incidental learning

附带学习
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在偶然条件下获得的偶然视觉空间学习比有意的情况更容易老化。老化过程中情景记忆变化的编码和检索的θ和γ相关。基于附带编码对老化的脆弱性,在视觉空间信息的偶然编码和有意编码和检索下,可能会发生不同的θ和γ相关。θ和γ脑电图从额颞区记录,在年轻(25-60岁)和老年(60-85岁)参与者中评估了偶然/有意的视觉空间学习。在编码和检索期间记录的EEG在偶然的低需求之间进行了比较,附带的高需求,通过考虑患者性别的ANCOVA和故意条件,IQ,和受教育年限作为协变量。老年人表现较差,尤其是在地方对象关联中。经过有意的学习,老年参与者的假阳性错误进一步增加.在年龄较大的参与者中,额颞叶的导数在theta和gamma波段上观察到更高的功率,用于编码和检索。在检索中,与正确回答相比,只有年轻参与者的错误能力较低.总之,力量和连贯性的不同模式支持年轻人和老年人的偶然和有意的视觉空间编码和检索。权力与行为的相关性对年龄和表现敏感。
    Incidental visuospatial learning acquired under incidental conditions is more vulnerable to aging than in the intentional case. The theta and gamma correlates of the coding and retrieval of episodic memory change during aging. Based on the vulnerability of incidental coding to aging, different theta and gamma correlates could occur under the incidental versus intentional coding and retrieval of visuospatial information. Theta and gamma EEG was recorded from the frontotemporal regions, and incidental/intentional visuospatial learning was evaluated in young (25-60 years old) and elderly (60-85 years old) participants. The EEG recorded during encoding and retrieval was compared between incidental low-demand, incidental high-demand, and intentional conditions through an ANCOVA considering the patient\'s gender, IQ, and years of schooling as covariates. Older adults exhibited worse performances, especially in place-object associations. After the intentional study, older participants showed a further increase in false-positive errors. Higher power at the theta and gamma bands was observed for frontotemporal derivations in older participants for both encoding and retrieval. Under retrieval, only young participants had lower power in terms of errors compared with correct responses. In conclusion, the different patterns of power and coherence support incidental and intentional visuospatial encoding and retrieval in young and elderly individuals. The correlates of power with behavior are sensitive to age and performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童有时比成年人更好地学习分散注意力的信息,也许是因为选择性注意力的发展。为了理解这个潜在的联系,我们问,当信息是直接关注的焦点时,儿童(7-9岁)的学习和成人的学习有何不同。参与者查看了常见物体的图纸,并被告知要注意图纸(实验1:42名儿童,35个成年人)或指示重复形状(覆盖在图纸上)的时间(实验2:53个儿童,60成年人)。之后,参与者尽快识别出这些图纸的碎片。当被指示参加绘画时,成年人比孩子学得更好;但是,当图纸与任务无关时,在测试的前半部分,儿童比成年人学习得更好。尽管将注意力集中在图纸上改善了成年人的学习,孩子们在实验中类似地学习图纸,无论图纸是任务的重点还是完全无关紧要。
    Children sometimes learn distracting information better than adults do, perhaps because of the development of selective attention. To understand this potential link, we ask how the learning of children (aged 7-9 years) and the learning of adults differ when information is the directed focus of attention versus when it is not. Participants viewed drawings of common objects and were told to attend to the drawings (Experiment 1: 42 children, 35 adults) or indicate when shapes (overlaid on the drawings) repeated (Experiment 2: 53 children, 60 adults). Afterward, participants identified fragments of these drawings as quickly as possible. Adults learned better than children when directed to attend to the drawings; however, when drawings were task irrelevant, children showed better learning than adults in the first half of the test. And although directing attention to the drawings improved learning in adults, children learned the drawings similarly across experiments regardless of whether the drawings were the focus of the task or entirely irrelevant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究解决了注意假说的主要论点,即有意识的注意是成功学习所必需的。提出了反对该假设的有力版本的论点,在这种情况下,没有有意识的注意就无法获得新的语言形式。对外国学习者的熟悉程度进行了测试,以了解他们对公式化表达的熟悉程度,尤其是由于他们的低显着性而选择的。此外,测试了所使用的表达吸引注意力的可能性。结果表明,尽管它们不显眼,这样的表达是学习者词汇表达的一部分。发现学生的表现与输入中的使用模式相关,一个强有力的迹象表明,他们的词汇表示是由许多遇到与这些表达式的具体用途。有人认为,即使在大多数情况下,有意识的注意力也不太可能,更不用说所有的相遇了。虽然这里没有讨论意识的重要性,这项研究质疑有意识的注意力作为学习的默认条件。
