gqs score

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在评估来自YouTube视频的关于经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)的患者信息的质量和可靠性。
    方法:通过输入“TLIF”列出了一百个视频,\"\"TLIF手术,YouTube搜索引擎中的“”和“经椎间孔融合”。根据视频功率指数(VPI)排名前50位最受欢迎的视频,视图比率,并选择排除标准进行审查.一名骨科顾问外科医生和一名神经外科医生顾问一起分析了这些视频。修改后的DISCERN评分,全球质量评分(GQS),美国医学会杂志(JAMA)评分,并使用新的椎间融合评分来评估视频。视频长度数据,视图计数,喜欢和不喜欢的数量,喜欢比率(如x100/(喜欢+不喜欢)),视频源,并收集评论率。
    结果:根据所有评分系统,视频的质量本来可以更好,无论视频来源如何。患者和商业广告发布的视频得分显着低于医生和相关专业人员的得分(p<0.05)。所有来源的VPI和视图比率相似。结论:研究表明,提供与TLIF手术相关信息的YouTube视频可供公众使用和访问。这项研究的结果表明,YouTube目前不是患者TLIF手术的适当信息来源。大多数有关TLIF手术的YouTube视频都包含有关手术技术的信息,并且有关患者术后状况的信息有限。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the information for patients from YouTube videos on transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF).
    METHODS: One hundred videos were listed by inputting \"TLIF,\" \"TLIF surgery,\" and \"transforaminal interbody fusion\" in the YouTube search engine. The top 50 most popular videos based on video power index (VPI), view ratio, and exclusion criteria were selected for review. One orthopedic consultant surgeon and one neurosurgeon consultant analyzed the videos together. The modified DISCERN score, the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and a novel interbody fusion score were used to evaluate videos. Data of video length, view count, number of likes and dislikes, like ratio (like x 100/(like+dislike)), video source, and comment rate were collected.
    RESULTS: The quality of the videos could have been better according to all scoring systems, regardless of the video source. The scores of the videos published by patients and commercials were significantly lower than those of physicians and allied professionals (p <0.05). VPI and view ratios were similar in all sources.  Conclusion: The study demonstrates that YouTube videos providing information related to TLIF surgery are available and accessed by the public. The results of this study would suggest that YouTube is not currently an appropriate source of information on TLIF surgery for patients. Most of the YouTube videos about TLIF surgery contain information about the surgical technique and have limited information about the post-operative condition of the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS),育龄妇女的慢性多因素疾病,是一个重大的公共卫生问题。大多数女性求助于像“YouTube”这样的平台,这些平台构成了娱乐的完美来源,我们的目标是分析相关内容的质量。
    目的:本研究的目的和目标是通过分析DISCERN评分来评估YouTube上与PCOS相关的内容的质量和可靠性。全球质量评分(GQS),和视频功率指数(VPI)。
    方法:这是一项基于设施的横断面研究,每天进行一次,每位作者使用预定关键字在PCOS上查看YouTube上的10个视频。喜欢的数量,不喜欢,视图,注释,和上传者的背景进行了评估。否认得分,GQS,还计算了每个视频的VPI。虽然数据输入是使用微软Excel2020(微软公司,华盛顿,美国),分析使用SPSSStatistics第16版(SPSSInc.2007年发布。SPSSforWindows,版本16.0。芝加哥,SPSSInc.)。分类变量表示为频率和百分比,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验/单向ANOVA确定统计学显著性。
    结果:共分析了80个符合纳入标准的视频。大多数视频(80%)是在一年前发布的,没有更新。只有28.8%的视频内容是由医生发布的。尽管大多数视频(96.25%)分享了与症状学有关的信息,只有45%的人谈到预防。在28.75%的视频内容中注意到促销内容。GQS和VPI更好,由医生提供信息,医院,和医疗保健组织(p值分别为0.033和0.006)。
    结论:随着女性接触YouTube等寓教于乐平台,以澄清她们对数字时代PCOS等生活方式疾病的担忧,评估此类平台上可用内容的质量变得相关。这项研究的结果形成了一个原型,可以解决YouTube上现有知识的差距。此外,这些发现保证了对这些可用的基于网络的内容的频繁监控,并且只有合格的健康专家才能提供这些内容。
    BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a chronic multifactorial disorder in women of reproductive age group, is a major public health problem. With most women resorting to platforms like \"YouTube\" that form a perfect source of edutainment, our aim was to analyze the quality of content available regarding the same.
