endovascular thrombectomy

血管内血栓切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内血栓切除术(EVT)是大血管闭塞(LVO)急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的现行标准;然而,尽管成功再灌注,但高达三分之二的EVT患者的功能结局较差.已经研究了许多放射学标志物作为AIS患者预后的预测性生物标志物。这项研究旨在确定哪些临床放射学因素与感兴趣的结果相关,以帮助选择LVOAIS的EVT患者。
    对2016年至2020年接受EVT的患者进行了回顾性研究。各种放射性变量的数据,如解剖参数,凝块特征,抵押品状态,和梗死面积,与传统的人口统计学和临床变量一起收集。对卒中后3个月功能独立性的主要结局(改良Rankin量表0-2)和院内死亡率和症状性颅内出血的次要结局进行单因素和多因素分析。
    该研究队列包括325例前循环LVOAIS患者(男性占54.5%),中位年龄为68岁(四分位距57-76)。NIHSS中位数为19。年龄,高血压,高脂血症,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS),艾伯塔省mCTA得分,各方面,凝块长度,单因素分析显示,血栓HU和mTICI评分以及ICA和CCA之间的夹角与3个月时的功能结局相关.在多变量分析中,年龄,艾伯塔省mCTA侧支和NIHSS与功能结局显着相关,而各方面接近意义。
    在许多为接受EVT的超急性患者提出的放射学标志物中,现有的经过充分验证的临床放射学措施仍然与功能状态密切相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the current standard of care for large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, up to two-thirds of EVT patients have poor functional outcomes despite successful reperfusion. Many radiological markers have been studied as predictive biomarkers for patient outcomes in AIS. This study seeks to determine which clinico-radiological factors are associated with outcomes of interest to aid selection of patients for EVT for LVO AIS.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of patients who underwent EVT from 2016 to 2020 was performed. Data on various radiological variables, such as anatomical parameters, clot characteristics, collateral status, and infarct size, were collected alongside traditional demographic and clinical variables. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed for the primary outcomes of functional independence at 3 months post-stroke (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and secondary outcomes of in-hospital mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
    UNASSIGNED: The study cohort comprised 325 consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVO AIS (54.5% male) with a median age of 68 years (interquartile range 57-76). The median NIHSS was 19. Age, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Alberta mCTA score, ASPECTS, clot length, thrombus HU and mTICI score and the angle between ICA and CCA were associated with functional outcomes at 3 months on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, age, Alberta mCTA collaterals and NIHSS were significantly associated with functional outcomes, while ASPECTS approached significance.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the many proposed radiological markers for patients in the hyperacute setting undergoing EVT, the existing well-validated clinico-radiological measures remain strongly associated with functional status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管内血栓切除术(EVT)作为大核心缺血性梗死患者的一线治疗是一个有争议的话题。在四个电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,用于比较EVT与大型核心梗塞(ASPECTS≤5)的最佳药物治疗(BMT)的随机对照试验(RCT)。筛选标题后增加了相关研究,摘要,和完整的文本。进行Meta分析。使用标准化均差(SMD)和95%CI分析连续结果,而使用风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)分析二元结果。漏斗图用于直观评估出版偏倚,如果可行的话,Egger\的测试用于验证。我们纳入了来自六个RCT的1918例患者,这些患者比较了由于前循环大血管闭塞而导致大核心梗塞的患者的EVT加BMT和单独BMT。EVT组946例,BMT组972例。来自两个RCTs的EVT组的314名患者和BMT组的292名患者可获得一年的结果。EVT组90天mRS0-1的发生率有统计学意义(RR=3.1,P值<0.0001),mRS0-2(RR=2.64,P值<0.0001),mRS0-3(RR=1.80,P值<0.0001),90天平均mRS评分较低(SMD=-0.29,P值<0.0001),90天死亡率较低(RR=0.85,P值=0.015),与BMT组相比,早期神经系统改善更大(RR=2.16,P值<0.00001)。然而,EVT组症状性脑出血(sICH)(RR=1.76,P值=0.01)和任何ICH(RR=2.18,P值<0.00001)的发生率较高.我们的发现表明,EVT加BMT导致5%的绝对改善,12%,90天mRS0-1、0-2和0-3分别为16%。此外,EVT+BMT组患者发生sICH的概率增加3%,发生任何ICH的易感性增加32%.此外,一年期mRS0-2(RR=2.16,P值<0.00001)和mRS0-3(RR=1.80,P值<0.0001)明显优于单纯BMT。虽然,两组的1年死亡率无显著差异(RR=0.91,P值=0.31).EVT加BMT组与BMT组的新卒中差异无统计学意义。去骨瓣减压术,和严重不良事件。来自六个RCT的综合数据表明,EVT加BMT提供了明显更好的短期和长期功能结果,并且在大核心梗死患者中,症状性出血的增加最小。
    Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT) as first-line treatment of patients with large core ischemic infarct is a subject of debate. