frontotemporal dementia

额颞叶痴呆
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微管相关蛋白,tau,涉及多种神经退行性疾病,统称为tau蛋白病。这些病症的特征在于在患病个体的脑内存在tau聚集体。编码tau蛋白的MAPT基因内的突变形成家族性tau蛋白病的遗传背景,如额颞叶痴呆(FTD),但是这种改变的分子后果及其病理效应尚不清楚。我们试图研究三种tau突变体的聚集体的构象特性:A152T,P301L,和R406W,都牵涉到FTD,并将它们与原生形式的(WT-Tau2N4R)进行比较。我们的免疫化学分析揭示突变体和WTtau寡聚体对构象特异性抗体表现出相似的亲和力,但具有不同的形态和二级结构。此外,这些寡聚体具有不同的染料结合性质和不同的敏感性蛋白水解加工。这些结果表明它们之间的构象多样性。然后,我们测试了突变寡聚物交叉接种WTtau单体的聚集的能力。使用类似的一系列实验,我们发现,与突变聚集体交叉接种导致构象上独特的WT寡聚体的形成。本文讨论的结果为WTtau2N4R及其突变体的寡聚形式的结构特性提供了新的视角,同时也揭示了他们的交叉播种行为。
    The microtubule associated protein, tau, is implicated in a multitude of neurodegenerative disorders that are collectively termed as tauopathies. These disorders are characterized by the presence of tau aggregates within the brain of afflicted individuals. Mutations within the MAPT gene that encodes the tau protein form the genetic backdrop for familial forms of tauopathies, such as frontotemporal dementia (FTD), but the molecular consequences of such alterations and their pathological effects are unclear. We sought to investigate the conformational properties of the aggregates of three tau mutants: A152T, P301L, and R406W, all implicated within FTD, and compare them to those of the native form (WT-Tau 2N4R). Our immunochemical analysis reveals that mutants and WT tau oligomers exhibit similar affinity for conformation-specific antibodies but have distinct morphology and secondary structure. Additionally, these oligomers possess different dye-binding properties and varying sensitivity to proteolytic processing. These results point to conformational variety among them. We then tested the ability of the mutant oligomers to cross-seed the aggregation of WT tau monomer. Using similar array of experiments, we found that cross-seeding with mutant aggregates leads to the formation of conformationally unique WT oligomers. The results discussed in this paper provide a novel perspective on the structural properties of oligomeric forms of WT tau 2N4R and its mutant, along with shedding some light on their cross-seeding behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管努力确定流体生物标志物以改善额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的诊断,近年来只有少数候选人被描述。在之前的研究中,我们鉴定了三个循环miRNA(miR-92a-3p,miR-320a和miR-320b)在FTD患者中相对于健康对照和/或阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的差异表达。现在,我们研究了这些变化是否可能是由于神经元衍生的细胞外囊泡(NDEV)中包含的miRNA。我们还评估了总血浆EV和CSF样品中的miRNA含量。对包括对照组在内的40名受试者进行血浆NDEV分析(n=13),FTD(n=13)和AD(n=14)患者,结果表明,与CT和AD患者相比,FTD组的miR-92a-3p和miR-320a水平均为三倍。与CT相比,在源自FTD组的CSF中也发现相同miRNA的水平增加。三组间miR-320b表达水平无差异。值得注意的是,所有分析的miRNA在FTD细胞模型中增加,MAPTIVS10+16个神经元。我们的结果表明,NDEV中的miR-92a和miR-320a可以作为FTD生物标志物。
    Despite the efforts to identify fluid biomarkers to improve diagnosis of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), only a few candidates have been described in recent years. In a previous study, we identified three circulating miRNAs (miR-92a-3p, miR-320a and miR-320b) differentially expressed in FTD patients with respect to healthy controls and/or Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) patients. Now, we investigated whether those changes could be due to miRNAs contained in neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs). We also evaluated miRNAs content in total plasma EVs and in CSF samples. The analysis of plasma NDEVs carried out on 40 subjects