intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)

肝内胆管癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)和癌胚抗原(CEA)已被广泛用于筛查,胆道癌(BTC)患者的诊断和预测。然而,在BTC患者中报道了大量碳水化合物抗原50(CA50)的研究。
    方法:本研究纳入2017年1月至2022年12月安徽省肝胆外科联盟肝癌Clin-Bio数据库的1121例患者(训练队列673例,验证队列448例):458与BTC,178例肝细胞癌(HCC),23合并肝细胞-胆管癌,462例非肿瘤患者。应用接收人工作特点(ROC)曲线和判定曲线剖析(DCA)评价诊断效能和临床有用性。
    结果:结合CA50,CA19-9和AFP获得的ROC曲线显示诊断模型1的AUC值为0.885(95%CI0.856-0.885,特异性70.3%,和敏感性84.0%)在训练队列中和0.879(0.841-0.917,76.7%,和84.3%)在验证队列中。此外,比较iCCA和HCC(训练队列中的235,157在验证队列中),诊断模型2的AUC值为0.893(95%CI0.853-0.933,特异性96%,和敏感性68.6%)在训练队列中和0.872(95%CI0.818-0.927,94.2%,和64.6%)在验证队列中。
    结论:结合CA50、CA19-9和AFP的模型不仅对BTC具有良好的诊断价值,而且对区分iCCA和HCC也具有良好的诊断价值。
    BACKGROUND: To date, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been widely used for the screening, diagnosis and prediction of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, few studies with large sample sizes of carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50) were reported in BTC patients.
    METHODS: A total of 1121 patients from the Liver Cancer Clin-Bio Databank of Anhui Hepatobiliary Surgery Union between January 2017 and December 2022 were included in this study (673 in the training cohort and 448 in the validation cohort): among them, 458 with BTC, 178 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 23 with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and 462 with nontumor patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical usefulness.
    RESULTS: ROC curves obtained by combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP showed that the AUC value of the diagnostic MODEL 1 was 0.885 (95% CI 0.856-0.885, specificity 70.3%, and sensitivity 84.0%) in the training cohort and 0.879 (0.841-0.917, 76.7%, and 84.3%) in the validation cohort. In addition, comparing iCCA and HCC (235 in the training cohort, 157 in the validation cohort), the AUC values of the diagnostic MODEL 2 were 0.893 (95% CI 0.853-0.933, specificity 96%, and sensitivity 68.6%) in the training cohort and 0.872 (95% CI 0.818-0.927, 94.2%, and 64.6%) in the validation cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: The model combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP not only has good diagnostic value for BTC but also has good diagnostic value for distinguishing iCCA and HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆管癌(CCA)构成了实质性威胁,因为它是第二大最常见的原发性肝肿瘤。有记录的美国肝内CCA(iCCA)发病率的年度上升令人担忧,表明其影响越来越大。此外,肿瘤切除后的5年生存率仅为25%,鉴于肿瘤复发是53-79%患者死亡的主要原因。iCCA的术前评估侧重于精确定位肿瘤位置,胆道受累,血管包裹,和转移检测。大量研究表明,门静脉栓塞(PVE)与提高生存率有关,改善肝脏合成功能,降低总死亡率。获得清晰切除边缘的挑战有助于iCCA的显着复发率,在一年内影响大约三分之二的案件,结果复发病例的中位生存期少于12个月。在iCCA病例中,最初认为有资格接受手术切除的患者中有近50%最终在手术探查期间被认为不合格。因此,已提出分期腹腔镜检查以减少不必要的剖腹手术。原位肝移植(OLT)的资格需要授予某些标准。OLT为早期发现的不可切除的iCCA提供生存优势;它可以与其他治疗相结合,如射频消融和经动脉化疗栓塞,在特定情况下。我们旨在全面描述可用于治疗CCA的手术策略,包括术前措施和干预措施,以及目前关于肝切除和OLT的选择。
    Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可用于改善晚期或转移性胆管癌尤其是肝内胆管癌(iCCA)患者预后的治疗选择有限。本研究旨在评估联合化疗联合抗PD-1/L1药物的疗效和安全性,不可切除,和复发性肝内胆管癌患者。
    晚期患者,不可切除,对接受化疗联合PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂或单纯化疗的复发iCCA进行回顾性筛选和分析.主要结果是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结果是总反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),和安全。
    81名符合条件的患者纳入研究(化疗加抗PD-1/L1组n=51,单纯化疗组n=30)。化疗加抗PD-1/L1组的中位OS为11个月,明显长于单纯化疗组的8个月,风险比(HR)为0.53(95%CI0.30-0.94,P=0.008)。化疗+抗PD-1/L1组7个月的中位PFS明显长于单纯化疗组4个月,HR为0.48(95%CI0.27-0.87);P=0.002)。同样,联合治疗组的ORR(29.4%)和DCR(78.4%)高于单纯化疗组的13.3%和73.3%,分别。与单纯化疗组(23.3%)相比,化疗加抗PD-1/L1组(66.7%)记录到更多的3-4级治疗相关不良反应,然而,他们是可以管理和容忍的。
    化疗加抗PD-1/L1代表了一种更有效和可耐受的晚期治疗选择,不可切除,和复发性iCCA患者与单纯化疗相比。
    UNASSIGNED: There are limited treatment options available to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 drugs compared to chemotherapy alone in advanced, unresectable, and recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with advanced, unresectable, or recurrent iCCA who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or chemotherapy alone were retrospectively screened and analyzed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.