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing EVT to best medical treatment (BMT) for large core infarcts (ASPECTS ≤ 5). Relevant studies were added after screening for titles, abstracts, and complete text. Meta-analysis was performed. The continuous outcomes were analyzed using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI, while the binary outcomes were analyzed using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A funnel plot was used to visually evaluate publication bias, and if feasible, Egger\'s test was used to validate. We included 1918 patients from six RCTs that compared EVT plus BMT and BMT alone in patients with large core infarct due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. There were 946 patients in the EVT group and 972 patients in the BMT group. The one-year outcomes are available for 314 patients in the EVT group and 292 patents in the BMT group from two RCTs. EVT group had statistically significant higher rate of 90-day mRS 0-1 (RR = 3.1, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.64, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mean mRS score (SMD = -0.29, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mortality rate (RR = 0.85, P-value = 0.015), and greater early neurological improvement (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) compared to the BMT group. However, the rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (RR = 1.76, P-value = 0.01) and any ICH (RR = 2.18, P-value < 0.00001) were higher in EVT group. Our finding showed that EVT plus BMT led to in an absolute improvement of 5%, 12%, and 16% in 90-day mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3, respectively. In addition, patients in EVT plus BMT group had a 3% increased probability of experiencing sICH and were 32% more susceptible to any ICH. Moreover, the one-year mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) and mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001) was significantly favor the EVT plus BMT over BMT alone. Although, the one-year mortality rate was not significantly differed between two groups (RR = 0.91, P-value = 0.31). There was no statistically significant difference observed between the EVT plus BMT group and the BMT group concerning new stroke, decompressive craniectomy, and serious adverse events. Combined data from six RCTs shows that EVT plus BMT provides significantly better short- and long-term functional outcomes with minimal increase in symptomatic hemorrhage over BMT in patient with large core infarcts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BrianMacGrory及其同事最近的一项研究调查了在入院前7天内使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)的患者中血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的安全性。通过这次回顾,观察性队列研究,他们发现之前使用VKA并没有增加症状性颅内出血(sICH)的总体风险.然而,近期使用VKA的国际标准化比值(INR)>1.7与sICH风险显著增加相关.未来应开展大规模随机对照试验,进一步明确EVT治疗缺血性脑卒中患者抗凝治疗的效果和可行性。
    A recent study by Brian Mac Grory and colleagues investigated the safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) among patients under vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) use within 7 days prior to hospital admission. Through this retrospective, observational cohort study, they found prior VKA use did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) overall. However, recent VKA use with a presenting international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.7 was associated with a significantly increased risk of sICH. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further clarify the effects and feasibility of EVT therapy in ischemic stroke patients under anticoagulation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通常使用临床量表如改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)评估卒中后患者的预后。存活天数,90天出院(DAOH-90),衡量生存,在医院或康复场所度过的时间,重新接纳和制度化,是一种客观的结果度量,可以从大型管理数据集中获得,而无需与患者联系。我们旨在评估急性卒中再灌注治疗后DAOH与mRS的可比性及其与其他预后变量的关系。
    结果:分析连续接受静脉溶栓或血管内血栓切除术治疗的缺血性卒中患者。DAOH-90是根据国家最低数据集计算的,强制性的全国性行政数据库。第90天的mRS评分(mRS-90)通过面对面或电话访谈进行评估。该研究包括1278例缺血性卒中患者(714例男性,中位年龄70[59-79],美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表中位数评分14[9-20])。DAOH-90中位数为71[29-84],mRS-90中位数为3[2-5]。DAOH-90与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(Spearmanrho-0.44,P<0.001)和Alberta卒中项目早期CT[计算机断层扫描]评分(Spearmanrho0.24,P<0.001)相关。mRS-90和DAOH-90之间有很强的相关性(Spearmanrho相关性-0.79,P<0.001)。预测mRS评分>0的受试者工作曲线下面积为0.86(95%CI,0.84-0.88),mRS评分>1为0.88(95%CI,0.86-0.90),mRS评分>2为0.90(95%CI,0.89-0.92)。
    结论:在接受再灌注治疗的中风患者中,DAOH-90与mRS-90的更确定的结果测量显示出合理的可比性。DAOH-90可以很容易地从管理数据库中获得,因此具有用于大规模临床试验和比较有效性研究的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Patient outcome after stroke is frequently assessed with clinical scales such as the modified Rankin Scale score (mRS). Days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH-90), which measures survival, time spent in hospital or rehabilitation settings, readmission and institutionalization, is an objective outcome measure that can be obtained from large administrative data sets without the need for patient contact. We aimed to assess the comparability of DAOH with mRS and its relationship with other prognostic variables after acute stroke reperfusion therapy.
