Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women. The vast majority of breast cancer patients have hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors. In advanced HR+ breast cancer, the combination of endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors is considered the standard of care in the front-line setting. Nevertheless, resistance to hormonal therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors eventually occurs, leading to progression of the disease. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a promising therapeutic choice with significant efficacy in patients with HR+ breast cancer, which is resistant to endocrine treatment. ADCs typically consist of a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker to a monoclonal antibody that targets a specific tumor-associated antigen, offering the advantage of a more selective delivery of chemotherapy to cancer cells. In this review, we focus on the ADC mechanisms of action, their toxicity profile and therapeutic uses as well as on related biomarkers and future perspectives in advanced HR+ breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Abemaciclib is an oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6). Data from the clinical trial monarchE (2023) showed improved survival from invasive disease. The aim of the present article was to conduct an economic assessment of adjuvant treatment with abemaciclib in women with luminal, HER2- and node-positive breast cancer.
METHODS: A Markov model was constructed with four mutually exclusive health states (disease-free, local recurrence, distal recurrence and death). Analyses were based on the clinical trial monarchE which compared an intervention group (abemaciclib + hormone therapy [HT]) with HT alone. The effectiveness measure used was quality-adjusted life years (QALY), with unit costs and utilities being obtained from existing literature. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was used to compare the two treatment strategies.
RESULTS: Total costs were €98,765 and €17,935 for the abemaciclib plus HT group and the HT alone group, respectively. The health outcome was 10.076QALY for the intervention group and 9.495QALY for the control group, with the ICUR being€139,173/QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant gains of abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment in terms of progression-free survival, this treatment is not cost-effective for the Spanish National Health System at published prices. It may be cost-effective with an appropriate discount on the official price.

BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in T2N1M0 stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR + /HER2-) breast cancer are ambiguous. The debate continues regarding whether NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) offers superior survival outcomes for these patients.
METHODS: Female patients diagnosed with HR + /HER2- breast cancer at T2N1M0 stage between 2010 and 2020, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and divided into two groups, the NACT group and the ACT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to establish balanced cohorts between groups, considering baseline features. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model were executed to assess the efficacy of both NACT and ACT in terms of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). A logistic regression model was employed to examine the association between predictive variables and response to NACT.
RESULTS: After PSM, 4,682 patients were finally included. K-M curves showed that patients receiving NACT exhibited significantly worse OS and BCSS when compared with patients undergoing ACT. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that not achieving pathologic complete response (non-pCR) after NACT (versus ACT), was identified as an adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.36-1.83) and BCSS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.44-2. 02). The logistic regression model revealed that low tumor grade independently predicted non-pCR.
CONCLUSIONS: Among T2N1M0 stage HR + /HER2- patients, OS and BCSS of NACT were inferior to ACT. Patients who attained non-pCR after NACT demonstrated significantly worse survival outcomes compared with those who received ACT.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a cornerstone adjuvant treatment of many hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, and nearly half of women taking aromatase inhibitors suffer from AI-induced arthralgia (AIA), also known as AI-associated musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS), for which there are limited evidence-based treatments. Pharmacologic management and complementary methods including supplements, exercise, physical therapy, yoga, acupuncture, and massage have all shown mixed results. Comprehensive diet and lifestyle strategies are understudied in AIA/AIMSS despite their disease-modifying effects across many chronic conditions. Here we report a case of a woman with stage 2 estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma on adjuvant anastrozole whose AI-induced arthralgia was durably controlled through a Mediterranean plant-forward diet and daily physical activity guided by continuous glucose monitoring. We posit that diet and a lifestyle inclusive of daily physical activity constitute a low-cost, low-risk, and potentially high-reward strategy for controlling common AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms and that more investigation in this arena, including well-designed randomized trials, is warranted.