    UNASSIGNED: 81 eligible patients were included in the study (chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group n=51, and chemotherapy-alone group n=30). The median OS was 11 months for the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group, significantly longer than the 8 months in the chemotherapy-alone group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (95% CI 0.30-0.94, P = 0.008). The median PFS of 7 months in the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group was significantly longer than the 4 months in the chemotherapy-alone group, with HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.87); P = 0.002). Similarly, the combined therapy group showed a higher ORR (29.4%) and DCR (78.4%) compared to 13.3% and 73.3% in the chemotherapy-alone group, respectively. More grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse effects were recorded in the chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 group (66.7%) compared to the chemotherapy-alone group (23.3%), however, they were manageable and tolerable.
    UNASSIGNED: Chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1/L1 represents a more effective and tolerable treatment option for advanced, unresectable, and recurrent iCCA patients compared to chemotherapy alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)与开腹LR(OLR)治疗肝内胆管癌(ICCA)的结果不均匀。我们旨在基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)研究比较ICCA的LLR和OLR。两名审阅者独立搜索了在线数据库(PubMed,Embase,和CochraneLibrary)进行PSM研究,比较了ICCA的LLR和OLR。使用截止值≥7的渥太华-纽卡斯尔质量评估量表来定义更高质量的文献。仅考虑了符合我们所有纳入标准的英语语言的“高质量”PSM分析。总共10个PSM试验包括在分析中。与OLR相比,尽管LLR组的淋巴结清扫(LND)(RR=0.67)和大肝切除术率较低(RR=0.87),LLR组的R0切除率较高(RR=1.05),主要并发症较低(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III)(RR=0.72).此外,LLR组患者估计失血量较少(MD=-185.52ml),住院时间也较短(MD=-2.75天).进一步分析发现总生存期(OS)(HR=0.91),无病生存率(DFS)(HR=0.95),LLR后ICCA患者的无复发生存率(HR=0.80)均与OLR患者相当。选定ICCA患者的LLR在技术上可能是安全可行的,提供短期利益和实现肿瘤疗效,而不损害患者的长期生存。
    Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open LR (OLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) are heterogeneous. We aimed to compare LLR and OLR for ICCA based on propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies. Two reviewers independently searched the online databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for PSM studies that compared LLR and OLR for ICCA. The Ottawa-Newcastle Quality Assessment Scale with a cutoff of ≥ 7 was used to define higher-quality literature. Only \'high-quality\' PSM analyses of the English language that met all our inclusion criteria were considered. A total of ten PSM trials were included in the analyses. Compared with OLR, although the lymph node dissection (LND) (RR = 0.67) and major hepatectomy rates were lower in the LLR group (RR = 0.87), higher R0 resections (RR = 1.05) and lower major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) (RR = 0.72) were also observed in the LLR group. In addition, patients in the LLR group showed less estimated blood loss (MD = - 185.52 ml) and shorter hospital stays as well (MD = - 2.75 days). Further analysis found the overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.91), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.95), and recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.80) for patients with ICCA after LLR were all comparable to those of OLR. LLR for selected ICCA patients may be technically safe and feasible, providing short-term benefits and achieving oncological efficacy without compromising the long-term survival of the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖抗原19-9(CA19-9)在肝内胆管癌(iCCA)患者的反应评估中的作用尚不清楚。作者研究了不可切除iCCA患者的CA19-9反应(定义为从基线降低>50%)与放射学反应和预后的关系。
