floor of mouth cancer

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap for small-medium tongue or floor of mouth defects caused by surgical resection of early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included patients with early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer and reconstructed by FAMM flap or traditional free or axial flaps. Demographic data and surgery-related data were collected. Patients were followed up for 6 months and evaluated with satisfaction, maximal mouth opening, satisfactory contour and speech, and oral intake function at months 3 and 6.
    RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included, with 15 in the FAMM group and 30 in the flap group. All patients finished 3 months follow-up, and 1 in each group was lost to follow-up at month 6. All followed-up patients had no recurrence or metastasis. The FAMM group had a significantly shorter surgical time than the flap group (P<0.05). The flap group had significantly more donor sites that were uncomfortable compared with the FAMM group (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance on satisfaction, but the FAMM group had better outcomes on contour, speech, and oral intake function at month 6 than the flap group (P<0.05). The FAMM group had smaller maximal mouth opening than the flap group (P<0.05) at month 3 but equivalent maximal mouth opening at month 6 (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: FAMM flap has some advantages for small-medium tongue or floor of mouth defects caused by surgical resection of early-medium stage tongue or floor of mouth cancer, and it could be an ideal choice for clinical application.
    目的: 探究以面动脉为蒂的黏膜肌(FAMM)瓣在修复临床早-中期舌癌及口底癌缺损中的临床效果及安全性。方法: 通过回顾性队列研究的方式纳入使用FAMM瓣(FAMM组)或者皮瓣(皮瓣组)修复早-中期舌癌、口底癌切除后中小型舌、口底缺损的患者,收集患者一般资料及相关手术资料,术后3个月和6个月评估患者满意度、张口度、外形满意度、语音满意度以及进食功能情况。结果: 本研究共纳入患者45名,其中FAMM组15名,皮瓣组30名。所有患者均完成了术后3个月随访,2组各1名患者在术后6个月失访,随访到的患者没有复发及转移征象。FAMM组手术时间短于皮瓣组(P<0.05)。皮瓣组患者术后供瓣区不适多于FAMM组(P<0.05)。2组患者术后总体满意度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但FAMM组术后6个月外形满意度、语音满意度和进食功能优于皮瓣组(P<0.05);术后3个月张口度FAMM组小于皮瓣组(P<0.05),但术后6个月2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: FAMM瓣修复早-中期舌、口底癌切除后中小型的舌、口底缺损具有一定的优势,可以在临床中考虑使用。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的放射性骨坏死是头颈部肿瘤患者最严重的并发症之一。其特征是辐射后持续暴露和失活的骨骼没有适当的愈合。下颌骨切开术和下颌骨边缘切除术对放射性骨坏死的影响程度尚不清楚。这项研究评估了口腔癌治疗后发生下颌骨放射性骨坏死的发生率和危险因素。方法回顾性分析2009-2019年某三级医院口腔癌手术及术后放疗患者的病历资料。患者特征,发病率,并对发生放射性骨坏死的危险因素进行了综述。使用t检验和卡方检验对连续数据和分类数据进行比较。Cox回归分析用于评估因素与放射性骨坏死发展之间的关系。结果纳入研究的61例患者中,在口腔癌切除术(下颌骨边缘切除术和/或下颌骨切开术)期间接受下颌骨手术的32例患者中,有9例(28.1%)发生下颌骨放射性坏死,在没有下颌骨手术的29例患者中,有2例(6.9%)发生放射性骨坏死.放射性骨坏死的发展与进行下颌骨手术(风险比4.64,95%置信区间:1.002,21.5)和HIV感染(风险比8.53,95%置信区间:2.2,33.3)显着相关。在下颌手术的亚组分析中,在接受下颌骨切开术的患者中,放射性骨坏死的发展显著增加(风险比6.62,95%置信区间:1.3,34.8),但在接受边缘下颌骨切开术的患者中没有增加(风险比3.56,95%置信区间:0.6,22.0).分析还表明,同步放化疗,辐射剂量≥60Gy,吸烟是放射性骨坏死发展的潜在危险因素,但这些因素均无统计学意义.结论下颌骨手术是口腔癌患者发生放射性骨坏死的重要危险因素。需要进一步的研究,包括更大的人口规模来验证这些发现。
    Objectives Osteoradionecrosis is one of the most severe complications in patients with head and neck cancer, which is characterized by persistent exposed and devitalized bone without proper healing after radiation. The extent to which mandibulotomy and marginal mandibulectomy influence the occurrence of osteoradionecrosis remains unclear. This study evaluated the incidence and risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis of the mandible after oral cancer treatments. Methods A retrospective study was performed to analyze medical records of patients who underwent surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for oral cancers from 2009 to 2019 at a tertiary care hospital. Patient characteristics, incidence, and risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis were reviewed. Comparisons between continuous and categorical data were performed using t-test and Chi-squared test. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between factors and the development of osteoradionecrosis. Results Among the 61 patients included in the study, osteoradionecrosis of the mandible occurred in 9 of 32 (28.1%) patients who underwent mandibular surgery during oral cancer resection (marginal mandibulectomy and/or mandibulotomy) and 2 of 29 (6.9%) patients without mandibular surgery. The development of osteoradionecrosis was significantly associated with performing mandibular surgery (hazard ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.002, 21.5) and HIV infection (hazard ratio 8.53, 95% confidence interval: 2.2, 33.3). In the subgroup analysis of mandibular surgery, the development of osteoradionecrosis significantly increased in patients undergoing mandibulotomy (hazard ratio 6.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.3, 34.8) but not in patients undergoing marginal mandibulectomy (hazard ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.6, 22.0). The analysis also showed that concurrent chemoradiation, radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy, and smoking were potential risk factors for the development of osteoradionecrosis, but none of these factors were statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings suggest that mandibular surgery is a significant risk factor for the development of osteoradionecrosis in patients with oral cancer. Further studies including larger population sizes are required to verify these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在我们的机构,放射肿瘤学家通常使用Au-198颗粒进行低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-BRT)治疗早期口腔癌。在这份报告中,我们展示了一个独特的病例,患者的下颌下腺内有一个金粒,在LDR-BRT治疗口腔地板癌后的随访中偶然发现。植入后一个月,他表现出唾液腺炎样症状,但两个月后疼痛缓解了.植入后四个月,通过计算机断层扫描(CT)在舌下前区周围检测到所有颗粒。出乎意料的是,植入后11个月,CT显示谷物位于下颌下腺的颗粒内。这一发现清楚地表明,谷物进入沃顿的导管,并通过导管逆行迁移到下颌下腺。作为沃顿波导内微积分形成的一种机制,已经提出了异物向管道内部的逆行迁移。我们在LDR-BRT后的偶然发现强调了使用Au-198颗粒治疗口腔癌的LDR-BRT后监测LDR-BRT的必要性,并进一步阐明了沃顿商学院内的逆行理论。
