health service use

卫生服务使用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以安德森的行为模型为指导,本研究的目的是(1)研究个人因素与预期利用家庭长期护理(LTC)服务的中国老年人之间的关系;(2)探讨社区支持的影响,如果有的话,在这些协会。
    方法:使用多阶段随机抽样方法,我们在成都招募了1064名老年人,中国。采用分层回归来研究个人预测因子和社区支持对基于家庭的LTC服务的预期使用的直接影响。使用Hayes过程检查了社区支持的调节作用。
    结果:两种诱发因素(即,年老未婚),四个启用(即,独自生活,孩子少了,并获得较少的家庭和同伴支持),和六个需要因素(即,患有更多的慢性疾病;日常生活中的工具性活动表现下降;抑郁症程度较高,焦虑,孤独;和较低的衰老自我形象),低社区支持与增加家庭LTC的预期利用率显着相关。此外,社区支持缓和了家庭支持的影响(B=-.20,p<.001),对等支持(B=-.20,p<.001),衰老的自我形象(B=-.39,p<.001),抑郁症(B=-.34,p<.001),以及对基于家庭的LTC服务的预期利用的孤独感(B=-.48,p<.001)。
    结论:政策制定者和从业人员应考虑为老年人提供量身定制的服务,并让社区参与加强以家庭为基础的LTC服务。
    OBJECTIVE: Guided by Andersen\'s behavioral model, the objectives of this study were to (1) examine the associations between individual factors and the intended utilization of home-based long-term care (LTC) services among older adults in China and (2) explore the influence of community support, if any, on these associations.
    METHODS: Using a multi-stage random sampling approach, we recruited 1,064 older adults in Chengdu, China. Hierarchical regression was employed to investigate the direct effects of individual predictors and community support on the intended use of home-based LTC services. The moderating effect of community support was examined using the Hayes Process.
    RESULTS: Two predisposing (i.e., being old and unmarried), four enabling (i.e., living alone, having fewer children, and receiving less family and peer support), and six need factors (i.e., having more chronic illnesses; decreased performance in instrumental activities of daily living; higher levels of depression, anxiety, loneliness; and a lower self-image of aging), and low community support were significantly associated with increased intended utilization of home-based LTC. In addition, community support moderated the effects of family support (B = -.20, p < .001), peer support (B = -.20, p < .001), self-image of aging (B = -.39, p < .001), depression (B = -.34, p < .001), and loneliness (B = -.48, p < .001) on the intended utilization of home-based LTC services.
    CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers and practitioners should consider delivering tailored services for older adults and involve the community in the context of enhancing home-based LTC services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:较年轻的迁移年龄与精神病的高风险相关,但迁移年龄与常见精神障碍之间的关系尚不清楚。这项研究调查了居住在挪威的移民中移民年龄与诊断出的常见精神障碍之间的关系。
    方法:使用2008年至2019年的挪威国家登记数据,我们比较了非移民在成年早期医疗服务中常见精神障碍诊断的几率。移民年龄和逗留时间不同的后代和移民。我们还调查了不同移民群体以及男女关系的差异。
    结果:挪威≥19岁的后代和儿童移民患常见精神障碍的几率高于非移民,而在挪威,青春期≥19岁的移民的几率相似。那些在新兴和成年早期迁移的人的几率较低。总的来说,在移民中,在挪威,年龄小于19岁的移民比19岁以上的移民和非难民与难民相比,移民年龄与常见精神障碍之间的关系更为明显。尤其是男人。
    结论:与非移民相比,长期居住的后代和儿童移民可能由于在双文化环境中成长的相关压力而具有更高的常见精神障碍的几率。迁移年龄与诊断出的常见精神障碍呈负相关,但这种影响可能会随着时间的推移而减弱。难民的影响似乎较弱,尤其是难民,这可能反映了更高水平的移民前创伤和与成年抵达者的寻求庇护期相关的压力。同时,移民,尤其是那些成年的人,经历护理障碍。这也可以解释成年移民中诊断出常见精神障碍的几率特别低,尤其是那些停留时间较短的人。
    BACKGROUND: Younger age of migration is associated with higher risk of psychotic disorders but the relationship between age of migration and common mental disorders is less clear. This study investigates the association between age of migration and diagnosed common mental disorders among migrants living in Norway.
