目的:从美国兽医麻醉与镇痛学院(ACVAA)导师和受训人员的角度,描述COVID-19大流行对麻醉住院医师方面的影响程度。这包括居住面试过程,住院医师学习的教学培训和临床病例的可用性和多样性。
方法:横截面,在线,匿名自愿调查。
方法:共有58名受访者,代表30位居住计划导师和28位居民。
方法:通过电子邮件将调查分发给94位居住项目导师和70位居民,代表2019-2021年间在ACVAA注册的计划和居民。通过电子邮件中嵌入的链接提供了在线调查的匿名链接。问题包括对教学和临床培训的感知影响(-5至+5量表),案例分布,工作量,居留申请和选择过程,和心理健康。用描述性统计[中位数(IQR)或平均值±SD]总结反应。
结果:居民计划导师和居民的总体调查回复率为31.9%(30/94)和40.0%(28/70),分别。据报道,对整体住院医师培训有负面影响:计划导师为-1.0(IQR-2.0至0),居民为-1.5±1.5。报告的旅行限制对病例日志完成的感知影响对于计划导师为-2.0(IQR-4.0至-1.0),对于居民为-2.4±2.0。项目导师和居民对大流行对工作时间的影响有不一致的感觉,居民报告认为工作时间增加[+2.1±2.1vs.0(IQR-1.0至0)]。
结论:住院医师计划导师和住院医师普遍认为,COVID-19大流行对住院医师面试和培训过程的多个方面产生了负面影响。更广泛的,目的分析兽医麻醉培训项目需要充分阐明的规模对兽医麻醉培训的影响。
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the extent of the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on aspects of the anesthesia residency experience from the perspective of American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia (ACVAA) mentors and trainees. This includes the residency interview process, didactic training and availability and variety of clinical cases for resident learning.
METHODS: Cross-sectional, online, anonymous voluntary survey.
METHODS: A total of 58 respondents, representing 30 residency program mentors and 28 residents.
METHODS: Surveys were distributed by email to 94 residency program mentors and 70 residents, representing programs and residents registered with the ACVAA during the years of 2019-2021. Anonymous links to an online survey were provided via a link embedded in the email. Questions included perceived impacts (-5 to +5 scale) on didactic and clinical training, case distribution, workload, residency application and selection process, and mental health. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics [median (IQR) or mean ± SD].
RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 31.9% (30/94) and 40.0% (28/70) for resident program mentors and residents, respectively. There was a negative perceived
impact on overall residency training reported: -1.0 (IQR -2.0 to 0) for program mentors and -1.5 ± 1.5 for residents. The reported perceived
impact of travel limitations on case log completion was -2.0 (IQR -4.0 to -1.0) for program mentors and -2.4 ± 2.0 for residents. Program mentors and residents had incongruent feelings on the
impact of the pandemic on work hours, with residents reporting a perceived increase in work hours [+2.1 ± 2.1 versus 0 (IQR -1.0 to 0)].
CONCLUSIONS: Residency program mentors and residents generally agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic had negatively impacted multiple aspects of residency interview and training process. A broader, objective analysis of veterinary anesthesia training programs is required to fully elucidate the scale of the
impact on veterinary anesthesia training.