    The present study addresses the main contention of the Noticing Hypothesis that conscious attention is necessary for successful learning. Arguments are given against the strong version of the hypothesis, under which one cannot acquire new language forms without conscious attention. Foreign learners were tested on their familiarity with formulaic expressions especially selected for their low salience. Additionally, the expressions used were tested for the likelihood of attracting attention. The results suggest that despite their inconspicuousness, such expressions are part of learners\' lexical representations. Students\' performance was found to correlate with usage patterns found in the input, a strong indication that their lexical representations are shaped by numerous encounters with specific uses of these expressions. It is argued that conscious attention is unlikely in even most, let alone all encounters. While the importance of awareness is not debated here, this study questions conscious attention as a default condition for learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多,人们正在放弃对新闻的积极追求,相反,假设重要信息将通过他们的社交媒体网络推送给他们。这种新闻方法使人们容易受到网上大量错误信息的影响,然而,关于这种参与的影响的研究好坏参半。需要更多关于技术附带学习效果的研究,定义为知识的变化,态度,信仰,以及在追求学习以外的目标时暴露于信息的行为(例如,entertainment).在这项研究中,我们调查了51名大学生对偶然接触通过模拟社交媒体环境提供的准确和不准确的COVID-19信息的反应.参与者在大声思考方案中的言语表达表明了许多心理过程,包括认知,元认知,认知认知,动机,和情感。正价心理加工更经常用准确的COVID-19信息表达,负价心理加工更经常用错误信息表达。对知识声明和来源的评估呈负值,预测对COVID-19错误信息帖子的参与减少。然而,在许多情况下,言语化的心理加工和行为反应之间的关系是复杂的或不明显的。例如,参与者的积极元认知和认知语言降低了他们参与准确的COVID-19信息的可能性,而积极的兴趣与参与错误信息的可能性增加相关。我们的发现对如何从社交媒体行为中准确推断人们的信念和意图以及如何设计干预措施以帮助人们成为更积极和周到的在线信息消费者具有启示意义。
    More and more, people are abandoning the active pursuit of news, assuming instead that important information will be pushed to them via their social media networks. This approach to news makes people susceptible to the vast amounts of misinformation online, yet research on the effects of this kind of engagement is mixed. More research is needed on technology incidental learning effects, defined as changes in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors as a result of being exposed to information while pursuing goals other than learning (e.g., entertainment). In this study, we examined how 51 college students responded to incidental exposure to accurate and inaccurate COVID-19 information delivered via a simulated social media environment. Participants\' verbalizations during think-aloud protocols indicated numerous mental processes including cognition, metacognition, epistemic cognition, motivation, and emotions. Positively valenced mental processing was more often expressed with accurate COVID-19 information and negatively valenced mental processing was more often verbalized with misinformation. Negatively valenced evaluations of knowledge claims and sources predicted less engagement with COVID-19 misinformation posts. However, in many cases the relations among verbalized mental processing and behavioral responses were complex or non-obvious. For example, participants\' positive metacognition and epistemic cognition verbalizations decreased their likelihood of engaging with accurate COVID-19 information, whereas positive interest was associated with an increased likelihood of engaging with misinformation. Our findings have implications for how to accurately infer people\'s beliefs and intentions from their social media behaviors and how to design interventions to help people be more active and thoughtful consumers of online information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    联想记忆可以说是最基本的记忆功能,其中构成了所有情节和语义记忆过程的基础。同时,联想记忆的下降代表了两者与年龄相关的认知能力下降的核心特征,健康和病理(即,与痴呆症相关的)衰老。与年龄相关的联想记忆损伤的潜在神经机制仍未完全理解,特别是关于附带的(即,非故意)学习。
    我们调查了46名年轻人(N=23;平均年龄=23.39岁)和老年人(N=22,平均年龄=69.05岁)参与者的年龄对面部名称组合的附带学习和记忆检索的影响。更具体地说,特别感兴趣的是编码/检索(E/R)翻转中与年龄相关的变化,这表示在记忆编码和检索过程中,同一大脑区域的相反激活模式的神经拮抗作用,使用fMRI进行评估。
    根据我们的假设,结果显示,老年组的检索性能显著下降.此外,在神经层面,我们发现,在老年受试者中,右前脑岛和关节的E/R翻转已消除,但在后中扣带皮质的E/R翻转激活幅度降低。
    总而言之,本研究结果表明,右侧aIC中E/R翻转的神经调节受损可能是早期检测神经衰老的敏感标志物。
    UNASSIGNED: Associative memory is arguably the most basic memory function and therein constitutes the foundation of all episodic and semantic memory processes. At the same time, the decline of associative memory represents a core feature of age-related cognitive decline in both, healthy and pathological (i.e., dementia-related) aging. The neural mechanisms underlying age-related impairments in associative memory are still not fully understood, especially regarding incidental (i.e., non-intentional) learning.
