hospital acquired pneumonia

医院获得性肺炎
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Nosocomial pneumonia is defined as pneumonia occurring ≥ 48 h after hospital admission in a patient without severe immunosuppression. It can occur in spontaneously breathing patients or with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanically ventilated patients. In patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (semi)quantitative cultures of tracheobronchial aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid should be perfomed. The initial empirical antimicrobial treatment is determined by the risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens (MDRP). The advantage of combination treatment increases with the prevalence of MDRPs. The antibiotic treatment should be adapted when the microbiological results are available. After 72 h a standardized re-evaluation including the response to treatment and also checking of the suspected diagnosis of pneumonia in a structured form is mandatory. Treatment failure can occur as a primary or secondary failure and in the case of primary progression necessitates another comprehensive diagnostic work-up before any further antibiotic treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Die nosokomiale Pneumonie ist definiert als eine Pneumonie, die ≥ 48 h nach Krankenhausaufnahme bei einem Patienten ohne schwere Immunsuppression auftritt. Sie kann spontan atmende bzw. nichtinvasiv sowie beatmete Patienten betreffen. Bei Verdacht auf eine VAP (ventilatorassoziierte Pneumonie) sollen (semi)quantitative Kulturen eines Tracheobronchialsekrets oder einer bronchoalveolären Lavageflüssigkeit gewonnen werden. Die initiale kalkulierte antimikrobielle Therapie richtet sich nach dem Risiko für multiresistente Erreger (MRE). Der Vorteil der Kombinationstherapie steigt mit der MRE-Prävalenz. Die initiale kalkulierte antimikrobielle Therapie sollte nach Vorliegen der mikrobiologischen Ergebnisse angepasst werden. Nach 72 h ist eine Reevaluation erforderlich, die sowohl das Therapieansprechen als auch die Überprüfung der Verdachtsdiagnose Pneumonie in strukturierter Form einschließt. Ein Therapieversagen kann primär oder sekundär auftreten und erfordert bei primärer Progression eine erneute umfassende Diagnostik vor jeglicher Antibiotikatherapie.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是肺移植(LT)后早期(<30天)的重要并发症。然而,当前发生率,相关因素和结局没有得到很好的报道。
    方法:前瞻性纳入在我们机构移植的LT受体(07/2019-01/2020和10/2021-11/2022)。我们评估了肺炎的发生率和表现,并使用回归模型评估了相关因素的影响。此外,我们使用脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)评估了在移植期间和肺炎发生时收集的呼吸道病原体的分子相关性.
    结果:在LT后的前30天,25/270(9.3%)受者被诊断为肺炎(68%[17/25]VAP;32%[8/25]HAP)。肺炎的中位时间为11天(IQR7-13)。49%(132/270)的供体和16%(44/270)的受体呼吸道周围移植培养物呈阳性。然而,与肺炎相关的病原体在移植时与供体或受体培养物没有遗传关系,由PFGE确定。已诊断的肺动脉高压(HR4.42,95%CI1.62-12.08)和免疫抑制使用(HR2.87,95%CI1.30-6.56)是与肺炎相关的移植前因素。在移植后的前30天内,肺炎的发生与住院时间较长(HR5.44,95%CI2.22-13.37)和ICU住院时间较长(HR4.31,95%CI:1.73-10.75)的VAP相关;30天和90天的死亡率相似。
    结论:前瞻性评估早期肺炎发生率约为LT的10%。肺炎发生风险增加的人群包括LT伴移植前肺动脉高压和移植前免疫抑制。肺炎与医疗保健使用增加有关,强调需要通过优先针对高风险患者进一步改善.
    BACKGROUND: Hospital- (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors and outcomes are not well reported.
    METHODS: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (07/2019-01/2020 and 10/2021-11/2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. In addition, we evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE).
