OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy requires continuous medical attention from multiple healthcare specialists, specialized facilities, and community-based care. In Spain, there is no standardized approach to epilepsy care. The aim of this study was to identify the factors impacting on the delivery of high-quality care by exploring key steps and barriers along the patient journey through the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS).
METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using opinions and experiences of neurologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers shared in discussion meetings. Using thematic content analyses, relevant aim-focused statements were coded according to prespecified issues in a discussion map (i.e., key steps and barriers), and sub-coded according to emerging issues. Thematic saturation and co-occurrence of key steps/barriers were evaluated to identify the most relevant factors impacting on the delivery of high-quality care.
RESULTS: Sixty-five stakeholders took part in discussion meetings (36 neurologists, 10 nurses, 10 patients, and nine caregivers). Six key steps on the patient journey were identified: emergency care, diagnosis, drug therapy, follow-up, referral, and interventional treatment. Of these, follow-up was the most relevant step impacting on the delivery of high-quality patient care, followed by drug therapy and diagnosis. Emergency care was considered a hot-spot step with impact throughout the patient journey. Communication (among HCPs and between HCPs and patients) was a barrier to the delivery of high-quality care at several stages of the patient journey, including drug therapy, follow-up, referral, and interventional treatment. Resource availability was a barrier for diagnosis (especially for confirmation), drug therapy (drug availability), and referral (lack of professionals and specialized centers, and long waiting lists).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study capturing perspectives of four key stakeholders involved in epilepsy care in Spain. We provide an overview of the patient journey through the Spanish NHS and highlight opportunities to improve the delivery of patient-centered care with a chronicity perspective.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with epilepsy may require prolonged medical care. In Spain, care is provided by a range of specialist and non-specialist centers. In this study, a team of Spanish neurologists, nurses, patients and caregivers identified barriers that affect the delivery of high-quality care for patients with epilepsy at each stage of their journey through the Spanish NHS. Specific epilepsy training for healthcare providers, appropriate resources for diagnosing and treating patients, and good communication between healthcare workers and patients were identified as important factors in providing high-quality care for patients with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines for managing screen-detected pulmonary nodules offer rule-based recommendations for immediate diagnostic work-up or follow-up at intervals of 3, 6, or 12 months. Customized visit plans are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To develop individualized screening schedules using reinforcement learning (RL) and evaluate the effectiveness of RL-based policy models.
METHODS: Using a nested case-control design, we retrospectively identified 308 patients with cancer who had positive screening results in at least two screening rounds in the National Lung Screening Trial. We established a control group that included cancer-free patients with nodules, matched (1:1) according to the year of cancer diagnosis. By generating 10,164 sequence decision episodes, we trained RL-based policy models, incorporating nodule diameter alone, combined with nodule appearance (attenuation and margin) and/or patient information (age, sex, smoking status, pack-years, and family history). We calculated rates of misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis, and delayed diagnosis, and compared the performance of RL-based policy models with rule-based follow-up protocols (National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline; China Guideline for the Screening and Early Detection of Lung Cancer).
RESULTS: We identified significant interactions between certain variables (e.g., nodule shape and patient smoking pack-years, beyond those considered in guideline protocols) and the selection of follow-up testing intervals, thereby impacting the quality of the decision sequence. In validation, one RL-based policy model achieved rates of 12.3% for misdiagnosis, 9.7% for missed diagnosis, and 11.7% for delayed diagnosis. Compared with the two rule-based protocols, the three best-performing RL-based policy models consistently demonstrated optimal performance for specific patient subgroups based on disease characteristics (benign or malignant), nodule phenotypes (size, shape, and attenuation), and individual attributes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of using an RL-based approach that is both clinically interpretable and performance-robust to develop personalized lung cancer screening schedules. Our findings present opportunities for enhancing the current cancer screening system.

