inpatient setting

住院设置
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    行为激活(BA)和认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明是抑郁症的有效治疗方法。以前的研究主要集中在小组或个人背景下的门诊治疗。本研究旨在比较BA与BA组治疗的疗效。CBT,住院时嵌入心身康复治疗。
    375名住院患者被随机分配到BA(N=174)或CBT(N=201)。我们使用既定的抑郁量表,如贝克抑郁量表II(BDI-II,自我评级),抑郁症状快速量表(QIDS;专家评级)和抑郁行为激活量表(BADS)评估治疗过程中和随访(4-6个月)的变化。此外,我们用Mini-ICF-APP测量残疾相关功能,参考国际功能分类建立的评级量表,残疾与健康(ICF)。进行了重复测量的多水平模型,以检查患者随机效应随时间变化的组间差异。
    两组患者在治疗结束时抑郁症状显著减轻(d=0.83BAvs.d=1.08CBT;BDI-II)和4至6个月后的随访(d=0.97BAvs.d=1.33CBT,BDI-II;d=1.17BAvs.d=1.09CBT,QIDS)。治疗方法之间没有显著差异。在BA中,症状至少减少了50%,分别减少了53.7%和54.2%。分别为CBT。报告的激活水平从治疗前到治疗后增加(d=0.76BAvs.d=0.70CBT),在两种形式的随访之前,在治疗结束之间显示增量损失(d=0.28BAvs.d=0.29CBT)。
    两种治疗方法均在治疗结束和随访时显著改善症状学和功能。从而首次证明了BA在康复诊所的实用性。考虑到它对认知能力的要求较低,更容易实现,BA被证明是其他心理治疗方法的良好替代品。
    UNASSIGNED: Behavioral activation (BA) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have shown to be efficacious treatment methods for depression. Previous studies focused mostly on the outpatient treatment either in group or individual setting. The present study aimed at comparing the efficacy of group treatment BA vs. CBT, when embedded in inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: 375 inpatients were randomly assigned to either BA (N = 174) or CBT (N = 201). We used established scales for depression such as the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II, self-rating), the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS; expert rating) and the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) to assess changes over the course of the treatment and at follow-up (4 to 6 months). In addition, we measured disability-related functioning with the Mini-ICF-APP, a rating scale built in reference to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Multilevel models with repeated measures were conducted to examine the differences between groups in relation to change over time with patients\' random effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Both group formats showed substantial reduction in depressive symptoms at the end of treatment (d= 0.83 BA vs. d= 1.08 CBT; BDI-II) and at follow-up after 4 to 6 months (d = 0.97 BA vs. d = 1.33 CBT, BDI-II; and d = 1.17 BA vs. d = 1.09 CBT, QIDS). There were no significant differences between treatment approaches. At least 50% symptom reduction was achieved by 53.7% and 54.2% in BA vs. CBT respectively. Reported activation levels increased from pre- to posttreatment (d = 0.76 BA vs. d = 0.70CBT), while showing loss of increment between the end of the treatment until follow up in both formats (d = 0.28 BA vs. d = 0.29 CBT).