    RESULTS: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR 7-13). 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE.Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR 4.42, 95% CI 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia.Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR 5.44, 95% CI 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR 4.31, 95% CI: 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplant; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in around 10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院获得性肺炎(HAP)也称为非呼吸机相关性肺炎,是住院患者中最常见的感染之一。改善口腔卫生似乎可以降低HAP的发生率。本研究旨在描述当前的实践,障碍和促进者,在澳大利亚医院环境中进行口腔保健的注册护士的知识和教育偏好,重点是预防HAP。我们将此作为一个简短的研究报告。
    方法:我们对澳大利亚注册护士进行了一项横断面在线匿名调查。参与者是通过现有的专业网络和社交媒体通过电子分发招募的。所使用的调查是从现有的口腔护理实践调查中修改的。
    结果:该调查由179名参与者完成。手卫生被认为是预防肺炎的一个非常重要的策略(n=90,58%),45%(n=71)认为口腔护理非常重要。报道最多的提供口腔护理的障碍包括:不合作的患者;人员配备不足;缺乏必要的口腔卫生。病人提醒,提示和提供牙刷是被认为有助于改善口腔护理的常见方法。
    结论:本次调查的结果将与消费者反馈一起使用,为了帮助告知计划中的多中心随机试验,医院获得性肺炎治疗(HAPPEN)研究,旨在降低HAP的发病率。研究结果也可能有助于为旨在改善口腔护理以减少HAP发生率的研究和质量改进举措提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) also known as non-ventilator associated pneumonia, is one of the most common infections acquired in hospitalised patients. Improving oral hygiene appears to reduce the incidence of HAP. This study aimed to describe current practices, barriers and facilitators, knowledge and educational preferences of registered nurses performing oral health care in the Australian hospital setting, with a focus on the prevention of HAP. We present this as a short research report.
    METHODS: We undertook a cross sectional online anonymous survey of Australian registered nurses. Participants were recruited via electronic distribution through existing professional networks and social media. The survey used was modified from an existing survey on oral care practice.
    RESULTS: The survey was completed by 179 participants. Hand hygiene was considered a very important strategy to prevent pneumonia (n = 90, 58%), while 45% (n = 71) felt that oral care was very important. The most highly reported barriers for providing oral care included: an uncooperative patient; inadequate staffing; and a lack of oral hygiene requisite. Patients\' reminders, prompts and the provision of toothbrushes were common ways believed to help facilitate improvements in oral care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this survey will be used in conjunction with consumer feedback, to help inform a planned multi-centre randomised trial, the Hospital Acquired Pneumonia PrEveNtion (HAPPEN) study, aimed at reducing the incidence of HAP. Findings may also be useful for informing studies and quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving oral care to reduce the incidence of HAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年医院获得性冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进展为危重疾病的危险因素仍然未知。这里,我们评估了医院获得性COVID-19患者进展为危重症的发生率和危险因素,并确定了它们对临床结局的影响.
    这项回顾性队列研究分析了2020年1月至2022年6月期间三甲医院收治的确诊为医院获得性COVID-19的患者。主要结果是医院获得性COVID-19进展为危重病。患者被分层为高,中介-,或低风险组进展为危重病的危险因素的数量。
    总共,包括204例患者,37例(18.1%)进展为危重症。在多变量逻辑分析中,患有呼吸系统疾病的患者(OR,3.90;95%CI,1.04-15.18),预先存在的心血管疾病(OR,3.49;95%CI,1.11-11.27),免疫受损状态(OR,3.18;95%CI,1.11-9.16),较高的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(OR,1.56;95%CI,1.28-1.96),和较高的临床虚弱量表(OR,2.49;95%CI,1.62-4.13)显示进展为危重病的风险显著增加。随着人群风险的增加,患者进展为危重病的可能性显著增加,且28日死亡率较高.
    在医院获得性COVID-19,先前存在呼吸系统疾病的患者中,预先存在的心血管疾病,免疫受损状态,基线时更高的临床虚弱量表和SOFA评分是进展为危重疾病的危险因素。有这些危险因素的患者必须优先考虑,适当隔离或及时治疗,尤其是在大流行环境中。
    OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for progression to critical illness in hospital-acquired coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unknown. Here, we assessed the incidence and risk factors for progression to critical illness and determined their effects on clinical outcomes in patients with hospital-acquired COVID-19.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients admitted to the tertiary hospital between January 2020 and June 2022 with confirmed hospital-acquired COVID-19. The primary outcome was the progression to critical illness of hospital- acquired COVID-19. Patients were stratified into high-, intermediate-, or low-risk groups by the number of risk factors for progression to critical illness.
