gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者存在卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)风险的促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂对卵母细胞触发的最佳剂量一直存在争论。在这项研究中,我们打算确定在这些患者中使用重复剂量的GnRH激动剂进行卵母细胞触发是否可以增强体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)的结局.
    方法:这项随机临床试验在Royan研究所(德黑兰,伊朗)从2020年5月到2022年6月。在触发当天雌二醇(E2)水平>3000pg/ml的OHSS风险患者被随机分配到对照组或实验组。A组(对照组)患者接受0.2mg曲普瑞林(Decapeptyl®)用于最终卵母细胞成熟。B组(实验组)患者在第一次给药后12小时接受0.1mgDecapeptyl®的第二次剂量,总剂量为0.3毫克。比较两组IVF/ICSI结果。
    结果:最终,来自研究组的35名妇女和来自对照组的33名妇女完成了治疗周期。两组在人口统计学特征方面具有可比性,基线荷尔蒙概况,和PCOS表型。促性腺激素的剂量,刺激持续时间,回收的卵母细胞数量,卵母细胞成熟率,和卵母细胞恢复率在两组之间没有显着差异。在胚泡和卵裂胚胎的数量方面没有发现显着差异,也不影响各组之间获得的胚胎质量。研究组轻中度OHSS发生率明显低于对照组(P=0.038)。
    结论:第一次给药后12小时,第二次给药GnRH激动剂并没有改善卵母细胞的数量和成熟度,或PCOS患者的妊娠结局(登记号:NCT04600986)。
    BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate about the optimal dosage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist for oocyte triggering in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). In this study, we intend to ascertain whether the use of repeated doses of a GnRH agonist for oocyte triggering in these patients can enhance the outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles.
    METHODS: This randomised clinical trial enrolled 70 PCOS women candidates for IVF/ICSI with the standard antagonist protocol at Royan Institute (Tehran, Iran) from May 2020 to June 2022. Patients at risk of OHSS with oestradiol (E2) levels >3000 pg/ml on the day of trigger were randomly assigned to a control or experimental group. Group A (control group) patients received 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl®) for final oocyte maturation. Group B (experimental group) patients received a second dose of 0.1 mg Decapeptyl®12 hours after their first dose, for a total dose of 0.3 mg. IVF/ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: Ultimately, 35 women from the study group and 33 from the control group completed the treatment cycle. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, baseline hormonal profiles, and PCOS phenotypes. The dosage of gonadotropin, stimulation duration, number of retrieved oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, and oocyte recovery ratio did not significantly differ between the groups. No significant differences were found in terms of the number of blastocyst and cleavage embryos, nor the quality of obtained embryos between the groups. The mild to moderate OHSS rate was significantly lower in the study group (P=0.038).
    CONCLUSIONS: A second dose of GnRH agonist 12 hours after the first dose did not improve the number and maturity of oocytes, or pregnancy outcomes in PCOS patients (registration number: NCT04600986).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本分析的目的是:1)描述跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)青年与急诊科(ED)和住院医院设置中最常见的心理健康诊断匹配的对照和2)评估性别确认激素治疗(GAHT)或促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)处方是否降低了这些设置中的自杀风险。方法:使用PEDSnet数据集(2009-2019年),8-18岁的TGD青年(n=3414,最后一次就诊的平均年龄为16.2[14.4,17.7]岁,倾向评分与对照组匹配(n=13,628,年龄16.6[14.2,18.3]岁)。与对照组相比,计算了TGD青年在ED和住院设置中最常见的心理健康诊断的相对风险。反复发生时间-事件分析用于检查GAHT或GnRHa是否降低了TGD青年子样本中的自杀风险。结果:在ED(5.46[4.71-6.33])和住院设置(6.61[5.28-8.28])中,TGD青年的心理健康诊断和自杀倾向的相对风险(95%置信区间[CI])高于匹配的对照组。在我们的研究期间或GAHT开始之前,与从未使用GAHT的TGD青少年相比,使用GAHT的TGD青少年自杀风险降低了43.6%(风险比[HR]=0.564[95%CI0.36-0.89])。与从未使用GnRHa的TGD青年相比,接受GnRHa治疗的TGD青年在ED或住院自杀诊断方面的降低无统计学意义(HR=0.79[0.47-1.31])。结论:尽管在ED和住院患者中,TGD青年的心理健康诊断和自杀风险较高,GAHT处方与自杀风险显著降低相关.
    Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to: 1) describe the most common mental health diagnoses in the emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital settings among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth vs. matched controls and 2) evaluate if a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) prescription decreased the risk of suicidality within these settings. Methods: Using the PEDSnet dataset (years 2009-2019), TGD youth aged 8-18 (n = 3414, with a median age at last visit of 16.2 [14.4, 17.7] years, were propensity-score matched to controls (n = 13,628, age 16.6 [14.2, 18.3] years). Relative risks of the most common mental health diagnoses within ED and inpatient settings were calculated for TGD youth compared with controls. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was used to examine whether GAHT or GnRHa attenuated the risk of suicidality among subsamples of TGD youth. Results: TGD youth had a higher relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in the ED (5.46 [4.71-6.33]) and inpatient settings (6.61 [5.28-8.28]) than matched controls. TGD youth prescribed GAHT had a 43.6% lower risk of suicidality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.564 [95% CI 0.36-0.89]) compared with those never prescribed GAHT during our study period or before GAHT initiation. TGD youth who were prescribed GnRHa therapy had a nonstatistically significant reduction in ED or inpatient suicidality diagnoses compared with those never prescribed GnRHa (HR = 0.79 [0.47-1.31]). Conclusion: Although risk of mental health diagnoses and suicidality in ED and inpatient settings was high among TGD youth, a GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in suicidality risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究不同年龄女性在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中激素替代治疗(HRT)前GnRH激动剂(GnRH-a)下调准备子宫内膜的作用。
    这是一项回顾性研究,排除子宫腺肌病患者后,子宫内膜异位症,严重的子宫内膜粘连,多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS),反复的胚胎植入失败,共收集4,091个HRT周期。将患者分为A组(<35岁)和B组(≥35岁),每组再分为HRT和GnRHa-HRT组。比较两组的临床疗效。
    在年龄<35岁的女性中,HRT组和GnRHa-HRT组的临床结果无统计学差异。在高龄女性中,GnRHa-HRT组的临床妊娠率和活产率较高.Logistic回归分析显示,女性年龄和胚胎移植数量影响FET周期活产率,在35岁以上的女性中,在HRT前使用GnRH-a下调可改善妊娠结局.
    在没有子宫腺肌病的老年女性中,子宫内膜异位症,PCOS,严重的宫腔粘连,RIF,GnRH激动剂用于垂体抑制的激素替代治疗可以提高FET周期的活产率。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effect of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) down-regulation prior to hormone replacement treatment (HRT) to prepare the endometrium in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in women of different ages.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study, and after excluding patients with adenomyosis, endometriosis, severe endometrial adhesions, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and repeated embryo implantation failures, a total of 4,091 HRT cycles were collected. Patients were divided into group A (<35 years old) and group B (≥35 years old), and each group was further divided into HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups. The clinical outcomes were compared between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups among women aged <35 years. In women of advanced age, higher rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were seen in the GnRHa-HRT group. Logistic regression analysis showed that female age and number of embryos transferred influenced the live birth rate in FET cycles, and in women aged ≥ 35 years, the use of GnRH-a down-regulation prior to HRT improved pregnancy outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: In elderly woman without adenomyosis, endometriosis, PCOS, severe uterine adhesions, and RIF, hormone replacement treatment with GnRH agonist for pituitary suppression can improve the live birth rate of FET cycles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:前瞻性研究剖宫产瘢痕缺损(CSD)联合促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)应用阴道修补术(VR)是否比单独应用VR取得更好的临床效果。