UNASSIGNED: One-third of individuals who contract novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reportedly experience persistent symptoms, including respiratory issues, headache, dizziness, taste disorders, fatigue, and various psychiatric and neurological symptoms, known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2. In this case report, we present a patient who became aware of brain fog, which is cognitive impairment, approximately 2 months after their COVID-19 symptoms had resolved, accompanied by anxiety and depression.
UNASSIGNED: The patient, a 35-year-old Japanese man, was infected with COVID-19 and resumed work approximately 2 weeks later after symptoms improved. Approximately 1 month after returning to work, the patient\'s concentration became impaired and he started making noticeable errors at work. These symptoms did not improve, leading him to the outpatient clinic specializing in COVID-19 sequelae at our hospital. Here, he underwent blood tests, electroencephalography, and head magnetic resonance imaging, which did not reveal any abnormalities. Cognitive decline due to COVID-19 sequelae was therefore suspected, prompting his evaluation in our department approximately 5 months after his initial COVID-19 infection. Detailed cognitive function tests were performed. He was monitored without the use of medications, and his cognitive function gradually improved. Approximately 11 months after his initial COVID-19 infection, the same cognitive function tests were conducted again, because his subjective cognitive function symptoms had disappeared, and improvement was observed in many items.
UNASSIGNED: Since brain fog is a relatively common sequela, we emphasize the importance of keeping this in mind from the initial consultations and comparing results over time.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its subsequent Omicron variant has raised concerns for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients due to the potential risk of disruptions to healthcare services and unknown comorbidities between COPD and Omicron.
METHODS: In this study, we conducted a follow-up investigation of 315 COPD patients during the Omicron outbreak at Shanxi Bethune Hospital to understand the impact of the pandemic on this vulnerable population. Among all patients, 228 were infected with Omicron, of which 82 needed hospitalizations.
RESULTS: We found that COPD patients with high blood eosinophil (EOS) counts exhibited lower susceptibility to Omicron infection and were more likely to have milder symptoms that did not require hospitalization. Conversely, patients with low EOS counts showed higher rates of infection and hospitalization. Moreover, EOS count was positively correlated with T lymphocyte counts in hospitalized patients after Omicron infection, suggesting potential associations between EOS and specific immune responses in COPD patients during viral infections. Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between EOS count and lymphocyte and T-cells, and a negative correlation between EOS count and age, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study contributes to the knowledge of COPD management during the COVID-19 Omicron outbreak and emphasizes the importance of considering individual immune profiles to improve care for COPD patients in the face of the ongoing global health crisis.

Patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) undergoing tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy are monitored with regular computed tomography (CT) scans, exposing patients to cumulative radiation. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing to monitor treatment response and compare changes in ctDNA levels with RECIST 1.1 and total tumor volume measurements. Between 2014 and 2021, six patients with KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) exon-11-mutated GIST from whom long-term plasma samples were collected prospectively were included in the study. ctDNA levels of relevant plasma samples were determined using the KIT exon 11 digital droplet PCR drop-off assay. Tumor volume measurements were performed using a semi-automated approach. In total, 94 of 130 clinically relevant ctDNA samples were analyzed. Upon successful treatment response, ctDNA became undetectable in all patients. At progressive disease, ctDNA was detectable in five out of six patients. Higher levels of ctDNA correlated with larger tumor volumes. Undetectable ctDNA at the time of progressive disease on imaging was consistent with lower tumor volumes compared to those with detectable ctDNA. In summary, ctDNA levels seem to correlate with total tumor volume at the time of progressive disease. Our exploratory study shows promise for including ctDNA testing in treatment follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Recreational use of nitrous oxide (N2O) has been associated with the development of severe nitrous oxide-induced neuropathy (N2On). Follow-up of these patients poses challenges, and their clinical progression remains largely unknown. The identification of prognostic factors is made difficult by the lack of standardized longitudinal assessments in most studies. The objective was to document the course of neuropathy through systematic follow-up assessments in N2On patients to identify prognostic factors for persistent disability after 6 months.
METHODS: We gathered demographic, clinical, biological, and electrophysiological data from N2On patients hospitalized in the Referral center in Marseille, both at baseline and during a standardized follow-up assessment at 6 months.
RESULTS: We retrospectively included 26 N2On patients (mean age 22.6 ± 4.4). Significant improvements were observed in all main clinical scores including Rankin, ONLS, and MRC testing (p < .01). Electrophysiological studies (EDX) revealed a predominantly motor neuropathy with marked reduction in CMAP in the lower limbs at baseline, and no significant improvement in motor parameters (p = .543). Rankin score at 6 months correlated with the initial weekly N2O consumption (r = .43, p = .03) and the CMAP sum score in the lower limbs at the first EDX (r = -.47, p = .02). Patients with and without myelitis showed similar Rankin and ONLS score after 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course generally improved favorably at 6 months with notable amelioration in the primary disability scores, sensory deficits, and ataxia. However, distal motor impairment associated with peripheral neuropathy persisted, with distal axonal loss emerging as the main prognostic factor for long-term disability in these young patients.

