interstitial brachytherapy

间质性近距离放射治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们比较了两种加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)技术之间的靶和危险器官(OAR)的剂量学特征以及初步临床结果。
    方法:回顾性分析了44例诊断为左侧早期乳腺癌的患者,这些患者使用间质近距离放射治疗(IB)或立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)和射波刀(CK)进行了APBI治疗。比较目标和OAR的剂量学参数。初步临床结果,包括肿瘤控制和急性毒性,进行了分析。
    结果:CK治疗计划显示出更好的心脏剂量节约效果。CK和IB组在V150cGy时心脏的辐射剂量分别为24.4%和60.4%,分别(p<0.001),而CK和IB组的平均心脏剂量为107.4cGy和204cGy,分别(p<0.001)。在IB组中,心脏D1c.c.和同侧肺接受较低剂量,没有任何重大差异。CK组和IB组的中位随访时间分别为28.6个月和61.3个月,分别。随访期间没有患者死于乳腺癌或心脏事件。IB组中的一名患者发生了颈部局部复发事件。
    结论:由CK计划的APBI被证明对心脏有更好的剂量节省作用,以及与目标更好的一致性和同质性。CK是一种非侵入性治疗,具有最小的急性毒性和有希望的肿瘤控制。
    BACKGROUND: We compared the dosimetric characteristics of the target and organs at risk (OARs) as well as the preliminary clinical outcomes between two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques.
    METHODS: Forty-four patients diagnosed with left-sided early breast cancer who underwent APBI using either interstitial brachytherapy (IB) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with CyberKnife (CK) were retrospectively reviewed. The dosimetric parameters of the target and OARs were compared. Preliminary clinical outcomes, including tumor control and acute toxicity, were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Treatment plans with CK demonstrated a better cardiac dose-sparing effect. Radiation doses to the heart at V150cGy for the CK and IB groups were 24.4 % and 60.4 %, respectively (p < 0.001), while the mean heart doses for the CK and IB groups were 107.4 cGy and 204 cGy, respectively (p < 0.001). The heart D1c.c. and the ipsilateral lung received a lower dose in the IB group, without any significant differences. The median follow-up time in the CK and IB groups was 28.6 and 61.3 months, respectively. No patients died from either breast cancer or cardiac events during follow-up. A locoregional recurrence event at the neck occurred in one patient within the IB group.
    CONCLUSIONS: APBI planned by CK was shown to have a better dose-sparing effect on the heart, as well as better conformity and homogeneity to the target. CK is a non-invasive treatment which showed minimal acute toxicity and promising tumor control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:3D打印模板用于腔内/间质近距离放射治疗(3DP-IC/IS)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)。我们在一年内两次应用失效模式和效应分析(FMEA)来提高3DP-IC/IS的安全性。
    方法:建立风险评估组。我们为3DP-IC/IS程序创建了流程图,识别潜在故障模式(FM)并评估发生情况(O),可检测性(D),严重性(S),和风险优先数(RPN=O*D*S)。高RPN值识别高风险FM,通过根本原因分析确定质量控制(QC)方法。一年后进行了第二次FMEA。
    结果:3DP-IC/IS过程包括10个主要步骤,48个子进程,和54FMs。初始RPN值范围为4.50至171.00(中位数50.50;平均52.18)。确定了十个高风险FM:(1)不合理的针轨设计(171.00/85.50),(2)非共面针头标签识别失败(126.00/64.00),(3)模板模型重建失败(121.50/62.50),(4)纱布填充不当(112.00/60.25),(5)针位不良(112.00/52.50)。在第二次评估期间,QC干预措施降低了所有高风险RPN值。
    结论:提出了一种可行的3DP-IC/IS工艺。员工培训,自动针路径规划,插入指导图,模板检查,系统调试,和模板设计的改进有效地提高了过程的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: 3D-printed templates are used in intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (3DP-IC/IS) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We applied failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) twice in one year to improve 3DP-IC/IS safety.
    METHODS: A risk assessment group was established. We created a process map for 3DP-IC/IS procedures, identifying potential failure modes (FMs) and evaluating occurrence (O), detectability (D), severity (S), and risk priority number (RPN = O*D*S). High RPN values identified high-risk FMs, and quality control (QC) methods were determined by root cause analysis. A second FMEA was performed a year later.
