背景:比较脂肪转移结合等离子体能量和仅脂肪转移方法用于生殖器再生,并研究等离子体能量的功效增强特性。
方法:46例患者按手术方式分为A组(n=23)和B组(n=23)。A组患者仅接受脂肪转移,B组患者接受脂肪转移联合血浆能量治疗。两组均安排在术后1、3、6和12个月进行随访。通过照片和患者满意度问卷(包括女性生殖器自我形象量表(FGSIS))评估了手术后对大阴唇的提升作用。
结果:所有参与者的平均年龄为32.8±5.1岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为24.7±3.4kg/m2。两组患者术前平均FGSIS评分相似(p=0.542)。术前平均FGSIS总分A组为18.8±1.4,B组为18.3±1.5。然而,B组1,3和6个月时的平均FGSIS评分显著高于A组(分别为p=0.032,p=0.012和p=0.009).随访6个月时,A组平均FGSIS总分20.7±1.4,B组平均22.3±1.5,表明统计学上的显著差异(p=0.028)。
结论:与其他常规方法相比,与其他能量方式相比,这种新颖的技术是一种更具侵入性的技术,具有较低的横向和垂直能量耗散,与仅脂肪转移相比,大阴唇脂肪填充增强应用可以获得更持久和更持久的结果。
方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
BACKGROUND: To compare the fat transfer combined with plasma energy and only fat transfer methods for genital rejuvenation and to investigate the efficacy enhancing properties of plasma energy.
METHODS: Forty-six patients were equally divided into two groups according to the surgical method as the group A (n = 23) and the group B (n = 23). The patients in the group A received only fat transfer, while the patients in the group B received fat transfer combined with plasma energy. Both groups were scheduled for postoperative follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The lifting effect on the labia majora after the procedure was evaluated with photographs and patient satisfaction questionnaires including the female genital self-image scale (FGSIS).
RESULTS: The mean age of all participants was 32.8 ± 5.1 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 3.4 kg/m2. The mean preoperative FGSIS scores were similar between the groups (p = 0.542). The mean total FGSIS score was 18.8 ± 1.4 in the group A and 18.3 ± 1.5 in the group B in the preoperative period. However, the mean FGSIS scores at 1, 3, and 6 months were significantly higher in the group B than the group A (p = 0.032, p = 0.012, and p = 0.009, respectively). At 6 months of follow-up, the mean total FGSIS score was 20.7 ± 1.4 in the group A and 22.3 ± 1.5 in the group B, indicating a statistically significant difference (p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: This novel technique is a more minimally invasive technique compared to other energy modalities with lower lateral and vertical energy dissipation than other conventional methods, and labia majora fat filling augmentation application can be performed with more permanent and longer-lasting outcomes than fat transfer only.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.