    UNASSIGNED: Both modalities led to significant improvement of symptomatology and functioning at the end of the treatment and at follow-up, thus for the first time demonstrating the practicability of BA in rehabilitation clinics. Considering its lower requirements regarding cognitive abilities and its easier implementation, BA proved to be a good alternative to other psychotherapeutic treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本系统评价的目的是确定和描述心力衰竭(HF)患者在整个过程中的信息需求。搜索了六个数据库(APAPsycINFO,CINAHLUltimate,Embase,护理护理,Medline所有,和WebofScience核心合集)从成立到2023年2月。搜索策略是利用PICO框架开发的。任何方法学设计的潜在研究都被认为是通过雪球手搜索纳入的。来自收录文章的数据由审阅者提取,提取的准确性由另一位作者独立交叉检查。质量评价使用混合方法评价工具进行评价。根据无荟萃分析报告指南的综合,使用叙述性综合来分析所有结果。包括25项研究(15项定量和10项定性)。社会经济,文化,并考虑了影响信息需求的人口因素。门诊患者的三大信息需求包括一般HF信息,体征和症状以及疾病管理策略。对于住院病人来说,药物,危险因素,和一般HF被报告为最高需求。这些不同的需求强调了在不同阶段进行量身定制教育的重要性。此外,审查确定了全球代表性方面的差距,来自非洲和南美的有限研究,强调包容性研究的必要性。调查结果警告不要由于不同的报告方法而过度概括。实际影响要求对文化敏感的干预措施,以解决细微差别的HF患者的需求,虽然未来的研究必须优先考虑标准化报告,考虑不同的患者旅程时间点,并尽量减少偏差,以增强可靠性和适用性。
    The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe information needs for individuals with heart failure (HF) throughout their patient journey. Six databases were searched (APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Ultimate, Embase, Emcare Nursing, Medline ALL, and Web of Science Core Collection) from inception to February 2023. Search strategies were developed utilizing the PICO framework. Potential studies of any methodological design were considered for inclusion through a snowball hand search. Data from the included articles were extracted by a reviewer, and the extraction accuracy was independently cross-checked by another author. Quality appraisal was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was used to analyze all the outcomes according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines. Twenty-five studies (15 quantitative and 10 qualitative) were included. Socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic factors influencing information needs were considered. The top three information needs for outpatients included general HF information, signs and symptoms and disease management strategies. For inpatients, medications, risk factors, and general HF were reported as the top needs. These divergent needs emphasize the importance of tailored education at different stages. Additionally, the review identified gaps in global representation, with limited studies from Africa and South America, underscoring the need for inclusive research. The findings caution against overgeneralization due to varied reporting methods. Practical implications call for culturally sensitive interventions to address nuanced HF patients\' needs, while future research must prioritize standardized reporting, consider diverse patient journey timepoints, and minimize biases for enhanced reliability and applicability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定住院癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的预测因子,并使用人口统计学方法开发预测模型。临床,实验室数据。我们的分析表明,患者群体被归类为非常高风险,高风险,低血红蛋白水平和肾病患者发生VTE的风险显著增加.我们开发了一个VTE风险评估模型(RAM),具有中等的歧视性表现,高特异性,和阴性预测值,表明其在识别无VTE风险患者方面的潜在效用。然而,模型的阳性预测值和敏感性较低,原因是分析人群中VTE的患病率较低.需要未来的研究来分析其他预测因素,并验证我们的VTERAM的有效性,以安全地排除VTE,将其与住院癌症患者的其他VTERAM进行比较,并解决我们研究的任何局限性。
    This study aimed to identify predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized cancer patients and develop a predictive model using demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Our analysis showed that patient groups categorized under a very high risk, and high risk, patients with low hemoglobin levels and renal disease were at a significantly increased risk of developing VTE. We developed a VTE risk-assessment model (RAM) with moderate discriminatory performance, high specificity, and negative predictive value, indicating its potential utility in identifying patients without VTE risk. However, the model\'s positive predictive value and sensitivity were low due to the low prevalence of VTE within the analyzed population. Future studies are needed to analyze additional predictive factors, and to validate the effectiveness of our VTE RAM to safely rule out VTE, compare it with other VTE RAMs in hospitalized cancer patients, and address any limitations of our study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:探索健康专业人员对住院成年人身体活动和久坐行为的看法,以了解在这种环境中导致这些行为的因素。
    方法:五个数据库(PubMed,MEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO和CINAHL)于2023年3月进行了搜索。
    方法:主题综合。纳入的研究使用定性方法探讨了卫生专业人员对住院成年人的身体活动和/或久坐行为的看法。研究资格由两名评审员独立评估,并对结果进行主题分析。使用McMaster关键审查表评估质量,并使用GRADE-CERQual评估结果的信心。
    结果:来自40项研究的结果探讨了来自12个卫生学科的1408名卫生专业人员的观点。确定的中心主题是,由于跨学科住院景观中存在的多层次影响的复杂相互作用,因此在这种情况下,体育活动不是优先事项。分主题,医院是个休息的地方,没有足够的资源来使运动成为优先事项,每个人的工作都不是任何人的工作,政策和领导驱动优先事项,支持中心主题。纳入研究的质量是可变的;在改进的评分系统中,关键评估得分范围为36%至95%。对调查结果的信心中等到较高。
    结论:住院患者的身体活动不是优先事项,即使在优化功能是关键的康复单位。将重点转向功能恢复和返回家园可能会促进积极的运动文化,并得到适当资源的支持,领导力,政策,和跨学科团队。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore health professionals\' perspectives on physical activity and sedentary behaviour of hospitalised adults to understand factors that contribute to these behaviours in this environment.