including controls (n = 13), FTD (n = 13) and AD (n = 14) patients, showed that both miR-92a-3p and miR-320a levels were triplicated in the FTD group if compared with CT and AD patients. Increased levels of the same miRNAs were found also in CSF derived from FTD group compared to CTs. No differences were observed in expression levels of miR-320b among the three groups. Worthy of note, all miRNAs analysed were increased in an FTD cell model, MAPT IVS10 + 16 neurons. Our results suggest that miR-92a and miR-320a in NDEVs could be proposed as FTD biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    年轻发作性痴呆(YOD)的性质难以诊断。尽管参与了多学科神经遗传学服务,患有YOD的患者及其家属面临显著的诊断延误.目前,对患有YOD的人进行基因检测涉及交错,迭代方法。目前没有最佳的单一遗传研究同时鉴定导致YOD的不同遗传变异。
    这篇综述讨论了针对患有YOD的人的临床基因组测试的进展。全基因组测序(WGS)可用作“一站式商店”的YOD基因组测试。除了单核苷酸变体,WGS可以可靠地检测结构变体,短串联重复扩展,线粒体遗传变异以及捕获单核苷酸多态性用于计算多基因风险评分。
    WGS,当用作初始基因测试时,可以提高精确诊断的可能性,并缩短达到这一目标所需的时间。使用WGS找到临床诊断可以减少侵入性和昂贵的调查,并且可能具有成本效益。这些进步需要与技术的局限性以及这些弱势患者及其家人的遗传咨询需求相平衡。
    UNASSIGNED: Young onset dementia (YOD) by its nature is difficult to diagnose. Despite involvement of multidisciplinary neurogenetics services, patients with YOD and their families face significant diagnostic delays. Genetic testing for people with YOD currently involves a staggered, iterative approach. There is currently no optimal single genetic investigation that simultaneously identifies the different genetic variants resulting in YOD.
    UNASSIGNED: This review discusses the advances in clinical genomic testing for people with YOD. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) can be employed as a \'one stop shop\' genomic test for YOD. In addition to single nucleotide variants, WGS can reliably detect structural variants, short tandem repeat expansions, mitochondrial genetic variants as well as capture single nucleotide polymorphisms for the calculation of polygenic risk scores.
    UNASSIGNED: WGS, when used as the initial genetic test, can enhance the likelihood of a precision diagnosis and curtail the time taken to reach this. Finding a clinical diagnosis using WGS can reduce invasive and expensive investigations and could be cost effective. These advances need to be balanced against the limitations of the technology and the genetic counseling needs for these vulnerable patients and their families.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:额颞叶痴呆(FTD)可以在表型上分为行为变异FTD(bvFTD),非流利型原发性进行性失语症(nfvPPA),和语义变异PPA(svPPA)。然而,这种表型异质性的神经基础仍然难以捉摸.
    方法:皮质形态学,白质高强度(WMH),沿血管周围空间的扩散张量图像分析(DTI-ALPS),并在FTD亚型中评估了它们之间的相互关系。还对亚型之间的区域皮质形态偏差进行了神经影像学转录分析。
    结果:皮质厚度的变化,表面积,陀螺,WMH,DTI-ALPS在FTD中具有亚型特异性。这三个形态学指标与全脑WMH体积和认知能力有关,而皮质厚度与DTI-ALPS有关。神经成像-转录分析确定了与TDP-43/tau病理的形成和/或传播相关的关键生物学途径。
    结论:我们发现皮质形态的亚型特异性变化,WMH,和FTD中的淋巴功能。我们的发现有可能有助于这种疾病的个性化预测和治疗策略的发展。
    结论:皮质形态变化,白质高强度(WMH),而类淋巴功能障碍是亚型特异性的。皮质形态变化,WMH,和淋巴功能障碍是相互关联的。皮质形态学改变和WMH负担导致认知障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) can be phenotypically divided into behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA). However, the neural underpinnings of this phenotypic heterogeneity remain elusive.
    METHODS: Cortical morphology, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS), and their interrelationships were assessed in subtypes of FTD. Neuroimaging-transcriptional analyses on the regional cortical morphological deviances among subtypes were also performed.