    RESULTS: The 3DP-IC/IS process included 10 main steps, 48 subprocesses, and 54 FMs. Initial RPN values ranged from 4.50 to 171.00 (median 50.50; average 52.18). Ten high-risk FMs were identified: (1) unreasonable needle track design (171.00/85.50), (2) noncoplanar needle label identification failure (126.00/64.00), (3) template model reconstruction failure (121.50/62.50), (4) improper gauze filling (112.00/60.25), (5) poor needle position (112.00/52.50). QC interventions lowered all high-risk RPN values during the second assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: A feasible 3DP-IC/IS process was proposed. Staff training, automatic needle path planning, insertion guidance diagrams, template checking, system commissioning, and template design improvements effectively enhanced process safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CT血管造影可能是在腔内和间质近距离放射疗法联合治疗宫颈癌时避免动脉穿刺的合适方法。有关该技术的文献中的数据很少。我们介绍了这种方法,并收集了2021年5月至2024年4月在我们部门接受治疗的患者的近距离放射治疗数据。我们分析了涂抹器的亚型,针头插入(计划与植入),植入深度和CT血管造影在选择针轨迹和插入深度中的作用。通过该方案治疗的患者均未经历心房穿刺和随后的出血。借助CT血管造影准确选择针头位置,并适当覆盖近距离放射治疗目标并避免危险器官。CT血管造影是在间质近距离放射治疗期间引导针插入的有前途的方法。
    CT angiography might be a suitable procedure to avoid arterial puncture in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer curatively treated with combined chemoradiation and brachytherapy boost. Data in the literature about this technique are scarce. We introduced this method and collected brachytherapy data from patients treated in our department between May 2021 and April 2024. We analyzed the applicator subtype, needle insertion (planned versus implanted), implanted depth and the role of CT angiography in selecting needle trajectories and insertion depths. None of the patients managed through this protocol experienced atrial puncture and consequent hemorrhage. Needle positions were accurately selected with the aid of CT angiography with proper coverage of brachytherapy targets and avoidance of organs at risk. CT angiography is a promising method for guiding needle insertion during interstitial brachytherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在宫颈癌的治疗中,近距离放射治疗起着至关重要的作用。最常用的技术是腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)。如果ICBT在技术上不可行,或者可能导致次优剂量分布,建议使用间质性近距离放射治疗(ISBT)。通过这项研究,我们想研究妇科癌症间质近距离放射治疗的临床结果和剂量学细节。
    方法:我们分析了2013年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在我们研究所进行的妇科恶性肿瘤间质近距离放射治疗(ISBT)的临床结果和剂量学细节。
    结果:共分析了42例间质近距离放射治疗(ISBT)的详细信息。37例患者患有宫颈癌,5例患者患有阴道癌。在大多数患者中,ISBT给药方案为三个部分各7Gy。D2cc至直肠,膀胱,乙状结肠和肠道为4.88Gy,5.62Gy,分别为3.57Gy和2.47Gy。平均CTV体积为129.89cc。CTV联合EBRT和ISBT的EQD2剂量为85.88Gy。ISBT对CTV的D90和D100分别占处方剂量的111.96%和68.21%。在5例(12%)患者中观察到III/IV级毒性。1年和2年的局部控制率分别为88%和85.7%。DFS在1年,2年和3年占80.7%,分别为72.3%和65.7%。操作系统在1年,2年,4年和5年分别为92.5%,65.5%,分别为59.5%和42.3%。
    结论:对于需要间质性近距离放射治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤,使用MUPIT植入物进行基于CT的3D成像剂量测定是可行的选择。鉴于在毒性方面的良好临床结果,本地控制,具有可接受的GEC-ESTRO剂量测定数据的DFS和OS,如果设施可用,并且在临床情况下需要ISBT,我们建议常规使用间质近距离放射治疗.
    BACKGROUND: In management of Carcinoma Cervix, Brachytherapy plays a crucial role. Most commonly used technique is Intracavitary Brachytherapy (ICBT). In cases where ICBT is not technically feasible or it may result in suboptimal dose distribution, Interstitial Brachytherapy (ISBT) is recommended. With this study we wanted to study the clinical outcome and dosimetric details of interstitial brachytherapy in gynecological cancers.