Surgical indications for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and congenital heart defects are controversial. The treat and repair strategy has demonstrated efficacy in adult populations, but there have been no studies on pediatric patients. This study included pediatric patients with PAH and simple congenital heart defects who underwent corrective repair between 2012 and 2021. According to the preoperative treatment strategies, the patients were divided into a regular strategy group (Group 1) and a treat-and-repair strategy group (Group 2). Postoperative recovery and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. A total of 33 patients were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 19 patients, whereas Group 2 consisted of 14 patients. The pulmonary vascular resistance index in Group 2 was higher than that in Group 1 (10.9 ± 4.1 vs. 8.2 ± 1.6 WU, p = 0.031). There were no differences in postoperative recovery between the two groups (p > 0.05). During follow-up, five patients were lost (three in Group 1 and two in Group 2). The median follow-up period was 59 months. One patient died in Group 1, and two patients died in Group 2. There was no significant difference in the survival curve (p = 0.39). At the last follow-up, another seven patients had experienced a non-low-risk condition, with a total of three non-low-risk patients in Group 1 and seven in Group 2, including one patient in each group who had a history of ICU admission. According to the ROC curve, a preoperative PVRi <8.2 WU×m2 can predict postoperative persistent low-risk state, PVRi <5.2 WU×m2 can avoid postoperative death and/or ICU administration. In pediatric patients with PAH and simple congenital heart defects, the treat and repair strategies may provide surgery opportunities, PVRi should be <8 WU×m2, and <5.2 WU×m2 is the best choice.

BACKGROUND: Patients formerly admitted to an intensive care unit and their relatives seek information about life after critical illness to understand their symptoms and what to expect as survivors, and they express a desire to talk to others with similar experiences. Various operational models of post-intensive care peer support exist, and studies have reported potential beneficial mechanisms in patients involved in peer support programs. However, most models have not been formally evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the content and setting of structured group meetings and explore participants\' experiences of meeting peers.
METHODS: A qualitative evaluation combining focused ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews with 22 participants attending three intensive care unit café meetings in a university hospital. A thematic analysis was conducted using all data collected.
RESULTS: Three main themes emerged; \'Accommodating the diversity of patients and relatives\', \'A range of possibilities for identification\' and \'A newfound community\'. Findings indicate that the content, setting and timing of the café meetings were of minor concern for the participants. Patients and relatives should attend together because the consequences of surviving a critical illness affect both. Larger groups of participants appeared to increase the likelihood of encountering broad variances in participants\' experiences from the critical illness trajectory. The findings indicate that before attending a meeting, the participants did not find previous experiences sufficient in managing their new life situations and they felt alone in their experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: Peer support invited participants into a secure community and eased their sense of being alone in their struggles. Meeting peers seemed to be more important than following a specific model of peer support.
CONCLUSIONS: When setting up peer support for former intensive care patients, the most important aspect is to create a secure space for patients and their relatives to meet.

When studies use different scales to measure continuous outcomes, standardised mean differences (SMD) are required to meta-analyse the data. However, outcomes are often reported as endpoint or change from baseline scores. Combining corresponding SMDs can be problematic and available guidance advises against this practice. We aimed to examine the impact of combining the two types of SMD in meta-analyses of depression severity. We used individual participant data on pharmacological interventions (89 studies, 27,409 participants) and internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT; 61 studies, 13,687 participants) for depression to compare endpoint and change from baseline SMDs at the study level. Next, we performed pairwise (PWMA) and network meta-analyses (NMA) using endpoint SMDs, change from baseline SMDs, or a mixture of the two. Study-specific SMDs calculated from endpoint and change from baseline data were largely similar, although for iCBT interventions 25% of the studies at 3 months were associated with important differences between study-specific SMDs (median 0.01, IQR -0.10, 0.13) especially in smaller trials with baseline imbalances. However, when pooled, the differences between endpoint and change SMDs were negligible. Pooling only the more favourable of the two SMDs did not materially affect meta-analyses, resulting in differences of pooled SMDs up to 0.05 and 0.13 in the pharmacological and iCBT datasets, respectively. Our findings have implications for meta-analyses in depression, where we showed that the choice between endpoint and change scores for estimating SMDs had immaterial impact on summary meta-analytic estimates. Future studies should replicate and extend our analyses to fields other than depression.