    方法:一项随机临床试验。
    方法:大学医院。
    方法:2016年12月至2021年9月,共有124名CSD女性接受了期待管理。61人被随机分配到VR+GnRHa,63人被随机分配到单独的VR。
    方法:阴道修复联合GnRHa和单独的阴道修复。
    结果:主要结果是手术后6个月的月经持续时间和剩余肌肉层(TRM)的厚度。次要结果包括长度,CSD的宽度和深度;手术时间;估计失血量;住院时间;和手术并发症。女性接受VR(n=63)或VR+GnRHa(n=61)治疗。患者的月经和TRM。vs.与VR或VR+GnRHa比较后均有显著改善(P<0.05)。与接受VR治疗的患者相比,接受VRGnRHa治疗的患者在月经持续时间和TRM方面存在显着差异(P<0.05)。此外,VR组术后CSD发生率明显高于VR+GnRHa组(P=.033),VR+GnRHa组CSD患者的治疗效果优于VR组(P=0.017)。与单独接受VR治疗的患者相比,接受VR+GnRHa的患者的月经持续时间更短,术后TRM增加更大(分别为P=.021;P=.002)。
    结论:对于有症状的CSD女性,VR+GnRHa治疗在改善瘢痕愈合和减少月经天数方面具有更大的潜力。PRéCIS:阴道修复联合GnRHa可产生更好的CSD治疗效果。
    背景:注册日期:2016年10月13日,初始参与者注册日期:2016年12月20日,临床试验识别号:NCT02932761,注册站点的URL:ClinicalTrials.gov,FigshareDOI:10.6084/m9。图24117114链接到临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02932761。
    OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate whether the application of vaginal repair (VR) of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) combined with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) achieve better clinical outcomes than VR alone.
    METHODS: A randomized clinical trial.
    METHODS: University hospital.
    METHODS: A total of 124 women with CSD were undergoing expectant management from December 2016 to September 2021. 61 were randomised to VR+ GnRHa and 63 to VR alone.
    METHODS: Vaginal repair combined with GnRHa and vaginal repair alone.
    RESULTS: The primary outcome was the duration of menstruation and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the length, width and depth of the CSD; operation time; estimated blood loss; hospitalization time; and operative complications. Women were treated with either VR (n = 63) or VR + GnRHa (n = 61). Menstruation and TRM in patients pre. vs. post comparisons either with VR or VR + GnRHa are significant improved (P < .05). Significant differences in menstruation duration and TRM occurred in patients treated with VR + GnRHa compared with those treated with VR (P < .05). Moreover, the rate of CSD after surgery in the VR group was significantly higher than that in the VR + GnRHa group (P = .033), and CSD patients in the VR + GnRHa group achieved better therapeutic effects than those in the VR group (P = .017). Patients who received VR + GnRHa had a shorter menstruation duration and a greater increment of TRM postoperatively than did patients treated with VR alone (P = .021; P = .002, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: VR + GnRHa therapy has a greater potential to improve scar healing and reduce the number of menstruation days than VR alone for symptomatic women with CSD. PRéCIS: Vaginal Repair Combined with GnRHa Creates Better Therapeutic Effects of CSD.
    BACKGROUND: Date of registration: October 13, 2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: December 20, 2016, Clinical trial identification number: NCT02932761, URL of the registration site: ClinicalTrials.gov, Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24117114 LINK TO THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02932761.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了GnRHa预处理对冻融胚胎移植(AC-FET)周期人工子宫内膜准备妊娠结局的影响。对2022年9月1日之前发表的英语语言研究进行了系统回顾,不包括会议文件和预印本。使用荟萃分析对41项涉及43,021名参与者的研究进行了分析,具有灵敏度分析,确保结果的鲁棒性。研究发现,GnRHa预处理普遍提高了临床妊娠率(CPR),植入率(IR),和活产率(LBR)。然而,随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究之间存在差异;RCT显示GnRHa治疗周期的结局无显著差异.DepotGnRHa方案优于LBR中的每日方案。与较短的治疗相比,延长的GnRHa预处理(两到五个周期)显着改善了CPR和IR。患有多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的女性从GnRHa预处理中获益,包括改善CPR和LBR和降低流产率。相比之下,在月经规律的女性中没有观察到显著的益处.需要更严格的研究来巩固这些发现。
