OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common bacterial infections affecting humans, causing gastroduodenal and extraintestinal diseases. Treatment of the infection remains challenging for the clinicians, and different factors are involved in the failure of the therapeutic approach. The importance of the intensity of acid secretion inhibition remains an unclear issue. The aim of this study is to assess whether 80 mg/day esomeprazole-based 10-day sequential therapy (esomeprazole-ST) achieved different eradication rates when compared to 80 mg/day pantoprazole-based analogous regimen (pantoprazole-ST).
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study where data of consecutive patients referred by their physicians to our unit to perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,327 patients were available for the analysis: 599 and 728 patients received pantoprazole-ST and esomeprazole-ST, respectively. Eradication rate was significantly higher in patients receiving esomeprazole-ST (92.6%, 95% CI: 91-94.5) than pantoprazole-ST (89.3%, 95% CI: 86.7-91.7; difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-6.5; P = 0.037). Even after a multivariate analysis, the esomeprazole-ST achieved a significantly higher eradiation (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.1-2.17).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that esomeprazole-ST achieved significantly higher H. pylori cure rates than pantoprazole-ST. Prospective and well-designed trials are demander to confirm this prelaminar finding.

UNASSIGNED: Helicobacter pylori infection is a common gastrointestinal infection that affects around 50% of the global population. This infection can lead to various health conditions such as peptic ulcer disease, dyspepsia, gastric carcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. The triple therapy which consists of proton-pump inhibitors, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole for 14 days is considered the first-line treatment for H. pylori and its eradication, especially in areas where clarithromycin sensitivity is still high. However, recent research shows that the efficacy of this treatment is decreasing due to antibiotic resistance.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study that took place at Al-Hayat Jazan Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. The study analyzed the medical records of 186 patients with H. pylori who had undergone the standard triple therapy. The objectives of this study were to determine the eradication rate of H. pylori by using the standard triple therapy, and to highlight the influence of some demographic characteristics such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus, and smoking on the eradication rate, in Jazan region, Saudi Arabia.
UNASSIGNED: The medical records of 186 patients were included in the study. The overall rate of successful eradication was found to be 77.4%. The results of the study showed that the decline in the eradication rate was significantly associated with the presence of diabetes and smoking status (with p-values of <0.001 and <0.004, respectively).
UNASSIGNED: This study finds that the standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication is less effective than optimal standards, as per literature and guidelines. Given its declining efficacy globally, alternative first-line treatments may be necessary. Further research is needed to assess its effectiveness in various regional contexts.

Sequential therapy (ST) and concomitant therapy (CT) are common first-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori (HP). This study aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of ST and CT in the first-line treatment of HP by comparing their clinical outcomes. Two authors independently searched PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for all the relevant articles published before March 2021 to compare the clinical outcomes of HP patients undergoing ST or CT. The primary outcome measures were HP eradication rates and adverse events (AEs). This meta-analysis included 24 articles with 7531 HP patients. CT was better than ST in eradicating HP from per-protocol analysis (PP) (RR=0.96, P<0.001) and modified intent-to-treat analysis (MITT) (RR=0.94, P=0.005). Compared with non-Asia, CT demonstrated more apparent advantages than ST in Asia. CT treated with lansoprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole outperformed ST treated with the same PPIs. CT for 10 days and ST for 14 days were the better choices of course of treatment. The incidence rates of AEs were significantly higher in CT than in ST for diarrhoea (RR=0.65, P<0.001), vomiting (RR=0.68, P=0.03), dysgeusia (RR=0.83, P=0.03) and dizziness (RR=0.77, P=0.05). Both ST and CT are safe and effective first-line treatments for HP. Although the AEs were more frequent with CT than ST, CT was superior to ST, especially in Asia. The effect of various PPIs varied in various therapies. The best course of treatment was 10 days for CT and 14 days for ST.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection affects approximately 70% of the Chilean population. It is a public health problem whose eradication treatment is part of the explicit health guarantees in Chile.
OBJECTIVE: Characterize the most widely used H. pylori first-line eradication therapies in our environment and evaluate their efficacy.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out where, in patients with certified H. pylori infection, the eradication therapy indicated by the treating physician, its efficacy, adherence and adverse effects, in addition to the eradication certification method used, were evaluated.
RESULTS: 242 patients and 4 main therapies were analyzed: standard triple therapy, dual therapy, concomitant therapy, and bismuth quadruple therapy. Eradication rates of 81.9% (95% CI 74.44-87.63), 88.5% (95% CI 73.13-95.67), 93.7% (95% CI 78.07-98.44) and 97.6% (95% CI 84.81-99.67) were observed respectively, with concomitant therapy (RR: 1,14; 95% CI 1.01-1.29; p=0.028) and quadruple therapy with bismuth (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.31; p<0.001) being significantly more effective than standard triple therapy. Regarding the rate of reported adverse effects, it was 58.5% (95% CI 50.66-65.92), 35.4% (95% CI 24.6-48.11), 22.9% (95% CI 81-37.14) and 63.4% (95% CI 47.8-76.64), having the dual and concomitant therapy significantly fewer adverse effects compared with standard therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapies are superior to standard triple therapy and should be considered as first-line treatment in Chile. Dual therapy is promising. More studies will be required to determine which therapies are most cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of antibiotic-resistant strains has been rapidly increasing due to the wide use of antibiotics. To evaluate the current effects of antibiotic resistance on Helicobacter pylori eradication efficacy, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS: A total of 120 studies, including 28 707 patients, were assessed. Only first-line therapy was considered. The pooled RR of eradication rate in patients with Helicobacter pylori strains sensitive versus resistant to clarithromycin was 0.682 (95% CI: 0.636-0.731). The pooled RR of eradication rate in patients with Helicobacter pylori strains sensitive versus resistant to metronidazole was 0.843 (95% CI: 0.810-0.877). The pooled RR of eradication rate in patients with Helicobacter pylori strains sensitive versus resistant to levofloxacin was 0.794 (95% CI: 0.669-0.941). The pooled RR of eradication rate in patients with Helicobacter pylori strains sensitive versus resistant to dual clarithromycin and metronidazole was 0.674 (95% CI: 0.590-0.770).
CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistance causes a decrease in the eradication rate of H pylori today. Quadruple concomitant therapy may overcome the declining H pylori eradication rate caused by metronidazole-only resistance.