    METHODS: Using national Norwegian register data from 2008 to 2019, we compared the odds of a common mental disorder diagnosis in healthcare services during early adulthood among non-migrants, descendants and migrants with different ages of migration and lengths of stay. We also investigated differences in the relationship for different migrant groups and for men and women.
    RESULTS: Descendants and childhood migrants with ≥ 19 years in Norway had higher odds of common mental disorders than non-migrants, while those migrating during adolescence with ≥ 19 years in Norway had similar odds. Those migrating during emerging and early adulthood had lower odds. Overall among migrants, the relationship between age of migration and common mental disorders was more pronounced for migrants < 19 years in Norway than ≥ 19 years and for non-refugees compared with refugees, especially men.
    CONCLUSIONS: Descendants and childhood migrants with long stays may have higher odds of common mental disorders due to the associated stress of growing up in a bicultural context compared with non-migrants. Age of migration has a negative association with diagnosed common mental disorders but much of this effect may attenuate over time. The effect appears weaker for refugees, and particularly refugee men, which may reflect higher levels of pre-migration trauma and stress associated with the asylum-seeking period for those arriving as adults. At the same time, migrants, especially those arriving as adults, experience barriers to care. This could also explain the particularly low odds of diagnosed common mental disorders among adult migrants, especially those with shorter stays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该队列简介描述了世界上最大的关联数据集之一,涉及智障人士的健康。该队列包括100,089名智力残疾人士的回顾性小组,他们在新南威尔士州接受了残疾和/或健康服务,澳大利亚。在这些参与者中,34%是女性,队列进入时的平均年龄为3岁(四分位间距,0至19年)。一个单独的比较队列包括455677个人,与5岁年龄组相匹配,性别,和住宅邮政编码为5:1。初步结果表明,在2001年至2018年期间,智障人士的住院率增加了一倍以上(每1000人年538人与235人)。以及急诊科就诊率明显较高(每1000人年707对379)和使用门诊精神卫生服务(每1000人年1012对157),相对于比较队列。住院人数差异最大的是精神障碍,透析,神经系统和感觉器官的疾病。此外,有智力残疾的个体的药物分配率是比较队列中发现的两倍多.在这些药物中,46.6%用于治疗神经系统疾病,相比之下,对比队列的比例为24.7%。平均死亡年龄为52岁(标准差[SD],19岁),智力障碍者和64岁(SD,22年)适用于比较者参与者。
    This cohort profile describes one of the largest linked datasets in the world concerning the health of people with intellectual disability. The cohort comprises a retrospective group of 100,089 individuals with intellectual disability who received disability and/or health services in New South Wales, Australia. Of these participants, 34% were female, with a median age at cohort entry of 3 years (interquartile range, 0 to 19 years). A separate comparator cohort included 455,677 individuals, matched by 5-year age group, sex, and residential postcode at a 5:1 ratio. Initial results indicate that between 2001 and 2018, people with intellectual disability experienced more than double the rate of hospitalisations (538 versus 235 per 1000 person-years), as well as markedly higher rates of emergency department presentations (707 versus 379 per 1000 person-years) and use of ambulatory mental health services (1012 versus 157 per 1000 person-years), relative to the comparator cohort. The largest disparities in hospital admissions were for mental disorders, dialysis, and diseases of the nervous system and sense organs. Furthermore, individuals with intellectual disability had more than double the rate of dispensed medications found in the comparator cohort. Of these medications, 46.6% were for the treatment of nervous system conditions, as opposed to 24.7% for the comparator cohort. The mean age at death was 52 years (standard deviation [SD], 19 years) for people with intellectual disability and 64 years (SD, 22 years) for the comparator participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数关于COVID-19大流行对抑郁负担的影响的研究都集中在以封锁为具体的早期大流行阶段,但对大流行的长期影响研究较少。在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们研究了COVID-19对抑郁症患者抑郁发生率和医疗服务使用的短期和长期影响.
