背景:本研究探讨肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂在多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)不孕妇女体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中的临床价值。
方法:对2010年1月至2020年6月在河北省生殖健康科学技术研究所首次接受IVF-ET治疗的100例PCOS患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据是否使用TNF抑制剂分为抑制剂组和对照组。接下来,比较两组的促性腺激素(Gn)使用天数,Gn的总剂量,触发时间,人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)注射当天的激素水平和子宫内膜状况,两种不同方案对控制性超促排卵(COH)和妊娠结局的影响。
结果:两组之间的基线特征没有显着差异,包括年龄,不孕的持续时间,体重指数(BMI),卵巢体积,窦卵泡计数,和基础激素水平。与对照组相比,抑制剂组患者的Gn使用天数和触发时间明显缩短,Gn总用量明显减少。就注射HCG时的性激素水平而言,抑制剂组的血清雌二醇水平低得多,而血清黄体生成素和孕酮(P)水平高于对照组。值得注意的是,使用TNF抑制剂也显著提高了优质胚胎率。然而,子宫内膜厚度(注射HCG当天)未观察到显着差异,子宫内膜A的比例,B和C形态(注射HCG当天),周期取消率,回收的卵母细胞数量,受精率,两组间的卵裂率。重要的是,抑制剂组的临床妊娠率明显高于对照组,但是生化妊娠率没有显着差异,早期流产率,多胎出生率,比较两组的异位妊娠率和活产数量。
结论:总的来说,应用TNF-α抑制剂方案后,在接受IVF-ET的不孕PCOS患者中,总体治疗效果较好。因此,TNF抑制剂在PCOS不孕妇女IVF-ET中具有一定的应用价值。
BACKGROUND: Clinical value of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) was investigated in this study.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 100 PCOS patients who received IVF-ET for the first time at Hebei Institute of reproductive health science and technology from January 2010 to June 2020. The patients were divided into Inhibitor group and Control group according to whether they were treated with or without TNF inhibitors. Next, the two groups were subject to comparison in terms of the days of gonadotropin (Gn) use, total dosage of Gn, trigger time, hormone level and endometrial condition on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection, the effects of two different regimens on controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including age, duration of infertility, body mass index (BMI), ovarian volume, antral follicle count, and basal hormone levels. Compared with the Control group, the days of Gn use and trigger time of patients in the Inhibitor group were significantly shortened, and the total Gn dosage was notably reduced. In terms of sex hormone levels on the HCG injection, the Inhibitor group displayed much lower serum estradiol levels while higher serum luteinizing hormone and progesterone (P) levels than the Control group. Notably, the high-quality embryo rate was also significantly increased with the use of TNF inhibitors. However, significant differences were not observed in endometrial thickness (on the day of HCG injection), proportion of endometrial A, B and C morphology (on the day of HCG injection), cycle cancellation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and cleavage rate between the two groups. Importantly, the clinical pregnancy rate in the Inhibitor group was significantly higher than that in the Control group, but there was no significant difference in the biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, multiple birth rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and number of live births between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, after application of TNF-α inhibitor regimen, superior overall treatment effect can be observed in infertile PCOS patients receiving IVF-ET. Therefore, TNF inhibitors have certain application value in IVF-ET in infertile women with PCOS.