    UNASSIGNED: We investigated the impact of age on the incidental learning and memory retrieval of face-name combinations in a total sample of 46 young (N = 23; mean age = 23.39 years) and elderly (N = 22, mean age = 69.05 years) participants. More specifically, particular interest was placed in age-related changes in encoding/retrieval (E/R) flips, which denote a neural antagonism of opposed activation patterns in the same brain region during memory encoding and retrieval, which were assessed using fMRI.
    UNASSIGNED: According to our hypothesis, the results showed a significant age-related decline in the retrieval performance in the old group. Additionally, at the neural level, we discovered an abolished E/R flip in the right anterior insula and a joint but reduced E/R flip activation magnitude in the posterior middle cingulate cortex in older subjects.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, the present findings suggest that the impaired neural modulation of the E/R flip in the right aIC might be a sensitive marker in the early detection of neural aging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    因为它们进化的重要性,有人提出,有生命的实体将比无生命的实体更好地记住。尽管越来越多的证据支持这一假设,尚不清楚在偶然的学习条件下,动画效应是否持续存在。此外,很少有研究测试这种效应在幼儿中的稳健性,结果相互矛盾。使用附带学习范式,我们调查了幼儿(4岁和5岁)在学习涉及人类或动物实体的单词方面是否比使用图片作为刺激的载体实体更好.79名儿童的样本被要求玩数字记忆游戏,而图片和单词之间的关联是偶然出现的。与记忆的自适应观点一致,结果表明,与人类和动物实体相关的单词比与车辆实体相关的单词更好地偶然学习。图片的视觉复杂性并没有影响这种动画效果。此外,图片曝光越多,发生的偶然学习越多。总的来说,结果证实了动物效应的鲁棒性,并表明这种处理优势可以在4或5岁儿童的附带学习任务中找到。此外,这是第一项研究表明这种效果可以在儿童中通过图片获得。用图片演示动画效果,而不仅仅是言语,是最终解释这种影响的先决条件。
    Because of their evolutionary importance, it has been proposed that animate entities would be better remembered than inanimate entities. Although a growing body of evidence supports this hypothesis, it is still unclear whether the animacy effect persists under incidental learning conditions. Furthermore, few studies have tested the robustness of this effect in young children, with conflicting results. Using an incidental learning paradigm, we investigated whether young children (4- and 5-year-olds) would be better at learning words that refer to either human or animal entities rather than vehicle entities using pictures as stimuli. A sample of 79 children were asked to play digital Memory games while associations between pictures and words were presented incidentally. Consistent with the adaptive view of memory, the results showed that words associated with human and animal entities were better learned incidentally than words associated with vehicle entities. The visual complexity of the pictures did not influence this animacy effect. In addition, the more exposure to the pictures, the more incidental learning occurred. Overall, the results confirm the robustness of the animacy effect and show that this processing advantage can be found in an incidental learning task in children as young as 4 or 5 years. Furthermore, it is the first study to show that this effect can be obtained with pictures in children. The demonstration of the animacy effect with pictures, and not just words, is a prerequisite for an ultimate explanation of this effect in terms of survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在具有挑战性的聆听环境中,语音识别的个体差异很明显。研究表明,内隐学习是可能导致这种变异性的一个变量。这里,我们探讨了内隐学习的三个指标对挑战性语音识别中个体差异的独特贡献。为此,我们评估了内隐学习的三个指标(感知,统计,和附带的),三种具有挑战性的语音(自然快速,vocoded,和噪音中的语音),和与语音识别相关的认知因素(词汇,工作记忆,和注意力)在一组51名年轻人中。语音识别被建模为认知因素和学习的函数,每个学习指标的独特贡献在统计学上是孤立的。这三个学习指标是不相关的。尽管所有学习指标对自然快速语音的识别都有独特的贡献,只有统计学习对噪声和语音编码语音中的语音识别有独特的贡献。这些数据表明,尽管内隐学习可能有助于识别具有挑战性的语音,贡献可能取决于语音挑战的类型和学习任务。
