with integration of molecular findings creates a valuable tool for postoperative treatment and follow-up. These refinements of established treatment components and novel approaches have the potential to make a major contribution to improving the outcome in head and neck cancer patients.

Parenchyma- sparing liver resections are aimed at maximizing the possible preservation of parenchyma not affected by the tumor - a current trend in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. On the other hand, a prerequisite for operations is to ensure their radicality. To effectively solve this problem, all diagnostic imaging methods available in the arsenal are used, which make it possible to comprehensively solve the issues of perioperative planning of the volume and technical features of the planned operation. Diagnostic imaging methods that allow intraoperative navigation through intraoperative, instrumentally based determination of the tumor border and resection plane have additional value. One of the methods of such mapping is ICG video fluorescence intraoperative navigation. An analysis of the clinical use of the domestic video fluorescent navigation system \"MARS\" for parenchymal-sparing resections of focal liver lesions is presented. An assessment was made of the dynamics of the distribution of the contrast agent during ICG videofluorescent mapping during parenchymal-sparing resection interventions on the liver, with the analysis of materials from histological examination of tissues taking into account three-zonal videofluorescent marking of the resection edge, performed using the domestic videofluorescence imaging system «MARS».
Выполнение паренхимосохранных резекций печени, направленных на максимально возможное сохранение не пораженной опухолью паренхимы —актуальный тренд гепатопанкреатобилиарной хирургии. С другой стороны, обязательным аспектом паренхимосохранных операций является обеспечение радикальности выполняемого хирургического пособия. Для эффективного решения этой задачи используются все имеющиеся в арсенале онкохирурга методы диагностической визуализации, позволяющие комплексно решать вопросы периоперационного планирования объема и технических особенностей планируемой операции. Дополнительной ценностью обладают методы диагностической визуализации, позволяющие осуществлять интраоперационную навигацию, посредством интраоперационного, инструментально обоснованного определения границы опухоли и плоскости резекции. Одним из методов такого картирования является ICG-видеофлуоресцентная интраоперационная навигация. Представлен анализ клинического применения отечественной системы видеофлуоресцентной навигации «МАРС» при паренхимосохранных резекциях очаговых образований печени. Осуществлена оценка динамики распределения контрастного препарата при ICG-видеофлуоресцентном картировании при паренхимосохранных резекционных вмешательствах на печени с анализом материалов гистологического исследования тканей с учетом трехзональной видеофлуоресцентной маркировки края резекции, выполненной с использованием отечественной системы видеофлуоресцентной визуализации «МАРС».

OBJECTIVE: Complications after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are important factors affecting the prognosis of patients, especially for complex hepatobiliary diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the value of a three-dimensional (3D) printed dry-laboratory model in the precise planning of LLR for complex hepatobiliary diseases.
METHODS: Patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases who underwent LLR were preoperatively enrolled, and divided into two groups according to whether using a 3D-printed dry-laboratory model (3D vs. control group). Clinical variables were assessed and complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scores were calculated and compared for each patient. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases underwent the precise planning of LLR. Among them, thirty-one patients acquired the guidance of a 3D-printed dry-laboratory model, and others were only guided by traditional enhanced CT or MRI. The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characters. However, compared to the control group, the 3D group had a lower incidence of intraoperative blood loss, as well as postoperative 30-day and major complications, especially bile leakage (all P < 0.05). The median score on the CCI was 20.9 (range 8.7-51.8) in the control group and 8.7 (range 8.7-43.4) in the 3D group (mean difference, -12.2, P = 0.004). Multivariable analysis showed the 3D model was an independent protective factor in decreasing postoperative complications. Subgroup analysis also showed that a 3D model could decrease postoperative complications, especially for bile leakage in patients with intrahepatic cholelithiasis.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3D-printed models can help reduce postoperative complications. The 3D-printed models should be recommended for patients with complex hepatobiliary diseases undergoing precise planning LLR.

