背景:产前超声心动图评估胎儿心功能变得越来越重要。胎儿二维斑点追踪超声心动图(2D-STE)可以确定全局和节段功能心脏参数。产前诊断越来越依赖人工智能,其算法改变了临床医生在日常工作流程中使用超声的方式。这项研究的目的是证明经验不足的操作员是否可以处理并可能从临床常规的2D-STE自动化工具中受益的可行性。
方法:总共136个未选中,正常,单身人士,对心率正常的孕中期和晚期胎儿进行了靶向超声检查.2D-STE由初学者和专家分别使用GEVolusonE10(FetalHQ®,GEHealthcare,芝加哥,IL).计算了几个胎儿心脏参数(舒张末期直径[ED],球度指数[SI],全局纵向应变[EndoGLS],缩短分数[FS])并分配给胎龄(GA)。Bland-Altman地块用于测试两个运营商之间的协议。
结果:产妇平均年龄为33岁,孕前孕妇平均体重指数为24.78kg/m2。GA的范围为16.4至32.0周(平均22.9周)。初学者的平均endoGLS值右侧为-18.57%±6.59个百分点(pp),左心室为-19.58%±5.63pp,专家的-14.33%±4.88页和-16.37%±5.42页。随着GA的增加,右心室内皮GLS略有下降,而左心室几乎恒定。endoGLS的统计分析显示,右侧的Bland-Altman-Bias为-4.24pp±8.06pp,左心室为-3.21pp±7.11pp。在所有分析段的两个心室中,ED的Bland-Altman-Bias范围为-.49mm±1.54mm至-.10mm±1.28mm,对于FS,从-.33pp±11.82pp到3.91pp±15.56pp,对于SI,从-.38±.68到-.15±.45。
结论:在两个运营商之间,我们的数据表明,2D-STE分析显示心脏形态测量参数(ED和SI)非常吻合,和心脏功能参数(EndoGLS和FS)的良好一致性。由于其复杂性,胎儿2D-STE的应用仍然是科学学术围产期超声的领域,应最好由熟练的操作者掌握。目前,从我们的角度来看,不建议在临床实践中实施“即时”。
BACKGROUND: Prenatal echocardiographic assessment of fetal cardiac function has become increasingly important. Fetal two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) allows the determination of global and segmental functional cardiac parameters. Prenatal diagnostics is relying increasingly on artificial intelligence, whose algorithms transform the way clinicians use ultrasound in their daily workflow. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of whether less experienced operators can handle and might benefit from an automated tool of 2D-STE in the clinical routine.
METHODS: A total of 136 unselected, normal, singleton, second- and third-trimester fetuses with normofrequent heart rates were examined by targeted ultrasound. 2D-STE was performed separately by beginner and expert semiautomatically using a GE Voluson E10 (FetalHQ®, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Several fetal cardiac parameters were calculated (end-diastolic diameter [ED], sphericity index [SI], global longitudinal strain [EndoGLS], fractional shortening [FS]) and assigned to gestational age (GA). Bland-Altman plots were used to test agreement between both operators.
RESULTS: The mean maternal age was 33 years, and the mean maternal body mass index prior to pregnancy was 24.78 kg/m2. The GA ranged from 16.4 to 32.0 weeks (average 22.9 weeks). Averaged endoGLS value of the beginner was -18.57% ± 6.59 percentage points (pp) for the right and -19.58% ± 5.63 pp for the left ventricle, that of the expert -14.33% ± 4.88 pp and -16.37% ± 5.42 pp. With increasing GA, right ventricular endoGLS decreased slightly while the left ventricular was almost constant. The statistical analysis for endoGLS showed a Bland-Altman-Bias of -4.24 pp ± 8.06 pp for the right and -3.21 pp ± 7.11 pp for the left ventricle. The Bland-Altman-Bias of the ED in both ventricles in all analyzed segments ranged from -.49 mm ± 1.54 mm to -.10 mm ± 1.28 mm, that for FS from -.33 pp ± 11.82 pp to 3.91 pp ± 15.56 pp and that for SI from -.38 ± .68 to -.15 ± .45.
CONCLUSIONS: Between both operators, our data indicated that 2D-STE analysis showed excellent agreement for cardiac morphometry parameters (ED and SI), and good agreement for cardiac function parameters (EndoGLS and FS). Due to its complexity, the application of fetal 2D-STE remains the domain of scientific-academic perinatal ultrasound and should be placed preferably in the hands of skilled operators. At present, from our perspective, an implementation into clinical practice \"on-the-fly\" cannot be recommended.