    This study investigates the effect of GnRHa pretreatment on pregnancy outcomes in artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) cycles. A systematic review of English language studies published before 1 September 2022, was conducted, excluding conference papers and preprints. Forty-one studies involving 43,021 participants were analyzed using meta-analysis, with a sensitivity analysis ensuring result robustness. The study found that GnRHa pretreatment generally improved the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), and live birth rate (LBR). However, discrepancies existed between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies; RCTs showed no significant differences in outcomes for GnRHa-treated cycles. Depot GnRHa protocols outperformed daily regimens in LBR. Extended GnRHa pretreatment (two to five cycles) significantly improved CPR and IR compared to shorter treatment. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) saw substantial benefits from GnRHa pretreatment, including improved CPR and LBR and reduced miscarriage rates. In contrast, no significant benefits were observed in women with regular menstruation. More rigorous research is needed to solidify these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些变性青年用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)治疗,然后用睾酮或雌二醇治疗。这可能会影响骨矿物质密度(BMD)。这项跨性别青年的横断面研究(n=56,年龄10.4-19.8岁,53%的指定女性出生时[AFAB])使用全身双能X射线骨密度仪来评估BMDZ评分,和GnRHa持续时间之间的关联,体重指数(BMI),和BMD。单独使用GnRHa的参与者(n=19,14名出生时被分配为男性[AMAB],5AFAB)在研究访问时为13.8[12.8,15.3](中位数[IQR])岁,已经使用GnRHa10[5.5,19.5]个月,并在12岁[10.4,12.6]岁时开始GnRHa。GnRHa单药治疗个体的总体BMDZ评分为-0.10[-0.8,0.4](AFAB,女性规范)和-0.65[-1.4,0.22](AMAB,男性规范)。服用睾酮的AFAB参与者(n=21)年龄为16.7[15.9,17.8]岁,服用睾酮11[7.3,14.5]个月,在16[14.8,16.8]岁时开始使用睾酮;总体BMDZ评分-0.2[-0.5,0](男性标准)和0.4[-0.2,0.7](女性标准)。AMAB参与者(n=16)年龄为16.2[15.1,17.4]岁,已经服用雌二醇11[5.6,13.7]个月,并在16岁[14.4,16.7]岁时开始使用雌二醇;总体BMDZ评分-0.4[-1.1,0.3](男性标准)和-0.2[-0.7,0.6](女性标准)。BMDZ评分与GnRHa病程呈负相关(男性规范:r=-0.5,P=.005;女性规范:r=-0.4,P=.029),与BMI呈正相关(男性规范:r=0.4,P=.003;女性规范:r=0.4,P=.004)。在这个横截面队列中,全身BMDZ评分略低于平均水平,但在GnRHa单一疗法的AMAB组中最低。
    Some transgender youth are treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) followed by testosterone or estradiol, which may impact bone mineral density (BMD). This cross-sectional study of transgender youth (n = 56, aged 10.4-19.8 years, 53% assigned female at birth [AFAB]) utilized total body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to evaluate BMD Z-scores, and associations between GnRHa duration, body mass index (BMI), and BMD. Participants on GnRHa alone (n = 19, 14 assigned male at birth [AMAB], 5 AFAB) at the time of the study visit were 13.8 [12.8, 15.3] (median [IQR]) years old, had been on GnRHa for 10 [5.5, 19.5] months, and began GnRHa at age 12 [10.4, 12.6] years. Total body BMD Z-score for individuals on GnRHa monotherapy was -0.10 [-0.8, 0.4] (AFAB, female norms) and -0.65 [-1.4, 0.22] (AMAB, male norms). AFAB participants (n = 21) on testosterone were age 16.7 [15.9, 17.8] years, had been on testosterone for 11 [7.3, 14.5] months, and started testosterone at age 16 [14.8, 16.8] years; total body BMD Z-score -0.2 [-0.5, 0] (male norms) and 0.4 [-0.2, 0.7] (female norms). AMAB participants (n = 16) were age 16.2 [15.1, 17.4] years, had been on estradiol for 11 [5.6, 13.7] months, and started estradiol at age 16 [14.4, 16.7] years; total body BMD Z-score -0.4 [-1.1, 0.3] (male norms) and -0.2 [-0.7, 0.6] (female norms). BMD Z-score was negatively correlated with GnRHa duration (male norms: r = -0.5, P = .005; female norms: r = -0.4, P = .029) and positively correlated with BMI (male norms: r = 0.4, P = .003; female norms: r = 0.4, P = .004). In this cross-sectional cohort, total body BMD Z-scores were slightly below average, but lowest in the AMAB group on GnRHa monotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超排卵是辅助生殖技术的关键步骤,但是使用人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)作为超排卵的触发因素会导致卵巢过度刺激。因此,促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)的使用已经越来越多地被采用,尽管与自然周期相比,它与更高的妊娠失败率有关。本研究旨在探讨GnRHa触发剂对小鼠胚胎植入的影响。