    方法:使用全港电子病历,我们确定了2014年至2022年间所有年龄≥10岁新诊断为抑郁症的患者.我们进行了中断的时间序列(ITS)分析,以检查大流行之前和期间医学上看抑郁症的发生率变化。然后,我们根据抑郁症发病率将所有患者分为9个队列,并研究了他们的初始和持续服务使用模式,直到2022年底。我们应用广义线性模型来比较大流行之前和期间新诊断的患者在诊断年份的医疗服务使用率。一项单独的ITS分析探讨了大流行对抑郁症患者持续使用服务的影响。
    结果:我们发现,大流行开始后,人群中抑郁症发病率立即增加(RR=1.21,95%CI:1.10-1.33,p<0.001),这表明在2022年底之前会有持续的影响。亚组分析显示,发病率在成年人和老年人群中显著增加,但不是青少年。在大流行期间新诊断的抑郁症患者在第一个诊断年度使用的资源比大流行前患者少11%。自大流行以来,先前存在的抑郁症患者在所有原因服务使用方面也立即减少了16%,正斜率变化表明在3年内逐渐反弹。
    结论:在大流行期间,面对COVID-19大流行期间抑郁症发病率增加产生的需求增加,抑郁症的服务提供并不理想。我们的研究结果表明,有必要为未来的公共卫生危机改善精神卫生资源规划准备。
    BACKGROUND: Most studies on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression burden focused on the earlier pandemic phase specific to lockdowns, but the longer-term impact of the pandemic is less well-studied. In this population-based cohort study, we examined the short-term and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on depression incidence and healthcare service use among patients with depression.
    METHODS: Using the territory-wide electronic medical records in Hong Kong, we identified all patients aged ≥ 10 years with new diagnoses of depression from 2014 to 2022. We performed an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis to examine changes in incidence of medically attended depression before and during the pandemic. We then divided all patients into nine cohorts based on year of depression incidence and studied their initial and ongoing service use patterns until the end of 2022. We applied generalized linear modeling to compare the rates of healthcare service use in the year of diagnosis between patients newly diagnosed before and during the pandemic. A separate ITS analysis explored the pandemic impact on the ongoing service use among prevalent patients with depression.
    RESULTS: We found an immediate increase in depression incidence (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10-1.33, p < 0.001) in the population after the pandemic began with non-significant slope change, suggesting a sustained effect until the end of 2022. Subgroup analysis showed that the increases in incidence were significant among adults and the older population, but not adolescents. Depression patients newly diagnosed during the pandemic used 11% fewer resources than the pre-pandemic patients in the first diagnosis year. Pre-existing depression patients also had an immediate decrease of 16% in overall all-cause service use since the pandemic, with a positive slope change indicating a gradual rebound over a 3-year period.
    CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, service provision for depression was suboptimal in the face of increased demand generated by the increasing depression incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings indicate the need to improve mental health resource planning preparedness for future public health crises.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:这项研究是一项为期两年的随访评估,旨在评估卫生服务使用情况以及针对健康结局不良高危人群的多成分一般干预措施的成本效益。
    方法:在2018-19年期间,在南澳大利亚进行了一项为期两年的成组随机对照试验的随访研究,招募了来自三个队列的1044名患者:儿童;成年人(18-64岁,患有两种或两种以上慢性疾病);老年人(年龄≥65岁)。干预组实践(n=10)提供了12个月的多组分一般实践干预。干预措施包括向首选全科医生(GP)登记患者,获得更长时间的全科医生预约,并在医院护理发作后及时进行全科医生随访。卫生服务结果包括医院使用,专业服务和药品。经济评估基于从EuroQoL5维度计算的质量调整生命年(QALYs),5个级别的效用得分,并使用每个QALY获得的50,000澳元阈值来确定成本效益。
    结果:在过去的两年中,卫生服务使用的干预效果无统计学意义.在总样本中,干预组每名患者的平均总费用高于对照组,但干预组获得的QALY数量较高.估计的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每QALY18,211澳元,低于澳大利亚使用的每QALY5万澳元的门槛。然而,干预措施的成本-效果因队列而异.对于成年队列,干预与较高的成本和较低的QALYs(与总队列相比)相关,且成本效益不高.对于老年人队列,干预措施与较低的成本相关(每位患者540澳元),主要由于医院费用较低,并且比常规护理更有效。
    结论:在一项研究中,24个月的随访保证复制了积极的成本效益,该研究对结果具有适当的动力,例如医院使用,干预期至少两年,并针对健康状况不佳的高风险老年人。
    BACKGROUND: This study was a two-year follow-up evaluation of health service use and the cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent general practice intervention targeted at people at high risk of poor health outcomes.