    RESULTS: In total, 204 patients were included and 37 (18.1%) progressed to critical illness. In the multivariable logistic analysis, patients with preexisting respiratory disease (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.04-15.18), preexisting cardiovascular disease (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.11-11.27), immunocompromised status (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.11-9.16), higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.96), and higher clinical frailty scale (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.62-4.13) showed significantly increased risk of progression to critical illness. As the risk of the groups increased, patients were significantly more likely to progress to critical illness and had higher 28-day mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hospital-acquired COVID-19, preexisting respiratory disease, preexisting cardiovascular disease, immunocompromised status, and higher clinical frailty scale and SOFA scores at baseline were risk factors for progression to critical illness. Patients with these risk factors must be prioritized and appropriately isolated or treated in a timely manner, especially in pandemic settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏手术期间术中输注红细胞(PRBC)与术后发病率和死亡率增加有关;然而,有关PRBC输血与术后肺部并发症(PPC)之间关联的数据存在一定的矛盾.使用胸外科医师协会成人心脏外科数据库,我们试图确定术中PRBC输注是否与单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后PPC以及重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长相关.
    方法:在2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间,对751,893例单独的CABG患者进行了基于注册的队列研究。使用倾向得分加权回归分析,我们分析了术中PRBC对PPC(医院获得性肺炎[HAP],机械通气>24小时或再插管),ICU住院时间,ICU再入院。
    结果:输注1、2、3和4单位PRBC与HAP的赔率增加相关[赔率比(ORs)1.24(1.21-1.26),1.28(1.26-1.32),1.36(1.33-1.39),1.31(1.28-1.34)],再插管[ORs1.23(1.21-1.25),1.38(1.35-1.40),1.57(1.55-1.60),1.70(1.67-1.73],长时间通气[ORs1.34(1.33-1.36),1.56(1.53-1.58),1.97(1.94-2.00),2.27(2.24-2.30)],初始ICU住院时间[以小时为单位的平均差,6.79(6.00-7.58),9.55(8.71-10.38),17.26(16.38-18.15),22.14(21.22-23.06)],重新进入ICU[ORs1.14(1.12-1.64),1.15(1.12-1.17),1.15(1.13-1.18),1.32(1.29-1.35],和额外的ICU住院时间[以小时为单位的平均差异,0.55(0.18-0.92),0.38(0.00-0.77),1.02(0.61-1.43),1.83(1.40-2.26)]。
    结论:术中PRBC输注与PPC的发生率增加有关,ICU住院时间延长,和单独CABG手术后ICU再入院。
    BACKGROUND: Intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion during cardiac surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality; however, data on the association between PRBC transfusion and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are somewhat conflicting. Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, we sought to determine whether intraoperative PRBC transfusion was associated with PPCs as well as with longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.
    METHODS: A registry-based cohort study was performed on 751,893 patients with isolated CABG between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Using propensity score-weighted regression analysis, we analyzed the effect of intraoperative PRBC on the incidence of PPCs (hospital-acquired pneumonia [HAP], mechanical ventilation for >24 hours, or reintubation), ICU length of stay, and ICU readmission.