Objective This study aimed to examine the axillary pathological condition through the development of an assessment framework for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer subsequent to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Furthermore, the primary objective of this study was to examine the association between axillary status and breast tumors that are positive for hormone receptors following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methodology The present retrospective investigation encompassed a cohort including 300 individuals who were administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy before receiving surgical intervention. The data collection period for this study was from September 2021 to December 2022. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, per the guidelines established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). We divided patients into two distinct groups: a test set of 250 patients and a validity set of 50 patients. Patients with no evidence of lymphoid involvement underwent a biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNB) and would have undergone axillary dissection if the biopsy results had indicated positive findings. A logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the variables linked to the presence of residual positive axillary lymph nodes in the test set. Subsequently, a multivariate analysis was conducted on the variables that exhibited a p-value below 0.2 in the univariate study. In addition, a value of 1 was assigned to all risk factors to construct a comprehensive correlation prediction model. Results The participants included in this study had a mean age and body mass index (BMI) of 46.24 ± 9.1 years and 25.8 ± 2.5 kg, respectively. The present investigation examined the presence of pathological axillary metastases in a cohort of 188 patients, which accounted for 62.55% of the total sample, by utilizing core-needle biopsy. Furthermore, the incidence rates of individuals presenting with clinical T1 were reported as 14.6%, while 55.2% cases of T2, 17.8% cases of T3, and 13% cases of T4 tumors were reported, respectively. Of the overall occurrences, the prevailing histological subtype was invasive ductal carcinoma, accounting for 91.4% (222 out of 243) of the cases. Multiple criteria were identified as independent predictors of the presence of residual positive axillary lymph nodes. The factors under consideration encompass lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio= 7.108; 95% breast cancer stage (odd ratio = 5.025; 95%, HER2 negativity (odd ratio= 2.997), low Ki-67 expression (odd ratio = 4.231), and suspected positive axillary lymph nodes before surgical intervention. Conclusion The present study presents a novel prediction model that integrates imaging and pathology data, aiming to assist patients and healthcare practitioners in evaluating the efficacy of NAC for hormone-receptor-positive breast tumors. The model holds particular significance for individuals who exhibit clinical positivity in their lymph nodes (LNs). Consequently, the model has the potential to provide guidance for the management of axillary lymph nodes and prevent unnecessary dissection.

Advanced breast cancer (ABC) that is positive for hormone receptors (HRs) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a cancer subtype with distinctive characteristics. The primary treatment guidelines suggest that a combination therapy comprising anti-HER2 therapy and chemotherapy should be administered as the initial treatment for HR-positive/ HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) ABC. However, crosstalk between the HR and HER2 pathways can partially account for the resistance of HR+/HER2+ disease to HER2-targeted therapy. This, in turn, provides a rationale for the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy (ET). Many clinical studies have confirmed that the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and ET as a first-line treatment is not inferior to the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy, and support its use as a first-line treatment choice for HR+/HER2+ ABC. Other drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors, may also improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer by blocking signaling pathways associated with tumor proliferation and break new ground for the treatment of HR+/HER2+ ABC.

