Exposure to chronic stress impairs memory. Also, escitalopram\'s impact on memory remains paradoxical. Therefore, this study examined how prolonged escitalopram administration affects input-output (I/O) functions, paired-pulse ratio (PPR), and long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampal CA1 area in rats that underwent predictable and unpredictable chronic mild stress (PCMS and UCMS, respectively). Male rats were randomly assigned to different groups of control (Co), sham (Sh), PCMS and UCMS (PSt and USt, respectively; 2 h/day, for 21 consecutive days), escitalopram (Esc; 10 mg/kg, i.p., for 21 days), as well as PCMS and UCMS with escitalopram (PSt-Esc and USt-Esc, respectively). The fEPSP slope, amplitude, and area under the curve (AUC) were assessed in the hippocampal CA1 area using I/O functions, PP responses, and LTP. Serum corticosterone (CORT) levels were quantified in all experimental animals. The slope, amplitude, and AUC of fEPSP in the I/O functions, and all three PP phases prior and subsequent to LTP induction significantly declined in the USt and PSt groups. Escitalopram significantly enhanced these parameters in the PSt-Esc, but not in the USt-Esc group. Serum CORT levels corroborated the electrophysiological findings among experimental groups. Both PCMS and UCMS impaired neural excitability, neurotransmission, and memory within the hippocampal CA1 area. Escitalopram improved memory impairment only under PCMS, potentially attributed to reduced serum CORT levels. However, no influence on neural excitability, neurotransmission, and memory was observed under UCMS. This suggests different escitalopram doses might be required to ameliorate simultaneous mechanisms in response to various types of chronic mild stress.

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and acceptability of oral monotherapy using psychedelics and escitalopram in patients with depressive symptoms, considering the potential for overestimated effectiveness due to unsuccessful blinding.
Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrial.gov, and World Health Organization\'s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to 12 October 2023.
Randomised controlled trials on psychedelics or escitalopram in adults with depressive symptoms. Eligible randomised controlled trials of psychedelics (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (known as MDMA), lysergic acid diethylamide (known as LSD), psilocybin, or ayahuasca) required oral monotherapy with no concomitant use of antidepressants.
The primary outcome was change in depression, measured by the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale. The secondary outcomes were all cause discontinuation and severe adverse events. Severe adverse events were those resulting in any of a list of negative health outcomes including, death, admission to hospital, significant or persistent incapacity, congenital birth defect or abnormality, and suicide attempt. Data were pooled using a random effects model within a Bayesian framework. To avoid estimation bias, placebo responses were distinguished between psychedelic and antidepressant trials.
Placebo response in psychedelic trials was lower than that in antidepression trials of escitalopram (mean difference -3.90 (95% credible interval -7.10 to -0.96)). Although most psychedelics were better than placebo in psychedelic trials, only high dose psilocybin was better than placebo in antidepression trials of escitalopram (mean difference 6.45 (3.19 to 9.41)). However, the effect size (standardised mean difference) of high dose psilocybin decreased from large (0.88) to small (0.31) when the reference arm changed from placebo response in the psychedelic trials to antidepressant trials. The relative effect of high dose psilocybin was larger than escitalopram at 10 mg (4.66 (95% credible interval 1.36 to 7.74)) and 20 mg (4.69 (1.64 to 7.54)). None of the interventions was associated with higher all cause discontinuation or severe adverse events than the placebo.
Of the available psychedelic treatments for depressive symptoms, patients treated with high dose psilocybin showed better responses than those treated with placebo in the antidepressant trials, but the effect size was small.
PROSPERO, CRD42023469014.

