Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have helped to improve the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. There are currently nine different commercially available gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) that can be used for body MRI cases, and which are classifiable according to their structures (cyclic or linear) or biodistribution (extracellular-space agents, target/specific-agents, and blood-pool agents). The aim of this review is to illustrate the commercially available MRI contrast agents, their effect on imaging, and adverse reaction on the body, with the goal to lead to their proper selection in different clinical contexts. When we have to choose between the different GBCAs, we have to consider several factors: (1) safety and clinical impact; (2) biodistribution and diagnostic application; (3) higher relaxivity and better lesion detection; (4) higher stability and lower tissue deposit; (5) gadolinium dose/concentration and lower volume injection; (6) pulse sequences and protocol optimization; (7) higher contrast-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T. Knowing the patient\'s clinical information, the relevant GBCAs properties and their effect on body MRI sequences are the key features to perform efficient and high-quality MRI examination.

Liver transplant is the definitive treatment of end-stage liver disease and early hepatocellular carcinoma. The number of liver transplant surgeries done is highly affected by the number and availability of deceased donor organs. Living donor liver transplantation has emerged as an alternative source of donors, increasing the availability of organs for transplant. Many factors must be considered when choosing living donor candidates to maintain a high level of donor safety and organ survival. To that end, potential donors undergo a rigorous pre-donation workup.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency setting is frequently investigated with an intravenous contrast enhanced CT as a first line diagnostic test. However, global contrast shortages restricted the use of contrast for a period in 2022, altering standard practice with many scans performed without intravenous contrast. Whilst IV contrast can be useful to assist with interpretation, its necessity in the setting of acute undifferentiated abdominal pain is not well described, and its use comes with its own risks. This study aimed to assess the shortcomings of omitting IV contrast in an emergency setting, by comparing the rate of CT scans with \"indeterminate\" findings with and without the use of IV contrast.
METHODS: Data from presentations to a single centre emergency department for undifferentiated abdominal pain prior to and during contrast shortages in June 2022 were retrospectively compared. The primary outcome was the rate of diagnostic uncertainty, where the presence or absence of intra-abdominal pathology could not be ascertained.
RESULTS: 12/85 (14.1%) of the unenhanced abdominal CT scans provided an uncertain result, compared with 14/101 (13.9%) of control cases performed with intravenous contrast (P = 0.96). There were also similar rates of positive and negative findings between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Omitting intravenous contrast for abdominal CT in the setting of undifferentiated abdominal pain demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of diagnostic uncertainty. There are significant potential patient, fiscal and societal benefits as well as potential improvements to emergency department efficiency with the reduction of unnecessary intravenous contrast administration.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of altered hepatic uptake and/or efflux on the hepatobiliary disposition of the imaging agents [99mTc]Mebrofenin (MEB) and [153Gd]Gadobenate dimeglumine (BOPTA) is important for proper estimation of liver function.
METHODS: A multi-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing MEB and BOPTA disposition in isolated perfused rat livers (IPRLs) was developed. The PK model was simultaneously fit to MEB and BOPTA concentration-time data in the extracellular space, hepatocytes, bile canaliculi, and sinusoidal efflux in livers from healthy rats, and to BOPTA concentration-time data in rats pretreated with monocrotaline (MCT).
RESULTS: The model adequately described MEB and BOPTA disposition in each compartment. The hepatocyte uptake clearance was much higher for MEB (55.3 mL/min) than BOPTA (6.67 mL/min), whereas the sinusoidal efflux clearance for MEB (0.000831 mL/min) was lower than BOPTA (0.0127 mL/min). The clearance from hepatocytes to bile (CLbc) for MEB (0.658 mL/min) was similar to BOPTA (0.642 mL/min) in healthy rat livers. The BOPTA CLbc was reduced in livers from MCT-pretreated rats (0.496 mL/min), while the sinusoidal efflux clearance was increased (0.0644 mL/min).
CONCLUSIONS: A PK model developed to characterize MEB and BOPTA disposition in IPRLs was used to quantify changes in the hepatobiliary disposition of BOPTA caused by MCT pretreatment of rats to induce liver toxicity. This PK model could be applied to simulate changes in the hepatobiliary disposition of these imaging agents in rats in response to altered hepatocyte uptake or efflux associated with disease, toxicity, or drug-drug interactions.