BACKGROUND: Removal of orbital foreign bodies is a surgical challenge. The purpose of this study is to report our experience in the removal of orbital foreign bodies and to evaluate the usefulness of various technological aids in their removal.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study at Nice University Hospital (France) from January 2017 to December 2023. All patients undergoing surgery for an orbital foreign body during the study period were included. Data recorded included the nature of the orbital foreign body, its size, location, surgical route, outcome (success, partial success, failure), and technological aids used (intraoperative navigation, intraoperative imaging scope, orbital magnet). Concurrently, we designed a dedicated orbital magnet, which was tested in the anatomy laboratory and in two of our patients.
RESULTS: Six patients, all young men, were included during the study period. Removal was successful, partially successful, or unsuccessful in one-third of cases, respectively. Failure was associated with orbital foreign bodies located in the intraconal or posterior orbital space. Preoperatively, the use of a \"low-artifact\" scanner allowed us to better determine the exact size and shape of the orbital foreign body. Intraoperative navigation was not accurate enough, due to the mobility of the orbital bodies within the orbital fat. In our experience, intraoperative scope imaging was more accurate. The use of a dedicated orbital magnet was successfully tested in the anatomy laboratory and allowed the removal of a small orbital foreign body in one of our patients. Intraoperative surgical videos are provided.
CONCLUSIONS: Vegetal orbital foreign bodies must be systematically removed. Removal of non-vegetal orbital foreign bodies should be considered on a case-by-case basis based on their size, best assessed using a \"low artifact\" scanner, their location, and their intrinsic ferromagnetism. Intraoperative navigation does not appear useful, while intraoperative scope imaging does. A dedicated orbital magnet might be helpful in removing ferromagnetic orbital foreign bodies. However, an orbital magnet may be ineffective in removing intraorbital bullets, since they are made primarily of an alloy of copper and lead.

Intraoperative navigation is critical during spine surgery to ensure accurate instrumentation placement. From the early era of fluoroscopy to the current advancement in robotics, spinal navigation has continued to evolve. By understanding the variations in system protocols and their respective usage in the operating room, the surgeon can use and maximize the potential of various image guidance options more effectively. At the same time, maintaining navigation accuracy throughout the procedure is of the utmost importance, which can be confirmed intraoperatively by using an internal fiducial marker, as demonstrated herein. This technology can reduce the need for revision surgeries, minimize postoperative complications, and enhance the overall efficiency of operating rooms.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients with acute spinal fractures represent a challenge for practicing spine surgeons due to difficult operative anatomy and susceptibility to complications.
OBJECTIVE: Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery?
METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016-06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: 37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p ​= ​0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p ​= ​0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p ​= ​0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p ​= ​0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p ​= ​0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p ​= ​0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p ​= ​0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p ​= ​0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare radiation exposure and implant-related complications of the freehand (FH) technique versus intraoperative image-guided navigation (IN) for pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and estimate associated lifetime attributable cancer risks.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 40 consecutive AIS patients treated with pedicle screw instrumentation using the FH technique was performed. The dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (ED) were calculated. Screw-related complications were analysed, and the age- and gender-specific lifetime attributable cancer risks were estimated. The results were compared to previously published data on IN used during surgery for AIS.
RESULTS: There were no implant-related complications in our cohort. Implant density was 86.6%. The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 75.2° (SD ± 17.7) preoperatively and 27.7° (SD ± 10.8) postoperatively. The mean ED of our cohort and published data for the FH technique was significantly lower compared to published data on the IN technique (p < 0.001). The risk for radiogenic cancer for our FH technique AIS cohort was 0.0014% for male patients and 0.0029% for female patients. Corresponding risks for IN were significantly higher (p < 0.001), ranging from 0.0071 to 0.124% and from 0.0144 to 0.253% for male and female patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of intraoperative navigation in AIS surgery does not necessarily reduce implant-related complications but may increase radiation exposure to the patient.

Extended reality (XR) technology refers to any situation where real-world objects are enhanced with computer technology, including virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. Augmented reality and mixed reality technologies have been widely applied in orthopedic clinical practice, including in teaching, preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and surgical outcome evaluation. The primary goal of this narrative review is to summarize the effectiveness and superiority of XR-technology-assisted intraoperative navigation in the fields of trauma, joint, spine, and bone tumor surgery, as well as to discuss the current shortcomings in intraoperative navigation applications. We reviewed titles of more than 200 studies obtained from PubMed with the following search terms: extended reality, mixed reality, augmented reality, virtual reality, intraoperative navigation, and orthopedic surgery; of those 200 studies, 69 related papers were selected for abstract review. Finally, the full text of 55 studies was analyzed and reviewed. They were classified into four groups-trauma, joint, spine, and bone tumor surgery-according to their content. Most of studies that we reviewed showed that XR-technology-assisted intraoperative navigation can effectively improve the accuracy of implant placement, such as that of screws and prostheses, reduce postoperative complications caused by inaccurate implantation, facilitate the achievement of tumor-free surgical margins, shorten the surgical duration, reduce radiation exposure for patients and surgeons, minimize further damage caused by the need for visual exposure during surgery, and provide richer and more efficient intraoperative communication, thereby facilitating academic exchange, medical assistance, and the implementation of remote healthcare.