    RESULTS: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy were analyzed. DAOH-90 was calculated from a national minimum data set, a mandatory nationwide administrative database. mRS score at day 90 (mRS-90) was assessed with in-person or telephone interviews. The study included 1278 patients with ischemic stroke (714 male, median age 70 [59-79], median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 14 [9-20]). Median DAOH-90 was 71 [29-84] and median mRS-90 score was 3 [2-5]. DAOH-90 was correlated with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (Spearman rho -0.44, P<0.001) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (Spearman rho 0.24, P<0.001). There was a strong association between mRS-90 and DAOH-90 (Spearman rho correlation -0.79, P<0.001). Area under receiver operating curve for predicting mRS score >0 was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.88), mRS score >1 was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90) and mRS score >2 was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.92).
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stroke treated with reperfusion therapies, DAOH-90 shows reasonable comparability to the more established outcome measure of mRS-90. DAOH-90 can be readily obtained from administrative databases and therefore has the potential to be used in large-scale clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是调查大血管闭塞卒中患者仅接受静脉替罗非班血管内血栓切除术的良好预后的影响因素。
    方法:使用RESCUEBT试验的事后探索性分析确定了2018年10月至2022年1月在中国55个综合性卒中中心接受静脉替罗非班血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞卒中的连续患者。
    结果:总共521例患者接受了静脉注射替罗非班,其中253人取得了90天的良好结果(改良的兰金量表[mRS]0-2)。年龄较小(调整后的比值比[aOR]:0.965,95%置信区间[CI]:0.947-0.982;p<0.001),降低血清葡萄糖(aOR:0.865,95CI:0.807-0.928;p<0.001),较低基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分(aOR:0.907,95CI:0.869-0.947;p<0.001),总通过次数较少(AOR:0.791,95CI:0.665-0.939;p=0.008),较短的穿刺至再通时间(aOR:0.995,95CI:0.991-0.999;p=0.017),和改良的脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)评分2b至3(aOR:8.330,95CI:2.705-25.653;p<0.001)是静脉替罗非班联合血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞卒中后良好结局的独立预测因子。
    结论:年龄较小,降低血清葡萄糖水平,较低的基线NIHSS评分,总传球次数较少,更短的穿刺至再通时间,2b~3分的mTICI评分是大血管闭塞卒中患者静脉应用替罗非班血管内血栓切除术后良好结局的独立预测因素.
    ChiCTR-IOR-17014167。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing good outcomes in patients receiving only intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.
    METHODS: Post hoc exploratory analysis using the RESCUE BT trial identified consecutive patients who received intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke in 55 comprehensive stroke centers from October 2018 to January 2022 in China.
    RESULTS: A total of 521 patients received intravenous tirofiban, 253 of whom achieved a good 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2). Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.947-0.982; p < 0.001), lower serum glucose (aOR: 0.865, 95%CI: 0.807-0.928; p < 0.001), lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (aOR: 0.907, 95%CI: 0.869-0.947; p < 0.001), fewer total passes (aOR: 0.791, 95%CI: 0.665-0.939; p = 0.008), shorter punctures to recanalization time (aOR: 0.995, 95%CI:0.991-0.999; p = 0.017), and modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score 2b to 3 (aOR: 8.330, 95%CI: 2.705-25.653; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.
    CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, lower serum glucose level, lower baseline NIHSS score, fewer total passes, shorter punctures to recanalization time, and mTICI scores of 2b to 3 were independent predictors of good outcomes after intravenous tirofiban with endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文总结了血管神经病学领域的培训途径和职业机会。它强调了开创性的临床试验,这些试验改变了急性中风护理,并因此增加了对现成的血管神经病学专业知识的需求。本文强调需要在亚专科培训更多不同的医生,以及血管神经科医师在改善人口和地理领域的结果方面的作用。
    The article summarizes the training pathways and vocational opportunities within the field of vascular neurology. It highlights the groundbreaking clinical trials that transformed acute stroke care and the resultant increased demand for readily available vascular neurology expertise. The article emphasizes the need to train a larger number of diverse physicians in the subspecialty and the role of vascular neurologists in improving outcomes across demographic and geographic lines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据最近关于早期时间窗口的试验,在符合条件的患者中,在血管内血栓切除术(EVT)之前省略静脉溶栓(IVT)似乎是不合理的。这是否也涉及到延长的时间窗口,从上次看井的4.5到9小时,还不清楚。
    方法:所有连续接受IVT治疗的患者,EVT,在2021年1月12日至2022年1月12日期间,在赫尔辛基大学医院(HUS)的延长时间窗内,或IVT加EVT与在2016年1月12日至2020年早期时间窗内治疗的匹配对照进行比较.对90天的功能结局进行回归分析,根据改良的Rankin量表(MRS)进行评估,以及症状性脑出血(sICH)的发生,针对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。
    结果:共纳入134名患者和134名匹配的对照。延长时间窗口与早期时间窗口之间的功能结果没有显着差异。在IVT加EVT的患者中,mRS有利结局变化的校正比值比(aOR)为1.15,95%置信区间(CI)0.54~2.43.尽管sICH在延长的时间窗口中发生的频率更高(2.2%对3.0%),回归分析没有显示出显著差异,OR0.96,95%CI0.14-6.87。
    结论:我们发现延长时间窗与早期时间窗两种IVT患者的功能或安全性结局无显著差异,EVT,或IVT加EVT。没有信号表明,在符合HUS现行临床治疗指南的延长时间窗内,符合条件的患者应避免IVT或EVT.
    BACKGROUND: Based on recent trials regarding the early time window, omitting intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in eligible patients seems unjustified. Whether this also concerns the extended time window, 4.5 to 9 h from last seen well, is yet unclear.
    METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with IVT, EVT, or IVT plus EVT in the extended time window at Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) between 1/2021 and 12/2022 were compared with matched controls treated in the early time window between 1/2016 and 12/2020. Regression analysis was applied on functional outcome at 90 days, evaluated on modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and on the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), adjusted for potential confounders.