    METHODS: Five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched in March 2023.
    METHODS: Thematic synthesis. Included studies explored perspectives of health professionals on the physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour of hospitalised adults using qualitative methods. Study eligibility was assessed independently by two reviewers and results thematically analysed. Quality was assessed using the McMaster Critical Review Form and confidence in findings assessed using GRADE-CERQual.
    RESULTS: Findings from 40 studies explored perspectives of over 1408 health professionals from 12 health disciplines. The central theme identified was that physical activity is not a priority in this setting due to the complex interplay of multilevel influences present in the interdisciplinary inpatient landscape. Subthemes, the hospital is a place for rest, there are not enough resources to make movement a priority, everyone\'s job is no one\'s job and policy and leadership drives priorities, supported the central theme. Quality of included studies was variable; critical appraisal scores ranged from 36% to 95% on a modified scoring system. Confidence in findings was moderate to high.
    CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity in the inpatient setting is not a priority, even in rehabilitation units where optimising function is the key. A shift in focus towards functional recovery and returning home may promote a positive movement culture that is supported by appropriate resources, leadership, policy, and the interdisciplinary team.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在了解儿童和青少年(CYP)的观点,父母和工作人员如何应对CYP在心理健康住院环境中进行的自我伤害事件。对CYP进行了半结构化访谈(n=6),父母(n=5)和心理健康专业人员(n=6)有这个问题的经验。使用反身性主题分析对数据进行了分析。确定了两个高级主题:(1)干预的门槛;(2)工作人员的人际属性。与会者普遍同意工作人员应该具备的人际交往技能,以便安全有效地与这些人群合作。工作人员和家长参与者之间对于使用限制性干预措施来管理该群体的自我伤害事件的适当阈值存在分歧。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步的工作来开发有效的方法来解决该人群的自我伤害,这些方法被认为是所有关键利益相关者都可以接受的。这项研究的结果可用于为未来的干预发展提供信息。
    This study aimed to understand the views of children and young people (CYP), parents and staff on how staff should respond to incidents of self-harm carried out by CYP in mental health inpatient settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CYP (n = 6), parents (n = 5) and mental health professionals (n = 6) with experience of this issue. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two superordinate themes were identified: (1) The threshold for intervening; and (2) Interpersonal attributes of staff. There was general agreement among participants about the interpersonal skills that staff should possess to work safely and effectively with this population. There was disagreement between staff and parent participants about the appropriate threshold for using restrictive interventions to manage incidents of self-harm for this group. Our findings suggest that further work is needed to develop effective approaches for addressing self-harm in this population which are considered acceptable to all key stakeholders. The results of this study could be used to inform future intervention development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期动员可以帮助减少住院期间发生的严重副作用,例如肌肉萎缩。然而,由于重症监护和重症监护的时间和人员短缺以及患者的安全风险,通常很难坚持每天两次二十分钟的推荐治疗时间。新的机器人技术可能是有效地为患者实现早期动员并减轻用户体力的一种方法。然而,目前,缺乏有关将这些技术整合到重症监护病房或康复病房等复杂治疗环境中的重要因素的知识。