    RESULTS: Changes in cortical thickness, surface area, gyrification, WMH, and DTI-ALPS were subtype-specific in FTD. The three morphologic indices are related to whole-brain WMH volume and cognitive performance, while cortical thickness is related to DTI-ALPS. Neuroimaging-transcriptional analyses identified key biological pathways linked to the formation and/or spread of TDP-43/tau pathologies.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found subtype-specific changes in cortical morphology, WMH, and glymphatic function in FTD. Our findings have the potential to contribute to the development of personalized predictions and treatment strategies for this disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cortical morphologic changes, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and glymphatic dysfunction are subtype-specific. Cortical morphologic changes, WMH, and glymphatic dysfunction are inter-correlated. Cortical morphologic changes and WMH burden contribute to cognitive impairments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)是引起痴呆的两大神经退行性疾病。由于相似的临床表型,没有特异性生物标志物的鉴别诊断具有挑战性。β-位点淀粉样蛋白前体蛋白裂解酶1(BACE1)是AD发病机制中关键的β-分泌酶。在AD和轻度认知障碍受试者中,脑/脑脊液中BACE1活性增加,血浆水平似乎反映了大脑中的水平。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估FTD中的血清BACE1活性,因为,到目前为止,没有证据表明它的作用。分析30名FTD患者和30名对照的血清,以评估(i)BACE1活性,使用荧光测定法,和(ii)神经胶质纤维酸蛋白(GFAP)和神经丝轻链(NfL)水平,使用Simoa套件。不出所料,与对照组相比,FTD患者的GFAP和NfL水平显著升高.FTD患者的血清BACE1活性没有改变。血清BACE1活性显着增加显示在AD与FTD和控件。我们的结果支持以下假设:血清BACE1活性是AD和FTD之间鉴别诊断的潜在生物标志物。
    Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the two major neurodegenerative diseases causing dementia. Due to similar clinical phenotypes, differential diagnosis is challenging without specific biomarkers. Beta-site Amyloid Precursor Protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is a β-secretase pivotal in AD pathogenesis. In AD and mild cognitive impairment subjects, BACE1 activity is increased in brain/cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma levels appear to reflect those in the brain. In this study, we aim to evaluate serum BACE1 activity in FTD, since, to date, there is no evidence about its role. The serum of 30 FTD patients and 30 controls was analyzed to evaluate (i) BACE1 activity, using a fluorescent assay, and (ii) Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP) and Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) levels, using a Simoa kit. As expected, a significant increase in GFAP and NfL levels was observed in FTD patients compared to controls. Serum BACE1 activity was not altered in FTD patients. A significant increase in serum BACE1 activity was shown in AD vs. FTD and controls. Our results support the hypothesis that serum BACE1 activity is a potential biomarker for the differential diagnosis between AD and FTD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    长链非编码RNA(lncRNAs)在基因调控中起关键作用,并与神经退行性疾病有关,包括额颞叶痴呆(FTD)。然而,它们在涉及9号染色体开放阅读框(C9ORF72)的遗传FTD中的表达模式和作为生物标志物的潜力,微管相关蛋白Tau(MAPT),和前颗粒蛋白(GRN)基因还没有得到很好的理解。
    本研究旨在分析在GENetic额颞叶痴呆倡议(GENFI)中收集的外周血单核细胞中lncRNAs的表达水平。
    用OpenArray自定义面板分析了53个lncRNA,在131例C9ORF72,MAPT,和GRN,包括68个症状突变携带者(SMC)和63个症状前突变携带者(PMC),与40个非载波对照(NC)相比。
    可检测到38个lncRNAs;与NC相比,在C9ORF72SMC中NEAT1和NORAD的相对表达明显更高。GAS5的表达在GRN组中明显低于NC。MAPT携带者没有明显的管制。在PMC中没有观察到显著差异。疾病持续时间与lncRNA表达无关。
    NEAT1和NORAD在C9ORF72SMC中上调,GAS5在GRNSMC中下调,强调lncRNAs在FTD中的相关性及其在生物标志物开发中的潜力。进一步的验证和机理研究对于临床意义至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in gene regulation and are implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, their expression patterns and potential as biomarkers in genetic FTD involving Chromosome 9 Open Reading Frame (C9ORF72), Microtubule Associated Protein Tau (MAPT), and Progranulin (GRN) genes are not well understood.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to profile the expression levels of lncRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected within the GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI).