    RESULTS: Altogether 134 patients and 134 matching controls were included. Functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the extended versus early time window. Among patients with IVT plus EVT, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for a favorable outcome shift on mRS was 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-2.43. Although sICH occurred more frequently (2.2% versus 3.0%) in the extended time window, regression analysis did not show a significant difference, aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.14-6.87.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in the functional or safety outcomes between the extended versus early time window among patients with either IVT, EVT, or IVT plus EVT. There were no signals indicating, that IVT or EVT should be avoided in eligible patients in the extended time window which aligns with the current clinical treatment guidelines of HUS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在开发和验证徒劳再化预测评分(FRPS),一种新的工具,旨在预测FR的严重风险,并有助于EVT前后的风险评估。方法:使用严格的过程开发FRPS,该过程涉及根据临床相关性和潜在影响选择预测变量。初始方程来自先前的荟萃分析,并使用各种统计技术进行了完善。我们采用了机器学习算法,特别是随机森林回归,捕获非线性关系并增强模型性能。使用五个折叠的交叉验证来评估泛化性和模型拟合。结果:最终的FRPS模型包括年龄、性别,心房颤动(AF),高血压(HTN),糖尿病(DM),高脂血症,认知障碍,卒中前改良Rankin量表(mRS),收缩压(SBP),从开始到穿刺的时间,sICH,和NIHSS得分。随机森林模型实现了约0.992的平均R平方值。FRPS评分的严重程度范围定义为轻度(FRPS<66),中等(FRPS66-80),严重(FRPS>80)。结论:FRPS通过预测FR的严重风险为治疗计划和患者管理提供了有价值的见解。该工具可以改善最有可能受益于EVT的候选者的识别,并提高EVT后的预后准确性。需要在不同环境中进行进一步的临床验证,以评估其有效性和可靠性。
    Objective: This study aims to develop and validate the Futile Recanalization Prediction Score (FRPS), a novel tool designed to predict the severity risk of FR and aid in pre- and post-EVT risk assessments. Methods: The FRPS was developed using a rigorous process involving the selection of predictor variables based on clinical relevance and potential impact. Initial equations were derived from previous meta-analyses and refined using various statistical techniques. We employed machine learning algorithms, specifically random forest regression, to capture nonlinear relationships and enhance model performance. Cross-validation with five folds was used to assess generalizability and model fit. Results: The final FRPS model included variables such as age, sex, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, cognitive impairment, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), onset-to-puncture time, sICH, and NIHSS score. The random forest model achieved a mean R-squared value of approximately 0.992. Severity ranges for FRPS scores were defined as mild (FRPS < 66), moderate (FRPS 66-80), and severe (FRPS > 80). Conclusions: The FRPS provides valuable insights for treatment planning and patient management by predicting the severity risk of FR. This tool may improve the identification of candidates most likely to benefit from EVT and enhance prognostic accuracy post-EVT. Further clinical validation in diverse settings is warranted to assess its effectiveness and reliability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)与急性缺血性中风(AIS)之间的相互作用是确定的,但尚未完全了解。本研究旨在分析AIS的危险因素,探讨血管紧张素I(AngI)等血清指标在血管内血栓切除术(EVT)患者预后中的作用。
    接受EVT的AIS患者和健康对照者回顾性纳入本研究,并将患者分为预后良好或不良组。我们比较了AngI,血常规指标,生化指标,电解质指数,患者和对照组之间的凝血指标。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来评估AIS的可能危险因素和接受EVT的患者的预后。通过多因素logistic回归分析构建诊断列线图,确定接受EVT患者预后的独立危险因素。通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)进一步评估。
    与以前的研究一致,高龄,高血糖,D-二聚体高,高凝血酶原活性是AIS的危险因素。此外,与对照相比,AIS中的AngI水平较低。预后良好组AngⅠ水平较高。此外,我们建立了列线图来评估其预测EVT后AIS预后的能力.联合ROC模型的AUC值(AngI和白蛋白-球蛋白比值(AGR))为0.859。
    总而言之,高龄,高血糖,D-二聚体高,高凝血酶原活性是AIS的危险因素。AngI和AGR联合模型对动脉取栓AIS患者的预后具有良好的预测能力。
    UNASSIGNED: The interaction between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is definite but not fully understood. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of AIS and explore the role of serum indicators such as angiotensin I (Ang I) in the prognosis of patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with AIS who underwent EVT and healthy controls were retrospectively enrolled in this study, and the patients were divided into a good or a poor prognosis group. We compared Ang I, blood routine indexes, biochemical indexes, electrolyte indexes, and coagulation indexes between patients and controls. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate possible risk factors for AIS and the prognosis of patients undergoing EVT. Independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients undergoing EVT were identified through multifactorial logistic regression analyses to construct diagnostic nomograms, further assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).
    UNASSIGNED: Consistent with previous studies, advanced age, high blood glucose, high D-dimer, and high prothrombin activity are risk factors for AIS. In addition, Ang I levels are lower in AIS compared to the controls. The level of Ang I was higher in the good prognosis group. Furthermore, we developed a nomogram to evaluate its ability to predict the prognosis of AIS after EVT. The AUC value of the combined ROC model (Ang I and albumin-globulin ratio (AGR)) was 0.859.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, advanced age, high blood glucose, high D-dimer, and high prothrombin activity are risk factors for AIS. The combined Ang I and AGR model has a good predictive ability for the prognosis of AIS patients undergoing arterial thrombectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号