    方法:来自科学的欧洲专家,使用半结构化访谈指南对机器人系统的技术开发和最终用户(n=13)进行了访谈,以确定将机器人系统集成到日常临床实践中的障碍和促进因素.他们被问及结构,影响整合的人员和环境因素,以及他们如何解决挑战。对COREQ标准进行了潜在内容分析。
    结果:我们发现了有关发展的相关因素,介绍,和机器人系统的常规。在这种情况下,成本,流程调整,缺乏豁免,缺乏制造商/开发商的支持被认为是挑战。易于处理,最终用户和医院决策者之间的联合决策,准确的工艺设计和最终用户和技术专家的机器人系统的联合开发被认为是促进因素。
    结论:将机器人辅助系统集成到住院患者环境中的集成和准备是一项涉及多方的复杂干预措施。这项研究为医院或制造商提供了证据,以简化永久使用的集成计划。
    背景:DRKS-ID:DRKS00023848;注册2020年10月12日。
    BACKGROUND: Early mobilization can help reduce severe side effects such as muscle atrophy that occur during hospitalization. However, due to time and staff shortages in intensive and critical care as well as safety risks for patients, it is often difficult to adhere to the recommended therapy time of twenty minutes twice a day. New robotic technologies might be one approach to achieve early mobilization effectively for patients and also relieve users from physical effort. Nevertheless, currently there is a lack of knowledge regarding the factors that are important for integrating of these technologies into complex treatment settings like intensive care units or rehabilitation units.
    METHODS: European experts from science, technical development and end-users of robotic systems (n = 13) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guideline to identify barriers and facilitating factors for the integration of robotic systems into daily clinical practice. They were asked about structural, personnel and environmental factors that had an impact on integration and how they had solved challenges. A latent content analysis was performed regarding the COREQ criteria.
    RESULTS: We found relevant factors regarding the development, introduction, and routine of the robotic system. In this context, costs, process adjustments, a lack of exemptions, and a lack of support from the manufacturers/developers were identified as challenges. Easy handling, joint decision making between the end-users and the decision makers in the hospital, an accurate process design and the joint development of the robotic system of end-users and technical experts were found to be facilitating factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: The integration and preparation for the integration of robotic assistance systems into the inpatient setting is a complex intervention that involves many parties. This study provides evidence for hospitals or manufacturers to simplify the planning of integrations for permanent use.
    BACKGROUND: DRKS-ID: DRKS00023848; registered 10/12/2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Evidence-based practice is critical but challenging in mental health. Rigorous research-proven interventions often do not yield expected results in the clinical practice. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to the effectiveness of Occupational Connections (OC)-an intervention for promotion of engagement in meaningful occupations in serious mental illness (SMI)-based on case series study of three quasi-experimental studies. The studies focused on people with SMI, admitted to intensive mental health services participated in the OC, as well as on a control condition group. Similar evaluation procedures throughout these studies addressed primary