An effective eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) should be used for the first time. In this study, we assessed whether tailored therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility testing is more effective than traditional therapy. We also evaluated the factors that cause treatment failure in high-resistance areas. For this multicenter trial, we recruited 467 H. pylori-positive patients. The patients were randomly assigned to receive tailored triple therapy (TATT), tailored bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (TABQT), or traditional bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (TRBQT). For the TATT and TABQT groups, antibiotic selection proceeded via susceptibility testing using an agar-dilution test. The patients in the TRBQT group were given amoxicillin, clarithromycin, esomeprazole, and bismuth. Successful eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test at least eight weeks after the treatment ended. Susceptibility testing was conducted using an agar-dilution test. The eradication rate was examined via intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. The clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole resistance rates were 26.12%, 28.69%, and 96.79%, respectively. Resistance against amoxicillin and furazolidone was rare. The eradication rates for TATT, TRBQT, and TABQT were 67.32%, 63.69%, and 85.99% in the ITT analysis (P 0.001) and 74.64%, 68.49%, and 91.22% in the PP analysis (P 0.001), respectively. The efficacy of TABQT was affected by clarithromycin resistance, and bismuth exerted a direct influence on TATT failure. TABQT was the most efficacious regimen for use in high-resistance regions, especially among clarithromycin-susceptible patients.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection has become more and more resistant to conventional first-line treatment regimens. So, there is a considerable interest in evaluating new antibiotic combinations and regimens. Nitazoxanide is an anti-infective drug with demonstrated activity against protozoa and anaerobic bacteria including H. pylori. This work is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a unique triple nitazoxanide-containing regimen as a treatment regimen in Egyptian patients with H. pylori infection.
METHODS: Two hundred and 24 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) dyspeptic symptoms in whom H. pylori -induced GIT disease was confirmed were included in the study. They have been randomized to receive either nitazoxanide 500 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and omeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 14 days or metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and omeprazole 40  mg twice daily for 14 days. Laboratory evaluation for H. pylori antigen within the stool was performed 6 weeks after cessation of H. pylori treatment regimens to assess the response.
RESULTS: The response to treatment was significantly higher in group 1 of nitazoxanide treatment regimen than group 2 of traditional treatment regimen. One hundred and six cases (94.6%) of 112 patients who completed the study in group 1 showed complete cure, while only 63 cases (60.6%) of 104 patients who completed the study in group 2 showed the same response according to per-protocol (PP) analysis (P<.001). The regimen was well tolerated by all the patients enrolled in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Nitazoxanide-containing triple therapy is a promising therapy for the first-line eradication of H. pylori. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422706).