    方法:对最初诊断为不可切除iCCA的422例患者进行前瞻性队列研究,基线CA19-9水平≥100U/mL,并于2017年1月至2021年12月期间在作者机构接受系统治疗,纳入本研究.使用实体瘤1.1版的反应评估标准评估放射学反应。对CA19-9反应和放射学反应进行了具有里程碑意义的评估。CA19-9反应和成像反应之间的关联,无进展生存期(PFS),分析总生存期(OS)。
    结果:两百六十七名患者(63.3%)有CA19-9反应。在132名放射学应答者中的123名(93.2%)和290名放射学无应答者中的144名(49.7%)中观察到CA19-9应答(p<.001)。CA19-9响应者的平均PFS表现优于无响应者(10.6vs.3.6个月;危险比[HR],4.8个月;95%置信区间[CI],3.8-6.0个月;p<.001)和OS(21.4与6.3个月;HR,5.3个月;95%CI,4.2-6.7个月;p<.001)。OS和PFS的共同独立预测因素包括转移,CA19-9无响应状态,多变量分析中的放射学无应答者状态。
    结论:CA19-9反应是评估肿瘤反应的有价值的补充,并且与iCCA患者预后改善相关。实现CA19-9反应应该是全身治疗后iCCA患者的治疗目标之一。
    结论:碳水化合物抗原19-9水平从升高的基线水平下降应该是接受全身性治疗的肝内胆管癌患者的治疗目标之一。
    The role of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in response assessment among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains unknown. The authors studied the association of the CA 19-9 response (defined as a reduction >50% from baseline) with the radiologic response and the outcome in patients with unresectable iCCA.
    A prospective cohort of 422 patients who were initially diagnosed with unresectable iCCA, had baseline CA 19-9 levels ≥100 U/mL, and received treatment with systemic therapies at the authors\' institution between January 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled in this study. The radiologic response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. A landmark assessment of the CA 19-9 response and the radiologic response was performed. The associations between CA 19-9 response and imaging response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
    Two hundred sixty-seven patients (63.3%) had a CA 19-9 response. A CA 19-9 response was observed in 123 of 132 (93.2%) radiologic responders and in 144 of 290 (49.7%) radiologic nonresponders (p < .001). CA 19-9 responders outperformed nonresponders in median PFS (10.6 vs. 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 4.8 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-6.0 months; p < .001) and OS (21.4 vs. 6.3 months; HR, 5.3 months; 95% CI, 4.2-6.7 months; p < .001). The common independent predictors of both OS and PFS included metastasis, CA 19-9 nonresponder status, and radiologic nonresponder status in multivariable analysis.
    CA 19-9 response is a valuable addition to assess tumor response and is associated with improved outcomes in patients with iCCA. Achieving a CA 19-9 response should be one of the therapeutic objectives of patients with iCCA after systemic therapies.
    A decline in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels from elevated baseline levels should be one of the therapeutic aims of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who are managed with systemic therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:胆管癌(CCA)是第二常见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤。如今,肝内胆管癌(iCCA)唯一可用的治疗方法是手术切除,5年总生存率(OS)为25-40%。然而,复发率仍然很高。在这次全面审查中,我们描述了iCCA管理的最新手术策略,包括血管切除,微创手术的作用,肝移植,未来肝脏残留物增加的策略,以及新辅助疗法的作用。
    方法:医学数据库综述(PubMed,Scopus和Cochrane数据库)在没有特定时间范围的情况下,选择了最相关的英语文章。
    多焦点演示,血管,神经周浸润,淋巴结受累与不良预后相关。正在研究预后因素以改善治疗方法和结果。淋巴结清扫的作用仍有争议。建议收集至少6个淋巴结以确保准确的淋巴结分期。肝移植(LT)最近仅在不可切除的早期疾病(≤2cm)患者中成为一种治疗选择。
    结论:对于CCA患者,手术切除仍然是唯一可能治愈的治疗方法,但是在诊断中继续理解,手术技术和化疗正在改变预后。在未来的研究中,多中心和随机研究是必要的,目的是个性化治疗。改善患者的切除选择,降低复发率。
    OBJECTIVE: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second commonest primary liver malignancy. Nowadays, the only available treatment with curative intent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is surgical resection, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 25-40%. However, recurrence rate remains high. In this comprehensive review, we describe the newest surgical strategies for iCCA management, including vascular resection, the role of mini-invasive surgery, liver transplant, strategies for future liver remnant augmentation, and the role of neoadjuvant therapies.
