gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs)

钆造影剂 (GBCA)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    钆造影剂(GBCA)有助于改善磁共振成像(MRI)在疾病诊断和治疗中的作用。目前有九种不同的市售钆造影剂(GBCA)可用于人体MRI病例,并且根据其结构(环状或线性)或生物分布(细胞外空间剂,目标/特定代理,和血池代理)。这篇综述的目的是说明市售的MRI造影剂,它们对成像的影响,以及对身体的不良反应,目的是在不同的临床环境中正确选择它们。当我们必须在不同的GBCA之间进行选择时,我们必须考虑几个因素:(1)安全性和临床影响;(2)生物分布和诊断应用;(3)更高的弛豫率和更好的病变检测;(4)更高的稳定性和更低的组织沉积;(5)钆剂量/浓度和更低的体积注射;(6)脉冲序列和方案优化;(7)在3.0T时比1.5T时更高的对比噪声比。相关的GBCA特性及其对人体MRI序列的影响是进行高效和高质量MRI检查的关键特征。
    Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have helped to improve the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. There are currently nine different commercially available gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) that can be used for body MRI cases, and which are classifiable according to their structures (cyclic or linear) or biodistribution (extracellular-space agents, target/specific-agents, and blood-pool agents). The aim of this review is to illustrate the commercially available MRI contrast agents, their effect on imaging, and adverse reaction on the body, with the goal to lead to their proper selection in different clinical contexts. When we have to choose between the different GBCAs, we have to consider several factors: (1) safety and clinical impact; (2) biodistribution and diagnostic application; (3) higher relaxivity and better lesion detection; (4) higher stability and lower tissue deposit; (5) gadolinium dose/concentration and lower volume injection; (6) pulse sequences and protocol optimization; (7) higher contrast-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T. Knowing the patient\'s clinical information, the relevant GBCAs properties and their effect on body MRI sequences are the key features to perform efficient and high-quality MRI examination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于钆的造影剂(GBCA)已成为神经肿瘤学中MRI采集的重要组成部分,脑肿瘤的表征和监测。然而,对比增强(CE)收购不仅会引发安全问题,还会导致患者不适,需要更多熟练的人力和成本增加。最近,一些拟议的深度学习工作打算减少,甚至消除,GBCA的需要。本研究回顾了与低剂量和/或其天然非CE对应物的CE图像合成相关的已发表作品。数据,神经网络的类型,总结了每种方法的输入方式数量以及评价方法。基于这一分析,我们讨论了这些方法需要克服的主要问题,以便适合其临床使用。我们还假设了有关该主题的研究可能遵循的一些未来趋势。
    Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have become a crucial part of MRI acquisitions in neuro-oncology for the detection, characterization and monitoring of brain tumors. However, contrast-enhanced (CE) acquisitions not only raise safety concerns, but also lead to patient discomfort, the need of more skilled manpower and cost increase. Recently, several proposed deep learning works intend to reduce, or even eliminate, the need of GBCAs. This study reviews the published works related to the synthesis of CE images from low-dose and/or their native -non CE- counterparts. The data, type of neural network, and number of input modalities for each method are summarized as well as the evaluation methods. Based on this analysis, we discuss the main issues that these methods need to overcome in order to become suitable for their clinical usage. We also hypothesize some future trends that research on this topic may follow.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于钆的造影剂(GBCA)被广泛用于磁共振成像(MRI)中以提高灵敏度并增强诊断性能。给药后,GBCA大部分通过肾脏从体内消除;然而,少量的钆保留在大脑和其他组织中。尽管人们越来越关注钆对健康的不利影响,GBCA的细胞效应仍然知之甚少。这里,我们阐明了GBCAsOmniscan和Gadovist在12种不同细胞系中的潜在细胞毒性,特别是3T3-L1脂肪细胞系。Omniscan和Gadovist治疗以时间和剂量依赖性方式显着增加3T3-L1细胞中的细胞内钆水平。此外,Omniscan和Gadovist治疗下调脂肪细胞分化标志物的表达,包括过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARG),脂联素(ADIPOQ),和脂肪酸结合蛋白(FABP4),在3T3-L1细胞中,特别是在早期分化(第0-2天)。此外,使用油红O染色的组织学分析显示氯化钆(GdCl3)处理抑制脂滴积累和脂肪细胞分化标志物的表达。总的来说,结果表明,Omniscan和Gadovist处理抑制了3T3-L1细胞的脂肪细胞分化,有助于了解GBCA暴露的潜在毒性作用。
    Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve the sensitivity and enhance diagnostic performance. GBCAs are mostly eliminated from the body through the kidney after administration; however small amounts of gadolinium are retained in the brain and other tissues. Although there is increasing concern about the adverse health effects of gadolinium, the cellular effects of GBCAs remains poorly understood. Here, we elucidated the potential cytotoxicity of the GBCAs Omniscan and Gadovist in 12 different cell lines, especially 3T3-L1 adipocyte cell line. Omniscan and Gadovist treatments significantly increased intracellular gadolinium levels in 3T3-L1 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Additionally, Omniscan and Gadovist treatments downregulated the expression of adipocyte differentiation markers, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARG), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), and fatty acid-binding protein (FABP4), in 3T3-L1 cells, especially during early differentiation (day 0-2). Moreover, histological analysis using Oil red O staining showed that gadolinium chloride (GdCl3) treatment suppressed lipid droplet accumulation and the expression of adipocyte differentiation markers. Overall, the results showed that Omniscan and Gadovist treatment suppressed adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells, contributing to the understanding of the potential toxic effects of GBCA exposure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已知某些患者多次暴露于基于g的造影剂(GBCA)与g在大脑中的沉积有关。这种沉积与特定的脑部MRI发现相关,尽管大多数可用的数据是患有基础神经系统疾病的患者。我们旨在前瞻性评估接受乳腺MRI筛查的女性的脑MRI信号变化以及神经系统和神经心理学测试结果。
    方法:在此IRB批准的,符合HIPAA的前瞻性研究,9名因筛查乳腺MRI而暴露于线性和/或大环GBCA5次或更多次的女性接受了非对比脑MRI检查,神经系统检查和神经心理测试。有潜在神经系统的女性,心理学,肝脏或肾脏疾病被排除.