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a highly effective treatment strategy across breast cancer (BC) subtypes, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+), hormone-receptor positive (ER/PR+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Over the past twenty years, ADCs have undergone relevant evolutions, from target diversity to payload ratio, to linker design, allowing for a progressive increase in their efficacy. From the first-generation ADC, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), approved in 2013 for HER2+ breast cancer, to next generation ADCs such as sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan, to emerging ADCs on the horizon, we continue to see unparalleled efficacy compared to traditional chemotherapy. However, each ADC has brought a new cadre of adverse events for clinicians and patients to manage. Importantly, with the development and approval of several ADCs to treat metastatic breast cancer, there are unanswered clinical questions surrounding how to optimally sequence treatment for patients who may be candidates for more than one ADC and, in general, how to treat patients beyond progression on ADCs. From bench to bedside, in this review, we will discuss the pharmacology and current indications for the novel ADCs trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan. Highlighting emerging ADCs and ongoing clinical trials, we will anticipate the changes in the breast cancer treatment paradigm. Lastly, we will outline the available data and current approaches for adverse event management and sequencing strategies for ADCs in clinical practice, including proposed mechanisms of resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates and overall survival (OS) between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients with early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.
METHODS: We identified early-stage invasive HER2-negative BC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database. HER2-low was defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, and HER2-zero by IHC0. All the methods were applied separately in the HR-positive and TNBC cohorts. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of HER2 status with pCR (i.e. ypT0/Tis and ypN0). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to estimate the association of HER2 status with OS. Inverse probability weighting and/or multivariable regression were applied to all analyses.
RESULTS: For HR-positive patients, 70.9% (n = 17,934) were HER2-low, whereas 51.1% (n = 10,238) of TNBC patients were HER2-low. For both HR-positive and TNBC cohorts, HER2-low status was significantly associated with lower pCR rates [HR-positive: 5.0% vs. 6.7%; weighted odds ratio (OR) = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: 21.6% vs. 24.4%; weighted OR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.98), p = 0.007] and improved OS [HR-positive: weighted hazard ratio = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: weighted hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), p < 0.001]. HER2-low status was associated with favorable OS among patients not achieving pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), p < 0.001; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), p < 0.001], while no significant difference in OS was observed in patients who achieved pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.61-1.63), p > 0.99; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11 (95% CI: 0.85-1.45), p = 0.44].
CONCLUSIONS: In both early-stage HR-positive and TNBC patients, HER2-low status was associated with lower pCR rates. HER2-zero status might be considered an adverse prognostic factor for OS in patients not achieving pCR.

OBJECTIVE: HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a novel entity with relevant therapeutic implications, especially in hormone receptor (HR) positive BC. This study examines whether HER2 mRNA through the 21-gene assay, Oncotype DX (ODX), can refine the diagnosis of HER2-low and HER2-zero, obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
METHODS: Between Jan 2021 and Jan 2023, 229 consecutive HR-positive HER2-negative early BC (T1-3 N0-1) have been characterised by IHC and ODX. HER2 status by IHC was either zero (IHC-0) or low (IHC-1 + and IHC-2 + /ISH-negative) while HER2-zero was further divided into HER2-null (IHC-0) and HER2-ultralow (IHC-1-10%). HER2 gene expression by ODX was negative if lower 10.7.
RESULTS: The distribution of HER2 IHC was as follows: 53.3% HER2-0, 29.25% HER2-1 + , and 17.5% HER2-2 + . The clinicopathological characteristics were similar in the three groups, with higher PgR-negative rate in HER2-zero (13.9% vs 3% vs 5%). The distribution of RS was homogeneous in the three groups with the median HER2 gene expression of 9.20 [IQR: 8.70-9.60]. HER2 gene expression gradually increased as the IHC score, with substantial overlap. After adjusting for confounders, HER2-1 + and HER2 2 + had a significant positive correlation between HER2 gene expression and IHC [OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.68, p < 0.001; OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.37, p < 0.001] compared to the HER2-zero group. HER2 gene expression did not differ between HER2-null and HER2-ultralow subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the substantial overlap, the HER2 gene expression is unable to properly distinguish HER2-low and HER2-zero IHC whose accurate identification is critical in the context of HER2-negative BC.

Breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer deaths, worldwide. Early breast cancers are treatment sensitive and patients under standardized treatment have prolonged. Breast cancer treatment has significantly evolved from the conventional surgical approach and radiotherapy to local and systemic adjuvant therapies. Though localized breast cancers are clinically manageable, distant recurrence is a cause of morbid concern. Adjuvant systemic therapy is effective in both distant and local recurrences and hence gained significant attention. Early breast cancer prognosis has greatly improved in the past 3 decades with reduced mortality rates due to the widespread use of adjuvant therapy. It can markedly increase the cure rate of breast cancers, and postoperative adjuvant therapy became a part of comprehensive breast cancer treatment. Further research to understand the early breast cancer characteristics could expand the treatment modalities that can improve the outcomes and survival benefits of breast cancer patients.