{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Impact of COVID-19 on paracoccidioidomycosis. Which was the most influential: The pandemic or the virus?
{Author}: Giusiano G;Tracogna F;Messina F;Sosa V;Rojas F;Chacón Y;Vásquez A;de Los Ángeles Sosa M;Formosa P;Fernández M;Cattana ME;Mussin J;Fernández N;Piedrabuena M;Romero M;Miranda C;Posse G;Davalos F;Valdez R;Acuña A;Aguilera A;Andreni M;Serrano J;Álvarez C;Aguirre D;Pineda G;Effron GG;Santiso G;
{Journal}: Mycoses
{Volume}: 67
{Issue}: 7
{Year}: 2024 Jul
{Factor}: 4.931
{DOI}: 10.1111/myc.13761
{Abstract}: The impact of COVID-19 on paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) in Argentina and the consequences generated by the pandemic are discussed. From 2018 to 3 years after the pandemic declaration, 285 proven PCM patients were registered. No association between both diseases was documented. PCM frequency decreased to extremely low levels in 2020. Mandatory social isolation and the emotional and psychological effects generated under pandemic circumstances led to delays in diagnosis, severe disseminated cases, and other challenges for diagnosis in subsequent years. Probable underdiagnosis should be considered due to the overlap of clinical manifestations, the low index of suspicion and the lack of sensitive diagnostic tools.