    METHODS: A two-year follow-up study of a clustered randomised controlled trial was conducted in South Australia during 2018-19, recruiting 1044 patients from three cohorts: children; adults (aged 18-64 years with two or more chronic diseases); and older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). Intervention group practices (n = 10) provided a multicomponent general practice intervention for 12 months. The intervention comprised patient enrolment to a preferred general practitioner (GP), access to longer GP appointments and timely general practice follow-up after episodes of hospital care. Health service outcomes included hospital use, specialist services and pharmaceuticals. The economic evaluation was based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) calculated from EuroQoL 5 dimensions, 5 level utility scores and used an A$50,000 per QALY gained threshold for determining cost-effectiveness.
    RESULTS: Over the two years, there were no statistically significant intervention effects for health service use. In the total sample, the mean total cost per patient was greater for the intervention than control group, but the number of QALYs gained in the intervention group was higher. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was A$18,211 per QALY gained, which is lower than the A$50,000 per QALY gained threshold used in Australia. However, the intervention\'s cost-effectiveness was shown to differ by cohort. For the adult cohort, the intervention was associated with higher costs and lower QALYs gained (vs the total cohort) and was not cost-effective. For the older adults cohort, the intervention was associated with lower costs (A$540 per patient), due primarily to lower hospital costs, and was more effective than usual care.
    CONCLUSIONS: The positive cost-effectiveness results from the 24-month follow-up warrant replication in a study appropriately powered for outcomes such as hospital use, with an intervention period of at least two years, and targeted to older people at high risk of poor health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同人群对眼部护理服务的使用各不相同。
    本研究旨在评估马拉维成年人自我报告的眼部护理使用(ECU)和相关的人口统计学因素。
    这项研究使用了马拉维第五次综合家庭调查2019-2020的二次数据,这是一项具有全国代表性的调查。该研究包括12,288户家庭和27,336名15岁及以上的个人。我们进入了年龄,性别,教育水平,居住地(城市/农村),和慢性病进入逻辑回归模型,并使用混淆矩阵来预测模型的准确性。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    约60.6%(95%CI60.0%-61.2%)的眼部问题患者在调查日期前2周接受了正式护理。逻辑回归模型显示,与无教育相比,ECU与教育呈正相关(比值比[OR]6.6,95%CI5.927-7.366;P<.001),男性与女性相比(OR1.2,95%CI1.104-1.290;P<.001),和城市住宅与农村住宅相比(OR1.2,95%CI1.118-1.375;P<.001)。ECU与年龄(OR7,95%CI6.782-8.476;P<.001)和患有慢性疾病(OR0.6,95%CI0.547-0.708;P<.001)呈负相关。
    社会支持,妇女赋权,教育,和流动诊所是关键的战略领域,将增加获得眼睛保健在马拉维。进一步的研究可以调查儿科人群中的ECU。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of eye care services varies among different population groups.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess self-reported eye care use (ECU) and associated demographic factors among Malawian adults.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used secondary data from the Malawi Fifth Integrated Household Survey 2019-2020, a nationally representative survey. The study included 12,288 households and 27,336 individuals 15 years and older. We entered age, sex, level of education, residency (urban/rural), and chronic disease into a logistic regression model, and used a confusion matrix to predict the model\'s accuracy. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: About 60.6% (95% CI 60.0%-61.2%) of those with eye problems accessed formal care 2 weeks before the survey date. A logistic regression model showed that ECU was positively associated with education compared to none (odds ratio [OR] 6.6, 95% CI 5.927-7.366; P<.001), males compared to females (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.104-1.290; P<.001), and urban residence compared to rural (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.118-1.375; P<.001). ECU was negatively associated with age (OR 7, 95% CI 6.782-8.476; P<.001) and having chronic diseases (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.547-0.708; P<.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Social support, women empowerment, education, and mobile clinics are key strategic areas that would increase access to eye care in Malawi. Further studies can investigate ECU among the pediatric population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:英国国家卫生局承诺提供3.65亿英镑,以通过社区围产期心理健康小组(CPMHTs)改善获得精神保健服务的机会,并降低患有严重精神疾病的妇女的围产期复发率。这项研究旨在探讨在英格兰具有专业精神保健史的孕妇中实施CPMHTs后服务使用模式的变化。并对这些变化进行成本分析。
    方法:本研究使用基于现有常规管理数据的纵向队列设计。研究人群是所有居住在英格兰的妇女,在2016年4月1日或之后怀孕,并且在2018年3月31日或之前分娩并患有精神疾病(N=70,323)。比较了实施CPMHTs前后的资源使用和成本。经济角度仅限于二级精神卫生服务,时间范围是围产期(从怀孕开始到出生后1年,~21个月)。
    结果:在有CPMHTs的地区,围产期使用社区精神保健服务的女性比例较高(30.96%,n=9,653)与没有CPMHTs的地区(24.72%,n=9,615)。在使用CPMHTs的地区,围产期使用急性护理服务(住院和危机解决小组)的妇女总体百分比较低(4.94%,n=1,540vs.5.58%,n=2,171),包括减少的危机解决团队联系人(4.41%,n=1,375vs.5.23%,n=2,035),但精神病住院人数增加(1.43%,n=445vs.1.13%,n=441)。对于使用CPMHTs的地区,围产期的总精神医疗费用明显更高(完全调整后的增量成本为111英镑,95%CI为29英镑至192英镑,p值0.008)。
    结论:在实施CPMHTs之后,使用急性护理的女性比例下降,而使用社区护理的女性比例上升.然而,与不使用CPMHT相比,CPMHT组女性更多使用住院患者以及更多使用社区护理,导致女性使用二级精神卫生服务的平均成本显著较高.必须谨慎考虑成本的增加,因为没有有关生活质量或服务满意度等相关结果的数据。
    BACKGROUND: The National Health Service in England pledged >£365 million to improve access to mental healthcare services via Community Perinatal Mental Health Teams (CPMHTs) and reduce the rate of perinatal relapse in women with severe mental illness. This study aimed to explore changes in service use patterns following the implementation of CPMHTs in pregnant women with a history of specialist mental healthcare in England, and conduct a cost-analysis on these changes.
    METHODS: This study used a longitudinal cohort design based on existing routine administrative data. The study population was all women residing in England with an onset of pregnancy on or after 1st April 2016 and who gave birth on or before 31st March 2018 with pre-existing mental illness (N = 70,323). Resource use and costs were compared before and after the implementation of CPMHTs. The economic perspective was limited to secondary mental health services, and the time horizon was the perinatal period (from the start of pregnancy to 1-year post-birth, ~ 21 months).
    RESULTS: The percentage of women using community mental healthcare services over the perinatal period was higher for areas with CPMHTs (30.96%, n=9,653) compared to areas without CPMHTs (24.72%, n=9,615). The overall percentage of women using acute care services (inpatient and crisis resolution teams) over the perinatal period was lower for areas with CPMHTs (4.94%, n=1,540 vs. 5.58%, n=2,171), comprising reduced crisis resolution team contacts (4.41%, n=1,375 vs. 5.23%, n=2,035) but increased psychiatric admissions (1.43%, n=445 vs. 1.13%, n=441). Total mental healthcare costs over the perinatal period were significantly higher for areas with CPMHTs (fully adjusted incremental cost £111, 95% CI £29 to £192, p-value 0.008).
    CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of CPMHTs, the percentage of women using acute care decreased while the percentage of women using community care increased. However, the greater use of inpatient admissions alongside greater use of community care resulted in a significantly higher mean cost of secondary mental health service use for women in the CPMHT group compared with no CPMHT. Increased costs must be considered with caution as no data was available on relevant outcomes such as quality of life or satisfaction with services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    作者试图确定快速通道心理健康干预措施是否提供给儿童个体减少心理健康问题以及这些个体的儿童对健康服务的需求。
    作者研究了从1年级到10年级的一代儿童(第2代;G2代)的快速通道作业是否减少了父母报告的心理健康问题和这些儿童的健康服务使用(第3代;G3)18年后相对于对照组。快速通道干预混合父母行为管理培训,儿童社会认知技能辅导,家访,以及1-10年级的课堂社会生态变化,以改善G2儿童中出现的行为问题。对于这项研究,快速通道参与者的1,057名G3儿童(N=581干预组,N=476对照组)进行评估。
    与随机分配到对照组的G2父母的G3儿童相比,随机分配到快速通道干预组的G2父母的G3儿童使用更少的一般住院服务和更少的住院或门诊精神卫生服务。其中一些影响是介导的:在25岁的G2成年人中,随机进入快速通道可预测内在化问题较少,体罚的使用较少,随后在G3儿童中预测了一般住院服务的使用和门诊心理健康服务的使用。G2父母34岁。两组的G3儿童在使用其他卫生服务或心理健康措施方面没有显着差异。
    快速通道与一般住院服务以及住院和门诊精神卫生服务的使用减少有关,但对父母报告的儿童心理健康的影响并不明显。投资于儿童心理健康干预措施可以减少跨代使用服务的负担。
    UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to determine whether the Fast Track mental health intervention delivered to individuals in childhood decreased mental health problems and the need for health services among the children of these individuals.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors examined whether Fast Track assignment in one generation of children (generation 2; G2) from grades 1 through 10 reduced parent-reported mental health problems and health services use in these children\'s children (generation 3; G3) 18 years later relative to a control group. The Fast Track intervention blended parent behavior-management training, child social-cognitive skills tutoring, home visits, and classroom social-ecology changes across grades 1-10 to ameliorate emerging conduct problems among the G2 children. For this study, 1,057 G3 children of Fast Track participants (N=581 intervention group, N=476 control group) were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: G3 children of G2 parents who were randomized to the Fast Track intervention group used fewer general inpatient services and fewer inpatient or outpatient mental health services compared with G3 children of G2 parents randomized to the control group. Some of these effects were mediated: randomization to Fast Track predicted fewer internalizing problems and less use of corporal punishment among G2 adults at age 25, which subsequently predicted less general inpatient service use and outpatient mental health service use among the G3 children by the time the G2 parents were 34 years old. There were no significant differences between G3 children from these two groups on the use of other health services or on mental health measures.
    UNASSIGNED: Fast Track was associated with lower use of general inpatient services and inpatient and outpatient mental health services intergenerationally, but effects on parent-reported mental health of the children were not apparent across generations. Investing in interventions for the mental health of children could reduce service use burdens across generations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用Andersen行为模型探讨瓦伦西亚(西班牙)大学医院PED中NUP的发生率及相关因素。
    方法:我们使用Andersen行为模型对在瓦伦西亚(西班牙)的大学医院与孩子一起访问PED的父母进行了描述性横断面研究。
    结果:该研究共涉及530名参与者,其中419人(79%)做了NUP。确定的诱发因素是:(I)由父亲带来的儿科患者(OR=0.460;p=0.005),(II)受教育程度较低(OR=3.841;p=0.000),(III)首次为人父母(OR=2.335;p=0.000)和(IV)父母压力较高(OR=1.974;p=0.023)。促成因素包括:(I)对与他人共享的大部分儿童保育的责任(OR=0.348;p=0.041)和(II)认为PED比初级保健(PC)服务提供更好的护理(OR=1.628;p=0.005)。需求因素是:(I)寻求护理的儿童中存在的慢性病(OR=0.343;p=0.000)和(II)感知的紧迫性严重程度(OR=0.440;p=0.031)。
    结论:这项研究中发现的NUP率与国际上发现的相似。根据安德森的行为模型,我们确定易感因素,启用和需要因素来解释PED中NUP的多因素性质。
    结论:确定与NUP相关的因素可以使干预措施针对那些最有可能参与NUP的群体,从而优化PED的功能并改善儿童和家庭的福祉。这些干预措施应侧重于提高父母的健康素养,提供教育,以做出有关获得卫生服务和识别儿童严重症状的适当决定,以及改善对高质量PC服务的访问。在向父母身份过渡期间向父母提供支持也将是有益的。
    本文遵循STROBE倡议指南。
    参与者,自愿同意参加的人,通过完成包含研究团队准备的所有研究变量的纸质问卷,为研究做出了贡献。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the rate of NUPs and associated factors in the PED of the \'Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe\' in Valencia (Spain) using Andersen\'s Behavioural Model.
    METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study using Andersen\'s Behavioural Model in parents visiting the PED with their children at the \'Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe\' in Valencia (Spain).
    RESULTS: The study involved a total of 530 participants, of whom 419 (79%) had made an NUP. The predisposing factors identified were: (I) paediatric patients brought in by their fathers (OR = 0.460; p = 0.005), (II) lower educational attainment (OR = 3.841; p = 0.000), (III) first-time parenthood (OR = 2.335; p = 0.000) and (IV) higher parental stress (OR = 1.974; p = 0.023). The enabling factors included: (I) responsibility for a significant part of the childcare shared with others (OR = 0.348; p = 0.041) and (II) the perception that PEDs provide better care than primary care (PC) services (OR = 1.628; p = 0.005). The need factors were: (I) existing chronic illness in the child seeking care (OR = 0.343; p = 0.000) and (II) the perceived severity of the urgency (OR = 0.440; p = 0.031).
    CONCLUSIONS: The NUP rates found in this study are similar to those found internationally. In accordance with Andersen\'s Behavioural Model, we identify predisposing, enabling and need factors to explain the multifactorial nature of NUPs in PEDs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the factors associated with NUPs enables interventions to be targeted at those groups most likely to engage in NUPs, thereby optimising the functioning of the PED and improving the well-being of children and families. These interventions should focus on improving parental health literacy, providing education on making appropriate decisions about accessing health services and recognising severe symptoms in children, as well as improving access to high-quality PC services. Providing support to parents during the transition to parenthood would also be beneficial.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper adheres to the STROBE initiative guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants, who voluntarily agreed to take part, contributed to the study by completing a paper-based questionnaire containing all the study variables as prepared by the research team.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与酒精相关的急诊科(ED)就诊很常见,并且与不良临床结局有关。包括过早死亡。这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究确定了经历酒精相关ED就诊的患者的临床不同亚组,并表征了他们之间不良结局风险的差异。在安大略省经历过与酒精有关的ED访问的73,658人,2017年至2018年的加拿大被确定。潜在类别分析(LCA)揭示了整个队列中五个临床上不同的亚组。这些亚组遵循从急性中毒的低频服务使用到酒精使用障碍(AUD)和相关合并症的高频服务使用的严重程度梯度。相对于那些出现急性中毒的人,出现AUD和合并症的患者的入院风险(校正后比值比[aOR]:8.26,95%置信区间[CI]:7.81~8.75)和出院后死亡率(校正后风险比[aHR]:3.07,95%CI:2.81~3.37)高得多.有一组具有高频酒精相关卫生服务使用史的个体,他们在指数事件后经历另一次酒精相关ED就诊的风险最高(aHR:4.76,95%CI:4.55-4.99)。经历与酒精相关的ED就诊的人不是同质的人群,而是一组具有不同临床特征和不良结局风险的亚组。
    Alcohol-related emergency department (ED) visits are common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including premature mortality. This population-based retrospective cohort study identified clinically distinct subgroups of individuals who experience alcohol-related ED visits and characterized differences in the risk of adverse outcomes between them. 73,658 individuals who experienced an alcohol-related ED visit in Ontario, Canada between 2017 and 2018 were identified. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed five clinically distinct subgroups within the overall cohort. These subgroups followed a severity gradient from low-frequency service use for acute intoxication to high-frequency service use for alcohol use disorder (AUD) and related comorbidities. Relative to those presenting for acute intoxication, those presenting for AUD and comorbidities had a much higher risk of hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.81-8.75) and post-discharge mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.07, 95 % CI: 2.81-3.37). There was a subgroup of individuals with a history of high frequency alcohol-related health service use who were at the highest risk of experiencing another alcohol-related ED visit after the index event (aHR: 4.76, 95 % CI: 4.55-4.99). Individuals who experience alcohol-related ED visits are not a homogenous population, but a constellation of subgroups with different clinical characteristics and risk of adverse outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号