    RESULTS: Transfusion of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 units of PRBCs was associated with increased odds for HAP (odds ratios [ORs], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.21-1.26], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.26-1.32], 1.36 [95% CI, 1.33-1.39], 1.31 [95% CI, 1.28-1.34]), reintubation (ORs, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.21-1.25], 1.38 [95% CI, 1.35-1.40], 1.57 [95% CI, 1.55-1.60], 1.70 [95% CI, 1.67-1.73]), prolonged ventilation (ORs, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.33-1.36], 1.56 [95% CI, 1.53-1.58], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.94-2.00], 2.27 [95% CI, 2.24-2.30]), initial ICU length of stay (mean difference in hours, 6.79 [95% CI, 6.00-7.58], 9.55 [95% CI, 8.71-10.38], 17.26 [95% CI, 16.38-18.15], 22.14 [95% CI, 21.22-23.06]), readmission to ICU (ORs, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.12-1.64], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.12-1.17], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.29-1.35]), and additional ICU length of stay (mean difference in hours, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.18-0.92], 0.38 [95% CI, 0.00-0.77], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.61-1.43], 1.83 [95% CI, 1.40-2.26]), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PRBC transfusion was associated with increased incidence of PPCs, prolonged ICU stay, and ICU readmissions after isolated CABG surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重症监护病房(ICU)因急性心力衰竭(AHF)入院的患者医院获得性肺炎(HAP)的预测因素和预后的数据很少。更好地了解这些因素可以为管理策略提供信息。本研究旨在评估ICU中AHF住院患者HAP的发生率和预测因素及其对管理和预后的影响。
    这是一项回顾性单中心观察性研究。从匿名的基于注册表的数据集中收集患者水平和结果数据。主要结局是院内全因死亡率,次要结局包括住院时间(LOS),对肌力/通气支持的要求,和出院时心力衰竭(HF)药物类别的处方模式。
    638例AHF患者(平均年龄,71.6±12.7年,61.9%男性),137例发生HAP(21.5%)。在多变量分析中,HAP是由从头AHF预测的,较高的NT前B型利钠肽水平,胸片上的胸腔积液,二尖瓣反流,有中风史,糖尿病,和慢性肾病。HAP患者的LOS较长,和更大的可能性需要斜切物(调整后的赔率比,OR,2.31,95%置信区间,CI,2.16-2.81;p<0.001)或通气支持(校正OR2.11,95CI,1.76-2.79,p<0.001)。在调整了年龄之后,性和临床协变量,HAP患者的全因住院死亡率明显更高(风险比,2.10;95CI,1.71-2.84;p<0.001)。从HAP恢复的患者在出院时接受HF药物的可能性较小。
    HAP在ICU环境中的AHF患者中很常见,在从头AHF患者中更为普遍。二尖瓣反流,更高的合并症负担,更严重的拥堵。HAP赋予更大的并发症和院内死亡风险,出院时接受循证HF药物治疗的可能性较低。
    UNASSIGNED: Data on predictors and prognosis of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) in patients admitted for acute heart failure (AHF) to intensive care units (ICU) are scarce. Better knowledge of these factors may inform management strategies. This study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of HAP and its impact on management and outcomes in patients hospitalised for AHF in the ICU.
    UNASSIGNED: this was a retrospective single-centre observational study. Patient-level and outcome data were collected from an anonymized registry-based dataset. Primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), requirement for inotropic/ventilatory support, and prescription patterns of heart failure (HF) drug classes at discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 638 patients with AHF (mean age, 71.6 ± 12.7 years, 61.9% male), HAP occurred in 137 (21.5%). In multivariable analysis, HAP was predicted by de novo AHF, higher NT proB-type natriuretic peptide levels, pleural effusion on chest x-ray, mitral regurgitation, and