outcomes of participation dimensions and recovery orientation, as well as secondary outcomes of functional capacity, cognition, and symptom severity. Patterns of changes in outcome measures varied between the three studies as to direction and extension. In the OC groups, 29-60% of the outcome measurements were changed, in comparison to 29-43% of measurements in the control groups. The secondary outcomes were consistently improved in the OC (18-100% of measurements) in comparison to the control (18-67%). The analysis of the studies revealed that clinical effectiveness of participation-oriented intervention varied dependent on interplay between the clinical context, clinician actions, served persons\' characteristics, and evidence-building process. These factors should be considered to maximize research benefits for practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经授权:肥胖治疗策略主要包括门诊生活方式的改变,药物和减肥手术。自愿康复住院患者计划作为潜在的替代护理设置越来越重要,这些护理设置侧重于减肥和通过多学科方法预防体重恢复。但由于费用高,其患病率仍然有限。
    UNASSIGNED:考虑到这方面缺乏证据,这项研究的目的是系统地回顾目前可用的非药物和非手术住院计划旨在减轻体重的文献,阐明这些干预措施的疗效和特点。
    UNASSIGNED:在相关数据库中搜索了2000年至2022年的适当英语文章。由两位不同的作者使用ROB2和robvis工具进行质量评估。成人和儿科研究分别进行了综述,并系统地展示了它们的特征。
    未经授权:包括36篇文章(20篇关于成年人,16、儿童和青少年)共5,510人。多学科方法主要是综合低热量饮食,预定的身体活动,和基于行为治疗的心理支持。教育和烹饪课程的比率较低。全球范围内,住院减肥计划在减轻体重和诱导对生活质量的有益影响方面表现出一致的功效,心理健康,饮食行为,物理性能,和疲劳。后续数据很少,但很高比例的患者在短时间内恢复体重。
    未经评估:减肥住院康复是一个有希望的领域,有证据表明在改善肥胖相关的几个方面取得了全面的成功。然而,在干预后保持这些益处似乎非常不一致。这可能会减缓这一领域的创新进程,并阻碍国家医疗保健的进一步投资。当专注于行为和教育方面时,个性化和丰富的课程可能会显示出更大的影响,这是关键点,特别是在儿科,建立持久的生活方式改变。因此,需要更多的研究来评估基于不同工作模型的长期疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: Obesity treatment strategies mainly include outpatient lifestyle modification, drugs and bariatric surgery. Voluntary rehabilitative inpatient programs are gaining relevance as potential alternative settings of care that focus on weight loss and prevention of weight regain through a multidisciplinary approach, but their prevalence is still limited due to the high costs.
    UNASSIGNED: Considering the lack of evidence in this area, the objective of this study is to systematically review the currently available literature on non-pharmacological and non-surgical inpatient programs aimed at weight loss, to clarify the efficacy and the characteristics of these interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Proper English language articles from 2000 to 2022 were searched on relevant databases. Quality assessment was performed by two different authors using ROB2 and robvis tools. Adult and pediatric studies were reviewed separately and their characteristics were systematically displayed.
    UNASSIGNED: 36 articles were included (20 on adults, 16 on children, and adolescents) for a total of 5,510 individuals. The multidisciplinary approach was mainly comprehensive of a low-calorie diet, scheduled physical activity, and psychological support based on behavioral treatment. Educational and cooking sessions were present at a lower rate. Globally, inpatient weight loss programs showed a consistent efficacy in reducing body weight and inducing beneficial effects on quality of life, psychological well-being, eating behavior, physical performance, and fatigue. Follow-up data were scarce, but with a high percentage of patients regaining weight after a short period.