BACKGROUND: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) represent a diverse class of medications widely prescribed for depression and anxiety. Despite their common use, there is an absence of large-scale, real-world evidence capturing the heterogeneity in their effects on individuals. This study addresses this gap by utilizing naturalistic search data to explore the varied impact of six different SSRIs on user behavior.
METHODS: The study sample included ∼508 thousand Bing users with searches for one of six SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline) from April-December 2022, comprising 510 million queries. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to examine 30 topics (e.g., shopping, tourism, health) and 195 health symptoms (e.g., anxiety, weight gain, impotence), using each SSRI as a reference. We assessed the relative hazard ratios between drugs and, where feasible, ranked the SSRIs based on their observed effects. We used Cox proportional hazard models in order to account for both the likelihood of users searching for a particular topic or symptom and the associated time to that search. The temporal aspect aided in distinguishing between potential symptoms of the disorder, short-term medication side effects, and later appearing side effects.
RESULTS: Differences were found in search behaviors associated with each SSRI. E.g., fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of searching weight gain compared to all other SSRIs (HRs 1.85-2.93). Searches following citalopram were associated with significantly higher rates of later impotence queries compared to all other SSRIs (HRs 5.11-7.76), except fluvoxamine. Fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly higher rate of health related searches than all other SSRIs (HRs 2.11-2.36).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals new insights into the varying SSRI impacts, suggesting distinct symptom profiles. This novel use of large-scale, naturalistic search data contributes to pharmacovigilance efforts, enhancing our understanding of intra-class variation among SSRIs, potentially uncovering previously unidentified drug effects.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to 1) examine how psychopharmacotherapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) influence absenteeism and job performance among individuals with anxiety disorders and 2) compare the effectiveness of these treatments in improving work performance.
METHODS: Adults (N = 67) with a primary anxiety disorder were recruited to participate in the study. Participants were randomized to escitalopram, a common treatment for anxiety disorders, or MBSR. Absenteeism and job performance were measured with the Health and Work Performance (HPQ) questionnaire prior to treatment and at the week 24 follow up.
RESULTS: At week 24, individuals in the escitalopram arm and the MBSR arm showed significant improvements in partial days of missed work due to mental/physical health problems from baseline (1.00 [0.00-2.50] to 0.00 [0.00 = 1.00], p = .034 and 0.00 [0.00-2.00] to 0.00 [0.00 = 1.00], p = .001, respectively). In the MBSR arm only, job performance increased from baseline to week 24 (65.00 [50.00-80.00] to 75.00 [67.50-82.50], p = .017). None of the outcome variables significantly varied by group at baseline or week 24.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study finds evidence that MBSR improves work performance equivalently to SSRI medication among individuals with anxiety disorders. Given the limitations of SSRIs, MBSR should be considered as an alternative to individuals who desire improved anxiety symptoms and work outcomes.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03522844.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a very contagious systemic disease dominantly affecting the respiratory tract. Recent findings oppose earlier suggestions that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might be protective during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, prompting the current study.
METHODS: The institutional registry of a tertiary referral center was retrospectively evaluated for SSRI use and associated clinical outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with mostly severe and critical disease.
RESULTS: Among 1,558 patients, there were 78 (5%) exposed to SSRI during hospitalization. SSRI users in comparison to non-users did not significantly differ in their demographic characteristics, comorbidity profile or the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and associated inflammatory response at admission. In multivariate analyses adjusted for clinically meaningful variables, SSRI use was significantly associated with higher risks of death, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit treatment, and bacteremia, whereas no significant relationship with risks of venous, arterial thrombosis, and major bleeding was present. Patients with less severe initial COVID-19 presentation, lower inflammatory burden, higher platelet count, lower cumulative comorbidity burden, presence of hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure and nonexposed to acetylsalicylic-acid had higher mortality associated with SSRI use.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings of the current study validate findings of higher mortality but also report higher tendency for respiratory deterioration, intensive care unit treatment, and bacteremia associated with SSRI use among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. These findings also suggest the potential contribution of cardiovascular comorbidities to detrimental clinical course of SSRI exposed patients.

The abrupt transition into mania, known as a bipolar switch, poses a significant challenge in the treatment of mental illnesses. We present a case of a 22-year-old Hispanic female with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who developed mania within five days after initiating escitalopram 5 mg. The patient had no reported history of bipolar disorder prior to this episode, and an extensive medical workup ruled out organic causes. The patient was in the acute inpatient psychiatric unit for 25 days and returned to baseline after discontinuation of escitalopram and initiating divalproex and olanzapine. This case underscores the potential risk of a bipolar switch with antidepressant use and highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring and considering underlying bipolarity in such patients.