    METHODS: A review of medical databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Database) was conducted selecting most relevant articles in English language without a specific timeframe.
    UNASSIGNED: Multifocal presentation, vascular, perineural invasion, and lymph nodes involvement are associated with poor outcome. Prognostic factors are being investigated to improve therapeutic approach and outcomes. The role of lymph nodes dissection remains debated. Harvesting at least 6 lymph nodes is recommended to ensure accurate nodal staging. Liver transplantation (LT) recently represented a treatment option only in patients with unresectable early disease (≤2 cm).
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with CCA, but continue understanding in diagnosis, operative technique and chemotherapies are changing the landscape in the prognosis. Multicentric and randomized studies are necessaries in the future research with the intent to personalize the treatments, improve patient selection for the resection and reduce recurrence rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝内胆管癌(iCCA)是一种高度侵袭性的癌症,在早期诊断具有挑战性。尽管联合化疗最近取得了进展,耐药性限制了该方案的治疗价值。据报道,iCCA具有高HMGA1表达和通路改变,特别是CCND1/CDK4/CDK6和PI3K信号通路的过度激活。在这项研究中,我们探讨了靶向CDK4/6和PI3K抑制治疗iCCA的潜力。
    方法:用体外/体内实验研究了HMGA1在iCCA中的意义。蛋白质印迹,qPCR,进行了双荧光素酶报告基因和免疫荧光分析以检查HMGA1诱导CCND1表达的机制。CCK-8,蛋白质印迹,transwell,进行3D球体形成和集落形成测定以预测CDK4/6抑制剂PI3K/mTOR抑制剂在iCCA治疗中的潜在作用。还使用异种移植小鼠模型来确定与iCCA中的HMGA1相关的组合治疗策略的功效。
    结果:HMGA1促进了细胞增殖,上皮-间质转化(EMT),iCCA的转移和干性。体外研究表明HMGA1通过促进CCND1转录和激活PI3K信号通路诱导CCND1表达。Palbociclib(CDK4/6抑制剂)可以抑制iCCA增殖,移民和入侵,尤其是前3天。尽管在HIBEpic模型中有更稳定的生长衰减,我们在每个肝胆肿瘤细胞模型中观察到大量生长。PF-04691502(PI3K/mTOR抑制剂)表现出与palbociclib相似的效果。与单药治疗相比,该组合通过对CCND1、CDK4/6和PI3K途径的更有效和稳定的抑制来保持对iCCA的有效抑制。此外,与单一疗法相比,该联合疗法对常见下游信号通路的抑制更为显著.
    结论:我们的研究揭示了CDK4/6和PI3K/mTOR通路双重抑制在iCCA中的潜在治疗作用,并为iCCA的临床治疗提出了新的范式。
    BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a highly aggressive cancer that is challenging to diagnose at an early stage. Despite recent advances in combination chemotherapy, drug resistance limits the therapeutic value of this regimen. iCCA reportedly harbors high HMGA1 expression and pathway alterations, especially hyperactivation of the CCND1/CDK4/CDK6 and PI3K signaling pathway. In this study, we explored the potential of targeting CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibition to treat iCCA.
    METHODS: The significance of HMGA1 in iCCA was investigated with in vitro/vivo experiments. Western blot, qPCR, dual-luciferase reporter and immunofluorescence assays were performed to examine the mechanism of HMGA1 induced CCND1 expression. CCK-8, western blot, transwell, 3D sphere formation and colony formation assays were conducted to predict the potential role of CDK4/6 inhibitors PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in iCCA treatment. Xenograft mouse models were also used to determine the efficacy of combination treatment strategies related to HMGA1 in iCCA.