a history of stroke, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Patients with HAP had a longer LOS, and a greater likelihood of requiring inotropes (adjusted odds ratio, OR, 2.31, 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.16-2.81; p < 0.001) or ventilatory support (adjusted OR 2.11, 95%CI, 1.76-2.79, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex and clinical covariates, all-cause in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with HAP (hazard ratio, 2.10; 95%CI, 1.71-2.84; p < 0.001). Patients recovering from HAP were less likely to receive HF medications at discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: HAP is frequent in AHF patients in the ICU setting and more prevalent in individuals with de novo AHF, mitral regurgitation, higher burden of comorbidities, and more severe congestion. HAP confers a greater risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, and a lower likelihood of receiving evidence-based HF medications at discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)聚合酶链反应(PCR)具有很高的阴性预测值(NPV)。我们旨在了解外科重症监护病房(ICU)中MRSA筛查的NPV是否存在差异,并确定其在抗生素降级中的作用。
    方法:我们执行了单中心,2016年至2019年入住外科ICU的呼吸道培养和MRSA鼻PCR阳性的成年人的回顾性队列研究.患者按外科ICU进行分层:心胸/心血管重症监护病房(CVICU)或移植/急性护理重症监护病房(ACS-ICU)。我们的主要结果是MRSA筛查的NPV。次要结果是经验性MRSA靶向治疗的持续时间。
    结果:我们分析了61例患者:42.6%(n=26)ACS-ICU和57.4%(n=35)CVICU。年龄没有差异,合并症,之前MRSA感染,最近使用抗生素,免疫受损状态,或者肾脏替代疗法.在肺炎诊断时,更多的ACS-ICU患者住院≥5天(65.4%对8.6%,P<0.0001),CVICU中更多的患者发生感染性休克(88.6%对34.5%,P<0.0001)和血小板减少性(40%对11.5%,P=0.02)。PCR的NPV相似(ACS-ICU:0.92[0.75-0.98],CV-ICU0.89[0.73-0.96])。关于多元线性回归,CVICU与更长的经验性治疗相关(β1.5,95%CI0.8-2.3,P<0.0001),住院≥5d(β0.73,95%CI0.06-1.39,P=0.03)。
    结论:MRSA鼻PCR筛查具有较高的NPV,可排除外科危重患者的MRSA肺炎。然而,CVICU患者和住院≥5d的患者MRSA靶向治疗降阶梯的时间更长,可能是由于临床风险较高。
    The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a high negative predictive value (NPV). We aimed to understand if there was a difference in the NPV of the MRSA screen in surgical intensive care units (ICUs) and to determine its role in antibiotic de-escalation.
    We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults with a positive respiratory culture and MRSA nasal PCR admitted to a surgical ICU from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical ICU: cardiothoracic/cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) or transplant/acute care surgery intensive care unit (ACS-ICU). Our primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA screen. Secondary outcome was the duration of empiric MRSA-targeted therapy.
    We analyzed 61 patients: 42.6% (n = 26) ACS-ICU and 57.4% (n = 35) CVICU. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, prior MRSA infection, recent antibiotic use, immunocompromised status, or renal replacement therapy. At pneumonia diagnosis, more patients in the ACS-ICU were hospitalized ≥5 d (65.4% versus 8.6%, P < 0.0001) and more patients in the CVICU were in septic shock (88.6% versus 34.5%, P < 0.0001) and thrombocytopenic (40% versus 11.5%, P = 0.02). NPV of the PCR was similar (ACS-ICU: 0.92 [0.75-0.98], CV-ICU 0.89 [0.73-0.96]). On multivariable linear regression, the CVICU was associated with longer empiric therapy (β 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.3, P < 0.0001), as was hospitalization for ≥5 d (β 0.73, 95% CI 0.06-1.39, P = 0.03).