The choice of antidepressants for depression or neurotic disorder is analyzed in the article. Drugs of the group of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are used for various mental disorders more often than other antidepressants according to clinical recommendations. Drugs of other groups (selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, tetracyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors) are used when the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is insufficient or the severity of the mental disorder is significant. The duration of therapy, if well tolerated, can range from several months to many years. Antidepressants from Canonpharma Production are successfully used in clinical practice: Sertraline Canon, Fluoxetine Canon, Escitalopram Canon, Duloxetine Canon, Mirtazapine Canon, Agomelatine Canon. These drugs have different mechanisms of action. They are used for various depression and other mental disorders. All antidepressants from Canonpharma Production have been tested for bioequivalence to the original drugs. This fact increases confidence in these medicines. Some features of the use of these antidepressants based on clinical recommendations and personal experience are discussed in the article.
В статье рассматривается проблема выбора антидепрессанта при развитии депрессивного или невротического состояния. В настоящее время в клинической практике применяются антидепрессанты нескольких классов, с различным механизмом действия, что дает возможность применения их при различных вариантах депрессий и иных психических расстройствах. В соответствии с клиническими рекомендациями терапию большинства состояний начинают с препаратов из группы СИОЗС и других антидепрессантов новых поколений, а при недостаточной эффективности или значительной выраженности болезненных проявлений применяют препараты других групп (СИОЗСН, трициклические, тетрациклические антидепрессанты, ингибиторы моноаминоксидазы). Длительность терапии при хорошей переносимости от нескольких месяцев до многих лет. В статье рассматриваются некоторые особенности применения антидепрессантов, выпускаемых ЗАО «Канонфарма продакшн» (Сертралин Канон, Флуоксетин Канон, Эсциталопрам Канон, Дулоксетин Канон, Миртазапин Канон, Агомелатин Канон) на основе клинических рекомендаций и собственного опыта. Отмечено, что исследования на на биоэквивалентность оригинальным препаратам увеличивает доверие к лекарственным средствам.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are typically prescribed for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) due to their high efficacy. These drugs function by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin [also termed 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)], which raises the levels of 5-HT in the synaptic cleft, leading to prolonged activation of postsynaptic 5-HT receptors. Despite the therapeutic benefits of SSRIs, this mechanism of action also disturbs the neuroendocrine response. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity is strongly linked to both MDD and the response to antidepressants, owing to the intricate interplay within the serotonergic system, which regulates feeding, water intake, sexual drive, reproduction and circadian rhythms. The aim of the present review was to provide up-to-date evidence for the proposed effects of SSRIs, such as fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline and fluvoxamine, on the endocrine system. For this purpose, the literature related to the effects of SSRIs on the endocrine system was searched using the PubMed database. According to the available literature, SSRIs may have an adverse effect on glucose metabolism, sexual function and fertility by dysregulating the function of the HPA axis, pancreas and gonads. Therefore, considering that SSRIs are often prescribed for extended periods, it is crucial to monitor the patient closely with particular attention to the function of the endocrine system.

Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive cognitive and functional decline. Nearly all patients with AD develop neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs). Agitation is one of the most distressing and challenging NPS. Brexpiprazole is an oral antipsychotic and is the first approved pharmacologic agent in the United States for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to AD. Its effect is thought to be from its partial serotonin 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptor agonist activity and serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Brexpiprazole is a maintenance medication, and it should not be used \"as needed\" or as a \"PRN\" treatment for breakthrough agitation. Brexpiprazole is a major substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Dose adjustments may be required for drug interactions or impaired renal or hepatic function. Clinical trials found brexpiprazole 2 to 3 mg/d demonstrated significant improvements in agitation, with brexpiprazole showing an approximate 5-point greater reduction on change in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory total score at week 12 from baseline compared with placebo. Brexpiprazole is generally well tolerated and safe, and common adverse reactions when used for this indication include dizziness, headaches, insomnia, nasopharyngitis, somnolence, and urinary tract infections. Like other antipsychotics used for agitation in AD, brexpiprazole is associated with higher mortality rates compared with placebo. In a long-term care setting, there are several considerations for its use. Benefits include an oral agent that is well tolerated and clinical data showing statistically significant effects on agitation. However, brexpiprazole has not been studied in head-to-head clinical trials against other antipsychotics, and there are differing opinions if the agitation score reductions translate to a clinically meaningful difference. The approval of brexpiprazole signals favorably for upcoming agents for this indication, including escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion. Both escitalopram and dextromethorphan-bupropion are currently undergoing clinical trials.

Citalopram and escitalopram are structurally close-related antidepressants and both forms are widely used in the world. We aimed to comparatively evaluate the anti-neuroinflammatory and neuroprotective effects of escitalopram and citalopram in Parkinson\'s disease (PD) mouse model. Mice were randomly divided into six groups and received 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) or vehicle administration. The mice were then treated with escitalopram, citalopram or saline for consecutive 7 days. Behaviors, neuroinflammation, neurotransmitters, and neurotoxicity were assessed. Results showed that citalopram but not escitalopram worsened body weight loss and increased freezing time in the PD mice. Both drugs had no impact on the anxiety-like behaviors but ameliorated the depressive-like behaviors as in elevated plus maze and sucrose splash tests. Escitalopram but not citalopram ameliorated motor discoordination in the PD mice as in rotarod test. In accordance, escitalopram but not citalopram attenuated the 6-OHDA-induced nigrostriatal dopaminergic loss. Further mechanistic investigations showed that both drugs mitigated activations of microglia and astrocytes and/or levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the PD mice, but escitalopram showed appreciably better effects in the substantia nigra. Neurotransmitter examination in the prefrontal cortex suggested that the two drugs had comparable effects on the disturbed neurotransmitters in the PD mice, but citalopram was prone to disrupt certain normal homeostasis. In conclusion, escitalopram is moderately superior than citalopram to suppress neuroinflammation and to protect against dopaminergic neuronal death and motor discoordination in the 6-OHDA-induced PD mice. Our findings imply that escitalopram shall be prescribed with priority over citalopram to treat PD patients with depression as escitalopram may meanwhile provide greater additional benefits to the patients.