    UNASSIGNED: Weight loss inpatient rehabilitation is a promising area that has evidence of all-rounded success in the amelioration of several aspects related to obesity. Nevertheless, it appears to be quite inconsistent in preserving these benefits after the intervention. This might slow the innovation process in this area and preclude further investments from national healthcare. Personalized and enriched programs could show greater impact when focusing on the behavioral and educational aspects, which are crucial points, in particular in pediatrics, for setting up a long-lasting lifestyle modification. More studies are therefore necessary to evaluate long-term efficacy based on the different work-up models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在调查促进四个阶段的艺术治疗干预的可行性,主要侧重于实施和可接受性。探索性目的是评估艺术治疗对5名因烧伤住院的个人(18岁以上)的焦虑和情绪自我报告结果的影响,并了解他们对艺术治疗的看法。采用收敛混合方法小N设计,收集定量和定性数据,然后进行整合,在艺术治疗之前和之后评估时,一个人作为他/她自己的对照。使用情绪困扰银行的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)焦虑简表评估焦虑,使用积极和消极影响量表(PANAS)评估情绪。焦虑评分和负面情绪量表有统计学上的显着下降。艺术治疗后,积极的情绪量表评分趋于改善,尽管没有统计学意义。定性数据的主题分析表明,艺术疗法改善了a)症状管理,B)促进情感表达,C)洞察力,D)带出象征性和隐喻性的表示,和e)允许对艺术媒体进行触觉和感官探索。这项研究表明,艺术疗法可以成功地应用于急性烧伤患者,并具有有希望的社会心理益处。需要更多的研究来确定艺术治疗对烧伤患者的影响和有效性,以对患者有意义的方式。
    This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of facilitating four sessions of art therapy intervention with a primary focus on implementation and acceptability. The exploratory aim was on assessing the effect of art therapy on self-reported outcomes on anxiety and mood among five individuals (aged 18+ years) hospitalized for burn injuries and to understand their perceptions of engagement with art therapy. A convergent mixed-methods small N design was adopted wherein both quantitative and qualitative data are gathered and then integrated, and an individual served as his/her own control when assessed before and after art therapy. Anxiety was assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety short-form of the emotional distress bank, and mood was assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). There was a statistically significant decrease in anxiety scores and negative mood scale. Positive mood scale scores tended to improve after art therapy though were not statistically significant. Thematic analysis of qualitative data indicates that art therapy improves 1) symptom management, 2) facilitates emotional expression and 3) insight, 4) brings out symbolic and metaphorical representations, and 5) allows tactile and sensory exploration of art media. This study demonstrated that art therapy can be successfully implemented with acute burn patients and can have promising psychosocial benefits. Further research in needed to determine the effectiveness of art therapy with more burn patients, in ways that is meaningful to the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文回顾并总结了短期心理社会干预(在不到八周的时间内进行了多达12个疗程)对焦虑的证据,抑郁症,住院姑息患者的情绪困扰。我们从以下五个数据库中筛选出版物,Embase,PubMed,PsycINFO,WebofScience,和CINAHL,从成立到2021年9月10日。符合条件的研究包括接受标准姑息治疗的对照,积极治疗的对照,和等待列表控件。9项研究符合资格标准,并报告了5项心理社会干预措施在总共543名患者中的效果。我们遵循PRISMA结果报告指南和Cochrane偏差风险评估工具来评估研究质量。本文使用网络荟萃分析通过提供更大的统计能力和观察到的治疗效果的交叉验证来比较多种治疗。使用R包BUGSnet。与对照组相比,以下在住院患者环境中的心理社会干预措施显示出优越性:生活回顾干预措施是改善焦虑和痛苦的最佳治疗方法,而降低抑郁的最高治疗方法是展望干预。在这项荟萃分析中调查的短期心理社会干预措施,尤其是生命回顾干预,是可行的,可以改善焦虑,抑郁症,以及姑息性住院患者的痛苦,因此应在住院环境中提供。
    This paper reviews and summarises the evidence of short-term psychosocial interventions (up to 12 sessions delivered within less than eight weeks) on anxiety, depression, and emotional distress in palliative patients in inpatient settings. We screened publications from the following five databases, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL, from their inception to 10 September 2021. The eligible studies included controls receiving standard palliative care, actively treated controls, and wait-list controls. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria and reported the effects of five psychosocial interventions in a total of N = 543 patients. We followed PRISMA-guidelines for outcome reporting and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for assessing study quality. This paper used the network meta-analysis to compare multiple treatments by providing greater statistical power and the cross-validation of observed treatment effects, using the R package BUGSnet. Compared to control groups, the following psychosocial interventions in inpatient settings showed to be superior: life review interventions were the best ranked treatment for improving anxiety and distress, while the top ranked treatment for reducing depression was outlook intervention. The short-term psychosocial interventions investigated in this meta-analysis, especially life review intervention, are feasible and can potentially improve anxiety, depression, and distress in palliative inpatients and should therefore be offered in inpatient settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号