    At our institution, radiation oncologists routinely treat early-stage oral cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BRT) using Au-198 grains. In this report, we show a unique case of a patient with a gold grain located within the submandibular gland, found incidentally during follow-up after LDR-BRT for floor of mouth cancer. One month after the implant, he showed sialadenitis-like symptoms, but the pain resolved two months later. All the grains were detected around the anterior sublingual area by computed tomography (CT) four months after the implant. Unexpectedly, 11 months after the implant, CT revealed that a grain was located in an intraglandular site of the submandibular gland. This finding clearly demonstrates that the grain entered Wharton\'s duct and retrogradely migrated to the submandibular gland through the duct. As a mechanism of the calculus formation within Wharton\'s duct, retrograde migration of foreign bodies to the inside of the duct has been proposed. Our incidental finding after LDR-BRT highlights the need for monitoring post-LDR-BRT using Au-198 grains for the treatment of floor of mouth cancer and sheds additional light on retrograde theory within Wharton\'s duct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the outcomes of adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to the tumor bed for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicity profile of low-dose-rate (LDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) BT.
    METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent postoperative LDR- or PDR-BT to the tumor bed as the sole adjuvant treatment for an oral tongue or floor of the mouth SCC between January 2000 and December 2020.
    RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were eligible for this study. The cohort was divided into an LDR group (n = 38) and a PDR group (n = 41). The median time interval between surgery and brachytherapy was 55 days. Median delivered total dose was 55 Gy and median hospital stay was 5 days. Five patients (8.3%) experienced grade 3-4 early toxicity, 2 in the LDR group and 3 in the PDR group. Late toxicities were present in 28 patients (44.4%) and were dominated by grade 1-2 residual pain and dysesthesia, without a statistical difference between the groups. After a median follow-up of 65.1 months, 5‑year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 76.3% (95% CI = 63.4-85.1), 61.6% (95% CI = 49.0-72.0), and 71.4% (95% CI = 58.6-80.8), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant BT after excision of oral cavity SCC provides satisfactory oncological outcomes along with good tolerance. In our study, PDR-BT showed similar oncological and functional results to LDR-BT in this indication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective To describe the determinants of survival for patients with floor of mouth (FOM) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 1973 to 2013 with the SEER database (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results). Study Design and Setting Retrospective cohort study with a national database. Subjects and Methods The SEER registry was utilized to calculate survival trends for patients with FOM SCC between 1973 and 2013. Patient data were analyzed with respect to age, sex, race, primary site, stage at presentation, tumor size, grade, and treatment modalities (surgery and radiotherapy). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated. Results A total of 14,010 FOM SCC cases were identified. The cohort was 69.5% male, and the median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Forty-six percent of cases were treated with surgery, while 14% received radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated OS and DSS of 39% and 59% at 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, grade, stage, size, and surgery were determinants for OS and DSS (all P < .05). For early- and advanced-stage cancers, age, grade, size, and surgery predicted OS and DSS, while radiotherapy was a predictor of OS and DSS in advanced-stage tumors only (all P < .05). Conclusion To our knowledge, this study is the largest to date investigating prognostic factors for survival of patients diagnosed with FOM SCC. Determinants of survival include age, grade, stage, size, and surgery. Surgery appears to play a critical role in the management of these tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号