背景:语义和社会情感知识,包括人的识别,可以改变额颞叶痴呆(FTD),通常与右颞叶变异有关。使用遗传FTD倡议的数据,我们调查了基因FTD中的人识别缺陷。
方法:901名GENFI参与者(279名突变阴性对照,280C9orf72突变携带者(MC),101个MAPTMC和241个GRNMC)使用临床痴呆评定量表加上国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心额颞叶变性(CDR加上NACCFTLD)全球评分进行分组,其中0表示无症状,0.5为前驱,1+为轻度至重度症状(C9orf72:135=0,48=0.5,97=1+;GRN:143=0,35=0.5,63=1+;MAPT:50=0,20=0.5,31=1+)。使用结构化临床问卷中的单个问题评估人认可度(PR),对识别应该通过面部或声音熟悉的人的能力进行评分,值在0(不存在)到3(严重)之间,类似于CDR规模。计算每组PR缺陷参与者的百分比。自举Logistic回归比较各组之间的PR评分与年龄,性别,和教育作为协变量。
结果:16.1%的C9orf72MC(0=0.7%,0.5=2.1%,1+=44.3%),GRN的7.5%(0=0.0%,0.5=8.6%,1+=23.8%)和17.8%的MAPT载波(0=2%,0.5=10%,1+=48.4%)显示PR缺陷。每组的平均值(标准偏差)严重程度为:C9orf720=0.0(0.0),0.5=0.0(0.1),1+=0.6(0.9);GRN0=0.0(0.0),0.5=0.0(0.1),1+=0.2(0.6);MAPT0=0.0(0.2),0.5=0.1(0.3),1+=0.6(0.8)。每个有症状的遗传组的PR缺陷明显大于对照组(p<0.001),前驱MAPT(p=0.006)和GRN(p<0.001)组也显示出比对照组更大的损害。与对照组相比,C9orf72无症状组和前驱组有显着性趋势(分别为p=0.058和p=0.059)。有症状的C9orf72和MAPT携带者比有症状的GRN携带者表现出更大的损害(均p=0.005)。
结论:人识别是一些遗传性FTD个体疾病的关键早期标志,进一步的影像学分析将有助于揭示这种缺陷的潜在机制。
BACKGROUND: Semantic and socioemotional knowledge, including person recognition, can be altered in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and is often associated with the right temporal lobe variant. Using data from the Genetic FTD Initiative, we investigated person recognition deficits in genetic FTD.
METHODS: 901 GENFI participants (279 mutation negative controls, 280 C9orf72 mutation carriers (MCs), 101 MAPTMCs and 241 GRN MCs) were grouped using the Clinical Dementia Rating scale plus National Alzheimer\'s Coordinating Centre Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR plus NACC FTLD) global score where 0 denotes asymptomatic, 0.5 as prodromal, and 1+ as mild to severe symptoms (C9orf72: 135 = 0, 48 = 0.5, 97 = 1+; GRN: 143 = 0, 35 = 0.5, 63 = 1+; MAPT: 50 = 0, 20 = 0.5, 31 = 1+). Person recognition (PR) was assessed using a single question within a structured clinical questionnaire, scoring the ability to recognise people who should be familiar by face or voice to them, with a value between 0 (absent) to 3 (severe), similar to the CDR scale. The percentage of participants with PR deficits was calculated for each group. Logistic regression with bootstrapping compared the PR score between groups with age, gender, and education as covariates.
RESULTS: 16.1% of C9orf72 MCs (0 = 0.7%, 0.5 = 2.1%, 1+ = 44.3%), 7.5% of GRN (0 = 0.0%, 0.5 = 8.6%, 1+ = 23.8%) and 17.8% of MAPT carriers (0 = 2%, 0.5 = 10%, 1+ = 48.4%) showed PR deficits. Mean (standard deviation) severity in each group was: C9orf72 0 = 0.0(0.0), 0.5 = 0.0(0.1), 1+ = 0.6(0.9); GRN 0 = 0.0(0.0), 0.5 = 0.0(0.1), 1+ = 0.2(0.6); MAPT 0 = 0.0(0.2), 0.5 = 0.1(0.3), 1+ = 0.6(0.8). Each of the symptomatic genetic groups had a significantly greater PR deficit than the control group (p<0.001), with the prodromal MAPT (p = 0.006) and GRN (p<0.001) groups also showing a greater impairment than controls. There was a trend to significance in the C9orf72asymptomatic and prodromal groups compared with controls (p = 0.058 and p = 0.059 respectively). Symptomatic C9orf72 and MAPT carriers showed greater impairment than the symptomatic GRN carriers (both p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Person recognition is a key early marker of disease in some individuals with genetic FTD and further imaging analyses will help to reveal the underlying mechanism of this deficit.