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-three lncRNAs were analyzed with the OpenArray Custom panel, in 131 patients with mutations in C9ORF72, MAPT, and GRN, including 68 symptomatic mutation carriers (SMC) and 63 presymptomatic mutation carriers (PMC), compared with 40 non-carrier controls (NC).
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-eight lncRNAs were detectable; the relative expression of NEAT1 and NORAD was significantly higher in C9ORF72 SMC as compared with NC. GAS5 expression was instead significantly lower in the GRN group versus NC. MAPT carriers showed no significant deregulations. No significant differences were observed in PMC. Disease duration did not correlate with lncRNA expression.
    UNASSIGNED: NEAT1 and NORAD are upregulated in C9ORF72 SMC and GAS5 levels are downregulated in GRN SMC, underlining lncRNAs\' relevance in FTD and their potential for biomarker development. Further validation and mechanistic studies are crucial for clinical implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的脑电图(EEG)数据集[1,2],使用卷积神经网络(CNN)对阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和健康对照(HC)进行分类并评估其性能。方法:对包含88名受试者的EEG数据集进行下采样并切成10秒。总数据集被分为火车,每个受试者的测试和验证集。使用CNN结构从EEG中提取时间和空间特征,并将患者分为3组(FTD/AD/HC)。使用Adam优化器计算交叉熵损失以训练模型。测量了分类性能,以验证模型的准确性,混淆矩阵,AUC(曲线下面积),F1得分。
    结果:培训后,验证准确率为95.35%,宏观平均AUC为0.9962.FTD组的F1评分为0.9469,受试者的最低验证准确率为57.14%。AD组平均准确率为92.79%,FTD组平均准确率为97.52%。健康对照组平均准确率为95.26%。
    结论:我们实现了CNN模型,该模型可以在没有专家设计的特征工程过程的情况下,以非常高的性能对痴呆患者的EEG进行分类。这些结果表明,基于深度学习的方法对于基于EEG的患者分类最有前途。
    BACKGROUND: A dataset[1,2] of electroencephalography(EEG) of frontotemporal dementia(FTD), alzheimer`s disease(AD) patients and healthy control(HC) were classified using convolutional neural network(CNN) and evaluated its performances METHOD: EEG dataset containing 88 subjects is downsampled and sliced into 10 seconds. Total dataset was divided into train, test and validation sets for each subject. CNN structure was used to extract temporal and spatial features from EEG and classify patients into 3 groups(FTD/AD/HC). Cross entropy loss was calculated to train the model using adam optimizer. Classification performances were measured to validate model such as accuracy, confusion matrix, AUC(area under curve), F1 Score.
    RESULTS: After training, validation accuracy was 95.35% and macro-averaged AUC was 0.9962. F1 score was 0.9469 and the minimum validation accuracy measured among subjects was 57.14% in FTD group. For AD group average accuracy was 92.79%, and for FTD group average accuracy was 97.52%. Average accuracy of healthy control group was 95.26%.