This is a rare case of extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH) presenting as a mass-like lesion in liver allograft. Our patient was a 57-year-old woman who had undergone liver transplantation due to hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. She presented with an ill-defined hypoechoic lesion on ultrasound which showed features of focal EMH on pathologic examinations. While transient intrahepatic hematopoiesis has been reported in liver transplant patients, focal EMH mass lesion is a rarely encountered phenomenon. Therefore, focal EMH may need to be considered as a differential diagnosis when encountering a mass in post liver transplant patients.

Hepatobiliary scintigraphy is a well-established nuclear imaging method for evaluating liver function and displaying the biliary system, but the spatial and temporal resolution is limited, and, there is still no established PET equivalent. Adapted from the work of Schuhmacher et al. in 1983, the production of a 68Gallium-labeled substitute, tetrabromophthalein ([68Ga]Ga-BP-IDA), was undertaken according to current Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards and proved feasible and reproducible. PET/CT with the radiotracer was performed in two complex patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in preparation for transarterial radioembolization. Due to its high spatial and temporal resolution, localization of areas with impaired liver function and visualization of the biliary system were possible. We could demonstrate that this 68Gallium-labeled, IDA-based PET tracer is feasible and could advance hepatic and biliary function PET imaging.

A 54-year-old man presented with abdominal pain and a history of post-traumatic splenectomy 33 years prior, imaging revealed an incidental hepatic mass.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiologic findings between perforated and non-perforated choledochal cysts in children.
METHODS: Fourteen patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 1.7 ± 1.2 years) with perforated choledochal cysts (perforated group) and 204 patients (3.6 ± 3.8 years) with non-perforated choledochal cysts (non-perforated group) were included between 2000 and 2019. All patients underwent choledochal cyst excision after ultrasound, CT, or MR cholangiopancreatography. Relevant data including demographics, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging findings, and outcomes were analyzed. Statistical differences were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher\'s exact test.
RESULTS: Choledochal cyst perforation occurred only in children under the age of 4 years. Acute symptoms, including fever (p < 0.001), were more common in the perforated group than in the non-perforated group. High levels of white blood cells (p = 0.004), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), and serum amylase (p = 0.002), and low levels of albumin (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the perforated group. All 14 patients with perforated choledochal cysts had ascites, whereas only 16% (33/204) of patients in the non-perforated group had ascites (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients who had ascites, a large amount of ascites (p = 0.001), increase in the amount of ascites in a short time (p < 0.001), complex ascites (p < 0.001), and perihepatic pseudocysts (p < 0.001) were more common in the perforated group than in the non-perforated group.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with perforated choledochal cysts have characteristic clinical and radiologic findings compared to those with non-perforated choledochal cysts. In young children with choledochal cysts, perforation should be differentiated in cases with acute symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, and characteristic ascites findings.

A rare case of arterio-biliary fistula and haemobilia complicating intra-operative microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in a 58-year-old woman with cirrhosis.

This study aims at prospectively evaluating the difference in the effect of cholecystokinin (CCK) and half-and-half milk (HHM) administered in the same patient on gallbladder contractility and correlation with clinical outcomes. Upon gallbladder visualization during standard hepatobiliary imaging, 0.02 μg/kg of CCK was injected over 3 min, and additional 30 min of dynamic imaging was obtained. Patients with gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) <35% after CCK were administered 8 oz of HHM followed by 30 min of imaging. The GBEF was recalculated. The number of patients whom GBEF changed from below 35% (abnormal) after CCK to above 35% (normal) after HHM was recorded. Follow-up of the clinical outcome at 6 months was performed. Fifty patients with abnormal GBEF were prospectively included. The average GBEF after CCK was 14.7% ± 8.5% and after HHM was 30.7% ± 20.8%. The average increase in GBEF with HHM was 16.0% ± 22.2%. The GBEF changed from abnormal to normal in 17 patients (34%). The remaining 33 patients remained abnormal. Clinical outcomes at 6 months were available in 47 patients. Cholecystectomy was performed in 60% of patients with abnormal GBEF with CCK and HHM with resolution or improvement of pain. Two of 16 patients (12%) with abnormal GBEF after CCK but normal after HHM had cholecystectomies with pain improvement, while 8 out of these patients (50%) were diagnosed and treated with other disorders and improved. Hepatobiliary imaging with HHM stimulation is a superior physiologic test which can lower the number of unnecessary cholecystectomies and misdiagnoses as functional cholecystitis.