    The MRSA nasal PCR screen has a high NPV for ruling out MRSA pneumonia in critically ill surgical patients. However, patients in the CVICU and patients hospitalized ≥5 d had a longer time to de-escalation of MRSA-targeted therapy, potentially due to higher clinical risk profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    选择性气管切开术(ET)可确保气道安全,并防止不良气道相关事件如计划外二次气管切开术(UT),长时间通气(PPV)或医院感染。这项研究的主要目的是确定重建下ja手术后气道并发症的诱发因素。我们回顾了接受下颌骨切除术和微血管骨重建的患者的记录(N=123)。流行病学因素,关于ET和UT的气管切开术方式,记录术后通气时间和医院获得性肺炎HAP的发生情况.PPV和HAP的预测值,确定了ET和UT。共有82例(66.7%)患者进行了气管切开术,其中12例(14.6%)作为UT进行。共有52例(42.3%)患者出现PPV,19人(15.4%)发展了HAP。手术时间增加(OR1.004,p=0.005)和气道困难(OR2.869,p=0.02)是预测因素,ET降低了PPV的发生率(OR0.054,p=0.006)。困难的气道(OR4.711,p=0.03)和术后谵妄(OR6.761,p=0.01)增加了UT表现。HAP在ICU中随麻醉诱导时间(OR1.268,p=0.001)和长度(OR1.039,p=0.009)而增加,而ET组降低(HR0.32,p=0.02)。ET的OR随CCI的安装(OR1.462,p=0.002)和术前放疗(OR2.8,p=0.018)而增加。对于CCI升高,术前放疗和手术时间延长的患者,应充分考虑ET。ET缩短了术后通气时间,降低了HAP。
    Elective tracheotomy (ET) secures the airway and prevents adverse airway-related events as unplanned secondary tracheotomy (UT), prolonged ventilation (PPV) or nosocomial infection. The primary objective of this study was to identify factors predisposing for airway complications after reconstructive lower ja surgery. We reviewed records of patients undergoing mandibulectomy and microvascular bone reconstruction (N = 123). Epidemiological factors, modus of tracheotomy regarding ET and UT, postoperative ventilation time and occurrence of hospital-acquired pneumonia HAP were recorded. Predictors for PPV and HAP, ET and UT were identified. A total of 82 (66.7%) patients underwent tracheotomy of which 12 (14.6%) were performed as UT. A total of 52 (42.3%) patients presented PPV, while 19 (15.4%) developed HAP. Increased operation time (OR 1.004, p = 0.005) and a difficult airway (OR 2.869, p = 0.02) were predictors, while ET reduced incidence of PPV (OR 0.054, p = 0.006). A difficult airway (OR 4.711, p = 0.03) and postoperative delirium (OR 6.761, p = 0.01) increased UT performance. HAP increased with anesthesia induction time (OR 1.268, p = 0.001) and length in ICU (OR 1.039, p = 0.009) while decreasing in ET group (HR 0.32, p = 0.02). OR for ET increased with mounting CCI (OR 1.462, p = 0.002) and preoperative radiotherapy (OR 2.8, p = 0.018). ET should be strongly considered in patients with increased CCI, preoperative radiotherapy and prolonged operation time. ET shortened postoperative ventilation time and reduced HAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医院获得性肺炎(HAP)是TBI患者最常见的并发症和晚期死亡原因之一。HAP的针对性防治对改善TBI患者预后具有重要意义。在以往的临床观察中,我们发现叶酸治疗对TBI患者有很好的预防和治疗HAP的作用。我们进行了这项回顾性队列研究,通过从两个医疗中心选择293名TBI患者并分析其住院数据来证明我们观察到的结果。结果显示,接受叶酸治疗的TBI患者的HAP发生率显着降低(44.1%vs.63.0%,p=0.012)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,叶酸治疗是TBI患者发生HAP的独立保护因素(OR=0.418,p=0.031)。特别是在HAP的高危人群中,例如旧的(OR:1.356vs.2.889),ICU(或:1.775vs.5.996)和严重TBI(OR:0.975vs.5.424)患者。同时,HAP患者的队列研究表明,叶酸对延缓HAP的进展也有很好的作用,例如减少气管切开术的机会(26.1%vs.50.8%,p=0.041),并缩短了住院时间(15dvs.19d,p=0.029)和ICU住院时间(5dvs.8d,p=0.046)。因此,我们认为TBI患者的叶酸治疗具有预防和治疗HAP的潜力,值得进一步临床研究。
    Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) is one of the most common complications and late causes of death in TBI patients. Targeted prevention and treatment of HAP are of great significance for improving the prognosis of TBI patients. In the previous clinical observation, we found that folic acid treatment for TBI patients has a good effect on preventing and treating HAP. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to demonstrate what we observed by selecting 293 TBI patients from two medical centers and analyzing their hospitalization data. The result showed that the incidence of HAP was significantly lower in TBI patients who received folic acid treatment (44.1% vs. 63.0%, p = 0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that folic acid treatment was an independent protective factor for the occurrence of HAP in TBI patients (OR = 0.418, p = 0.031), especially in high-risk groups of HAP, such as the old (OR: 1.356 vs. 2.889), ICU (OR: 1.775 vs. 5.996) and severe TBI (OR: 0.975 vs. 5.424) patients. At the same time, cohort studies of HAP patients showed that folic acid also had a good effect on delaying the progression of HAP, such as reducing the chance of tracheotomy (26.1% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.041), and reduced the length of hospital stay (15 d vs. 19 d, p = 0.029) and ICU stay (5 d vs. 8 d, p = 0.046). Therefore, we believe that folic acid treatment in TBI patients has the potential for preventing and treating HAP, and it is worthy of further clinical research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗菌素耐药性(AMR),包括多药(MDR)和广泛耐药(XDR)细菌,是预防和管理医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的重要考虑因素。在AMR时代,BioFireFilmArray肺炎联合小组(BFPP)诊断HAP/VAP的临床效用尚未得到彻底评估.