    CONCLUSIONS: We implemented CNN model that can classify EEG of dementia patients with very high performances without expert-designed feature engineering process. These results imply that deep learning based approach is most promising for EEG-based patient classification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ALLFTD(ARTFL-LEFFTDS纵向前叶变性)研究是一项由NIH资助的工作,旨在为散发性(s-FTLD)和家族性(f-FTLD)FTLD综合征的临床试验做准备。开发新的临床试验结果指标,并评估疾病进展。ALLFTD代表了两项先前研究的合并和延续:推进额颞叶变性的研究和治疗(ARTFL)和家族性额颞叶痴呆受试者的纵向评估(LEFFTDS)。
    方法:ALLFTD招募FTLD谱系障碍患者(bvFTD,svPPA,nfvPPA,FTD-ALS,CBS或PSP),拥有丰富的FTLD家族史,或家族中已知的FTLD相关遗传变异。北美的26个地点招募参与者进行临床和神经心理学评估,MR成像,抽血,和自愿参与者的CSF收集;要求参与者每年返回进行后续评估。对所有参与者进行痴呆相关突变的基因分型。参与者还参加了FTD疾病登记处的后续调查。一部分参与者通过ALLFTD应用程序进行远程评估。在ARTFL和LEFFTDS下进行的访问包括在ALLFTD数据集中。
    结果:ALLFTD在开发进行远程或混合访问的方法以及积极评估参与者方面取得了成功。自ALLFTD于2020年1月开始以来,已经对1034名参与者(736名新参与者;298名以前参加ARTFL或LEFFTDS的参与者)进行了纵向评估;另外119名参与者参加了缩短,以生物流体为重点的访问。349人已返回进行后续访问。包括先前的参与者,ALLFTD数据集包含来自2343人的3871次访视.1277人患有零星综合征;1045人被登记为家族性。在s-FTLD中,bvFTD是最常见的表型(32.8%),其次是PSP(15.9%)。61.4%的f-FTLD参与者在首次访问时临床正常;bvFTD是有症状的f-FTLD中最常见的综合征(40%)。477是FTLD相关基因突变的证实携带者。获得了2594次访问的MRI;3492次访问有相关的血液生物样本库存;978次访问有相关的CSF样本。
    结论:ALLFTD联盟正在积极评估北美地区的参与者,以更好地表征FTLD综合征并支持FTLD临床试验的规划和开发。纵向数据集,包括临床,遗传,和成像数据可根据要求。
    BACKGROUND: The ALLFTD (ARTFL-LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontemporal Lobar Degeneration) study is an NIH-funded effort to prepare for clinical trials in sporadic (s-FTLD) and familial (f-FTLD) FTLD syndromes by characterizing cohorts, developing new clinical trial outcome measures, and evaluating disease progression. ALLFTD represents the merger and continuation of two prior studies: Advancing Research and Treatment of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS).
    METHODS: ALLFTD recruits participants with FTLD spectrum disorders (bvFTD, svPPA, nfvPPA, FTD-ALS, CBS or PSP), with strong family histories of FTLD, or known FTLD-associated genetic variants within the family. 26 sites in North America enroll participants for clinical and neuropsychological evaluations, MR Imaging, blood draws, and CSF collection in willing participants; participants are requested to return annually for follow-up evaluation. All participants are genotyped for dementia-associated mutations. Participants also enroll in the FTD Disorders Registry for follow-up surveys. A subset of participants undergo remote assessment via the ALLFTD app. Visits conducted under ARTFL and LEFFTDS are included in the ALLFTD dataset.
    RESULTS: ALLFTD has been successful in developing methods to conduct remote or hybrid visits and in actively evaluating participants. Since ALLFTD began in January 2020, 1034 participants (736 new; 298 previously enrolled in ARTFL or LEFFTDS) have been evaluated in the longitudinal arm; an additional 119 participants have been participated in a shortened, biofluid-focused visit. 349 have returned for follow-up visits. Including prior participants, the ALLFTD dataset contains 3871 visits from 2343 individuals. 1277 people have sporadic syndromes; 1045 were enrolled as familial. Among s-FTLD, bvFTD is the most common phenotype (32.8%) followed by PSP (15.9%). 61.4% of f-FTLD participants were clinically normal at first visit; bvFTD is the most common syndrome in symptomatic f-FTLD (40%). 477 are confirmed carriers of FTLD-associated genetic mutations. MRIs were obtained for 2594 visits; 3492 visits have associated blood biospecimens banked; 978 visits have associated CSF samples.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ALLFTD consortium is actively evaluating participants across North America to better characterize FTLD syndromes and support the planning and development of FTLD clinical trials. Longitudinal datasets including clinical, genetic, and imaging data are available by request.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:语义和社会情感知识,包括人的识别,可以改变额颞叶痴呆(FTD),通常与右颞叶变异有关。使用遗传FTD倡议的数据,我们调查了基因FTD中的人识别缺陷。