    METHODS: We analysed clinicaloutcome and dosimetric details of interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) done for gynecological malignancies in our institute during the period 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2020.
    RESULTS: Total of 42 interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) details were analysed.37 patients had Carcinoma Cervix and 5 patients had Carcinoma Vagina. In the majority of the patients, ISBT dosage schedule was three fractions 7Gy each. D2cc to rectum, bladder, sigmoid and bowel were 4.88 Gy, 5.62 Gy, 3.57 Gy and 2.47 Gy respectively. Mean CTV volume was 129.89 cc. EQD2 dose to CTV combining EBRT and ISBT dose was 85.88 Gy. D90 and D100 to CTV from ISBT were 111.96% and 68.21 % of prescribed dose respectively. Grade III/IV toxicities were seen in 5 (12%) patients. Local control rates at 1year &2 years were 88% & 85.7% respectively. DFS at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were 80.7%, 72.3% and 65.7% respectively. OS at 1year, 2 years, 4 years and 5 years were 92.5%, 65.5%, 59.5% and 42.3% respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: 3D imagebased dosimetry with CT based planning using MUPIT implant is a feasible option for gynecological malignancies warranting interstitial brachytherapy. In view of good clinical outcomes in terms of toxicity profile, Local control, DFS and OS with acceptable GEC-ESTRO dosimetric data, we recommend routine use interstitial brachytherapy if facilities are available and in clinical situations were ISBT is indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:图像引导自适应近距离放射治疗(IGABT)在治疗宫颈癌时显示出出色的局部控制率和低毒性。对于腔内/间质(IC/IS)近距离放射治疗(BT),几个施药器是商业上可用的。威尼斯(Elekta,瑞典),先进的妇科涂药器,设计用于IC/ISBT治疗局部晚期宫颈癌。Venezia涂药器有两种类型的间隙针:圆形针和锋利针。一般来说,圆针更安全,因为它比锋利的针损伤危险器官的风险更小。然而,目前尚无证据表明,对于IC/ISBT中的Venezia涂药器,圆针优于尖针.在这里,我们记录了我们在IC/ISBT中使用Venezia涂药器同时使用圆形和锋利针头治疗宫颈癌的经验。
    方法:一名71岁女性被诊断为临床分期T2bN0M0和国际妇产科联合会IIB期宫颈鳞状细胞癌。明确治疗,包括高剂量率的BT增强,计划在IC/ISBT中使用带有Venezia涂抹器的圆针。在第一次和第二次BT期间插入四根间质圆针后,在子宫颈和卵圆形之间检测到一个出乎意料的大间隙(1.5厘米)。因此,在第三次和第四次BT会议期间,我们将锋利的针头与Venezia涂药器一起用于IC/ISBT。在第三次和第四次BT会议期间,三根锋利的针被牢固地插入。
    结论:研究结果表明,对于使用Venezia涂药器进行IC/ISBT的宫颈癌患者,不应使用间质圆针。
    BACKGROUND: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) demonstrates an excellent local control rate and low toxicity while treating cervical cancer. For intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) brachytherapy (BT), several applicators are commercially available. Venezia (Elekta, Sweden), an advanced gynecological applicator, is designed for IC/IS BT for treating locally advanced cervical cancer. There are two types of interstitial needles for the Venezia applicator: the round needle and sharp needle. Generally, a round needle is safer because it has less risk of damaging the organ at risk than a sharp needle. However, there is currently no evidence to suggest that a round needle is better than a sharp needle for the Venezia applicator in IC/IS BT. Herein, we documented our experience of using both round and sharp needles with the Venezia applicator in IC/IS BT for cervical cancer.