    Individual differences in speech recognition in challenging listening environments are pronounced. Studies suggest that implicit learning is one variable that may contribute to this variability. Here, we explored the unique contributions of three indices of implicit learning to individual differences in the recognition of challenging speech. To this end, we assessed three indices of implicit learning (perceptual, statistical, and incidental), three types of challenging speech (natural fast, vocoded, and speech in noise), and cognitive factors associated with speech recognition (vocabulary, working memory, and attention) in a group of 51 young adults. Speech recognition was modeled as a function of the cognitive factors and learning, and the unique contribution of each index of learning was statistically isolated. The three indices of learning were uncorrelated. Whereas all indices of learning had unique contributions to the recognition of natural-fast speech, only statistical learning had a unique contribution to the recognition of speech in noise and vocoded speech. These data suggest that although implicit learning may contribute to the recognition of challenging speech, the contribution may depend on the type of speech challenge and on the learning task.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衰老会损害昼夜节律和记忆,尽管这些损害之间的关系还没有完全理解。昼夜节律在很大程度上是由体内中央起搏器内的时钟基因决定的,视交叉上核(SCN),尽管这些基因也在整个身体的局部时钟中表达。由于昼夜节律可以直接影响记忆表现,一种可能性是随着年龄增长观察到的记忆缺陷是源于SCN的全球昼夜节律中断的下游。这里,我们证明了时钟基因Period1在记忆相关的皮质结构中的表达,脾后皮质(RSC),是偶然学习所必需的,并且RSC中与年龄相关的Period1的破坏-但不一定是SCN-导致认知能力下降。这些数据扩展了时钟基因的已知功能,超出了维持昼夜节律的范围,并表明与年龄相关的时钟基因表达变化以依赖大脑区域的方式调节昼夜节律和记忆表现。
    Aging impairs both circadian rhythms and memory, though the relationship between these impairments is not fully understood. Circadian rhythms are largely dictated by clock genes within the body\'s central pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), though these genes are also expressed in local clocks throughout the body. As circadian rhythms can directly affect memory performance, one possibility is that memory deficits observed with age are downstream of global circadian rhythm disruptions stemming from the SCN. Here, we demonstrate that expression of clock gene Period1 within a memory-relevant cortical structure, the retrosplenial cortex (RSC), is necessary for incidental learning, and that age-related disruption of Period1 within the RSC-but not necessarily the SCN-contributes to cognitive decline. These data expand the known functions of clock genes beyond maintaining circadian rhythms and suggests that age-associated changes in clock gene expression modulates circadian rhythms and memory performance in a brain region-dependent manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的研究检查,第一次从发展的角度来看,刺激反应间隔(RSI)在附带序列学习(SL)中的作用。4、7和10岁的儿童执行了连续反应时间(SRT)任务,其中系统地操纵了RSI(0、250、500或750ms)。SL(固定和随机块之间的反应时间的差异)没有观察到最小的孩子,无论RSI条件,而7岁的孩子仅在250msRSI条件下学习了序列,而10岁的孩子在除500msRSI条件外的所有时间条件下都表现出SL。最后,结果表明,只有在面对500和750msRSI条件的年龄较大的儿童中,才会意识到序列.讨论根据个人和上下文因素质疑内隐学习过程的鲁棒性。
    The current study examined, for the first time in a developmental perspective, the effect of response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) in incidental sequence learning (SL). Children aged 4, 7, and 10 years performed a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which the RSI was systematically manipulated (0, 250, 500, or 750 ms). SL (difference in reaction times between fixed and random blocks) was not observed for the youngest children whatever the RSI condition, whereas the 7-year-olds learned the sequence only in the 250-ms RSI condition and the 10-year-olds exhibited SL in all temporal conditions except the 500-ms RSI condition. Finally, the results suggest that conscious awareness of the sequence emerges only in older children faced with the 500- and 750-ms RSI conditions. The discussion questions the robustness of implicit learning processes in the light of individual and contextual factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:长篇COVID描述了2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的长期影响。在长期COVID患者中,神经心理学改变是经常报告的症状。研究指出长期COVID患者内侧颞叶功能障碍及其与嗅觉缺失的关系。这项研究旨在调查长期COVID患者的陈述性和程序性记忆的获得和巩固,并探讨失语症是否与这些分离的记忆功能有关。
