OBJECTIVE: This article provided a comprehensive scoping review, synthesizing existing literature on the financial distress faced by breast cancer patients. It examined the factors contributing to financial distress, the impact on patients, coping mechanisms employed, and potential alleviation methods. The goal was to organize existing evidence and highlight possible directions for future research.
METHODS: We followed the scoping review framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) to synthesize and report evidence. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for relevant literature. We included English articles that met the following criteria: (a) the research topic was financial distress or financial toxicity, (b) the research subjects were adult breast cancer patients, and (c) the article type was quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research. We then extracted and integrated relevant information for reporting.
RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 5459 articles were retrieved, and 43 articles were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The articles addressed four main themes related to financial distress: factors associated with financial distress, impact on breast cancer patients, coping mechanisms, and potential methods for alleviation. The impact of financial distress on patients was observed in six dimensions: financial expenses, financial resources, social-psychological reactions, support seeking, coping care, and coping lifestyle. While some studies reported potential methods for alleviation, few discussed the feasibility of these solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients experience significant financial distress with multidimensional impacts. Comprehensive consideration of possible confounding factors is essential when measuring financial distress. Future research should focus on exploring and validating methods to alleviate or resolve this issue.

BACKGROUND: The intersection between perinatal mental health and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains of significant public health importance. The current study examined the emotional and financial well-being and predictors of elevated depressive symptoms among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: This online survey was conducted with 2118 women ≥18 years old who were pregnant at the time of the survey and living in the United States or Puerto Rico. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, with scores ≥10 indicative of elevated depressive symptoms. The final logistic regression model included housing insecurity, financial distress, COVID-19 diagnosis, exposure to COVID-19, and demographic covariates.
RESULTS: More than half the sample (53.8%) had elevated depressive symptoms. In logistic regression analyses, the odds of having elevated depressive symptoms were significantly higher for participants reporting housing insecurity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.22-2.01), financial distress (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.17-2.12), COVID-19 diagnosis (aOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.53-4.17), and COVID-19 exposure (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07-1.86), after adjusting for covariates. The association of elevated depressive symptoms with housing insecurity was especially strong among those who experienced COVID-19 (aOR, 6.04; 95% CI, 2.15-17.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous literature revealing that diagnosis, exposure, concerns about family, and effects on financial stability were related to depressive symptoms during the pandemic. The relationships between financial and housing concerns with elevated depressive symptoms, independent of concerns about infection in family members, suggest that there may be direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on mental health.

Financial distress identification remains an essential topic in the scientific literature due to its importance for society and the economy. The advancements in information technology and the escalating volume of stored data have led to the emergence of financial distress that transcends the realm of financial statements and its\' indicators (ratios). The feature space could be expanded by incorporating new perspectives on feature data categories such as macroeconomics, sectors, social, board, management, judicial incident, etc. However, the increased dimensionality results in sparse data and overfitted models. This study proposes a new approach for efficient financial distress classification assessment by combining dimensionality reduction and machine learning techniques. The proposed framework aims to identify a subset of features leading to the minimization of the loss function describing the financial distress in an enterprise. During the study, 15 dimensionality reduction techniques with different numbers of features and 17 machine-learning models were compared. Overall, 1,432 experiments were performed using Lithuanian enterprise data covering the period from 2015 to 2022. Results revealed that the artificial neural network (ANN) model with 30 ranked features identified using the Random Forest mean decreasing Gini (RF_MDG) feature selection technique provided the highest AUC score. Moreover, this study has introduced a novel approach for feature extraction, which could improve financial distress classification models.

Information on the financial toxicity experienced by Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is lacking, even though Japan has its own unique public health insurance system. Thus, a web-based survey was conducted to evaluate the financial toxicity experienced by Japanese mRCC patients using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) tool. This study enrolled Japanese patients who underwent, or were undergoing, systemic therapy for mRCC. The outcomes evaluated were the distribution of COST scores, the correlation between COST and quality of life (QOL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale, and demographic factors associated with financial toxicity. The median (range) COST score was 19.0 (3.0-36.0). The Pearson correlation coefficient for COST and FACT-G total scores was 0.40. Univariate analysis revealed that not having private health insurance and lower household income per year were significantly associated with lower COST scores. Multivariate analyses showed that age < 65 years and not having private health insurance were significantly associated with lower COST scores. This study revealed that Japanese mRCC patients experience adverse financial impacts even under the universal health insurance coverage system available in Japan, and financial toxicity negatively affects their QOL.

Aims: To describe nursing practices for financial toxicity management based on nurses\' perceptions. Materials & methods: A survey was conducted with 615 oncology nurses in Japan, focusing on nurses\' perspectives on the importance of financial toxicity, nursing practices to manage financial toxicity and factors inhibiting its management. Results: A total of 521 participated, of whom 266 respondents (51.1%) considered nurses\' role important, and they engaged in a significantly higher proportion of nursing practices. Participants with greater perceptions of their role included certified or specialized nurses and nurses responsible for outpatient care. Conclusion: Interventions leveraging the expertise of certified or specialized nurses and nurses involved in outpatient care could help to spread proactive nurse practices addressing financial toxicity.