    METHODS: A 71-year-old woman was diagnosed with clinical stage T2bN0M0 and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Definitive therapy, including a high-dose-rate BT boost, was planned using a round needle with the Venezia applicator in IC/IS BT. After inserting four interstitial round needles during the first and second BT sessions, an unexpectedly large gap (1.5 cm) was detected between the cervix and ovoid. We therefore used a sharp needle with the Venezia applicator for IC/IS BT during the third and fourth BT sessions. Three sharp needles were firmly inserted during the third and fourth BT sessions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that the interstitial round needle should not be used for cervical cancer patients undergoing IC/IS BT using the Venezia applicator.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)提供了肿瘤细胞性的测量。我们评估了从外部束放射治疗(EBRT)DWI和近距离放射治疗(BT)之前获得的表观扩散系数(ADC)值的潜力,以预测大体积宫颈癌的完全代谢反应(CMR)。
    方法:临床和DWI(b值=500s/mm2)数据来自接受间质BT的高风险临床目标体积(HR-CTV)>30cc的患者。在共同配准的T2加权图像上对体积进行轮廓化,并计算第90百分位ADC值。患者通过CMR(在BT后三个月通过PET-CT定义)进行分层。CMR与第90百分位数ADC值和其他临床因素的关系(国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)阶段,组织学,肿瘤和HR-CTV大小,治疗前血红蛋白,和年龄)在单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析中均进行了评估。Youden的J统计量用于确定阈值。
    结果:在45名患者中,28人(62%)实现了CMR。关于CMR的单变量分析,只有第90百分位数的ADC值是显著的(p=0.029),而其他影像学和临床因素则不显著.临界显著因素是HR-CTV大小(p=0.054)和化疗周期数(p=0.078)。在多变量分析中,第90个百分位数的ADC(p<0.0001)和HR-CTV大小(p<0.003)高度显着。第90百分位ADC值高于2.10×10-3mm2/s的患者达到CMR的可能性是5.33倍(95%CI,1.35-24.4)。
    结论:临床DWI可能有助于对接受间质性BT治疗的大宫颈癌患者进行风险分层。
    BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) provides a measurement of tumor cellularity. We evaluated the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from post-external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) DWI and prior to brachytherapy (BT) to predict for complete metabolic response (CMR) in bulky cervical cancer.
    METHODS: Clinical and DWI (b value = 500 s/mm2) data were obtained from patients undergoing interstitial BT with high-risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) > 30 cc. Volumes were contoured on co-registered T2 weighted images and 90th percentile ADC values were calculated. Patients were stratified by CMR (defined by PET-CT at three months post-BT). Relation of CMR with 90th percentile ADC values and other clinical factors (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, tumor and HR-CTV size, pre-treatment hemoglobin, and age) was assessed both in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Youden\'s J statistic was used to identify a threshold value.
    RESULTS: Among 45 patients, twenty-eight (62%) achieved a CMR. On univariate analysis for CMR, only 90th percentile ADC value was significant (p = 0.029) while other imaging and clinical factors were not. Borderline significant factors were HR-CTV size (p = 0.054) and number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.078). On multivariate analysis 90th percentile ADC (p < 0.0001) and HR-CTV size (p < 0.003) were highly significant. Patients with 90th percentile ADC values above 2.10 × 10- 3 mm2/s were 5.33 (95% CI, 1.35-24.4) times more likely to achieve CMR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinical DWI may serve to risk-stratify patients undergoing interstitial BT for bulky cervical cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:复发性寡转移妇科恶性肿瘤的治疗可能涉及靶向手术,热消融,或CT引导的高剂量率间质近距离放射治疗消融(CT-HDR-IBTA)。这项研究的目的是描述CT-HDR-IBTA治疗寡转移妇科恶性肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在机构审查委员会批准(IRB)和遵守1996年健康保险流通和责任法案(HIPAA)的情况下,我们检索了我们的数据库,收集了2012-2022年所有接受CT-HDR-IBTA随访的寡转移妇科癌症患者的单臂研究队列.审查电子记录以确定相关的临床病理变量,包括患者的人口统计学,先前的治疗,临床课程,本地控制,和随访影像学的局部和远处复发。
    结果:研究队列包括34例接受CT-HDR-IBTA治疗的复发性少部子宫(n=17)患者中的37个病灶,子宫颈(n=1),或卵巢癌(n=16),平均病变大小为2.5厘米,患者平均年龄为61.4岁。每个病变的平均放射剂量为23.8Gy,分1.8次,中位随访时间为24.0个月。CTHDRITBA的主要疗效为73%,中位无进展生存期为8.0个月(95%CI3.6-12.8个月),58%的患者在43个月时仍存活,中位总生存期未达到。1级不良事件的发生率为22%,没有任何2级,3级或4级事件。
    结论:CTHDRIBTA在大量预处理的队列中治疗寡转移妇科癌症是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND: Treatment of recurrent oligometastatic gynecologic malignancy may involve targeted surgery, thermal ablation, or CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy ablation (CT-HDR-IBTA). The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of CT-HDR-IBTA for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies.