    未经评估:招募了42名长COVID参与者和30名对照(C)。根据是否存在嗅觉缺失,将长期感染COVID患者样本分为两组,A组和NA组,分别。言语陈述性记忆中的客观表现(配对关联学习,PAL),程序记忆(后视镜跟踪测试,MTT),一般认知功能(蒙特利尔认知评估量表),精神运动速度,和附带学习(数字符号替代测试)进行了评估和比较,NA,C组。采集后24小时评估PAL和MTT的长期保留。
    未经评估:一般认知得分较低,精神运动速度,与C相比,A和NA中发现了持续的注意力,然而,附带学习,提示引导和自由召回,与C组相比,A组减少,与NA组无差异。在长期COVID组中,一般认知和附带学习仅与陈述性记忆功能有关。在回忆测试中,长期COVID组的口头陈述性记忆的长期保留率低于对照组,但在识别测试中没有差异。在程序记忆的获得中没有发现组差异。然而,与NA和C组相比,A组的这种记忆的长期保留较差,分别,当考虑错误和执行时间时。
    未经评估:研究结果支持,在长期COVID患者中,程序性和陈述性记忆的巩固比这些记忆的获得受到的影响更大,与承认陈述性记忆相比,他们在延迟回忆中也更容易受到缺陷的影响。程序性记忆的巩固和陈述性信息的即时回忆的缺陷在患有失语症的长期COVID参与者中尤其相关。这表明COVID-19的嗅觉缺失可能与边缘系统的长期功能障碍有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Long-COVID describes the long-term effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In long-COVID patients, neuropsychological alterations are frequently reported symptoms. Research points to medial temporal lobe dysfunction and its association with anosmia in long-COVID patients. This study aims to investigate the acquisition and consolidation of declarative and procedural memory in long-COVID patients and to explore whether anosmia is related to these dissociated memory functions.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-two long-COVID participants and 30 controls (C) were recruited. The sample of long-COVID patients was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of anosmia, group A and group NA, respectively. Objective performance in verbal declarative memory (Paired-Associate Learning, PAL), procedural memory (Mirror Tracing Test, MTT), general cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale), psychomotor speed, and incidental learning (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) were assessed and compared among the A, NA, and C groups. Long-term retention of PAL and MTT were assessed 24 h after acquisition.
    UNASSIGNED: Lower scores in general cognition, psychomotor speed, and sustained attention were found in A and NA compared with C. However, incidental learning, both cue-guided and free-recalled, was diminished in group A compared with C, with no differences with group NA. General cognition and incidental learning were related to declarative memory function exclusively in long-COVID groups. Long-COVID groups presented lower long-term retention of verbal declarative memory than controls in recall tests but no differences in recognition tests. No group differences were found in the acquisition of procedural memory. However, long-term retention of this memory was worse in group A as compared to the NA and C groups, respectively, when errors and time of execution were considered.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings support that consolidation of both procedural and declarative memories is more affected than the acquisition of these memories in long-COVID patients, who are also more vulnerable to deficits in delayed recall than in recognition of declarative memories. Deficits in the consolidation of procedural memory and immediate recall of declarative information are especially relevant in long-COVID participants with anosmia. This indicates that anosmia in COVID-19 could be associated with a long-term dysfunction of the limbic system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号