    结果:GBCA暴露的平均总数为8(标准偏差2.7),63/72(87%)的暴露是线性剂。脑MRI信号变化与神经系统或神经心理学检查异常之间没有关联。GBCA暴露总数与神经系统或神经心理学检查异常之间没有关联。
    结论:在这项前瞻性探索性研究中,9名女性因筛查乳腺MRI而暴露于5次或更多GBCA,脑MRI信号改变与神经或神经心理检查的临床异常之间没有关联.虽然在这个患者人群中需要更大的研究,在这项研究中,多重GBCA暴露缺乏临床影响,这让人放心.
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple exposures to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is known to be associated with gadolinium deposition in the brain in certain patients. Such deposition has been correlated with specific brain MRI findings, although most available data is in patients with underlying neurologic disorders. We aim to prospectively evaluate brain MRI signal changes as well as neurologic and neuropsychologic testing results in women undergoing screening breast MRI.
    METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 9 women with 5 or more exposures to linear and/or macrocyclic GBCA due to screening breast MRI underwent noncontrast brain MRI, neurologic exam and neuropsychologic testing. Women with underlying neurologic, psychologic, hepatic or renal disorders were excluded.
    RESULTS: The mean total number of GBCA exposures was 8 (standard deviation 2.7), with 63/72 (87%) of the exposures being linear agents. There was no association between brain MRI signal changes and abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination. There was no association between total number of GBCA exposures and abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective exploratory study of 9 women with 5 or more GBCA exposures due to screening breast MRI, there was no association between brain MRI signal changes and clinical abnormalities on neurologic or neuropsychologic examination. While larger studies are needed in this patient population, the lack of clinical impact of multiple GBCA exposures in this study is reassuring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的五年里,一些研究报道了在放射学过程中使用基于钆的造影剂(GBCA)后,钆在大脑中的沉积和保留。肾功能不全的患者不能有效地过滤钆;然而,钆也保留在一些成年人和儿科的大脑中,没有肾功能损害。在文学中,数据主要来自回顾性磁共振成像(MRI)研究,其中钆沉积可以通过评估脑组织中T1信号强度的变化来间接测量,特别是在深灰质,如齿状核和/或苍白球。许多病理学研究报道了人和动物尸检标本中T1信号变化和钆沉积之间的直接相关性,这引起了人们对GBCA使用的担忧,特别是线性螯合剂。钆的积累与身体和神经副作用或神经毒性损伤的发生之间的关联尚未得到最终证明。研究还观察到钆沉积在颅外组织中,比如肝脏,皮肤,还有骨头,肾功能正常的患者。这篇叙述性综述描述了不同类型的GBCA对钆沉积的影响,评估目前关于钆在人体各种组织中沉积的证据,并总结了当前有关使用GBCA的建议。
    Over the past five years, several studies have reported deposition and retention of gadolinium in the brain after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) during radiological procedures. Patients with renal insufficiency cannot filter gadolinium efficiently; however, gadolinium is also retained in the brain of some adults and pediatrics with no renal impairment. In the literature, data is mostly available from retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, where gadolinium deposition may be indirectly measured by evaluating changes in T1 signal intensity in the brain tissues, particularly in the deep gray matter such as the dentate nucleus and/or globus pallidus. Many pathological studies have reported a direct correlation between T1 signal changes and gadolinium deposition in human and animal autopsy specimens, which raised concerns on the use of GBCAs, particularly with linear chelators. The association between gadolinium accumulation and occurrence of physical and neurological side effects or neurotoxic damage has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. Studies have also observed that gadolinium is deposited in the extracranial tissues, such as the liver, skin, and bone, of patients with normal kidney function. This narrative review describes the effects of different types of GBCAs in relation to gadolinium deposition, evaluates current evidence on gadolinium deposition in various tissues of the human body, and summarizes the current recommendations regarding the use of GBCAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管钆(Gd)造影剂(GBCA)的安全性令人印象深刻,少数患者报告新的发病,严重,即使是单次暴露后的持续症状-一种称为钆沉积病(GDD)的综合征。线粒体功能障碍和氧化应激已被动物和体外研究反复暗示为Gd/GBCA相关毒性的机制。以及在表现相似的其他疾病中的致病性。这里,我们旨在分子表征和探索与GDD症状的潜在代谢关联。系统获得了一小部分个体(n=15)的详细临床表型,这些个体具有归因于GBCA增强MRI的持续症状,并符合GDD的临时诊断标准。对血浆样品进行了基于全局非靶向质谱的代谢组学分析,并检查了与单标记和途径方法的相关性。除了GDD标准,经常报告的症状与已知线粒体相关疾病的患者相似。与健康的血浆相比,813个生化指标中的45个为无症状参考队列.其中显着比例与线粒体功能和相关疾病有关,包括核苷酸和能量超通路,代表过多。虽然早期的证据,鉴于临床前模型显示Gd/GBCA对线粒体功能的多个方面有不利影响,GDD中潜在线粒体参与的临床和生化指征非常显着。建议进一步研究这些标志物和途径在GBCA暴露引起的持续症状中的潜在作用。