    METHODS: With institutional review board approval (IRB) approval and compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliance, we searched our database to assemble a single-arm study cohort of all patients with oligometastatic gynecologic cancers who underwent CT-HDR-IBTA from 2012-2022 with follow-up. The electronic record was reviewed to determine relevant clinicopathological variables including patient demographics, prior treatments, clinical course, local control, and local and distant recurrence with follow-up imaging.
    RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 37 lesions in 34 patients treated with CT-HDR-IBTA for recurrent oligometastatic uterine (n = 17), cervix (n = 1), or ovarian cancer (n = 16) with an average lesion size of 2.5 cm with an average patient age of 61.4 years. Each lesion was treated with an average radiation dose of 23.8 Gy in 1.8 fractions and a median follow-up time of 24.0 months. The primary efficacy of CT HDR ITBA was 73% with a median progression-free survival of 8.0 months (95% CI 3.6-12.8 months) and with 58% of patients still alive at 43 months with median overall survival not reached. The rate of Grade 1 adverse events was 22% without any Grade 2, 3 or 4 events.
    CONCLUSIONS: CT HDR IBTA was safe and effective for treating oligometastatic gynecologic cancers in a heavily pretreated cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的报告下眼睑基底细胞癌(BCC)患者高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗(BT)的疗效,并评估剂量学参数与急性和晚期毒性之间的关系。材料和方法2012年1月至2019年12月期间,对诊断为下眼睑活检证实的BCC接受HDRBT治疗的患者进行回顾性单中心研究。处方剂量为36Gy至40Gy,分9至10分,每天两次,超过五天。主要终点是本地控制,次要终点是急性和晚期毒性,根据CTCAEv4.0注册。在定性量表(CAIB量表)上评价美容结果。根据Kaplan-Meier检验计算局部控制。使用两个样本T检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验来确定剂量测定参数与副作用之间的关联。结果58例患者中位年龄76岁。在这些患者中,55.2%接受佐剂HDRBT,44.8%接受自由基HDRBT。在44个月的中位随访中,有四次局部复发,在佐剂和自由基组中,在四年内实现局部控制的概率为95%和100%,分别。只有一个3级事件(放射性皮炎)的患者中有76%发生了急性毒性。晚期毒性占56%。8例患者在随访期间接受了3级白内障的治疗。93%的患者的美容效果非常好或非常好。急性结膜充血与眼球接受的剂量密切相关(体积为0.1cc,1cc,和2cc)(p<0.05)。结论间质性HDRBT治疗下睑BCC具有良好的局部控制能力。可接受的长期副作用,和良好的美容效果。
    Objective To report the outcomes with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) treatment in patients with lower eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and to evaluate the relationship between dosimetric parameters and acute and late toxicities. Material and methods A retrospective unicentric study with patients diagnosed with lower eyelid biopsy-proven BCC treated with HDR BT between January 2012 and December 2019. The prescribed dose was 36 Gy to 40 Gy in 9 to 10 fractions, twice daily, over five days. The primary endpoint was local control, and the secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities, registered according to CTCAE v4.0. The cosmetic result was evaluated on a qualitative scale (the CAIB scale). Local control was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier test. Two sample T-tests and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to determine the association between dosimetric parameters and side effects. Results Fifty-eight patients with a median age of 76 years were included. Among these patients, 55.2% received adjuvant HDR BT and 44.8% received radical HDR BT. At a median follow-up of 44 months, there were four local relapses, achieving a probability of local control at four years of 95% and 100% in the adjuvant and radical groups, respectively. Acute toxicity occurred in 76% of patients with only one grade 3 event (radiation dermatitis). Late toxicity was present in 56%. Eight patients underwent treatment for grade 3 cataracts during follow-up. Cosmetic results were excellent or very good in 93% of patients. Acute conjunctival hyperemia is strongly associated with the dose received by the ocular globe (volumes of 0.1cc, 1cc, and 2 cc) (p<0.05). Conclusion Lower eyelid BCC treatment with interstitial HDR BT is associated with excellent local control, acceptable long-term side effects, and good cosmetic results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    转移性宫颈癌的治疗是一个棘手的问题。目前,国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南推荐化疗联合贝伐单抗治疗复发或转移性宫颈癌.尽管如此,标准治疗后复发率高,生存率低。我们迫切需要实现复发或转移性宫颈癌的多模式治疗方法。