    RESULTS: HMGA1 promoted the proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymaltransition (EMT), metastasis and stemness of iCCA. In vitro studies showed that HMGA1 induced CCND1 expression via promoting CCND1 transcription and activating the PI3K signaling pathway. Palbociclib(CDK4/6 inhibitor) could suppress iCCA proliferation, migration and invasion, especially during the first 3 days. Although there was more stable attenuation of growth in the HIBEpic model, we observed substantial outgrowth in each hepatobiliary cancer cell model. PF-04691502(PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) exhibited similar effects to palbociclib. Compared with monotherapy, the combination retained effective inhibition for iCCA through the more potent and steady inhibition of CCND1, CDK4/6 and PI3K pathway. Furthermore, more significant inhibition of the common downstream signaling pathways is observed with the combination compared to monotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals the potential therapeutic role of dual inhibition of CDK4/6 and PI3K/mTOR pathways in iCCA, and proposes a new paradigm for the clinical treatment of iCCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:肝内胆管癌(iCCA)是一种罕见的肝脏恶性肿瘤,预后不良,在过去的十年中,发病率有所增加。大多数患者表现为晚期疾病,不适合手术切除,那些能够接受切除的人,经常发展为复发性疾病。随着精准医学的兴起,已经描述了iCCA的几种可靶向突变,目前正在研究中.改进的靶向治疗的发展对于延长总生存期(OS)至关重要。iCCA靶向药物的使用目前是几项正在进行的随机对照试验的重点.这篇综述的目的是总结目前的诊断指南,手术切除,和系统治疗,其中包括正在进行的临床试验研究靶向治疗。
    方法:使用MEDLINE/PubMed进行了全面审查,最终搜索日期为2022年10月1日。在PubMed中,术语“肝内胆管癌,\"\"胆管癌\",“靶向治疗”,和“临床试验”进行了搜索。
    UNASSIGNED:iCCA的主要治疗方法是R0切除和淋巴结清扫。手术切除后,新指南推荐6个月的卡培他滨辅助治疗.在晚期或转移性疾病患者中,全身化疗在延长这些患者的生存期方面发挥着重要作用.
    结论:手术切除是治疗的主要手段,随后是6个月的卡培他滨辅助治疗。虽然需要通过随机对照试验获得更多数据,靶向治疗,包括成纤维细胞生长因子受体(FGFR),异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH),和红细胞癌基因B2(ErbB2)抑制剂作为当前iCCA护理标准的辅助手段提供了有希望的结果,特别是在患有不可切除疾病的个体中。随着临床试验数据的获得,关于使用靶向治疗的未来建议将出现。
    OBJECTIVE: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare hepatic malignancy with poor prognosis, which has seen an increased incidence over the last decade. Most patients present with advanced disease that is not amenable to surgical resection, and those who are able to undergo resection, frequently develop recurrent disease. With the rise of precision medicine, several targetable mutations have been described for iCCA and are currently under investigations. The development of improved targeted therapies is critical to prolonged overall survival (OS), and the use of targeted agents for iCCA is currently the focus of several ongoing randomized controlled trials. The objective of this review is to summarize current guidelines for diagnosis, surgical resection, and systemic treatment, which includes ongoing clinical trials investigated targeted therapies.
    METHODS: A comprehensive review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed with the end search date of October 1, 2022. In PubMed the terms \"intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,\" \"bile duct cancer\", \"targeted therapies\", and \"clinical trials\" were searched.
    UNASSIGNED: The mainstay of treatment for iCCA is R0 resection with lymphadenectomy. Following surgical resection, new guidelines recommend 6 months of adjuvant capecitabine. Among patients with advanced or metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy plays a significant role in prolonging survival for these patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection represents the mainstay of treatment followed by 6 months of adjuvant capecitabine. While additional data is needed through randomized controlled trials, targeted therapies including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), and erythroblastic oncogene B2 (ErbB2) inhibitors offer promising results as adjuncts to current standard of care in iCCA, particularly among individuals with unresectable disease. Future recommendations regarding the use of targeted therapy will emerge as clinical trial data become available.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号