    方法:901名GENFI参与者(279名突变阴性对照,280C9orf72突变携带者(MC),101个MAPTMC和241个GRNMC)使用临床痴呆评定量表加上国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心额颞叶变性(CDR加上NACCFTLD)全球评分进行分组,其中0表示无症状,0.5为前驱,1+为轻度至重度症状(C9orf72:135=0,48=0.5,97=1+;GRN:143=0,35=0.5,63=1+;MAPT:50=0,20=0.5,31=1+)。使用结构化临床问卷中的单个问题评估人认可度(PR),对识别应该通过面部或声音熟悉的人的能力进行评分,值在0(不存在)到3(严重)之间,类似于CDR规模。计算每组PR缺陷参与者的百分比。自举Logistic回归比较各组之间的PR评分与年龄,性别,和教育作为协变量。
    结果:16.1%的C9orf72MC(0=0.7%,0.5=2.1%,1+=44.3%),GRN的7.5%(0=0.0%,0.5=8.6%,1+=23.8%)和17.8%的MAPT载波(0=2%,0.5=10%,1+=48.4%)显示PR缺陷。每组的平均值(标准偏差)严重程度为:C9orf720=0.0(0.0),0.5=0.0(0.1),1+=0.6(0.9);GRN0=0.0(0.0),0.5=0.0(0.1),1+=0.2(0.6);MAPT0=0.0(0.2),0.5=0.1(0.3),1+=0.6(0.8)。每个有症状的遗传组的PR缺陷明显大于对照组(p<0.001),前驱MAPT(p=0.006)和GRN(p<0.001)组也显示出比对照组更大的损害。与对照组相比,C9orf72无症状组和前驱组有显着性趋势(分别为p=0.058和p=0.059)。有症状的C9orf72和MAPT携带者比有症状的GRN携带者表现出更大的损害(均p=0.005)。
    结论:人识别是一些遗传性FTD个体疾病的关键早期标志,进一步的影像学分析将有助于揭示这种缺陷的潜在机制。
    BACKGROUND: Semantic and socioemotional knowledge, including person recognition, can be altered in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and is often associated with the right temporal lobe variant. Using data from the Genetic FTD Initiative, we investigated person recognition deficits in genetic FTD.
    METHODS: 901 GENFI participants (279 mutation negative controls, 280 C9orf72 mutation carriers (MCs), 101 MAPTMCs and 241 GRN MCs) were grouped using the Clinical Dementia Rating scale plus National Alzheimer\'s Coordinating Centre Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR plus NACC FTLD) global score where 0 denotes asymptomatic, 0.5 as prodromal, and 1+ as mild to severe symptoms (C9orf72: 135 = 0, 48 = 0.5, 97 = 1+; GRN: 143 = 0, 35 = 0.5, 63 = 1+; MAPT: 50 = 0, 20 = 0.5, 31 = 1+). Person recognition (PR) was assessed using a single question within a structured clinical questionnaire, scoring the ability to recognise people who should be familiar by face or voice to them, with a value between 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), similar to the CDR scale. The percentage of participants with PR deficits was calculated for each group. Logistic regression with bootstrapping compared the PR score between groups with age, gender, and education as covariates.
    RESULTS: 16.1% of C9orf72 MCs (0 = 0.7%, 0.5 = 2.1%, 1+ = 44.3%), 7.5% of GRN (0 = 0.0%, 0.5 = 8.6%, 1+ = 23.8%) and 17.8% of MAPT carriers (0 = 2%, 0.5 = 10%, 1+ = 48.4%) showed PR deficits. Mean (standard deviation) severity in each group was: C9orf72 0 = 0.0(0.0), 0.5 = 0.0(0.1), 1+ = 0.6(0.9); GRN 0 = 0.0(0.0), 0.5 = 0.0(0.1), 1+ = 0.2(0.6); MAPT 0 = 0.0(0.2), 0.5 = 0.1(0.3), 1+ = 0.6(0.8). Each of the symptomatic genetic groups had a significantly greater PR deficit than the control group (p<0.001), with the prodromal MAPT (p = 0.006) and GRN (p<0.001) groups also showing a greater impairment than controls. There was a trend to significance in the C9orf72asymptomatic and prodromal groups compared with controls (p = 0.058 and p = 0.059 respectively). Symptomatic C9orf72 and MAPT carriers showed greater impairment than the symptomatic GRN carriers (both p = 0.005).