    Despite the impressive safety of gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (GBCAs), a small number of patients report the onset of new, severe, ongoing symptoms after even a single exposure-a syndrome termed Gadolinium Deposition Disease (GDD). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress have been repeatedly implicated by animal and in vitro studies as mechanisms of Gd/GBCA-related toxicity, and as pathogenic in other diseases with similarities in presentation. Here, we aimed to molecularly characterize and explore potential metabolic associations with GDD symptoms. Detailed clinical phenotypes were systematically obtained for a small cohort of individuals (n = 15) with persistent symptoms attributed to a GBCA-enhanced MRI and consistent with provisional diagnostic criteria for GDD. Global untargeted mass spectroscopy-based metabolomics analyses were performed on plasma samples and examined for relevance with both single marker and pathways approaches. In addition to GDD criteria, frequently reported symptoms resembled those of patients with known mitochondrial-related diseases. Plasma differences compared to a healthy, asymptomatic reference cohort were suggested for 45 of 813 biochemicals. A notable proportion of these are associated with mitochondrial function and related disorders, including nucleotide and energy superpathways, which were over-represented. Although early evidence, coincident clinical and biochemical indications of potential mitochondrial involvement in GDD are remarkable in light of preclinical models showing adverse Gd/GBCA effects on multiple aspects of mitochondrial function. Further research on the potential contributory role of these markers and pathways in persistent symptoms attributed to GBCA exposure is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) improve the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging. Although initially believed to be without major adverse effects, GBCA use in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) was demonstrated to cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Restrictive policies of GBCA use in CKD and selective use of GBCAs that bind free gadolinium more strongly have resulted in the virtual elimination of NSF cases. Contemporary studies of the use of GBCAs with high binding affinity for free gadolinium in severe CKD demonstrate an absence of NSF. Despite these observations and the limitations of contemporary studies, physicians remain concerned about GBCA use in severe CKD. Concerns of GBCA use in severe CKD are magnified by recent observations demonstrating gadolinium deposition in brain and a possible systemic syndrome attributed to GBCAs. Radiologic advances have resulted in several new imaging modalities that can be used in the severe CKD population and that do not require GBCA administration. In this article, we critically review GBCA use in patients with severe CKD and provide recommendations regarding GBCA use in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Drug biodistribution analyses can be considered a key issue in pharmaceutical discovery and development. Here, mass spectrometric imaging can be employed as a powerful tool to investigate distributions of drug compounds in biologically and medically relevant tissue sections. Both matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometric imaging as molecular method and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometric imaging as elemental detection method were applied to determine drug distributions in tissue thin sections. Several mouse organs including the heart, kidney, liver, and brain were analyzed with regard to distribution of Gadovist™, a gadolinium-based contrast agent already approved for clinical investigation. This work demonstrated the successful detection and localization of Gadovist™ in several organs. Furthermore, the results gave evidence that gadolinium-based contrast agents in general can be well analyzed by mass spectrometric imaging methods. In conclusion, the combined application of molecular and elemental mass spectrometry could complement each other and thus confirm analytical results or provide additional information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Gadolinium-based contrast agents have been considered extremely safe drugs with a low incidence of acute adverse reactions. Most of the reactions are mild and physiologic. However, despite being extremely rare, acute severe adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, may occur. In this article adverse reactions are discussed with regard to their classification, pathophysiology, symptoms, and risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号