    从2019年7月至2021年10月,我们在Siriraj医院和Saraburi医院招募了患有HAP或VAP的成年住院患者。收集呼吸道样本进行标准微生物测定,抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST),和BFPP分析。
    在40个科目中,21是男人HAP/VAP诊断的中位持续时间为10.5(5,21.5)天,收集36例气管内抽吸物和4例痰标本。标准培养物分离出54种生物体-A。鲍曼不动杆菌(37.0%),铜绿假单胞菌(29.6%),和嗜麦芽链球菌(16.7%)。68.6%的革兰氏阴性显示MDR或XDR谱。BFPP检测到77个细菌靶标-A。鲍曼不动杆菌32.5%,铜绿假单胞菌26.3%,和肺炎克雷伯菌17.5%。在检测到的28个AMR基因靶标中,CTX-M(42.5%),OXA-48样(25%),最常见的是NDM(14.3%)。与标准测试相比,BFPP的总体灵敏度为98%(88-100%),特异性为81%(74-87%),阳性预测值为60%(47-71%),阴性预测值为99%(96-100%),κ(κ)系数为0.64(0.53-0.75)。在肠杆菌中,表型AST与检测到的AMR基因之间的一致性为0.57。鲍曼不动杆菌之间没有一致性,铜绿假单胞菌,和金黄色葡萄球菌。
    BFPP对检测HAP/VAP病因具有优异的诊断灵敏度。嗜麦芽窄食链球菌的缺失和AMR基因结果的不一致限制了测试性能。
    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including multidrug (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, is an essential consideration in the prevention and management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). In the AMR era, the clinical utility of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus (BFPP) to diagnose HAP/VAP has not been thoroughly evaluated.
    We enrolled adult hospitalized patients with HAP or VAP at Siriraj Hospital and Saraburi Hospital from July 2019-October 2021. Respiratory samples were collected for standard microbiological assays, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), and the BFPP analysis.
    Of 40 subjects, 21 were men. The median duration of HAP/VAP diagnoses was 10.5 (5, 21.5) days, and 36 endotracheal aspirate and 4 sputum samples were collected. Standard cultures isolated 54 organisms-A. baumannii (37.0%), P. aeruginosa (29.6%), and S. maltophilia (16.7%). 68.6% of Gram Negatives showed an MDR or XDR profile. BFPP detected 77 bacterial targets-A. baumannii 32.5%, P. aeruginosa 26.3%, and K. pneumoniae 17.5%. Of 28 detected AMR gene targets, CTX-M (42.5%), OXA-48-like (25%), and NDM (14.3%) were the most common. Compared with standard testing, the BFPP had an overall sensitivity of 98% (88-100%), specificity of 81% (74-87%), positive predictive value of 60% (47-71%), negative predictive value of 99% (96-100%), and kappa (κ) coefficient of 0.64 (0.53-0.75). The concordance between phenotypic AST and detected AMR genes in Enterobacterales was 0.57. There was no concordance among A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus.
    The BFPP has excellent diagnostic sensitivity to detect HAP/VAP etiology. The absence of S. maltophilia and discordance of AMR gene results limit the test performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号