    CONCLUSIONS: Person recognition is a key early marker of disease in some individuals with genetic FTD and further imaging analyses will help to reveal the underlying mechanism of this deficit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:C9orf72重复序列扩增(C9RE)是额颞叶痴呆(FTD)最普遍的遗传原因。自从它被发现,研究表明,FTD患者的家族史(FH)和病史携带C9RE通常不仅对痴呆症呈阳性,但也适用于精神疾病和迟发性行为改变。相反,在原发性精神疾病(PPD)队列中发现C9RE携带者很少见。这些发现证明临床医生可以测试C9RE,不管FH,在诊断FTD患者时,不在PPD队列中筛查C9RE。目前尚不清楚在出现迟发性行为改变的病例中C9RE的频率。因此,我们调查了C9RE筛查对迟发性行为改变的诊断价值.
    方法:在2011年至2023年期间转诊至阿姆斯特丹阿尔茨海默病中心,接受FTD或非FTD基线诊断的患者。进行遗传筛选,排除除C9RE以外的突变携带者。该队列分为C9RE携带者和非携带者。检索FH数据。FH阳性(FH)定义为患有痴呆症或精神病学的一级亲属,阴性FH(FH-),没有痴呆症或精神病学的一级亲属。研究了FH(+/-)在C9RE-载体和非-载体之间的分布。在C9RE运营商中,测量FTD诊断与非FTD诊断之间的FH分布。使用卡方检验比较分布。
    结果:总共n=344,其中16,2%的C9RE携带者,包括在内。在C9RE载波中,66.7%具有FH+,而非携带者为35.7%(p=4.36e-05)。在C9RE载波组中,n=34例接受FTD诊断,其中n=20具有FH-(58.5%),而n=20例接受非FTD诊断,其中n=14(70%)具有FH-(p值=0.596,表1)。
    结论:在一组迟发性行为改变中,14例(占队列总数的4.2%)接受非FTD诊断,痴呆症和精神病学的FH为阴性,但结果是C9RE。这表明C9RE丰富了迟发性行为变化,无论FH或基线诊断,提示筛查C9RE对迟发性行为障碍具有诊断和预后价值.
    BACKGROUND: The C9orf72-repeat expansion (C9RE) is the most prevalent genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Since its discovery, studies have shown that both family history (FH) and medical history of FTD patients carrying a C9RE are often not only positive for dementia, but also for psychiatric disorders and late-onset behavioural change. Conversely, finding a C9RE carrier in a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) cohort is rare. These findings justify clinicians to test for the C9RE, regardless of FH, when diagnosing a patient with FTD but not to screen for C9REs in PPD cohorts. It is unknown what the frequency is of C9RE in cases presenting with late-onset behavioural change. Therefore, we investigated the diagnostic value of screening for C9RE in cases with late-onset behavioural change.
    METHODS: Patients with late-onset (>45years) behavioural change referred to the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam between 2011 and 2023, that received a baseline diagnosis of FTD or non-FTD were included. Genetic screening was performed and mutation carriers other than C9RE were excluded. The cohort was devided in C9RE-carriers and non-carriers. FH data was retrieved. Positive FH (FH+) was defined as having a first-degree relative with dementia or psychiatry, negative FH (FH-) without a first-degree relative with dementia or psychiatry. Distribution of FH(+/-) between C9RE-carriers and non-carriers was studied. Within the C9RE-carriers, distribution of FH between FTD and non-FTD diagnosis was measured. Distributions were compared using chi-squared tests.
    RESULTS: A total of n = 344, of which 16,2% C9RE-carriers, were included. Of the C9RE-carriers, 66.7% had a FH+ versus 35.7% of the non-carriers (p = 4.36e-05). Within the C9RE-carriers group, n = 34 cases received a FTD diagnosis of which n = 20 had a FH- (58.5%) versus n = 20 cases receiving a non-FTD diagnosis of which n = 14 (70%) having a FH- (p-value = 0.596, table 1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Within a cohort of late-onset behavioural change, 14 cases (4.2% of total cohort) received a non-FTD diagnosis, had a negative FH for dementia and psychiatry but turned out to have a C9RE. This shows late-onset behavioural change is enriched with C9RE, regardless of FH or baseline diagnosis, and suggests that screening for C9RE is of both diagnostic and prognostic value in late-onset behavioural disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号