    超排卵(PG)组的小鼠给予7.5IU的PMSG,48小时后注射3.5μgGnRHa(亮丙瑞林),而对照组(CTR)的小鼠自然交配。我们比较了卵母细胞的数量,囊胚,两组之间的黄体和自然胚泡转移后的着床部位。卵巢,子宫,交配后2天和4天收集血清进行qRT-PCR,转录组测序,和激素检测。
    PG组有更多的卵母细胞,囊胚,CTR组超排卵后黄体和黄体。然而,PG组白血病抑制因子(Lif)的mRNA表达和植入部位的数量减少。ELISA实验显示,超排卵增加了卵巢雌激素的分泌。转录组分析表明,超生理雌激素导致子宫对高雌激素信号的反应,导致异常子宫内膜和细胞外基质重塑以及离子转运和炎症相关基因的上调。
    我们的研究结果表明,PMSG和GnRHa的组合引发小鼠胚胎植入受损,由于子宫对超生理雌激素水平的过度反应可导致子宫内膜重塑相关基因表达的改变,子宫离子转运基因和过度免疫相关基因的异常表达。
    UNASSIGNED: Superovulation is a critical step in assisted reproductive technology, but the use of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a trigger for superovulation can result in ovarian hyperstimulation. Thus, the use of Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger has been increasingly adopted, although it has been associated with a higher rate of pregnancy failure compared to natural cycles. This study aimed to investigate the effect of GnRHa trigger on embryo implantation in a mouse model.
    UNASSIGNED: Mice in the superovulation (PG) group were administered 7.5 IU of PMSG, followed by the injection of 3.5 μg of GnRHa (Leuprorelin) 48 h later, while mice in the control group (CTR) mated naturally. We compared the number of oocytes, blastocysts, and corpus luteum between the two groups and the implantation sites after the transfer of natural blastocysts. Ovaries, uterus, and serum 2 and 4 days after mating were collected for qRT-PCR, transcriptome sequencing, and hormone assays.
    UNASSIGNED: The PG group had more oocytes, blastocysts, and corpus luteum after superovulation than the CTR group. However, the mRNA expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (Lif) and the number of implantation sites were reduced in the PG group. The ELISA assay revealed that superovulation increased ovarian estrogen secretion. The transcriptome analysis showed that superphysiological estrogen led to a response of the uterus to a high estrogen signal, resulting in abnormal endometrium and extracellular matrix remodeling and up-regulation of ion transport and inflammation-related genes.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that a combination of PMSG and GnRHa trigger impaired embryo implantation in mice, as the excessive uterine response to superphysiological estrogen levels can lead to the change of gene expression related to endometrial remodeling, abnormal expression of uterine ion transport genes and excessive immune-related genes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)加激素替代疗法(HRT)预处理与仅HRT周期的生殖妊娠结局。并研究单个息肉切除术和多发性息肉切除术之间的差异,以及一剂或两剂GnRH-a之间。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2018年3月至2019年5月接受冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的息肉切除术患者。他们分为GnRH-a预处理组和HRT组。每组分为单个息肉切除术或多个息肉切除术(在单个宫腔镜手术中)亚组。临床妊娠率和活产率(LBR)是主要结局。进一步分析了GnRH-a剂量的影响。
    结果:有212例GnRH-a预处理病例(45例单发和167例多发性息肉)和448例仅HRT病例(228例单发和220例多发性息肉)。GnRH-a预处置组的LBR(53.3%)显著高于HRT组(43.3%;P=0.016)。Logistic回归分析显示GnRH-a预处理显著影响LBR(比值比,或1.470,95%置信区间,Cl1.046-2.065;P=0.026)。在多发性息肉切除术亚组中,GnRH-a预处理的LBR高于仅HRT的LBR(54.5%vs43.6%;P=0.034)。然而,LBR在各自的单个息肉切除术亚组之间没有差异(48.9%vs43.0%;P=0.466).对于多发性息肉患者,两个GnRH-a预处理产生比单个GnRH-a预处理更高的LBR(62.7%vs47.8%),但无显著性差异(P=0.055)。
    结论:GnRH-a预处理改善了宫腔镜多发性息肉切除术后FET循环的LBR,独立于剂量。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the reproductive pregnancy outcomes of pretreatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with HRT-only cycles, and investigate differences between single polypectomy and multiple polypectomies, and between one or two doses of GnRH-a.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing polypectomy who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) from March 2018 to May 2019. They were divided into GnRH-a pretreatment and HRT-only groups. Each group was divided into single polypectomy or multiple polypectomies (in a single hysteroscopic session) subgroups. Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate (LBR) were the main outcomes. The effect of GnRH-a dosage was further analysed.