    OBJECTIVE: The aims and objectives of this study were to assess the quality and reliability of content related to PCOS on YouTube by analyzing the DISCERN score, global quality score (GQS), and video power index (VPI).
    METHODS: It was a facility-based cross-sectional study undertaken on a single day with each author reviewing 10 videos from YouTube on PCOS using predetermined keywords. The number of likes, dislikes, views, comments, and uploader backgrounds were evaluated. DISCERN score, GQS, and VPI were also calculated for each video. While data entry was done using Microsoft Excel 2020 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, United States), the analysis was carried out using SPSS Statistics version 16 (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages, and statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test/one-way ANOVA.
    RESULTS: A total of 80 videos that fit the inclusion criteria were analyzed. A majority of the videos (80%) were posted a year back with no updates. Only 28.8% of the video content was posted by doctors. Though most videos (96.25%) shared information pertaining to symptomatology, only 45% spoke regarding prevention. Promotional content was noted in 28.75% of the video content. GQS and VPI were better with information being provided by doctors, hospitals, and healthcare organizations (p-value 0.033 and 0.006, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: With women reaching out to edutainment platforms like YouTube to clarify their concerns surrounding lifestyle diseases such as PCOS in the digital era, it becomes relevant to evaluate the quality of content available on such platforms. The findings of the study form a prototype for addressing the existing gaps in the knowledge available on YouTube. Furthermore, the findings warrant frequent monitoring of such available web-based content and delivery of such content only from qualified wellness experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是阐明有关YouTubeTM上冠状动脉旁路移植术的英语视频的可靠性和质量。
    该研究在7月16日至7月30日之间进行。一名心血管外科医生搜索了包括“冠状动脉疾病”的术语,冠状动脉治疗,\"\"冠状动脉搭桥\"和\"冠状动脉搭桥手术,\"在YouTubeTM中。根据上传视频的来源,将所有视频分为两组,分为专业视频和非专业视频。视频特征,包括YouTube™上的视频持续时间,视频长度,并记录了每个视频的观看编号。此外,“评论的数量,\"\"喜欢,注意到“”和“不喜欢”。此外,对视频的目标受众(专业医护人员和患者)进行了分析,计算每个视频的DISCERN评分和全局质量评分(GQS)。
    完全,根据上传来源,812个视频分为两组;448个视频被归类为专业视频,364个视频被归类为非专业视频。专业视频的平均观看次数为3220.5,非专业视频为2216.5(p=0.001)。此外,对于专业视频,平均“喜欢”数字和平均评论数字明显更高(p=0.001和p=0.001)。专业视频的平均DISCERN评分为2.6,非专业视频为1.5(p=0.001)。同样,专业视频的平均GSQ明显更高(3.5vs.2.5,p=0.001)。
    由专业医护人员共享的YouTube™视频具有更好的质量和可靠性,DISCERN评分和GQS明显更高。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to clarify the reliability and quality of English videos about Coronary artery bypass grafting on YouTubeTM.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was performed between July 16 and July 30. A cardiovascular surgeon searched for terms including \"coronary artery disease,\" \"coronary artery treatment,\" \"coronary artery bypass\" and \"coronary artery bypass surgery,\" in YouTubeTM. All videos were classified into two groups according to the source who uploaded the video as professional videos and non-professional videos. Video characteristics including duration of video on YouTube™, length of video, and view numbers for each video were recorded. Moreover, the numbers of \"comments,\" \"likes,\" and \"dislikes\" were noted. Furthermore, the target audience of the videos (professional health care worker and patients) was analyzed, DISCERN score and Global quality score (GQS) were calculated for each video.
    UNASSIGNED: Totally, 812 videos were divided into two groups according to upload sources; 448 videos were categorized as professional videos and 364 videos were categorized as non-professional videos. The mean number of views was 3220.5 for professional videos and 2216.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). In addition, the mean \"like\" numbers and mean comment numbers were significantly higher for professional videos (p=0.001 and p=0.001). The mean DISCERN score was 2.6 for professional videos and 1.5 for non-professional videos (p=0.001). Similarly, the mean GSQ was significantly higher for professional videos (3.5 vs. 2.5, p=0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: YouTube™ videos which are shared by professional healthcare workers have better quality and reliability with significantly higher DISCERN score and GQS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号