UNASSIGNED: The current study systematically reviews the literature about financial toxicity (FT) in head and neck cancer patients. Three databases were reviewed: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.
UNASSIGNED: Full text English papers published from 2000 to 2022 reporting on quantitative results about FT in head and neck cancer survivors collected through structured questionnaires or interviews were included.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven articles were included. Most of the articles were published after 2015 and from United States. There was a slight prevalence of papers dealing with oropharyngeal cancer, squamous-cell carcinoma and locally advanced head and neck cancer. Measures of FT were obtained through validated questionnaires like COST, FIT and FDQ. Collected data were mostly referrable to financial spending, financial resources, psychosocial aspect, support seeking, coping care and coping lifestyle subdomain. FT scores by COST were found to be worse in the COVID era. Financial counseling and adequate information about the costs of treatment were two effective strategies to mitigate FT.
UNASSIGNED: FT is a relatively new challenge in head and neck cancer treatment, whose expenses are higher than therapies for other cancers. A universal method to assess FT and a unified guideline for the administration of questionnaires are needed to mitigate FT and to improve patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Spiritual pain and financial distress are two important dimensions of cancer care that are often overlooked. Both dimensions can have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with cancer and their families.
METHODS: This study conducted a cross-cultural adaptation, feasibility study, and psychometric properties of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Financial and Spiritual (ESAS-FS) in a Spanish-speaking population with advanced cancer. The ESAS-FS is a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses 12 symptoms, including spiritual pain and financial distress.
RESULTS: In the cross-cultural adaptation process, the terms \"spiritual pain\" and \"financial distress\" were refined to \"sufrimiento espiritual\" and \"preocupación por asuntos económicos\" respectively, with strong professional consensus and high patients\' acceptancy (relevant questions 80%, appropriate terms 91%). A cohort of 100 onco-hematologic patients revealed that 70% experienced spiritual pain (mean 2.9/10), while 49% reported financial distress (mean 2.2/10). Symptomatic analyses illustrated significant associations of spiritual pain with various symptoms like fatigue, drowsiness, and depression. Similarly, financial distress correlated notably with drowsiness, depression, and anxiety. Moreover, a distinct correlation was observed between spiritual pain and financial distress.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the ESAS-FS is a valuable tool for assessing spiritual pain and financial distress in Spanish-speaking patients with advanced cancer. The tool can be used to identify patients who are experiencing these dimensions of distress and to provide them with appropriate care.

Due to processes of financialisation, financial parties increasingly penetrate the healthcare domain and determine under which conditions care is delivered. Their influence becomes especially visible when healthcare organisations face financial distress. By zooming-in on two of such cases, we come to know more about the considerations, motives and actions of financial parties in healthcare. In this research, we were able to examine the social dynamics between healthcare executives, banks and health insurers involved in a Dutch hospital and mental healthcare organisation on the verge of bankruptcy. Informed by interviews, document analysis and translation theory, we reconstructed the motives and strategies of executives, banks and health insurers and show how they play a crucial role in decision-making processes surrounding the survival or downfall of healthcare organisations. While parties are bound by legislation and company procedures, the outcome of financial distress can still be influenced. Much depends on how executives are perceived by financial stakeholders and how they deal with threats of destabilisation of the network. We further draw attention to the consequences of financialisation processes on the practices of healthcare organisations in financial distress.

In India the cancer burden for 2021 was 26.7 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and this is expected to increase to 29.8 million in 2025 (Kulothungan et al., 2022). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for one in six deaths. As per WHO, palliative care is a strategy that assists both adults and children along with their families in dealing with life-threatening illnesses. Currently, only 14% of those in need of pain and palliative (P&P) care receive it globally (WHO, 2020). Financial toxicity (FT) is the term used to describe the negative effects that an excessive financial burden resulting from cancer have on patients, their families, and society (Desai and Gyawali, 2020). Addressing this gap will require significant adjustments to both demand- and supply-side policies to ensure accessible and equitable cancer care in India (Caduff et al., 2019). Measuring FT along with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) represents a clinically relevant and patient-centred approach (de Souza et al., 2017).
OBJECTIVE: To estimate FT and its association with quality of life (QoL).
METHODS: This was an observational descriptive study conducted among cancer patients recommended for P&P care. Scores were estimated from September 2022 to February 2023 using official tools: the Functional Assessment for Chronic illness Treatment Compressive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaires for Cancer (QLQ30).
RESULTS: From 150 patients (70 males and 80 females, mean age 54.96 ± 13.5 years), 92.6% suffered from FT. Eleven patients (7.3%) were under FT grade 0, 41 (27.3%) were FT grade 1, 98 (65.3%) were FT grade 2, and no patients were under FT grade 3. At criterial alpha 0.05 (95%CI), FT and the global score for HRQoL showed an association. Among inpatient department (IPD) expenses, medication bills contributed the greatest expense at 33%, and among outpatient department (OPD) expenses treatment expenses contributed 50% of the total. Breast cancer (30 cases, 20%) and oral cancer (26 cases, 17.3%) were the most frequent cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: FT measured using the COST tool showed an association with HRQoL.
UNASSIGNED: This paper refers to the insurance policies available for cancer patients irrespective of P&P care treatment.

BACKGROUND: Financial distress is a primary concern for young adults with cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables that are associated with financial distress in young adult cancer survivors.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the Cancer Survivor Employment Needs Survey. Participants were young adults (18-39 years of age) who lived in the United States and had a cancer diagnosis. Multivariable linear regression was used to model relations between financial distress and material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables.
RESULTS: Participants (N = 214) were mostly non-Hispanic White (78%), female (79%), and had a mean age of 31 years and 4.6 years post-diagnosis. Material resources, physical and psychological health, and workplace variables were all identified as contributing to study participants\' financial distress. Among the young adults surveyed, financial distress was prevalent, and an array of problems were associated with financial distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncology and rehabilitation providers should openly discuss finances with YAs with cancer and guide them to resources that can address their financial, benefits, and vocational needs to ultimately improve quality of life.