    RESULTS: There were 212 GnRH-a pretreatment cases (45 single and 167 multiple polyps) and 448 HRT-only cases (228 single and 220 multiple polyps). The LBR of the GnRH-a pretreatment group (53.3%) was significantly higher than the HRT group (43.3%; P = 0.016). Logistic regression analysis showed that GnRH-a pretreatment significantly affected the LBR (odds ratio, OR 1.470, 95% confidence interval, Cl 1.046-2.065; P = 0.026). In the multiple polypectomy subgroup, the LBR with GnRH-a pretreatment was higher than with HRT-only (54.5% vs 43.6%; P = 0.034). However, the LBR was not different between the respective single polypectomy subgroups (48.9% vs 43.0%; P = 0.466). For patients with multiple polyps, two GnRH-a pretreatments produced a higher LBR than a single GnRH-a pretreatment (62.7% vs 47.8%), but without significant difference (P = 0.055).
    CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-a pretreatment improved the LBR for FET cycles after hysteroscopic multiple polypectomies, independent of dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体外受精(IVF)和胚胎移植和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)使数百万不育夫妇实现了怀孕。作为IVF/ICSI的重要组成部分,能够在一个周期中检索大量卵母细胞,控制性卵巢刺激(COS)治疗主要包括标准的促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)方案和促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRH-ant)方案。然而,由于结论不一致和亚组分析不足,GnRH-ant方案的有效性仍存在争议.这项系统评价和荟萃分析共包括52项研究,GnRH-ant组5193名参与者和GnRH-a组4757名参与者.这项研究的结果表明,当考虑活产作为主要结果时,GnRH-ant方案与长GnRH-a方案相当。这是一项有利的方案,有证据表明可以降低接受IVF/ICSI的女性卵巢过度刺激综合征的发生率,尤其是多囊卵巢综合征的女性。需要进一步的研究来比较一般和卵巢反应不良患者中两种方案之间的后续累积活产率,因为这些患者的临床妊娠率较低。GnRH-ant方案中回收的卵母细胞较少或高级胚胎较少。
    In vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have allowed millions of infertile couples to achieve pregnancy. As an essential part of IVF/ICSI enabling the retrieval of a high number of oocytes in one cycle, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment mainly composes of the standard long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. However, the effectiveness of GnRH-ant protocol is still debated because of inconsistent conclusions and insufficient subgroup analyses. This systematic review and meta-analysis included a total of 52 studies, encompassing 5193 participants in the GnRH-ant group and 4757 in the GnRH-a group. The findings of this study revealed that the GnRH-ant protocol is comparable with the long GnRH-a protocol when considering live birth as the primary outcome, and it is a favourable protocol with evidence reducing the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing IVF/ICSI, especially in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Further research is needed to compare the subsequent cumulative live birth rate between the two protocols among the general and poor ovarian response patients since those patients have a lower clinical pregnancy rate, fewer oocytes retrieved or fewer high-grade embryos in the GnRH-ant protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号