    我们报告一例IB2期宫颈鳞癌患者,在接受一线标准治疗后短期内出现多发转移,她在全身治疗后接受了间质近距离放射治疗,结果令人鼓舞。患者在一线治疗结束后9个月出现疑似腹股沟淋巴结转移,腹股沟淋巴结多发转移,前腹壁,17个月后右肺.由于患者在全身治疗后腹股沟淋巴结残留,她接受了3D打印模板引导下的腹股沟淋巴结间质近距离放射治疗和维持治疗.到2023年9月,她取得了良好的治疗结果,无进展生存期(PFS)为36个月。
    根据我们的患者反应,当一线治疗后,早期宫颈鳞癌短期内发生多发转移时,我们可以考虑实施局部治疗联合全身治疗.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment of metastatic cervical cancer is a tricky issue. Currently, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommends chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Still, the recurrence rate is high and the survival rate is low after standard treatment. We urgently need to achieve a multimodal therapy approach for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: We report the case of a patient with stage IB2 cervical squamous carcinoma who developed multiple metastases within a short term after receiving first-line standard treatment, and she underwent interstitial brachytherapy after systemic therapy with an encouraging outcome. The patient developed suspected inguinal lymph node metastases after 9 months at the end of first-line therapy and multiple metastases in the inguinal lymph nodes, anterior abdominal wall, and right lung after 17 months. As the patient had residual inguinal lymph nodes after systemic therapy, she received 3D-printed template-guided interstitial brachytherapy to the inguinal lymph nodes and maintenance therapy. By Sep 2023, she had achieved a good treatment outcome with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 36 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on our patient response, when multiple metastases develop in the short term in early-stage cervical squamous carcinoma after first-line therapy, we may consider implementing local therapy combined with systemic therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近距离放射治疗(BT)是局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)放射治疗的重要组成部分,近几十年来发展迅速。自从三维图像引导自适应近距离放射治疗(3D-IGABT)出现以来,磁共振成像(MRI)已成为图像引导的主要方式。同时,其他成像模式,比如计算机断层扫描,18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射体层摄影术,超声,它们的组合也得到了广泛的研究。材料和方法:我们回顾了用于目标描绘和计划的不同成像方式的研究。IGABT中的新兴技术,如实时图像指导和3D打印也包括在内。我们总结了其可行性的研究,并集中于其临床结果。结果:MRI引导的BT是金标准,CT引导下BT应用最广泛。其他方法在剂量学研究和初步结果中显示出可行性和有希望的疗效。与这些方法相关的长期临床结果需要进一步阐明。结论:由于3D-IGABT得到了有希望的临床结果的验证,BTforLACC的未来有望朝着更有效的图像引导程序的完善迈进。此外,实现操作共识和推动技术进步,以减轻与不同成像模式相关的固有限制仍然至关重要。
    Background: Brachytherapy (BT) is a critical component of radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), and it has rapidly developed in recent decades. Since the advent of three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (3D-IGABT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the primary modality for image guidance. Meanwhile, other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and their combinations have also been widely studied. Materials and methods: We reviewed studies on different imaging modalities utilized for target delineation and planning. Emerging techniques in IGABT like real-time image guidance and 3D printing were also included. We summarized research on their feasibility and concentrated on their clinical outcomes. Results: MRI-guided BT was the gold standard, and CT-guided BT was the most widely applied. Other modalities have shown feasibility and promising efficacy in dosimetry studies and preliminary outcomes. The longer-term clinical outcomes associated with these approaches require further elucidation. Conclusions: As 3D-IGABT was validated by promising clinical outcomes, the future of BT for LACC is expected to progress toward the refinement of more effective image-guided procedures. Moreover, achieving operational consensus and driving technological advancements to mitigate the inherent limitations associated with different imaging modes remain essential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号